Simply Lift David Pollak September 8, 2011 ii Copyright © 2010-2011 by David Pollak This document is licensed Creative Commons Attribution, Non Commercial, No Derivatives: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ iii v vii 1 3 5 5 6 7 8 9 Contents Contents List of Figures List of Listings I The Lift Web Framework 1 Introduction 2 The ubiquitous Chat app 2.1 The View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2 The Chat Comet component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3 The ChatServer . 2.4 User Input 2.5 Chat In . . 2.6 Running it . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7 What you don’t see . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3 Snippets and SiteMap 11 3.1 Starting at the beginning: Boot.scala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.1.1 LiftRules rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.1.2 Properties and Run modes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.1.3 By convention . 3.1.4 Misc Rules . 3.1.5 Html5 . 3.2 SiteMap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.2.1 Defining the SiteMap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 iii iv CONTENTS 3.2.2 Simplest SiteMap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.2.3 Menu and Loc[_] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.4 Access Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.5 Hidden and Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.6 Submenus . 3.2.7 Parameters . 3.2.8 Wildcards . 3.2.9 Summary . 3.3 View First . . . . . . . . . . 3.3.1 Page source . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3.2 Dynamic content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.3.3 Surround and page chrome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.3.4 Embed . 3.3.5 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.4 Snippets and Dynamic content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.4.1 Snippets in markup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.4.2 Snippet resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.4.3 Dynamic Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.4.4 Embedded Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.4.5 Param Example . 3.4.6 Recursive . 3.4.7 Summary . 3.5 Wrap up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 4 Forms 27 4.1 Old Fashioned Dumb Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 4.2 OnSubmit . . . . 4.3 Stateful Snippets 4.4 RequestVars . 4.5 Field Errors . . 4.6 LiftScreen . 4.7 Wizard . 4.8 Ajax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 4.9 But sometimes Old Fashioned is good . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 4.10 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 CONTENTS 5 HTTP and REST v 43 5.1 Introduction . . . . . 5.2 REST the hard way . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 5.3 Making it easier with RestHelper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 5.4 A complete REST example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 5.5 Wrap Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 6 Wiring 63 6.1 Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2 Hooking it up to the UI . 6.3 Shared Shopping . 6.4 Wrap up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 7 Core Concepts 77 7.1 Snippets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 7.1.1 Snippet NodeSeq => NodeSeq . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 7.1.2 Snippet instances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 7.1.3 Multiple methods on a snippet class . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 7.1.4 Inter-snippet communication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 7.1.5 Recursive Snippets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 7.1.6 Snippet parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 7.2 Box/Option . 7.3 S/SHtml 7.4 Boot . . . 7.5 SiteMap . 7.6 GUIDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 7.6.1 How GUIDs are generated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 7.6.2 Where they are used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 7.7 LiftRules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 7.8 SessionVars and RequestVars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 7.9 Helpers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 7.10 CSS Selector Transforms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 7.11 Client-side behavior invoking server-side functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 7.12 Ajax . . 7.13 Comet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 vi CONTENTS 7.14 LiftActor . . . . . . 7.15 Pattern Matching . 7.16 Type safety . . . 7.17 Page rewriting . 7.18 Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 8 Common Patterns 91 8.1 Localization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 8.1.1 Localizing Templates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 8.1.2 Resource Lookup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 8.1.3 Accessing Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 8.1.4 Conclusion . . 8.2 Dependency Injection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 8.2.1 Lift Libraries and Injector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 8.2.2 Lift WebKit and enhanced injection scoping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 8.2.3 Conclusion . 8.3 Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 8.4 HtmlProperties, XHTML and HTML5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 8.4.1 XHTML via OldHtmlProperties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 8.4.2 HTML5 via Html5Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 8.4.3 Changing behavior mid-session or mid-request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 9 Built-in Snippets 101 9.1 CSS . 9.2 Msgs 9.3 Msg . . . . 9.4 Menu . 9.5 A . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.6 Children . 9.7 Comet . 9.8 Form . 9.9 Ignore . 9.10 Loc . . . . . . . . . . 9.11 Surround . 9.12 TestCond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 CONTENTS vii 9.13 Embed . 9.14 Tail . . . . . . . 9.15 WithParam . 9.16 VersionInfo . . . . . 9.17 SkipDocType . 9.18 XmlGroup . 9.19 LazyLoad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.20 WithResourceId . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 10 SiteMap 11 REST 12 MVC (If you really want it) 13 From MVC 103 105 109 111 13.1 First things first . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 13.2 Making a SiteMap entry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 13.3 Creating the view . . 13.4 Creating the Snippet 13.5 Getting Ajaxy . 13.6 Next Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 II Recipes 14 Dynamic html tables created from DB.runQuery() 115 117 14.1 Problem . 14.2 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Dynamically choosing content 15.1 Problem . 15.2 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 119 16 Ajax Forms 17 Protecting REST APIs 121 123 17.1 Problem . 17.2 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 viii 18 URI-based locale selection 18.1 Problem . 18.2 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CONTENTS 125 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 19 Embedding JavaScript in an HTML page 127 19.1 Problem . 19.2 Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 III Questions and Answers 20 Scaling 21 How Lift does function/GUID mapping 22 How Lift does Comet 23 Advanced Concepts 129 131 137 139 141 23.1 Snippet Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 23.1.1 LiftSession.liftTagProcessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 23.1.2 LiftRules.liftTagProcessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 23.1.3 Snippet name resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 23.1.4 Post-processing of results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 23.2 The Merging Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 IV Misc 24 Releases 145 147 24.1 Lift 2.2-RC1 . 24.2 Lift 2.2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 List of Figures ix x LIST OF FIGURES List of Listings 2.1 index.html . 2.2 Chat.scala . . . . . . . 2.3 ChatServer.scala . 2.4 ChatIn.scala . 3.1 Boot.scala . 3.2 index.html . . . . 3.3 dynamic.html . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4 HelloWorld.scala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6 7 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 samples/snippet_and_sitemap/src/main/webapp/_embedme.html . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.5 Embedded.scala . 3.6 param.html . 3.7 Param.scala . 3.8 recurse.html . 3.9 Recurse.scala . 4.1 dumb.html . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2 DumbForm.scala . 4.3 onsubmit.html . . 4.4 OnSubmit.scala . 4.5 4.6 4.7 stateful.html . Stateful.scala . . . requestvar.html 4.8 ReqVar.scala . . 4.9 fielderror.html . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 4.10 FieldErrorExample.scala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 4.11 screen.html . . . . . . . 4.12 ScreenExample.scala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 xi xii LIST OF LISTINGS 4.13 WizardExample.scala . 4.14 ajax.html . . . . . . . 4.15 AjaxExample.scala . 4.16 Query.scala . . . . . . 5.1 BasicExample.scala . 5.2 Item.scala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3 BasicWithHelper.scala . 5.4 FullRest.scala . 6.1 Cart.scala . . . . . . . . . . 6.2 AllItemsPage.scala . 6.3 items.html . . . . . 6.4 AnItemPage.scala . 6.5 CometCart.scala . 6.6 Link.scala . . . . . 6.7 ShareCart.scala . 13.1 index.html . . . . 13.2 TimeNow.scala . 13.3 ClickMe.scala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 Part I The Lift Web Framework 1 Chapter 1 Introduction The Lift Web Framework provides web application developers tools to make writing security, in- teracting, scalable web applications easier than with any other web framework. After reading Part I of this book, you should understand Lift’s core concepts and be able to write Lift applications. But with anything, practice is important. I have been writing Lift and Scala for 4 years, and even I learn new things about the language and the framework on a weekly basis. Please consider Lift an path and an exploration, rather than an end point. “Yo, David, stop yer yappin’. I’m coming from Rails|Spring|Struts|Django and I want to get started super fast with Lift.” See From MVC ( 13 on page 111). Lift is built on top of the Scala programming language. Scala runs on the Java Virtual Machine. Lift applications are typically packaged as WAR files and run as a J/EE Servlets or Servlet Filters. This book will provide you with the core concepts you need to successfully write Lift web applications. The book assumes knowledge of Servlets and Servlet containers, the Scala Language (Chapters 1-6 of Beginning Scala gives you a good grounding in the language), build tools, program editors, web development including HTML and JavaScript, etc. Further, this book will not explore persistence. Lift has additional modules for persisting to relational and non-relational data stores. Lift doesn’t distinguish as to how an object is materialized into the address space... Lift can treat any object any old way you want. There are many resources (including Exploring Lift) that cover ways to persist data from a JVM. Lift is different from most web frameworks and it’s likely that Lift’s differences will present a challenge and a friction if you are familiar with the MVC school of web frameworks1. But Lift is different and Lift’s differences give you more power to create interactive applications. Lift’s differences lead to more concise web applications. Lift’s differences result in more secure and scalable applications. Lift’s differences let you be more productive and make maintaining appli- cations easier for the future you or whoever is writing your applications. Please relax and work to understand Lift’s differences... and see how you can make best use of Lift’s features to build your web applications. Lift creates abstractions that allow easier expression of business logic and then maps those ab- stractions to HTTP and HTML. This approach differs from traditional web frameworks which build abstractions on top of HTTP and HTML and require the developer to bridge between com- mon business logic patterns and the underlying protocol. The difference means that you spend more time thinking about your application and less time thinking about the plumbing. 1This includes Ruby on Rails, Struts, Java Server Faces, Django, TurboGears, etc. 3 4 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION I am a “concept learner.” I learn concepts and then apply them over and over again as situations come up. This book focuses a lot on the concepts. If you’re a concept learner and like my stream on conciousness style, this book will likely suit you well. On the other hand, it may not. Up to date versions of liftweb.net/Simply_Lift.pdf. https://github.com/dpp/simply_lift. this book are available in PDF form at http://simply. this book is available at The source code for If you’ve got questions, feedback, or improvements to this document, please join the conversation on the Lift Google Group. I’m a “roll up your sleaves and get your hands dirty with code” kinda guy... so let’s build a simple Chat application in Lift. This application will allow us to demonstrate some of Lift’s core features as well as giving a “smack in the face” demonstration of how Lift is different. Chapter 2 The ubiquitous Chat app Writing a multi-user chat application in Lift is super-simple and illustrates many of Lift’s core concepts. The Source Code can be found at https://github.com/dpp/simply_lift/tree/master/chat. 2.1 The View When writing a Lift app, it’s often best to start off with the user interface... build what the user will see and then add behavior to the HTML page. So, let’s look at the Lift template that will make up our chat application. 1 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Listing 2.1: index.html 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Home
Some chat messages
5 6 24 25 CHAPTER 2. THE UBIQUITOUS CHAT APP It’s a valid HTML page, but there are some hinky looking class attributes. The first one is . The class in this case says “the actual page content is contained by the element with id=’main’.” This allows you to have valid HTML pages for each of your templates, but dynamically add “chrome” around the content based on one or more chrome templates. at the look
. It’s as well: Let’s lift:surround?with=default;at=content. This class invokes a snippet which sur- rounds the
with the default template and inserts the
and its children at the element with id “content” in the default template. Or, it wraps the default chrome around the
. For more on snippets, see 7.1 on page 78. funky class got a Next, we define how we associate dynamic behavior with the list of chat elements:
. The “comet” snippet looks for a class named Chat that extends CometActor and enables the mechanics of pushing content from the CometActor to the browser when the state of the CometActor changes. 2.2 The Chat Comet component The Actor Model provides state in functional languages include Erlang. Lift has an Actor library and LiftActors (see 7.14) provides a powerful state and concurrency model. This may all seem abstract, so let’s look at the Chat class. Listing 2.2: Chat.scala 1 package code 2 package comet 3 4 import net.liftweb._ 5 import http._ 6 import util._ 7 import Helpers._ 8 9 /** 10 11 12 * The screen real estate on the browser will be represented * by this component. When the component changes on the server * the changes are automatically reflected in the browser. */ 13 14 class Chat extends CometActor with CometListener { 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 private var msgs: Vector[String] = Vector() // private state /** * When the component is instantiated, register as * a listener with the ChatServer */ def registerWith = ChatServer /** 2.3. THE CHATSERVER 7 * The CometActor is an Actor, so it processes messages. * In this case, we're listening for Vector[String], * and when we get one, update our private state * and reRender() the component. reRender() will * cause changes to be sent to the browser. */ override def lowPriority = { case v: Vector[String] => msgs = v; reRender() } /** * Put the messages in the li elements and clear * any elements that have the clearable class. */ def render = "li *" #> msgs & ClearClearable 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 } The Chat component has private state, registers with the ChatServer, handles incoming mes- sages and can render itself. Let’s look at each of those pieces. The private state, like any private state in prototypical object oriented code, is the state that defines the object’s behavior. registerWith is a method that defines what component to register the Chat component with. Reg- istration is a part of the Listener (or Observer) pattern. We’ll look at the definition of the Chat- Server in a minute. The lowPriority method defines how to process incoming messages. In this case, we’re Pat- tern Matching (see Section 7.15) the incoming message and if it’s a Vector[String], then we perform the action of setting our local state to the Vector and re-rendering the component. The re-rendering will force the changes out to any browser that is displaying the component. We define how to render the component by defining the CSS to match and the replacement (See Section 7.10). We match all the
  • tags of the template and for each message, create an
  • tag with the child nodes set to the message. Additionally, we clear all the elements that have the clearable in the class attribute. That’s it for the Chat CometActor component. 2.3 The ChatServer The ChatServer code is: 1 package code 2 package comet 3 4 import net.liftweb._ 5 import http._ 6 import actor._ 7 8 /** Listing 2.3: ChatServer.scala 8 CHAPTER 2. THE UBIQUITOUS CHAT APP 9 10 11 * A singleton that provides chat features to all clients. * It's an Actor so it's thread-safe because only one * message will be processed at once. */ 12 13 object ChatServer extends LiftActor with ListenerManager { private var msgs = Vector("Welcome") // private state 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 /** * When we update the listeners, what message do we send? * We send the msgs, which is an immutable data structure, * so it can be shared with lots of threads without any * danger or locking. */ def createUpdate = msgs /** * process messages that are sent to the Actor. In * this case, we're looking for Strings that are sent * to the ChatServer. We append them to our Vector of * messages, and then update all the listeners. */ override def lowPriority = { case s: String => msgs :+= s; updateListeners() } 32 33 } The ChatServer is defined as an object rather than a class. This makes it a singleton which can be referenced by the name ChatServer anywhere in the application. Scala’s singletons differ from Java’s static in that the singleton is an instance of an object and that instance can be passed around like any other instance. This is why we can return the ChatServer instance from the registerWith method in that Chat component. The ChatServer has private state, a Vector[String] representing the list of chat messages. Note that Scala’s type inferencer infers the type of msgs so you do not have to explicitly define it. The createUpdate method generates an update to send to listeners. This update is sent when a listener registers with the ChatServer or when the updateListeners() method is invoked. Finally, the lowPriority method defines the messages that this component can handle. If the ChatServer receives a String as a message, it appends the String to the Vector of messages and updates listeners. 2.4 User Input Let’s go back to the view and see how the behavior is defined for adding lines to the chat.
    defines an input form and the form.ajax snippet turns a form into an Ajax (see Section 7.12) form that will be submitted back to the server without causing a full page load. Next, we define the input form element: . It’s a plain old input form, but we’ve told Lift to modify the ’s behavior by calling the ChatIn snippet. 2.5. CHAT IN 2.5 Chat In 9 The ChatIn snippet (See Section 7.1) is defined as: Listing 2.4: ChatIn.scala 1 package code 2 package snippet 3 4 import net.liftweb._ 5 import http._ 6 import js._ 7 import JsCmds._ 8 import JE._ 9 10 import comet.ChatServer 11 12 /** 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 * A snippet transforms input to output... it transforms * templates to dynamic content. Lift's templates can invoke * snippets and the snippets are resolved in many different * ways including "by convention". The snippet package * has named snippets and those snippets can be classes * that are instantiated when invoked or they can be * objects, singletons. Singletons are useful if there's * no explicit state managed in the snippet. */ 21 22 object ChatIn { 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 /** * The render method in this case returns a function * that transforms NodeSeq => NodeSeq. In this case, * the function transforms a form input element by attaching * behavior to the input. The behavior is to send a message * to the ChatServer and then returns JavaScript which * clears the input. */ def render = SHtml.onSubmit(s => { ChatServer ! s SetValById("chat_in", "") }) 35 36 } The code is very simple. The snippet is defined as a method that associates a function with form element submission, onSubmit. When the element is submitted, be that normal form submission, Ajax, or whatever, the function is applied to the value of the form. In English, when the user submits the form, the function is called with the user’s input. The function sends the input as a message to the ChatServer and returns JavaScript that sets the value of the input box to a blank string. 10 CHAPTER 2. THE UBIQUITOUS CHAT APP 2.6 Running it Running the application is easy. Make sure you’ve got Java 1.6 or better installed on your machine. Change directories into the chat directory and type sbt update ~jetty-run. The Simple Build Tool will download all necessary dependencies, compile the program and run it. You can point a couple of browsers to http://localhost:8080 and start chatting. Oh, and for fun, try entering Part III Questions and Answers 129 Chapter 20 Scaling Lift is a web framework built on the Scala programming language. Lift takes advantage of many of Scala’s features that allow developers to very concisely code secure, scalable, highly interactive web applications. Lift provides a full set of layered abstractions on top of HTTP and HTML from "close to the metal" REST abstractions up to transportation agnostic server push (Comet) support. Scala compiles to JVM byte-code and is compatible with Java libraries and the Java object model. Lift applications are typically deployed as WAR files in J/EE web containers... Lift apps run in Tomcat, Jetty, Glassfish, etc. just like any other J/EE web application. Lift apps can generally be monitored and managed just like any Java web app. Web Applications, Sessions, and State. All web applications are stateful in one way or another. Even a "static" web site is made up of the files that are served... the application’s state is defined in those files. The site content may be served out of a database, but the content served does not depend on identity of the user or anything about the HTTP request except the contents of the HTTP request. These contents can include the URI, parameters, and headers. The complete value of the response can be calculated from the request without referencing any resources except the content resources. For the purpose of this discussion, I will refer to these as session-less requests. News sites like the UK Guardian, MSNBC, and others are prototypical examples of this kind of site. Sessions. Some applications are customized on a user-by-user basis. These applications include the likes of Foursquare and others where many HTTP requests make up a "session" in which the results of previous HTTP requests change the behavior of future HTTP requests. Put in concrete terms, a user can log into a site and for some duration, the responses are specific to that user. There are many mechanisms for managing sessions, but the most common and secure method is creating a cryptographically unique token (a session id), and putting that token in the Set-Cookie response header such that the browser will present that Cookie in subsequent HTTP requests for a certain period of time. The server-side state is referenced by the Cookie and the state is made available to the web appli- cation during the scope of servicing the request and any mutations the web app makes to session state during the request are kept on the server and are available to the application in subsequent requests. Another available technique for managing state is to serialize application state in the Cookie and deliver it to the browser such that the server is not responsible for managing state across requests. As we’ve recently discovered, this is a tremendously insecure way to manage application state. Further, for any moderately complex application, the amount of data the needs to be transferred as part of each request and response is huge. Migratory Sessions. Many web application managers allow for server-managed sessions to migrate across a cluster of web appli- cation servers. In some environments such as Ruby on Rails, this is a hard requirement because 131 132 CHAPTER 20. SCALING only one request at a time can be served per process, thus for any moderate traffic site, there must be multiple processes serving pages. There are many strategies for migrating state across processes: storing state on disk, in memcached, in a database (relational or NoSQL), or having some proprietary cluster communications protocol. In any of these scenarios sessions can migrate across the grid of processes serving requests for a given web application. Web applications that support migratory state are often referred to as "stateless" because the session state does not re- side in the same process as the web application. Session Affinity. Some applications require that all requests related to a particular session are routed to the same process and that process keeps session-related content in local memory. In a cluster, there are multiple mechanisms for achiev- ing session affinity... the two most popular being HAProxy and Nginx. Availability, Scalability, Security, Performance, and User Experience. There are many vectors on which to measure the overall-quality of a web application. Let’s take a quick peek at each one. Availability. Avail- ability of an application is the amount of time it gives a meaningful response to a request. Highly available applications generally span multiple pieces of hardware and often multiple data centers. Highly available applications are also typically available during upgrades of part of the system that makes up the application. Highly available applications have very few single points of failure and those single points of failure are usually deployed on very reliable hardware. Scalability. A scalable application can, within certain bounds, respond with similar performance to increased load by adding hardware to process more load. No system is infinitely or linearly scalable. How- ever, many systems have grossly disproportionate load demands such that, for example, you can add a lot of web application front-ends to a Rails application before there’s enough load on the back-end RDBMS such that scaling is impaired. Security. The Internet is a dangerous place and no request that is received from the Internet can be trusted. Applications, frameworks, systems and everything else must be designed to be se- cure and resist attacks. The most common attacks on web application are listed in the OWASP Top Ten. Performance. Web application performance can be measured on two vectors: response time to a request and system resources required to service the request. These two vectors are inter-dependent. User Experience. The user experience of a web app is an important measure of its quality. User experience can be measured on many different vectors including perceived re- sponsiveness, visual design, interactivity, lack of "hicups", etc. Ultimately, because we’re building applications for users, the user experience is very important. Lift’s trade-offs. Given the number and complexity related to the quality of a web application, there are a lot of trade-offs, implicit and explicit, to building a framework that allows developers and business people to deliver a great user experience. Let’s talk for a minute about what Lift is and what it isn’t. Lift is a web framework. It provides a set of abstractions over HTTP and HTML such that developers can write excellent web applications. Lift is persistence agnostic. You can use Lift with relational databases, file systems, NoSQL data stores, mule carts, etc. As long as you can materialize an object into the JVM where Lift is running, Lift can make use of that object. Lift sits on top of the JVM. Lift applications execute in the Java Virtual Machine. The JVM is a very high performance computing system. There are raging debates as to the relative performance of JVM code and native machine code. No matter which benchmarks you look at, the JVM is a very fast performer. Lift apps take advantage of the JVM’s performance characteristics. Moderately complex Lift apps that access the database can serve 1,000+ requests per second on quad-core Intel hardware. Even very complex Lift apps that make many back-end calls per request can serve hundreds of requests per second on EC2 large instances. Lift as proxy. Many web applications, typically REST applications, provide a very thin layer on top of a backing data store. The web application serves a few basic functions to broker between the HTTP request and the backing store. These functions include: request and 133 parameter validation, authentication, parameter unpacking, back-end service request, and trans- lation of response data to wire format (typically XML or JSON). Lift can service these kinds of requests within the scope of a session or without any session at all, depending on application design. For more information on Lift’s REST features, see Lift RestHelper. When running these kinds of services, Lift apps can be treated without regard for session affinity. Lift as HTML gen- erator. Lift has a powerful and secure templating mechanism. All Lift templates are expressed as valid XML and during the rendering process, Lift keeps the page in XML format. Pages ren- dered via Lift’s templating mechanism are generally resistant to cross site scripting attacks and other attacks that insert malicious content in rendered pages. Lift’s templating mechanism is de- signer friendly yet supports complex and powerful substitution rules. Further, the rendered page can be evaluated and transformed during the final rendering phase to ensure that all script tags are at the bottom of the page, all CSS tags are at the top, etc. Lift’s templating mechanism can be used to serve sessionless requests or serve requests within the context of a session. Further, pages can be marked as not requiring a session, yet will make session state available if the re- quest was made in the context of a container session. Lift page rendering can even be done in parallel such that if there are long off-process components on the page (e.g., advertising servers), those components can be Sessionless Lift, forms and Ajax Lift applications can process HTML forms and process Ajax requests even if there’s no session associated with the request. Such forms and Ajax requests have to have stable field names and stable URLs, but this is the same require- ment as most web frameworks including Struts, Rails, and Django impose on their applications. In such a mode, Lift apps have the similar characteristics to web apps written on tops of Struts, Play, JSF and other popular Java web frameworks. Lift as Secure, Interactive App Platform Lift features require session affinity: GUID to function mapping, type-safe SessionVars and Comet. Applications that take advantage of these features need to have requests associated with the JVM that stores the session. I’ll discuss the reason for this limitation, the down-side to the limitation, the downside to migratory session, and the benefits of these features. Application servers that support migratory sessions (sessions that are available to application servers running in multiple address spaces/processes) require a mechanism for transferring the state information between processes. This is typically (with the exception of Terracotta) done by serializing the stored data. Serialization is the process of converting rich data structures into a stream of bytes. Some of Scala’s constructs are hard or impossible to serialize. For example, local variables that are mu- tated within a closure are promoted from stack variables to heap variables. When those variables are serialized at different times, the application winds up with two references even though the references are logically the same. Lift makes use of many of these constructs (I’ll explain why next) and Lift’s use of these constructs makes session serialization and migration impossible. It also means that Lift’s type-safe SessionVars are not guaranteed to be serialized. One of the key Lift constructs is to map a cryptographically unique identifier in the browser to a function on the server. Lift uses Scala functions which close over scope, including all of the variables referenced by the function. This means that it’s not necessary to expose primary keys to the client when edit- ing a record in the database because the primary key of the record or the record itself is known to the function on the server. This guards against OWASP Vulnerability A4, Insecure Object Ref- erences as well as Replay Attacks. From the developer’s standpoint, writing Lift applications is like writing a VisualBasic application... the developer associates the user action with a function. Lift supplies the plumbing to bridge between the two. Lift’s GUID to function mapping extends to Lift’s Ajax support. Associating a button, checkbox, or other HTML element with an Ajax call is literally a single line: SHtml.ajaxButton(PressMe, () => Alert("You pressed a button at "+Helpers.currentTimeFormatted) Lift’s Ajax support is simple, maintainable, and secure. There’s no need to build and maintain routing. Lift has the most advanced server-push/Comet support 134 CHAPTER 20. SCALING of any web framework or any other system currently available. Lift’s comet support relies on session affinity. Lift’s comet support associates an Actor with a section of screen real estate. A single browser window may have many pieces of screen real estate associated with many of Lift’s CometActors. When state changes in the Actor, the state change is pushed to the browser. Lift takes care of multiplexing a single HTTP connection to handle all the comet items on a given page, the versioning of the change deltas (if the HTTP connection is dropped while 3 changes become available, all 3 of those changes are pushed when the next HTTP request is made.) Fur- ther, Lift’s comet support will work the same way once web sockets are available to the client and server... there will be no application code changes necessary for web sockets support. Lift’s comet support requires that the connect is made from the browser back to the same JVM in which the CometActors are resident... the same JVM where the session is located. The downside to Lift’s session affinity requirement mainly falls on the operations team. They must use a session aware load balancer or other mechanism to route incoming requests to the server that the session is associated with. This is easily accomplished with HAProxy and Nginx. Further, if the server running a given session goes down, the information associated with that session is lost (note that any information distributed off-session [into a database, into a cluster of Akka actors, etc.] is preserved.) But, Lift has extended session facilities that support re-creation of session information in the event of session lost. Lift also has heart-beat functionality so that sessions are kept alive as long as a browser page is open to the application, so user inactivity will not result in session timeouts. Compared to the operational cost of a session aware load balancer, there are many costs associated with migratory sessions. First, there must be a persistence mechanism for those sessions. Mem- cached is an unreliable mechanism as memcached instances have no more stability than the JVM which hosts the application and being a cache, some sessions may get expired. Putting session data in backing store such as MySQL or Cassandra increases the latency of requests. Further, the costs of serializing state, transmitting the state across the network, storing it, retrieving it, trans- mitting it across the network, and deserializing it all costs a lot of cycles and bandwidth. When your Lift application scales beyond a single server, beyond 100 requests per second, the costs of migrating state on every request becomes a significant operational issue. Session serialization can cause session information loss in the case of multiple requests being ex- ecuted in multiple processes. It’s common to have multiple tabs/windows open to the same ap- plication. If session data is serialized as a blob and two different requests from the same server are being executed at the same time, the last request to write session data into the store will over- write the prior session data. This is a concurrency problem and can lead to hard to debug issues in production because reproducing this kind of problem is non-trivial and this kind of problem is not expected by developers. The third issue with migratory sessions and session serialization is that the inability to store com- plex information in the session (e.g., a function that closes over scope) means that the developer has to write imperative code to serialize session state to implement complex user interactions like multi-screen wizards (which is a 400 line implementation in Lift). These complex, hand written serializations are error prone, can introduce security problems and are non-trivial to maintain. The operational costs of supporting session affinity are not materially different from the opera- tional costs of providing backing store for migratory sessions. On the other hand, there are many significant downsides to migratory sessions. Let’s explore the advantages of Lift’s design. Lift’s use of GUIDs associated with functions on the server: Increase the security of the applica- tion by guarding against cross site request forgeries, replay attacks, and insecure object references 135 Decrease application development and maintenance time and costs Increase application inter- activity, thus a much better user experience Increase in application richness because of simpler Ajax, multi-page Wizards, and Comet Improved application performance because fewer cycles are spent serializing and transmitting session information No difference in scalability... just add more servers to the front end to scale the front end of your application The positive attributes of Lift’s design decisions are evident at Foursquare which handles thousands of requests per second all served by Lift. There are very few sites that have more traffic than Foursquare. They have scaled their web front end successfully and securely with Lift. Other high volume sites including Novell are successfully scaling with Lift. If you are scaling your site, there are also commercial Lift Cloud manager tools that can help manage clusters of Lift’s session requirements. Conclusion Lift provides a lot of choices for developing and deploying complex web applications. Lift can operate in a web container like any other Java web framework. If you choose to use certain Lift features and you are deploying across multiple servers, you need to have a session aware load balancer. Even when using Lift’s session-affinity dependent features, Lift applications have higher perfor- mance, identical availability, identical scalability, better security, and better user experience than applications written with web frameworks such as Ruby on Rails, Struts, and GWT. 136 CHAPTER 20. SCALING Chapter 21 How Lift does function/GUID mapping 137 138 CHAPTER 21. HOW LIFT DOES FUNCTION/GUID MAPPING Chapter 22 How Lift does Comet I can speak to Lift’s Comet Architecture which was selected by Novell to power their Pulse product after they evaluated a number of different technologies. Lift’s Comet implementation uses a single HTTP connection to poll for changes to an arbitrary number of components on the page. Each component has a version number. The long poll in- cludes the version number and the component GUID. On the server side, a listener is attached to all of the GUIDs listed in the long poll requests. If any of the components has a higher version number (or the version number increases during the period of the long poll), the deltas (a set of JavaScript describing the change from each version) is sent to the client. The deltas are applied and the version number on the client is set to the highest version number for the change set. Lift integrates long polling with session management so that if a second request comes into the same URL during a long poll, the long poll is terminated to avoid connection starvation (most browsers have a maximum of 2 HTTP connections per named server). Lift also supports DNS wild-carded servers for long poll requests such that each tab in the browser can do long polling against a different DNS wildcarded server. This avoids the connection starvation issues. Lift dynamically detects the container the Servlet is running in and on Jetty 6 & 7 and (soon) Glassfish, Lift will use the platform’s "continuations" implementation to avoid using a thread during the long poll. Lift’s JavaScript can sit on top of jQuery and YUI (and could sit on top of Prototype/Scriptaculous as well.) The actual polling code includes back-off on connection failures and other "graceful" ways of dealing with transient connection failures. I’ve looked at Atmosphere and CometD (both JVM-oriented Comet technologies). Neither had (at the time I evaluated them) support for multiple components per page or connection starvation avoidance. 139 140 CHAPTER 22. HOW LIFT DOES COMET Chapter 23 Advanced Concepts 23.1 Snippet Resolution Lift snippets transform markup to dynamic content. The are functions that transform NodeSeq => NodeSeq. Snippets can be invoked from templates via tags: 1 2 3 4

    You have reached this page, but you can only get here if you've logged in first.

    5 6     or via class attributes. 1

    You have reached this page, but you can only get here if you've logged in first. In both cases, the surround (See Section 9.11) snippet will be invoked with attribute with set to default and at set to content. The parameter passed to the surround NodeSeq => NodeSeq function is: 1

    You have reached this page, but you can only get here if you've logged in first. 3 4

    2 2 3 4

    Lift will resolve from the snippet name to a function in the following steps. 141 142 CHAPTER 23. ADVANCED CONCEPTS 23.1.1 LiftSession.liftTagProcessing a consults List[PartialFunction[(String, Elem, MetaData, NodeSeq, Lift String), NodeSeq]] located in LiftSession.liftTagProcessing for the rules to use to LiftSes- evaluate the snippet name, attributes, etc. sion.liftTagProcessing is the result of LiftRules.liftTagProcessing or else the default Lift tag processor. If you need special snippet resolution mechanisms, you can place them in LiftRules.liftTagProcessing. By default, the snippets get processed by LiftSession.processSnippet. into the resulting NodeSeq. 23.1.2 LiftRules.liftTagProcessing LiftRules.liftTagProcessing looks for the form attribute and sets the isForm variable. Next, Lift determines if the contents of the snippet should be evaluated eagerly by looking for one of eager_eval, l:eager_eval, or lift:eager_eval attributes. If the snippet is an eager evaluation, the child tags will be evaluated for any snippets. Either the originally passed children or the eagerly evaluated children will be referred to as chil- dren in the next section. 23.1.3 Snippet name resolution Lift looks for the named snippet in the following locations in order: • S.locateMappedSnippet - the complete snippet name without any camel or snake ap- plication is used to look up a NodeSeq => NodeSeq in within the scope of the current extended request1. Snippets may be registered using S.mapSnippet. • SiteMap Loc snippet the current SiteMap Loc (S.location) will be queried it has a NodeSeq => NodeSeq that matches the current snippet name - to see if (loc.snippet(snippetName)). • LiftRules.snippets - next, the snippet name is split at the ’.’ character to determine the snippet name and snippet method name. The snippets RulesSeq is tested for a match between the List[String] that results from splitting the name at the period and NodeSeq => NodeSeq. • If the above mechanisms do not result in a NodeSeq => NodeSeq, Lift looks for a Class that matches the name. – S.snippetForClass - is checked to see if a Class has been associated with the snip- pet name. If none is found... 1For the purposes of this discussion, the extended request is the scope of a RequestVar. This is the scope of a full page render plus any subsequent Ajax operations that originate from that page. This means that a snippet may be registered using S.mapSnippet during page rendering and the same snippet function with the same scope binding will be used by any Ajax commands. 23.1. SNIPPET RESOLUTION 143 – LiftRules.snippetDispatch is checked to see if theres an instance of Dispatch- Snippet that matches to snippet name. Lift’s built-in snippets are registered with LiftRules.snippetDispatch. If there’s no match... – Lift tries reflection to find a matching class name (note that Lift will try camel case and snake case for class names, so the foo_bar snippet will match the class Lift looks for classes in the snippet subpack- foo_bar as well as FooBar). age of all the packages added via LiftRules.addToPackages. So if you call LiftRules.addToPackages("foo.bar") in Boot.scala, then Lift will search for the classes foo.bar.snippet.foo_bar and foo.bar.snippet.FooBar. – Once the class is found, Lift will try to instantiate the class the following ways: * Lift will look at the current location (S.location) and if the parameter type of the Loc is not Unit, Lift get the current parameter and look for a constructor that matches the current parameter type or Box of current parameter type (and super- classes of both). If there’s a match the constructor will be called with the param- eters. For example, if the current page is a Loc[Dog] and Dog is a subclass of Animal, the following constructors will match: Dog) Animal) Box[Dog]) Box[Animal]) · class MySnippet(dog: · class MySnippet(animal: · class MySnippet(dog: · class MySnippet(animal: · class MySnippet(dog: · class MySnippet(animal: · class MySnippet(dog: · class MySnippet(animal: Dog, session: LiftSession) Animal, session: LiftSession) Box[Dog], session: LiftSession) Box[Animal], session: LiftSes- sion) * If a typed constructor cannot be found, try the zero argument constructor; * If the zero argument constructor cannot be found, try to treat the Class as a Scala object singleton and get the instance that the singleton refers to. – Once we’ve got an instance of the potential snippet handling class: * If it’s a StatefulSnippet, register with S.overrideSnippetForClass; * Update the LiftSession snippetMap RequestVar so subsequent references to the snippet during the same extended request uses same instance (that way if any instance variables are set on the class instance, they are picked up by subsequent accesses to the same snippet); * Next, Lift attempts to invoke the snippet method. If no explicit method is given, the render method is used. · Stateful and Dispatch use dispatch method to find the NodeSeq => Node- Seq · Non-dispatch, do the following method lookup: · method that takes no parameters and returns CssBindFunc, NodeSeq => NodeSeq, invoke the method and apply the function to the children; or · try to invoke the named method with Group(children) (NodeSeq signa- ture) or invoke it with no parameters. If the return value is NodeSeq, Node, or Seq[Node], then it was successful. 144 CHAPTER 23. ADVANCED CONCEPTS 23.1.4 Post-processing of results • LiftRules.snippetDispatch (built in snippets registered here) parallel snippets 23.2 The Merging Phase Part IV Misc 145 Chapter 24 Releases 147 148 24.1 Lift 2.2-RC1 December 8, 2010 CHAPTER 24. RELEASES The Lift team is pleased to announce Lift 2.2-RC1. In the month since the 2.2-M1 release, the team has closed 53 tickets and made significant improvements to Lift based on community feedback. Lift is an elegant, expressive framework that allows any size team build and maintain secure, highly interactive, scalable web applications quickly and efficiently. Lift is built on Scala and compiles to JVM byte-code. Lift applications deploy as WAR files on popular application servers and web containers including Jetty, Glassfish and Tomcat. Lift applications can be monitored and managed with the same proven infrastructure used to manage and monitor any Java web application. Lift is open source licensed under an Apache 2.0 license. Lift features include: • Community... the Lift community is 2,400 members strong, super-active and always there to help with questions • Best Comet (server-push) support that allows the creation of dynamic application such as Novell Vibe • Super simple Ajax for creating highly interactive web applications without worrying about HTTP plumbing • Secure by default... Lift apps are resistant to the OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities including XSS, XSRF, and parameter tampering • Concise and Maintainable... Lift apps typically contain fewer lines of code than correspond- ing Rails apps, yet are type safe so that many errors are flagged by the compiler • Scalable... Lift apps scale to millions of users across many servers, yet are highly efficient for single-box implementations • Compatible... Lift apps can take advantage of any Java library as well as the growing collec- tion of Scala libraries Lift 2.2-RC1 improvements include: • HTML5 Support: Lift supports parsing HTML5 input files and rendering HTML5 to the browser in addition to Lift’s XHTML support • Wiring: Spreadsheets meet web application yielding an automatic mechanism for updating dependent elements on a page, making it even easier to build dynamic apps with Lift • Wizard and Screen Improvements: Build complex screens more easily with new helper methods for creating form elements and improved life-cycle callbacks • CSS Selector Transforms Improvements: including appending attributes, multiple selectors applying to a single element, and element lifting 24.1. LIFT 2.2-RC1 149 • Support for migratory sessions: ContainerVars provide type-safe, guaranteed serializable session variables that can migrate across application servers in a cluster • Improved i18n: including per-page localization strings and localization strings and HTML stored in templates rather than Java resource files which makes editing much easier • Security Improvements: including creation of new sessions on login • MongoDB Improvements: performance improvements as well as new features • Support for Scala 2.8.1 as well as 2.8.0 and 2.7.7 • ProtoUser support for Record: Lift’s ProtoUser and CRUDify can be used on Record-based persistence classes as well as Mapper-based persistence classes • Squeryl integration improvements: Lift is updated to use the latest version of Squeryl Lift-powered sites include: • Foursquare: the multi-million user location based service that services millions of check-ins a day on their Lift-powered system • Novell Vibe: enterprise collaboration software platform based on Google Wave • Innovation Games: The fun way to do serious business – seriously • Xerox/XMPie: the leading provider of software for cross-media, variable data one-to-one marketing • Exchango: The easy and convenient way to give and get free stuff. • Snapsort: Compare and decide on cameras • No Fouls: Find pickup basketball games Please join the Lift community and help use grow Lift. And a super-big thanks to the 30+ Lift committers who have grown the Lift community and code-base to what it is today... and what it will be in the future! 150 24.2 Lift 2.2 January 5, 2011 CHAPTER 24. RELEASES The Lift team is pleased to announce Lift 2.2. In the three months since the 2.1 release, the team has closed over 100 tickets and made significant improvements to Lift based on community feedback. Lift is an elegant, expressive framework that allows any size team build and maintain secure, highly interactive, scalable web applications quickly and efficiently. Lift is built on Scala and compiles to JVM byte-code. Lift applications deploy as WAR files on popular application servers and web containers including Jetty, Glassfish and Tomcat. Lift applications can be monitored and managed with the same proven infrastructure used to manage and monitor any Java web application. Lift is open source licensed under an Apache 2.0 license. Lift features include: • Community... the Lift community is 2,400 members strong, super-active and always there to help with questions • Best Comet (server-push) support that allows the creation of dynamic application such as Novell Vibe • Super simple Ajax for creating highly interactive web applications without worrying about HTTP plumbing • Secure by default... Lift apps are resistant to the OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities including XSS, XSRF, and parameter tampering • Concise and Maintainable... Lift apps typically contain fewer lines of code than correspond- ing Rails apps, yet are type safe so that many errors are flagged by the compiler • Scalable... Lift apps scale to millions of users across many servers, yet are highly efficient for single-box implementations • Compatible... Lift apps can take advantage of any Java library as well as the growing collec- tion of Scala libraries Lift 2.2 improvements include: • HTML5 Support: Lift supports parsing HTML5 input files and rendering HTML5 to the browser in addition to Lift’s XHTML support • Wiring: Spreadsheets meet web application yielding an automatic mechanism for updating dependent elements on a page, making it even easier to build dynamic apps with Lift • Wizard and Screen Improvements: Build complex screens more easily with new helper methods for creating form elements and improved life-cycle callbacks • CSS Selector Transforms Improvements: including appending attributes, multiple selectors applying to a single element, and element lifting 24.2. LIFT 2.2 151 • Support for migratory sessions: ContainerVars provide type-safe, guaranteed serializable session variables that can migrate across application servers in a cluster • Improved i18n: including per-page localization strings and localization strings and HTML stored in templates rather than Java resource files which makes editing much easier • Security Improvements: including creation of new sessions on login • MongoDB Improvements: performance improvements as well as new features • Support for Scala 2.8.1 as well as 2.8.0 and 2.7.7 • ProtoUser support for Record: Lift’s ProtoUser and CRUDify can be used on Record-based persistence classes as well as Mapper-based persistence classes • Squeryl integration improvements: Lift is updated to use the latest version of Squeryl • Designer-friendly templates • Stateless renderingincluding the HTML pipeline • Support for MVC-style development Lift-powered sites include: • Foursquare: the multi-million user location based service that services millions of check-ins a day on their Lift-powered system • Novell Vibe: enterprise collaboration software platform based on Google Wave • Innovation Games: The fun way to do serious business – seriously • Xerox/XMPie: the leading provider of software for cross-media, variable data one-to-one marketing • Exchango: The easy and convenient way to give and get free stuff. • Snapsort: Compare and decide on cameras • No Fouls: Find pickup basketball games Please join the Lift community and help use grow Lift. And a super-big thanks to the 30+ Lift committers who have grown the Lift community and code-base to what it is today... and what it will be in the future! Index MVC, 3 152