update personal preference ranking

README.md

@@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ Think step by step. Solve this problem without removing any existing functionali
 
 | **Rank** | **Model Name**                               | **Token Speed (tokens/s)** | **Debugging Performance**                                             | **Code Generation Performance**                                      | **Notes**                                                                                 |
 |----------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-| 1        | codestral-22b-v0.1-IQ6_K.gguf (this repo)    | 34.21                       | Excellent at complex debugging, often surpasses GPT-4o and Claude-3.5  | Good, but may not be par with GPT-4o                                           | Best overall for debugging in my workflow, use Balanced Mode.                               |
-| 2*       | Claude-3.5-Sonnet                            | N/A                         | Poor in complex debugging compared to Codestral                         | Excellent, better in design and more creative than GPT-4o in code generation  | Great for code generation, but weaker in debugging.                                       |
-| 2*       | GPT-4o                                       | N/A                         | Good at complex debugging but can be outperformed by Codestral          | Excellent, generally reliable for code generation, more knowledgable          | Balanced performance between code debugging and generation.                               |
+| 1*       | codestral-22b-v0.1-IQ6_K.gguf (this repo)    | 34.21                       | Excellent at complex debugging, often surpasses GPT-4o and Claude-3.5  | Good, but may not be par with GPT-4o                                           | One of the best overall for debugging in my workflow, use Balanced Mode.                               |
+| 1*       | Claude-3.5-Sonnet                            | N/A                         | Poor in complex debugging compared to Codestral                         | Excellent, better in design and more creative than GPT-4o in code generation  | Great for code generation, but weaker in debugging.                                       |
+| 1*       | GPT-4o                                       | N/A                         | Good at complex debugging but can be outperformed by Codestral          | Excellent, generally reliable for code generation, more knowledgable          | Balanced performance between code debugging and generation.                               |
 | 4        | DeepSeekV2 Coder Instruct                    | N/A                         | Good, but outputs the same code in complex scenarios                    | Excellent at general code generation, rivals GPT-4o                           | Excellent at code generation, but has data privacy concerns as per Privacy Policy.        |
 | 5*       | Qwen2-7b-Instruct bf16                       | 78.22                       | Average, can think of correct approaches                                | Sometimes helps generate new ideas                                            | High speed, useful for generating ideas.                                                  |
 | 5*       | AutoCoder.IQ4_K.gguf (this repo)             | 26.43                       | Excellent at solutions that require one to few lines of edits           | Generates useful short code segments                                          | Try Precise Mode or Balanced Mode.                                                      |