text
stringlengths 12
440
| cluster
stringclasses 3
values |
|---|---|
The question was if it was appropriate to ask the Doctor, not the intensivist, about the clinical findings. | 2) Content Accuracy |
The summary is not exactly accurate; there is no indication in the post that the woman knew the poster for less than a week. | 2) Content Accuracy |
This make it sound like he is leaving as in breaking up and that wasn't specified. | 2) Content Accuracy |
This is a good summary but it isn't the only option, as the guy's solution is for her to go home. | 2) Content Accuracy |
The summary should be rewritten so it flows a little better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary doesn't sound coherent enough, it lacks context. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary makes it a statement when it's actually a question | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
For the most part the summary reflects the intention of relaying petty revenge. However, for clarity and to reinforce that the latter sentence was a result of the former I would connect the two sentences using the conjunction 'so'. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
I would change a few words to make this summary 'flow' better and more naturally. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The post gets cut off so it's impossible to answer | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Sounds like caveman talk. Use articles and conjunctions. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
What to do other than emailing all the sites and asking to take down his info, he means. Also use a complete sentence. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be rewritten into more cohesive sentences to make it easier to comprehend. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
All the sentences are grammatically incorrect. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This reads like a hypothetical situation but it actually happened. The “you” words should be replaced with I and written in the first person so it makes more sense. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary covers the point in a concise way, but it doesn't flow naturally. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is pretty accurate. I would have isolated the symptoms to their situational occurrence for more clarity. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be written in a way that would flow better than separating each point with a comma. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary doesn't flow naturally when you read it. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The end of the summary where it states “and being less reactive” should be a separate sentence that explains he is working on being less reactive. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could be written more fluently. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The "what do" at the end of the summary is vague and confusing even if it was taken from the poster's title. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Why did he block you? Also use complete sentences. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is accurate, but could have been written better grammatically | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is strong but would be better phrased if the question was "Are these thoughts ok and should I bring them up?" | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary feels a bit disjointed. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary reads like definitive instructions but the post is told from a question standpoint for ideas on how to remedy the situation where the new dog tries to take the lead. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary feels disjointed. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary should rephrase the first sentence without the dash is to make it read easier. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary isn't structed enough to be discernable, and has no details. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Every important detail from this passage is stuffed into a single sentence. It doesn't make grammatical sense. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The word "phased" is wrong; it should be "fazed". | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
It's too vague, needs more detail, and too wordy before it gets to the point. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is an accurate account of the post. The ord "him" should be placed at the end. That sentence is incomplete. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could be written in a way that flows better and easier to read. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could be written so it flows a little better. The comma could be replaced with the word “and.” | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
relationship breakdown makes no sense | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary should say “doesn’t” instead of “don’t.” | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This could be rewritten to make it flow a little better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
It's a bunch of disjointed sentence fragments. It should be more readable. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is worded unclearly and should clarify that the guy was talking to the poster. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is made up of incomplete sentences, which could be adjusted for clarity. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This pretty much covers everything, but it could do so in complete sentences. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The last sentence doesn't summarize anything in the post. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be rephrased so that it is easier to read and understand. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary sums it up well. Small thing, it mixes tenses. It should be couldn't instead of can't. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary does cover most details of the post but doesn’t tell the story in a natural and coherent way. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is incoherent and does not make sense. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is written in a confusing way because you cannot tell who is referring to who. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could be worded better to make it more concise and coherent | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary has an error in which it states that the user is paying bills for their mother and herself but should said “myself.” | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This covers just about everything important. Doesn't need "The text describe..." part and could be rewritten without it. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
There is a small grammatical error in the summary where “don’t” should be “doesn’t.” | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The question at the end could have been phrased a little better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Covers things pretty well. Maybe use complete sentences. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is accurate, but it could have been written better. The first sentence seems choppy and the second is a bit unclear. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
"The text describes a situation in which" needs to be removed. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is oddly written since it implies that her goal is 2 hours of sleep nightly | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The first sentence in the summary could flow a little better. Semicolons instead of commas would make more sense. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be rewritten into separate sentences instead of one long one with the different points separated by a comma. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary is not written clearly and contains the spelling error "voluntold." | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The way this summary reads doesn’t make much sense. It needs to be rephrased so that you can understand that the author’s reputation has been tarnished. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The sentence could be rewritten without the parenthesis and ages/gender as it makes it confusing. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be written in full words so it makes more sense and reads easier. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Very convoluted | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is written in the third person, while the original passage is in the first person. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The sentence is phrased a bit weird and could be improved for better understanding. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summarizes the main point well, but the first sentence could have been broken up into two to improve readability | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is a little disjointed. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary first starts out from the girlfriend’s point of view and ends in the boyfriend’s so it’s a but confusing. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is not well written. The first sentence doesn't even belong. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
I think this summary is a bit confusing, I can't tell if when they say 'with what we choose' if they're talking about employees, companies, or someone else. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary seems all over the place and difficult to read. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is a very hard to decipher summary. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Should say in college in a year or two | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The roommate the summary is referring to is the user themselves so the wording is a little difficult to understand. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be rephrased so it reads more fluently. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This make no sense in the first sentence. It needs to be worded better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
I feel like this could have been written better. Perhaps using full sentences | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
First sentence doesn't read right. Should be something like 16 year old female goes to movie night with guy she likes and is super shy, making the night awkward. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could be written so it flows better and is easier to comprehend. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could be written so it flows nicely and is easier to comprehend. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
That last sentence has too much wasted space. It should simply say that it does bother him and then go into the bonus question. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is written in the third person, but the original text is in the first person. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This could have been broken up into more than one sentence to make it easier to read. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
It's a string of sentence fragments that could be more coherent. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
While the events mentioned did happen, two of them are in the wrong order so it doesn’t read properly. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could have been composed better | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is disjointed, confusing and incoherent. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is confusing and cannot stand alone at all. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This description doesn't really make sense. I don't know what 'girlfriend will be soon' means, and it's written in a way that's a bit confusing (like it mentions academic stuff, but doesn't mention anything about his engineering studies beforehand) | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is too vague and not that coherent by itself. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is not well written at all. The first sentence makes no sense. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary is too stilted. It could be rewritten better | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Having the second sentence written in the second person is kind of confusing. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Needs to be written in separate sentences. Should read Is it time to call this unhealthy friendship off? | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is totally incomprehensible. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is accurate, but it is not well written. It could have been nroken up into two sentences. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could be structured in more complete sentences. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary has a lot of information written in short form which makes it confusing. It should be rewritten to better understand it. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |