Datasets:

andreuka18

/

Jigsaw2017

like 0

e7a8cc886f345c4e

" A response to ""For the attention of the IPs inserting the 'racism section'"" I inserted facts documenting instances of named sources accusing Catherine Glick of racism. I'd like to take a moment to address comments in the ""For the attention of the IPs inserting the 'racism section.'"" Please do not misinterpret documentation of allegations of racism for allegations themselves. The section inserted, apparently subject to some controversy, is ""accusations of recism."" In that section, the accusations of racism that several writersEileen Read, Alex Pareene, and Paul J. Balleshave leveled at Caroline Glick are documented. Properly, no opinion or point of view has been expressed in the ""Allegations of racism"" section as to the veracity of these allegations. 1. I therefore cannot understand why documenting such allegations could be considered controversial, let alone ""potentially libelous"" as you say. The documentation of specific allegations of racism by named sources need only prove that such allegations exist, not their veracity. Documentation of written defenses of Ms. Glick's work are solicited and in fact highly encouraged. 2. I apologize for linking to www.youtube.com. The link I should have used was the one from Ms. Glick's homepage. That link is at: http://www.carolineglick.com/e/2010/06/we-con-the-world-the-gaza-fl.php 3. I never claimed to be other than a single user even though, incidentally, all of the contributions to the ""Allegations of racism"" section are not mine. Incidentally, if it matters, I for my part am a fan of Ms. Glick's work and do not believe that she is a racist. I contributed to the section to advance the Wikipedia mission to provide a forum where issues of public significance can be documented in a way as to provide reasoned information to the public. one of Ms. Glick's detractors, Eileen Read, wrote an article in the Huffington Post accusing Ms. Glick of racism and asking that she be fired. The article is making rounds all over the internet and has likely been read by hundreds of thousands, if not many more. It'd be a great shame from my perspective if Ms. Glick's career suffered as a result of such charges (since they are, in my own personal view, baseless)such charges should be documented neutrally and weighed against the writings of Ms. Glick and her defenders, aiming only to inform the public, which can then decide. When I inserted a reference arguing that Ms. Glick's positions are ""not racist"" but ""common sense,"" it was taken down by those same persons invoking BLP standards and undue weight. 69.110.8.85 "

e3032cb09e53f55c

, maybe you can give us your opinion about the whole issue... Your opinion is appreciated.

5eb28fa4c7d2039e

" Hello and Privet Commodore Sloat and . I am the person who added the info on Team B to this article originally, and fight to keep the errors of the Team kept in the article. I have to agree with TDC on this one, and trust me, TDC and I disagree A LOT. I see TDC as an American apologist. But if you two can't provide a source, then it is not worthy of inclusion in wikipedia. What I mean by providing a source is , You read these articles and provide footnotes and quotes of these articles. It is your responsibility, not users who question the validity of your inclusions, to provide a source. See Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Reliable sources This sentence is poor, the phrase ""deliberately ignored"" is poor, and it is definatly POV without a source. There is a reason to cite your sources, as I argues against a fellow dissenter here: Talk:Philippine-American War#Why User:Travb ""plays this thing by the book"" A hopeless fight against a lifetime of indocrination"

754103026f4279b2

Thanks for the tip. I contacted the author of the template that originated the discussion. S(he) will answer soon. At least I hope so...'''' ''

ea4c7874588d85c1

Log back into my original account, this is my original account! Oh I just love this bit - User talk:GiantSnowman[edit source] From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Archives 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Contents [hide] 1 I'm surprised it's taken me this long to notice I'm surprised it's taken me this long to notice[edit source] but this editor is obviously this indefblocked editor. Apart from similarity of interests, their edit summary is unmistakable. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 8:02 pm, Today (UTC+1) Well very observant of you User:Struway - you're unbelievable! Okay so there are similar interests shared between myself and User Pablo is that a crime, does that automatically give you an incentive to ahead and immediately block my account no! Right so one user isn't allowed to share interests of another user ... you are way in over your head because what happens if there are some twins that register an account on here ... if they share similarities between each other (music), writing style etc. and one becomes a problem user but the other is the complete opposite you are then telling me that you will block the GOOD twin (from a Wikipedia point of view to spite the vandal twin) - now you have done that you have alienated this user from Wikipedia, and the better twin not only resents Wikipedia but they have also lost all faith in the encyclopedia and will NOT be recommending its services to his / her friends! Another scenario could be that a friend or relative has seen how the account user writes and has decided to hack into their account and perform some very inappropriate edits under that person's username ... meanwhile the owner of the account is completely oblivious to this and only when they log in or just take a look at their user talk page find that they have been either issued a warning (s) or have been BLOCKED for something they did NOT do as a result of the nastiness caused by the vandal (hacker), the person that has USED their account to create problems with other users and to ultimately get them in a lot of trouble with the Wikipedia Community.

090d9284aec45cb3

==External link== can anyone add this link to the sam coupe wicki please i ahve been trying for several years now thanks

6bd8d169c3532e23

Biggest problem: The justification for having the template on alllllllllll those character articles goes out the window. -

07e76c5b1e7684d7

"==Hilary Duff== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. "

cdc0cec0c404c3af

Yeah, just a bunch more whiney suck garbage from this problematic editor. Have a look at all the spew GabeMc posted on mine and Andreasesgde's talk pages that has not ben complained about and it soon becomes apparent that the scales have been tipped in this now cocky editor's favour. You have to admit that complaining about an apologie on your talk page as harrassement it about as childish as the on looker that buys into his political antics. Me thinks a meatpuppet or even a sockpuppet case will arise from this nonsense in the future. I find it way to hard to believe that so many editors can not feel like total idiots when they get caught not doing more than three minutes of investigation before acting. I am disgusted and come to realize the WP system is a complete and utter embarrasing joke. Gabe and I had an agreement (I won't disclose the details to protect him) and after the plan began to work he turned on me like a rabid dog. Some thanks. I disagreed with his edits and now watch him inject his non-approved the/The changes to Pink Floyd and other articles as a cocky test to rape and pilage another few hundred music articles with his same the/The nonsense currently being mediated and under dispute. This guy isn't interested in furthering WP. He only wants to have his name in lights with [WP:Ownership]. I guess this IP is done and time to go back to account editing again. This was much more fun! Bite me bitches! Hasta Luego! Joe 99.251.125.65

794d08e9742dedb2

Contested deletion This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... a well known model who has been covered in a number of reliable sources. she has been covered in the movie Rush and is the ex wife of two celebrities

892f0916010c9c12

" Fire enough but you're talking this out of context. ""The Bhutto faction, which included some prominent generals, put out the canard that Ayub's cowardice stemmed from his desire to protect his newly acquired wealth. It was boasted at the time that one Pakistani soldier was equal to four Indian soldiers and so on."" the article goes on to say: ""By Sept 22 both sides had agreed to a UN mandated cease-fire ending the war that had by that point reached a stalemate"" the war ended in a stalemate. So how are you claiming Pakistan recived a drubbing? which is a POV. "

f9474fbe62cb704b

Could you kindly state which ones? You have to be clear on specifying which citations are not valid. I will do research to see if the article contents are in citations given.

0ded8ddda93810bc

", 9 August 2010 (UTC) ::::(ec) Both of you clearly don't read what other people say, as it seems you just skimmed over what ChrisO said. If you read again, you would notice that he said he has no problem with not using the image for DYK and just using the text. I agree with him that preventing this DYK nomination for purely political reasons damages the ethics of Wikipedia. ChrisO spent time and energy on that article to improve it to where it is now. And I am also appalled at Jimbo's statement on T:TDYK, as it would be one thing if he had just said ""I think this should be postponed for a few months, right now is not a good time to be putting this on the front page."" But, instead, he said, ""I this this should be postponed for a few months or forever."" That is a ridiculous statement and seems to imply that any subject that is ever ""political"" for Wikipedia in any way can never be allowed to be shown as good. I suppose it will never be allowed up on FA, no matter the quality it becomes, since it's so political. That should also go for a number of other articles too then, huh? ::::In short, I am extremely disappointed in this action. 23:34"

d617828ea3004215

and allowed to dwefend myself against the ioffensive and very surface presumptions on ani

14c12ed581d226fd

" (cont.) Unfortunately, the recent editing of Wikipedia:Public domain does not help this situation. I had done a search for ""images of Nazi regime U.S. copyright law"" and been directed via Wapedia (Wikipedia for mobile telephones) to the following section, which was edited recently and has many missing citations and cannot therefore be used as a source for determining the propriety of how to license these images. See: . That is a copy of the ""content guideline"" Wikipedia:Public domain, which has been edited recently by the uploader of the images whose licensing is under review; such edits are highly questionable, as the ""content guideline"" appears to be edited to support a position re: specific images currently under review (a past or potential edit war): see Wikipedia:Edit warring and Wikipedia:Disruptive editing for guidance. Editing content guidelines and policy pages in Wikipedia when involved in a difference of viewpoints re: specific content is highly problematic and frowned upon, especially if it is done w/o following WP:CITE and WP:V#Sources. (cont.)I've added the missing citations templates and an editorial interpolation and a comment explaining the templates on the talk page at in that article's talk page. This is an alert to the potential problem of a feedback loop occurring in Wikipedia to validate images whose status is still under review pertaining to WP:IUP and WP:PUI. This is merely an expression of concern; see Wikipedia:Guidelines for controversial articles, already in a template at top. When adding material to controversial articles or controversial sections of articles or content guidelines in Wikipedia, it is still necessary to avoid violating WP:NOR and to follow WP:V and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view; these are core editing policies in Wikipedia. "

2d1447d9e38d5139

, the source is, DE RE MILITARI, in the hope you have some grasps with vegetian iconcinnitas

104af5ceae7cd5d4

:Examples are required. At this time, you and your sockpuppets have zero credibility. -

c348baed63938f08

has just updated it. I shall give more thanks to Cyclonebiskit.

5506e96c6807b309

Added full list of Rod Smith quotes.

366179f5a523c404

== Encyclopedia should be accessible to laymen, this article is not. == Encyclopedia should be accessible to laymen, this article is not. If I hadn't had a solid secondary school education, I would not understand a word of this explanation. This is not the place for specialized lingo, this is the free encyclopedia that should help especially those who were not blessed with, or could not afford to build, a strong math background. Please re-write for the mainstream. Umberto Torresan

c7cdc929eaffdb7a

categories thanks for fixing the categories on the articles i made...i'm new to the site, so i need all the help i can get.

2c66b6c902a599b2

==A humble suggestion== Have you tried autofellatio? I hear it makes you less of a fucking asshole. Go suck yourself.

6237cb715db81fb9

Unhelpful lede For those of us who are unfamiliar with US history, the lede is extremely unhelpful. The introduction should provide a comprehensive, yet simple overview of the whole topic, covering the main points. This lede doesn't even say whether the Confederate Army was the North or South. I know that to Americans it's a no-brainer, but I came to this article to find out that particular piece of info, and it should be in the intro. 206.116.59.222

582e66326b92c43c

Citation for you from MS Encarta, article “Poland” There is nothing like supposition about history of the “Recovered territories”. If you prefer you can check it in other encyclopaedia like “Britannica” or some other – neutral of course ) Good lack with studies. The Piast Dynasty Mieszko converted the Poles to Christianity in order to compete better with the crusading and marauding Germans. During the reign (992-1025) of his son, Boleslaw I, the Christian church was firmly established in Poland. Boleslaw also conducted successful wars against Holy Roman Emperor Henry II and considerably expanded the Polish domain. He was crowned king by the pope in 1025. At his death, Poland extended beyond the Karpaty Mountains (Carpathian Mountains) and the Odra and Dniester rivers.

3df352ff5db6f6ad

cc licensed image http://www.flickr.com/photos/bernhardbenke/1270597372/sizes/o/ no account so cannot add

ae10c164e1e4f1ad

Vandalism to this page I have reverted and IP's installation of another archiving bot that was set to rapid archiving. He also hit my talk page and I've given them a only warning. Please let me know if it happens to your talk page again. The IP left a message as well with the archiving change that you are better qualified to answer than I am, but I had to revert it to get rid of the archival vandalism. -''''''004

e7542b342e6a04e4

" Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Stutton, Suffolk. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Will (aka ) "

a7bd0cd552438891

Links to Articles Edited https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Santror#Birth_of_Santror https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saskatchewan_Accelerator_Laboratory#Beginnings:_1947.E2.80.931961 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developing_8_Countries

8cd100e8105e38fb

I admire you for speaking out on this sort of abuse, actually. 161.55.204.162 So do I. One of Wikipedia's dirty little secrets is the fact that the admins here don't just think that they own certain articles, they actually do own them. Forget about trying to stand up to them because they all cover for each other. 161.55.204.3

3a69337e8215143c

::::Perhaps because what he is doing isn't wrong? (except for the verbal abuse of course). Removing well cited facts that try to paint an entire ethnic group as responsible for crimes committed by ten of them is a good thing however you turn it. Just like we don't include crimes committed by groups of Jews or Mormons in the articles on Jewish and Mormon minorities we obviously also don't do that for British Pakistanis. Doing so would not be writing an encyclopedia but perpetuating racism and making ourselves complicit in the bloodlibel of the far right against the Muslim minority in Europe. ·

016b64d389c9a1c1

Elizabeth Hi lil romeo I am one of your biggest fans I really like you I always dream of you at night I would like you to come to Dallas Tx. to Ignacio Zaragoza and give a concert at this Elementary school I am in the 6th grade and I am 15 years old I want you to come and help me with my homework See you later I will write to you soon By

e5716172e65c071b

Who the hell is Ulaş Erdil?

95e952427aff0300

gay as hell and like dicks in my butt

6faf75c13f456bb4

REDIRECT Talk:Women in ancient Sparta

3885a702be156946

" In regard to the recent suggestion of WP:IAR, I shall quote a part from the page itself: ""Ignoring all rules is about cutting through red tape to construct an encyclopedia."" Please tell me how userpage images apply to constructing an encyclopedia. I could see if we were discussing using this image on a page about Firefox; then yes, it would be needed because it is a helpful addition. IAR is not meant for userpages, it's meant for actual content. Defining logic since 1988"

5f3f1933dc2020dd

The person who apparently wiped out one of the answers appears to be the same person who removed the search box from WP:Teahouse, and is not going to put it back, so past questions and answers just drop into a black hole and are unlikely to be found again. ;-)

9115dbb67e4b4754

" Personally i'd leave the original picture as that is / well was now the ""norm"" for a user using this service to see. You could add the new picture sepeartly under a heading such as ""phase out of MSN Hotmail"" etc etc if you felt it necessary to add it. "

024ffa8c8c8d2306

== Wrong coordinates == Wikipedia is my favorite source of information. But there is a mistake in this article: It gives the coordinates of Gran Canaria as 27°58′S 15°36′W. It should say 27°58′ NORTH, 15°36′W. Regards, Bernd Riechelmann [email protected]

d3363825f335b731

you attacked me but hey wateva ur all against me anyway so why bother fighting on, just let me ask you this, are you german in origin....211.28.41.32

c21a72cd77113a29

" Here's the Oxford English Dictionary's entry on ""evolutionism"": :The theory of evolution or development. :1869 HUXLEY in Sci. Opin. 28 Apr. 487/1 The three schools of geological speculation which I have termed Catastrophism, Uniformitarianism, and Evolutionism. 1872 E. FRY in Spectator 21 Sept. 1201 Evolutionism does not propose to explain the unfolding of life out of dead matter. 1873 DAWSON Earth & Man xiv. 348 Evolutionism..excluded creation and theism. A few other quotes: :""Nothing can give a better idea (in small compass) of the growth of Evolutionism and its position at this time, than a quotation from Mr. Huxley* — "" (Francis Darwin, Life and Letters of Charles Darwin) :""In France, the influence of Elie de Beaumont and of Flourens-the former of whom is said to have ""damned himself to everlasting fame"" by inventing the nickname of ""la science moussante"" for Evolutionism,* -to say nothing of the ill-will of other powerful members of the Institut, produced for a long time the effect of a conspiracy of silence; and many years passed before the Academy redeemed itself from the reproach that the name of Darwin was not to be found on the list of its members."" (Ibid) :""It is satisfactory to hear so capable an anatomist, and so embittered an opponent of evolutionism, admitting even the possibility of either of his first propositions."" (Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man) I just came across those searching through the text on the British Library's collection of Darwin's works. What seems worth wondering to me is not whether the term was ever used, but whether the entry should 1. be about the term itself, and 2. whether or not the information currently on the page is just a duplicate of the article History of evolutionary thought. I am feeling that any useful information should be merged with the latter article and the Evolutionism article should be somewhat more devoted to the term, or redirect to the ""history"" article and have an entry at Wikitionary. "

a4c60c946501ed7c

" == FAR == nominated 2004 Atlantic hurricane season for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare ""Keep"" or ""Remove"" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. – "

a640486660ad148b

" It depends on your definition of ""open."" The HD DVD specification is created by the DVD Forum (which is comprised of many different companies) and not by any individual company, although of course any given section of the specificaion originiated from a proposal made by one or more individual companies. Case in point: the interactive layer was proposed by Microsoft and Disney, but it was accepted by all companies and the final version in the specification has had contributions from other companies such as Sonic Solutions and Toshiba. The point being that no single company controls the format; the other member companies must agree to the proposal in order for it to pass. Clearly this doesn't meet some definitions of ""open"" since the specification is still covered by copyright and implementing it requires paying royalties, etc. but it is also not wholly proprietary, either. "

ee81c94378657d7e

Do you seriously think that I give a shit what you or anyone else thinks here in this shit-hole? I'm done with wikipedia, let the kiddies do what they will with it. Fatuorum

d3ff403efd51a59f

" (UTC) :I suggest someone take the work to research a little more on ""Chocolate Truffles"" and hopefully make its own article (but if not, perhaps a stub). Then we can do a ""see-also"" at the article's start to distinguish the fungus from the confection, and shorten the chocolate truffle section to reference the article. 04:51, 18 February 2006"

d70049a1637de419

You can post me messages here.

0fb24cfa360ab60b

Handedness and sexual orientation are in no way comparable. People aren’t in the closet about being left-handed. No one tries to pass constitutional amendments preventing left-handed people from getting married. There aren’t thousands of websites for “left-handed curious” people. There are a lot of people out there who have had homosexual/bisexual experiences who are not homosexual/bisexual or do not identify as such. Sexuality is such a sensitive subject that no label should be used without incontrovertible evidence or an admission from the person in question. Let’s not forget also that the magazine that this quote was mentioned in has a biased interest in hyping lesbianism. Loken could have just as easily been making the comment for shock value or because she has been bi-curious in the past.

03a91b47951ef376

Regarding edits made during December 2 2007 (UTC) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Bendigo South East Secondary College page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers.

1e05a099a18bcfb6

" Suggest you be more thoughtful in this discussion Your suggestions and comments are not at all in line with key wikipedia behavior, including WP:GOODFAITH and Wikipedia:Civility. For example, ""Bullshit"" or ""Put up or Shut up"" or ""Then read a dictionary!"" are over the top and make it difficult to work with you. So far, I have not once been uncivil or personally disrepectful towards you. "

86e5cd1a4094f326

== The {ar} template == I've now added a Unicode LEFT-TO-RIGHT MARK control character to the end of the {ar} template, just after the RTL span. This acts as an invisible Latin character, and should force correct rendering of weak-direction characters in following left-to-right text in any conformant BiDi implementation. Please let me know if it fixes the problem in the Zarqawi article.

e84b1fa0589a589d

" :Track listings How are they unorganized? They are in the same order as before. WP:ALBUM advises that if an article is already established without then you shouldn't add it: it's pointless to edit back-and-forth over adding a template to show the same information. —❤☮☺M☯ "

c71d09e5260f8dbd

==Guanches== :There's also a very reduced number of guanche people, the original natives of the Canary Islands (a Spaniard insular region located off the northwestern African coast). Are there people who are acknowleged generally as Guanches or is this simply people who identify themselves as such?

42935bef5b98129c

"==America is== A pack of shit, full of capitalist fuckers and a bunch of right-wing BASTARDS. I would love to see your health care too. ""I'm hurt, so I'm going to have to pay for someone to take care of me!"" Piece of shit. America is a deteriorating cuntry where people can buy guns LEGALLY and where the President implies fascistic laws. America is probably the next Big Brother/Orweillian country. "

f7da5c6945bb1015

"====Regarding edits made during November 30 2006 (UTC)==== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. "

fd9eaf7260abbb57

== Template discussion == I saw that you had participated in a previous discussion on NHL award templates. Just wanted to let you know that there is another discussion going on right now. -

3690374444d1c116

I was off line and he wrongly represented me and got decision in his favour. He cheated me, you and other admins of WP. see the history on Total Siyapaa Talk page. how he used my edit summary relevant to other section for critical reception section to show WP Consensus. Is it my fault to draw attention to such clever cheating with WP admin.

9561f2fc31418a94

See page 48 of the Freeh report for Freeh's explanation of what news articles are trying to explain. http://progress.psu.edu/assets/content/REPORT_FINAL_071212.pdf

67524f9b2adc81e1

Erm u didnt and i received an error while correcting some grammar what happened

c1ae073cc02a78b7

" :indefblocked, obvoiusly has no intent on contributing. "

6e4955203674067f

" :I'm really anti it, personally. The ""-ize/ization"" endings and especially the dreaded Oxford comma just give US wiki contributors licence (no 's') to adhere to an old definition of British English, one that's closer to contemporary American usage than British. (I got that from Bill Bryson.) The Beatles were an English band – to many readers, they're the epitome of (Northern) Englishness – and wikipedia articles should reflect as British/English an editorial style as possible. As a Brit, I'm thinking your earlier ""organisation"", ""criticising"", ""realise"" etc looked way better, Evan 2008. On the subject of style, should all chart positions not be in numerals (eg ""peaked at number seventeen"" for Love Me Do), especially as numerals are used for the likes of ""Lennon felt that Harrison, then 14, was too young to join the band"". "

868647ca6795e965

The article is fine and useful and should stay. It will be easier for other editors to prune, edit and diversify opinions from this existing article than from a blank article. There is a substantial research literature on the psychology and sociology of the entrepreneur and this could perhaps be given more discussion in the article. 128.205.75.214

56f5824e9e18b477

" I have replaced the mention ""NPOV"" which has been cancelled. See thediscussion above and in the French version. "

9957a7e65ab6fb4f

== Proposed merge with List of Seraph of the End chapters == List of Seraph of the End chapters should simply be appended to Seraph of the End. The list of chapters may not meet notability for stand alone lists. Furthermore, this resembles a directory, with most citations pointing improperly to commercial sites. An ISBN is sufficient for verification, we should not direct readers to Amazon.com, etc.

c7fe53ade1f22b1b

== Catch-22 == I don't see how the princess' situation is a Catch-22 (as describided is the Catch-22 article) either I am misunderstanding something or the word have to be changed.

99045f5e5601d47e

" :The Council voted on whether the Prime Minister of Libya could have another citizenship besides his Libyan one, which may confirm the speculations that the current Vice President of the Executive Office of the Minister of Finance and Oil, Ali Tarhouni, who holds U.S. citizenship as well as the Libyan nationality might be nominated for the position.BENGHAZI-EMAD HAJJAJ, ""Negotiations on Dual Citizenship Might Be in Tarhouni’s Favour,"" Arabs Today, 31 October 2011"

98ddee942dc77146

I've deleted the personal information from the edit history of this article. Please don't do something like that again.

09bfd7c47ed801ed

You do not have the right to remove entries because you don't feel the ECC is not part of the restoration movement. I will remove your work because I don't agree with you.

f003ca2fbbb575f5

" Please do get well soon. (Talk) "

b251f99c02783c8a

":Thanks for the opinion. I agree. By the way, were there flashing red lights and pop-up banners saying ""nyah-nyah, you can't edit!""? (talk) 15:00, July 23, 2005 (UTC) "

e964f417db9ee58b

Slam time again Hi there. I notice that during the 2011 Australian Open you attempted to delete the day to day article and advised the removal of another silly table thing. Well guess what there back on the 2011 French Open page. I have been bold and removed both and we have a load of people going I like and nothing else. None of whom can come up with a constructive reason why they should be kept. Your view on why it is not suitable for wikipedia would be suitable here

8bbe58fc050af450

":I do not want to debate you here. I am asking you to explain (1) what the ""significant problems"" from the AfD are and (2) how Cordless Larry can address those problems. I think this is a reasonable question to ask because without knowing what the problems are, creating a brand new article to salvage the topic still might fall afoul of the problems from the AfD. "

4916c430b882ecb0

== rude == idiot shut up

9fadc356aff72deb

, I have again undone the reference to a crime from years ago that really has no relevance AT ALL to the school becoming a comprehensive in 1980. FFS! If you go to the page for any school on wikipedia, you will not find, generally speaking, references to crimes committed by pupils at the school they attended!!! Hello Graham

d3c6b37b0739b221

we would like to request you not to delete this page because it is from the organization only we send these data of chairman to other news portals. We haven't copied this content from anywhere. It has been months that we have been trying to create an account of Dr. Sahoo and you people delete the entire thing without giving us any solution to the problem. It would be highly appreciated if you can suggest changes.

79038811b1c2f6b0

#Image:Penis corrected.jpg

0505a9737bcc2dfa

":::Thanks for your involvement and your feedback. Sincerely, "

e095874bc0343475

Template:Pic There have been discussions as to whether Template:Pic, which you created, should be orphaned and deleted. You might want to state your opinion at Template talk:Pic. Also, I suppose that the same will be said of Template:Picp eventually, although I have no intention of dealing with that at the moment. If you're interested in the sister projects templates, by the way, I suggest that you vote at WP:TFD#Template:Sisterproject as to whether the {{Sisterproject}} template should be kept. 20:53, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

5c527399e91c311e

" That doesn't make having a tangential article copy pasted into NST a good thing. It's strong enough to stand alone, and you could probably expand upon the preview gameplay, but that's beside the point. - "

0e228d4296c5823c

Organ Club - AfD discussion You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organ Club.  —

f3e4d32f2a289a98

with many stories in cinema

c2f7972aad7b7ee4

: Ok, maybe I underestimated Wikipedia, there is a brain dump on categorial grammar.

557256025e0525a4

" ::Thank you very much for providing this source. I wonder why none of the vehement supporters of this map is answering ...It would be a real pity if the disputed map is really used in contemporary schoolbooks, as has been stated above. is certainly right in saying that the Imperial German authorities tried to artificially diminish the number of Polish-speakers by introducing a new category ""Masurian-speakers"". If fact, Masurian is simply a Polish dialect. However, as one can see from the statistical data cited by several people chose to declare themselves as ""Masurians-speakes"" because they would not regard themselves as Poles. Polish historiography has for a long time lamented bitterly the indifference of Masurian people against Polish patriotic propaganda. But Masurians simply did not regard themselves as Poles. They always regarded themselves as Prussians and did not want to join a Polish state. I myself have Masurians ancestors, my mother is born in the village of Lyck (Ełk), all her family descended from there and she has a Polish family name. I can tell you: people there simply did not regard themselves as Poles. They felt threatened by Polish nationalistic pretensions and wanted to stay within East Prussia. Public opinion was totally different from that in the Greater Poland (Poznań) area where people really felt as Poles.This map is really an embarrassment and people who support it are either not well-informed or try to promote a view of the history of their country which certainly does not reflect what is understood as ""the neutral standpoint"". In their efforts they are really doing their country a disservice. The Poles in Prussia very well resisted the tendency of Germanization in the late 19th century when they really regarded themselves as Poles. Prussia and Imperial Germany was not Nazi Germany. There was a wealth of Polish interest groups, local associations, banks, Polish nobility, deputies in the Reichstag who all tried to promote Polish interests. In the Province of Posen the percentage of Polish-speakers increased significantly during the years 1870-1910 under German rule despite all failed bureaucratic Germanization attempts. Germanization was only successful in areas where people did not have the feeling of belonging to another nationality. "

20a927d4cd775ad3

" The sentence is garbled. Perhaps it should read: ""In the wake of H.R. 4437 and the 2006 U.S. immigration reform protests, some Paleoconservatives and Neoconservatives vented nativist sentiments in claiming that illegal aliens were flooding the U.S., taking advantage of social welfare programs, and overwhelming state and federal governments."" "

9aeadf76910bc120

. Bear in mind that I'm completely wrong and I enjoy raping children

3898445a612b75b4

" You've got mail! talk with me "

9feb8f1aea424f74

Rouge is actually 17, because SEGA always that's her official age.

36dc149c159fc83f

Look here... This may be small to read, but I can tell it says October 13, instead of September 28, take a look at it: http://www.moviegoods.com/movie_product.asp?cmio=&sku;=114817&master;%5Fmovie%5Fid=8557.

3306cfaf72b02d99

ASSHOLE YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE I HATE YOU YOU SUCK WHY THE FUCK DID YOU EDIT MY PAGE YOU FUCKING FATTY GEEK HOBO LIVING IN YOUR MOMS HOUSE YOU LAZY WHORE. I JUST WANT TO HAVE FUN YOU STUPID SHIT WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU

712c580402ff5d55

" == UK was bound by ""Treaty of Versailles"" == WRONG UK was bound by ""Treaty of Versailles"" In March 1935, under the government of Adolf Hitler, Germany violated the Treaty of Versailles by introducing compulsory military conscription in Germany and rebuilding the armed forces. In March 1936, Germany violated the treaty by reoccupying the demilitarized zone in the Rhineland. In March 1938, Germany violated the treaty by annexing Austria in the Anschluss. And Czechoslovakia in 1938. Quote me google ""20,21 May 1938 or weekend crisis May 1938 Czechoslovakia"". Check out the Royal UK family Edward the VIII and the just released clip of your Queen giving a Nazi salute in the past. Maybe you should read your own history!. And Yes I am part Czech/English too. *http://www.sachsen.de/en/276.htm *http://www.britannica.com/place/Lower-Saxony *http://www.ggsmn.org/cpage.php?pt=35 *https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=zQoXa-hriJUI.kR6FMEHv0kuY -See this map its based on 2nd century Ptolemy's maps with modern markers. Look at the green markers every one is in a country called ""Germania Magna"" there was none of your aledged Saxon stories. Atilla the Hun went up the Danube and then the Rhine in the 5th century. You know located in Austria, German and he was killed in present day France on the Rhine in 454. Casurgis 18 July 2015"

34d9bda5c0569a10

because i didnt do anything wrong in the first place..you accused me of doing something i didnt so i thought i would just in spite..but harrassement is absolutely pathetic..talking crud.

72d8b1fcdf93f682

":::::: Once again, there is no dispute about the definition of realism. The dispute here is over your claim that special relativity is incompatible with realism. As I've explained to you repeatedly, special relativity does not claim that reality changes with differences in frames of reference. I've been very clear and precise in all my explanations, none of which you've disputed (perhaps because you haven't read any of them?). Whoever told you that ""reality chages"" when it is described in terms of different coordinate systems was simply wrong. So, now that we've cleared this up, can we all agree that special relativity is perfectly compatible with objective realism? "

9be585867461d56c

you abuse you position a$$hole

2f787f2e0e22c1c6

File:Tension applied.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tension applied.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

9bfce650fdaeba0b

Maintaining status quo would be like making wikipedia not a free encyclopedia. There are a lot more people who feel that the images that are on the article, though featured, do not belong on this page, but would be better suited on another page such as tribes of India for the toda hut or apanti image.

5ac20bd9105b0cf0

I apologize in advance for not being proficient in Wikipedia editing citation styles. As stated above, I'm not sure how to site material that mentioned a wide range of activities in a manner acceptable to Wikipedia. However, I did find links that I thought covered the territory. I added a citation in the Education section from Congressman Tim Bishop and in the Consulting section from the European Council that appear to deal with most if not all of the lacking citations in those sections. I see that extensive editing was done to remove peacock terms and add other citations. As the one who created the original article I did so without knowing the prohibition of this kind of language and welcome the corrections. I would hope that between that editing and the additional citations the editors will see their way to removing some of the tags. I have links from the MSNBC, Wired.com, Parade Magazine, The Montel Williams Show, the Early Show, USA Today, CNN, the FTC, Congressional Record, and many other sources that serve as testimony to the biography. I also have about 2 dozen citations from commercial databases such as Ebsco and Newsbank. Again, any help in making proper citations would be appreciated.

6d6ac2d29b43af2a

" Thank you for your clarification, TeaDrinker also brought these differences to my attention. These observations do present reasonable doubt for the removal of such content. Arguably, one could pursue further verification of whether it meets the ""fair use"" policy which is granted to some content in the modern editions, but you have you have significantly clarified your point. I still believe page blanking is a bit overly aggressive of a solution, although I may just be unfamiliar with wikipedia's potential copyright violation resolution policy."

b2d1064fe9aee97c

If i deleted something valid by mistake, apologies. TABThis user is a recent changes patroller with Twinkle!

ab3eb750fcf33840

" Oh, I'm not venting at you, so you have no need to apologize. I'm just venting at the people who somehow thought these user categories were going to be a good idea without considering how worthless and headache-inducing they actually are. CFD wastes a lot more time than necessary trying to figure out what the ""optimal"" name for any particular user category should be, when my personal viewpoint is that they shouldn't exist at all because WP:ENC tells us Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social networking site, so categories should be used to categorize articles, not users. "

c0d2d2a56806c035

Dear editor, kindly refrain from edit warring and vandalism, SP balsubrahmanya is from andhra pradesh and has significantly contributed to telugu film industry when compared to others. ( ).

203864df6330d78b

I appreciate you taking the time to have a look at the edit history. Yes Codf1977 was always very active whilst 'semi-retired, but although they made a couple of edits after their 'retirement' their activity had fallen off almost completely (predictably one of their very few 'retirement' edits was to revert an action that I had made here: []) and on quite a few days there was no activity at all on the account. VHarris44 was clearly not someone completely new to Wikipedia. That much is very clear from their skill in navigating Wikipedia, such as posting a help request on their talk page and posting Advert tags on articles, right from the first day of their activity. This is someone who had prior experience on Wikipedia. It is also I believe reasonably well established that VHarris44's behaviour towards me was inappropriate, they were afterall permanently blocked for their behaviour and four requests by them for a reversal were turned down. There is also the issue of VHarris44 having known details about my university. Did they really find this from looking through the history of my talk page? That has to be extremely unlikely. So the obvious question is, who is VHarris44? A very logical possibility is, another experienced user that I have serious disagreements with. To my knowledge there is only one user in that category. Now in view of the timing of that user's retirement, the fact that that retirement quickly followed their failure to succeed in getting a page that I had created deleted, the fact that one of the only edits during their retirement was to undo one of my edits, and the fact that they then remerged so quickly following my difficulties with VHarris44, this is all very strong circumstantial evidence that VHarris44 and Codf1977 are the same person. So was Codf1977's detailed exposition of their view of my dealings with VHarris44 here: User talk:TFOWR#Rangoon11's filing of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Codf1977 and his other actions yesterday. In terms of the spelling mistakes made by VHarris44, I have looked again myself and concede that I cannot immediately find examples of the same spelling mistake in Codf1977's writing, but equally I cannot find exactly the same text written by Codf1977 in which those mistakes occurred (i.e. I can't find an example of Codf1977 saying 'no one agrees with you' or 'know one agrees with you'). They both seem to have poor spelling. 'such big changes must be agreed in talk page' is an edit description which both Codf1977 and VHarris44 have used. Ultimately there is little text written by VHarris44 to go on though. I do not believe it a absolute certainly that Codf1977 and VHarris44 are the same person, merely that the circumstantial evidence in that direction is very strong. I can accept that others do not feel the evidence sufficient. However I have been blocked on the grounds of harrassment for making a complaint based upon that circumstantial evidence. That seems very unfair, for even though others may not believe that there is sufficient evidence that Codf1977 and VHarris44 are the same person, I really struggle to see that others cannot see the circumstantial evidence that I saw and therefore relate to why I felt compelled to post a message on the admin board.

702f8383f5de660d

unblock|Material scientist isa dum dum and so is Pbass607 #yolo #swag #they are both gay with each other