Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_battle-dd51f1d2-bf9d-4e42-9a72-5b30dd2bd338.jsonl

@@ -15,3 +15,4 @@
 {"tstamp": 1722358379.1948, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "fe1ce490872a499fb54784a3637c1683", "0_model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "0_prompt": "are all achiral molecules meso?", "0_output": [["are all achiral molecules meso?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: Test If An NSString Contains a Letter I'm working on an iPhone project and I need to check if the user's input in a UITextfield contains a letter. More generally if an NSString contains a letter.\nI tried this with a giant if loop with the rangeofstring:@\"A\".location == NSNotFound and then did OR rangeofstring:@\"B\".location == NSNotFound\nand so on....\nBut:\n\n\n*\n\n*It doesn't seem to work\n\n*There has to be a simple line of code to check if the NSString contains letters.\n\n\nI have been searching this for hours... Can someone please answer this question???\n\nA: If you want to make sure the text has a certain letter in it (as opposed to just ANY letter),  use the rangeOfString: message. For example, to ensure the text contains the letter \"Q\":\nNSString *string = @\"poQduu\";\n\n\nif  ([string rangeOfString:@\"Q\"].location != NSNotFound) {\n    DLog (@\"Yes, we have a Q at location %i\", [string rangeOfString:@\"Q\"].location );\n}\n\nAs others (Rob Napier) note, if you want to find ANY letter, use the rangeOfCharacterFromSet: message.\nif ([string rangeOfCharacterFromSet:[NSCharacterSet letterCharacterSet]].location != NSNotFound) ...\n\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "8090cc0cc0b946bc8818f151b0cfcdfd", "1_model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "1_prompt": "are all achiral molecules meso?", "1_output": [["are all achiral molecules meso?", "Physics Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why can a solution show optical rotation? Why can a solution show optical rotation? A solution, as a liquid, is rotationally isotropic, right? So, even if the molecules are chiral, because of the random orientation of the molecules, shouldn't the effect cancel out?  \n\nA: Your claim:\nSo, even if the molecules are chiral, because of the random orientation of the molecules, should not the effect cancel out?\nis not correct.\nOne should think in a way that molecules have different dispersion for left and right circularly polarized light. Hence one of the circular polarization will be retarded with respect to another which will result in rotated linear polarization.\nIf molecules also have different absorption the exiting light will be elliptic\nEDIT:\nTo visualize the effect take a spring and rotate it - you will see - no matter from which side you look it will be still left (or right), in a sense of clock or -counterclockwise rotation of the spring.\nThus if you have only left springs - you will have more retardation for the left light.\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1722358420.2689, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "31f178365d4f46f68c5dc6cfef04f2c0", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "do tonics stack in bioshock 2?", "0_output": [["do tonics stack in bioshock 2?", "Gaming Stackexchange\n\nQ: Can multiple gene tonics stack in Bioshock 2? If I have a specific gene tonic in level 1 and level 2, is there any benefit to equipping both of them at the same time?  Will I get the full 1+2 bonuses? Or will I get just somewhat over the 2nd bonus?  Or is the level 1 tonic completely useless?\n\nA: The bonuses from the gene tonics stack, so if you equip a level 1 and a level 2 tonic, you will get the full bonuses from both.\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "35ba2fd72c234df5816ca5c243d4e6de", "1_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "1_prompt": "do tonics stack in bioshock 2?", "1_output": [["do tonics stack in bioshock 2?", "Gaming Stackexchange\n\nQ: Can multiple gene tonics stack in Bioshock 2? If I have a specific gene tonic in level 1 and level 2, is there any benefit to equipping both of them at the same time?  Will I get the full 1+2 bonuses? Or will I get just somewhat over the 2nd bonus?  Or is the level 1 tonic completely useless?\n\nA: The bonuses from the gene tonics stack, so if you equip a level 1 and a level 2 tonic, you will get the full bonuses from both.\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1722358443.207, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "051c9eaffd8c4a1f88d6a7b072e3a3da", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "I am looking for a paper to help me deal with data constraints as I scale up my language model.", "0_output": [["I am looking for a paper to help me deal with data constraints as I scale up my language model.", "Title: Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models\n\nAbstract: The current trend of scaling language models involves increasing both parameter count and training dataset size. Extrapolating this trend suggests that training dataset size may soon be limited by the amount of text data available on the internet. Motivated by this limit, we investigate scaling language models in data-constrained regimes. Specifically, we run a large set of experiments varying the extent of data repetition and compute budget, ranging up to 900 billion training tokens and 9 billion parameter models. We find that with constrained data for a fixed compute budget, training with up to 4 epochs of repeated data yields negligible changes to loss compared to having unique data. However, with more repetition, the value of adding compute eventually decays to zero. We propose and empirically validate a scaling law for compute optimality that accounts for the decreasing value of repeated tokens and excess parameters. Finally, we experiment with approaches mitigating data scarcity, including augmenting the training dataset with code data or removing commonly used filters. Models and datasets from our 400 training runs are freely available at https://github.com/huggingface/datablations."]], "0_corpus": "arxiv", "1_conv_id": "bf3763ae7d234c86b92a4acbf172612e", "1_model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "1_prompt": "I am looking for a paper to help me deal with data constraints as I scale up my language model.", "1_output": [["I am looking for a paper to help me deal with data constraints as I scale up my language model.", "Title: Like Sparrows on a Clothes Line: The Self-Organization of Random Number Sequences\n\nAbstract: We study sequences of random numbers {Z[1],Z[2],Z[3],...,Z[n]} -- which can be considered random walks with reflecting barriers -- and define their \"types\" according to whether Z[i] > Z[i+1], (a down-movement), or Z[i] < Z[i+1] (up-movement). This paper examines the means, xi, to which the Zi converge, when a large number of sequences of the same type is considered. It is shown that these means organize themselves in such a way that, between two turning points of the sequence, they are equidistant from one another. We also show that m steps in one direction tend to offset one step in the other direction, as m -> infinity. Key words:random number sequence, self-organization, random walk, reflecting barriers."]], "1_corpus": "arxiv"}
+{"tstamp": 1722358779.586, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "5f897a82cc1c4bb6877d9de92b903c30", "0_model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "0_prompt": "Who was temujin's greatest rival before 1207?", "0_output": [["Who was temujin's greatest rival before 1207?", "Rise of Genghis Khan\n\nThe period of Temüjin's life from 1177 to 1191 is largely unknown except that Temüjin often fought the Taichiud, Salji'ut, Khadagin, and Tatars with mixed results. One of the clans following Temüjin eventually left and was defeated by the Taichiud, after which they joined Jamukha. During the 1180s there was a drought in Mongolia which increased conflict between the tribes but Temüjin only played a limited part in these affairs.\nAttack on the Merkit (1191)\nThe previous attack on the Merkit that resulted in the rescue of Börte may have been a separate campaign that occurred in 1191, and was confused in the sources. In 1191, Jamukha, Temüjin, and Toghrul and his brother Jakha Gambhu decided to attack the Merkit. However Temüjin and Toghrul were late to the rendezvous area by three days, which greatly angered Jamukha. Together the 40,000 strong allied forces made a detour east to attack the enemy camp from the north-east. A fisherman spotted them and warned the Merkit of the impending attack, but the Merkit failed to make the necessary preparations, and dispersed.\nBattle of Dalan Baljut (1187/1193)\nTemüjin and Jamukha stayed together for a while after the battle. At one point they sent an embassy to the Khadagin and Salji'ut to try to win them over against the Taichiud. In  1187 or 1193, Temüjin and Jamukha split when retainers of the two camps clashed over horse thievery. Temüjin took with him 41 tribal leaders and 10,000 men from Jamukha and was elected khan by his followers in the following days. The Taichiud became frightened by Temüjin's power and joined Jamukha."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "8b89df9e59e0464fbb8397b16371fca3", "1_model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "1_prompt": "Who was temujin's greatest rival before 1207?", "1_output": [["Who was temujin's greatest rival before 1207?", "Emperor Ōjin\n\n, also known as  (alternatively spelled ) or , was the 15th (possibly legendary) Emperor of Japan, according to the traditional order of succession. Both the Kojiki, and the Nihon Shoki (collectively known as the Kiki) record events that took place during Ōjin's alleged lifetime. Ōjin is traditionally listed as the first emperor of the Kofun period, and is primarily known for being the controversial son of Empress Jingū. Historians have mixed views on his factual existence, if Ōjin was indeed a historical figure then it's assumed he reigned much later than he is attested.\nNo firm dates can be assigned to Ōjin's life or reign, but he is traditionally considered to have reigned from 270 to 310. According to the Shinto religion and Buddhism in Japan, Emperor Ōjin is the divine spirit of the deity Hachiman (八幡神). While the location of Ōjin's grave (if any) is unknown, he is traditionally venerated at a memorial Shinto tomb. Modern historians have come to the conclusion that the title of \"Emperor\" and the name \"Ōjin\" was used by later generations to describe this possibly legendary Emperor."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}

data/retrieval_individual-dd51f1d2-bf9d-4e42-9a72-5b30dd2bd338.jsonl

@@ -55,3 +55,9 @@
 {"tstamp": 1722358430.6263, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358430.4894, "finish": 1722358430.6263, "ip": "", "conv_id": "dc88e4011588465bbce13608ce8e41a8", "model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "prompt": "why is the confidence interval narrow?", "output": [["why is the confidence interval narrow?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: Installed Programs/Computer Info for Web Application I'm currently developing a support system for a university. The system is written in PHP and I would like to be able to get a current list of software and basic computer information on a computer. Basically when one of the faculty or staff creates a ticket from our web interface, I would like to have a Java Applet or similar that could be run and would return the information to the help desk PHP script. Does something like this exist?\n\nA: There are lots of programs that do this sort of thing. Googling for \"CMDB\" should give you a reasonable start -- a couple of them are open source, though others aren't even close to free (e.g., BMC Atrium).\nTo keep things closer to topical (i.e., programming related), one of the main frameworks for this sort of situation is called Web-Based Enterprise Management (WBEM). On Windows this is implemented as WMI. On Linux there are a couple of implementations including OpenWBEM and HP WBEM. \n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1722358439.8134, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358439.7006, "finish": 1722358439.8134, "ip": "", "conv_id": "051c9eaffd8c4a1f88d6a7b072e3a3da", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "I am looking for a paper to help me deal with data constraints as I scale up my language model.", "output": [["I am looking for a paper to help me deal with data constraints as I scale up my language model.", "Title: Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models\n\nAbstract: The current trend of scaling language models involves increasing both parameter count and training dataset size. Extrapolating this trend suggests that training dataset size may soon be limited by the amount of text data available on the internet. Motivated by this limit, we investigate scaling language models in data-constrained regimes. Specifically, we run a large set of experiments varying the extent of data repetition and compute budget, ranging up to 900 billion training tokens and 9 billion parameter models. We find that with constrained data for a fixed compute budget, training with up to 4 epochs of repeated data yields negligible changes to loss compared to having unique data. However, with more repetition, the value of adding compute eventually decays to zero. We propose and empirically validate a scaling law for compute optimality that accounts for the decreasing value of repeated tokens and excess parameters. Finally, we experiment with approaches mitigating data scarcity, including augmenting the training dataset with code data or removing commonly used filters. Models and datasets from our 400 training runs are freely available at https://github.com/huggingface/datablations."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}
 {"tstamp": 1722358439.8134, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358439.7006, "finish": 1722358439.8134, "ip": "", "conv_id": "bf3763ae7d234c86b92a4acbf172612e", "model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "prompt": "I am looking for a paper to help me deal with data constraints as I scale up my language model.", "output": [["I am looking for a paper to help me deal with data constraints as I scale up my language model.", "Title: Like Sparrows on a Clothes Line: The Self-Organization of Random Number Sequences\n\nAbstract: We study sequences of random numbers {Z[1],Z[2],Z[3],...,Z[n]} -- which can be considered random walks with reflecting barriers -- and define their \"types\" according to whether Z[i] > Z[i+1], (a down-movement), or Z[i] < Z[i+1] (up-movement). This paper examines the means, xi, to which the Zi converge, when a large number of sequences of the same type is considered. It is shown that these means organize themselves in such a way that, between two turning points of the sequence, they are equidistant from one another. We also show that m steps in one direction tend to offset one step in the other direction, as m -> infinity. Key words:random number sequence, self-organization, random walk, reflecting barriers."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}
+{"tstamp": 1722358712.6955, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BM25", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358712.5556, "finish": 1722358712.6955, "ip": "", "conv_id": "0d4422c4b95845cf8fc73dc3274ad500", "model_name": "BM25", "prompt": "is cyanide a strong base?", "output": [["is cyanide a strong base?", "Gaming Stackexchange\n\nQ: If you poison a ration of water, will you be able to put it into the well? I'm talking about die2nite, of course, and I ask out of curiousity since I've seen that someone in my town has the corrosive liquid and the cyanide. \nI know that when you turn corrosive liquid into vial of poison, it can poison food and/or water, but I'm not sure if the cyanide can. My main concern is him (or her) trying to poison the main water source. I want to know if it's possible so I can tell everyone to stop it before it happens. \nThis player has been very troublesome and I wouldn't be surprised by this, seeing as how he/she has these items now...\n\nA: The vial of poison can only be used to poison Suspicious-looking Vegetables, Fleshroom Puree, Anabolic Steroids, Open Cans, or Water Rations. Poisoned water rations cannot be added into the well poison it. \n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722358712.6955, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358712.5556, "finish": 1722358712.6955, "ip": "", "conv_id": "8ccfabd5ce8240a7a578d0b59bcb2bc2", "model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "prompt": "is cyanide a strong base?", "output": [["is cyanide a strong base?", "Physics Stackexchange\n\nQ: The force exerted by a ~10 Tesla magnet on a C13 isotope? How much force would a ~10 Tesla magnet exert on a weakly magnetic C13 isotope?  If I made a molecule of diamond with $N$ C13 atoms, how large would $N$ need to be for me to pull on it with something like a ~1 pico-newton force?\n\nA: The strength of the magnet isn't important when it comes to magnetic force, what is important is the flux that the dipole experiences, i.e the rate of change of the magnetic field.\nUsing an example of the Stern-Gerlash experiment its shown that the Bohr-Magneton provides an energy of:\n$ U = \\mu_B B $.\nUsing: $ \\frac{dU}{dx} = F $ then $ F = \\frac{d(\\mu_B B)}{dx} $\nor $ F = \\mu_B \\frac{\\partial B}{\\partial x} $\nwhere $ \\mu_B = \\frac{e \\hbar}{2m_{e}} $\nOn an estimate I would say that for a pico-newton force\n$13  \\times \\frac{e \\hbar}{2m_{e}} \\times \\frac{\\partial B}{\\partial x}   > 1 \\times 10^{-9} N $\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1722358755.8706, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358753.7395, "finish": 1722358755.8706, "ip": "", "conv_id": "5f897a82cc1c4bb6877d9de92b903c30", "model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "prompt": "Who was temujin's greatest rival before 1207?", "output": [["Who was temujin's greatest rival before 1207?", "Rise of Genghis Khan\n\nThe period of Temüjin's life from 1177 to 1191 is largely unknown except that Temüjin often fought the Taichiud, Salji'ut, Khadagin, and Tatars with mixed results. One of the clans following Temüjin eventually left and was defeated by the Taichiud, after which they joined Jamukha. During the 1180s there was a drought in Mongolia which increased conflict between the tribes but Temüjin only played a limited part in these affairs.\nAttack on the Merkit (1191)\nThe previous attack on the Merkit that resulted in the rescue of Börte may have been a separate campaign that occurred in 1191, and was confused in the sources. In 1191, Jamukha, Temüjin, and Toghrul and his brother Jakha Gambhu decided to attack the Merkit. However Temüjin and Toghrul were late to the rendezvous area by three days, which greatly angered Jamukha. Together the 40,000 strong allied forces made a detour east to attack the enemy camp from the north-east. A fisherman spotted them and warned the Merkit of the impending attack, but the Merkit failed to make the necessary preparations, and dispersed.\nBattle of Dalan Baljut (1187/1193)\nTemüjin and Jamukha stayed together for a while after the battle. At one point they sent an embassy to the Khadagin and Salji'ut to try to win them over against the Taichiud. In  1187 or 1193, Temüjin and Jamukha split when retainers of the two camps clashed over horse thievery. Temüjin took with him 41 tribal leaders and 10,000 men from Jamukha and was elected khan by his followers in the following days. The Taichiud became frightened by Temüjin's power and joined Jamukha."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1722358755.8706, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358753.7395, "finish": 1722358755.8706, "ip": "", "conv_id": "8b89df9e59e0464fbb8397b16371fca3", "model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "prompt": "Who was temujin's greatest rival before 1207?", "output": [["Who was temujin's greatest rival before 1207?", "Emperor Ōjin\n\n, also known as  (alternatively spelled ) or , was the 15th (possibly legendary) Emperor of Japan, according to the traditional order of succession. Both the Kojiki, and the Nihon Shoki (collectively known as the Kiki) record events that took place during Ōjin's alleged lifetime. Ōjin is traditionally listed as the first emperor of the Kofun period, and is primarily known for being the controversial son of Empress Jingū. Historians have mixed views on his factual existence, if Ōjin was indeed a historical figure then it's assumed he reigned much later than he is attested.\nNo firm dates can be assigned to Ōjin's life or reign, but he is traditionally considered to have reigned from 270 to 310. According to the Shinto religion and Buddhism in Japan, Emperor Ōjin is the divine spirit of the deity Hachiman (八幡神). While the location of Ōjin's grave (if any) is unknown, he is traditionally venerated at a memorial Shinto tomb. Modern historians have come to the conclusion that the title of \"Emperor\" and the name \"Ōjin\" was used by later generations to describe this possibly legendary Emperor."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1722358794.1134, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358793.8686, "finish": 1722358794.1134, "ip": "", "conv_id": "3e37c16891be4c93b46019fea42d4f30", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1722358794.1134, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722358793.8686, "finish": 1722358794.1134, "ip": "", "conv_id": "e4c6ce6f8a924a55914bd8af25aab3ff", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}