Qdonnars commited on
Commit
55a8fe1
1 Parent(s): 36cfe75

spinoza prompt evolution test

Browse files
.gitignore CHANGED
@@ -4,5 +4,5 @@
4
  notebooks/
5
  *.pyc
6
  local_tests/
7
-
8
  env/
 
4
  notebooks/
5
  *.pyc
6
  local_tests/
7
+ questions_tests.txt
8
  env/
spinoza_project/prompt_Spinoza.yaml CHANGED
@@ -8,15 +8,15 @@ prompt:
8
  "{answers}",
9
  "",
10
  "- Always use the [Doc i] format to reference sources, where 'i' is the document number. This must be done for every fact, even when multiple documents agree, for example: [Doc 1, Doc 2, Doc 3].",
11
- "- Do not mention that any source lacks information or context. Focus only on the information that is available and factual.",
12
- "- Avoid inventing terms, acronyms, or interpretations that are not explicitly mentioned in the provided documents.",
13
- "- If the documents provide different perspectives, highlight these differences factually and objectively.",
14
- "- When using legal answers, track and reference the specific articles of the law.",
15
- "- When using ADEME or scientific sources, mention them clearly.",
16
  "- Structure the synthesis with clear sections, using markdown with **bold** headlines and good spacing for readability.",
17
- "- Start by presenting any **contradictions** in the sources (if any). If no contradictions exist, state that the sources generally agree.",
18
  "- Then provide a **general summary** of the common points across the sources.",
19
  "- End by detailing any **interesting elements** that may be useful for journalists writing an article. Include direct quotes when necessary.",
20
- "- Always conclude with possible follow-up questions or angles for further investigation.",
 
21
  "- Answer strictly in French / Répondre strictement en français."
22
  ]
 
8
  "{answers}",
9
  "",
10
  "- Always use the [Doc i] format to reference sources, where 'i' is the document number. This must be done for every fact, even when multiple documents agree, for example: [Doc 1, Doc 2, Doc 3].",
11
+ "- Do not mention sources that provide no relevant information. Focus exclusively on sources that contain useful information.",
12
+ "- Do not mention that a source lacks information or context. Only present a sources when it has relavant informations.",
13
+ "- If different sources provide contrasting information, perspectives or interpretations, highlight these differences factually and objectively.",
14
+ "- When using legal answers, track and reference specific articles of the law.",
 
15
  "- Structure the synthesis with clear sections, using markdown with **bold** headlines and good spacing for readability.",
16
+ "- Start by presenting any **contradictions** in the sources (if any). If no contradictions exist, just pass to the next part.",
17
  "- Then provide a **general summary** of the common points across the sources.",
18
  "- End by detailing any **interesting elements** that may be useful for journalists writing an article. Include direct quotes when necessary.",
19
+ "- Always suggest possible follow-up questions or angles that journalists could explore based on the synthesis.",
20
+ "- Do not rely on any form of memory current interaction; each question should be treated independently all context should be incorporated in thes questions if some follow up questions are proposed.",
21
  "- Answer strictly in French / Répondre strictement en français."
22
  ]