|
# QA-Align |
|
|
|
This dataset contains QA-Alignments --- fine-grained annotations of cross-text content overlap. |
|
The task input is two sentences from two documents, roughly talking about the same event, along with their QA-SRL annotations |
|
which capture verbal predicate-argument relations in question-answer format. The output is a cross-sentence alignment between sets of QAs which denote the same information. |
|
|
|
See the paper for details: [QA-Align: Representing Cross-Text Content Overlap by Aligning Question-Answer Propositions, Brook Weiss et. al., EMNLP 2021](https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.778/). |
|
|
|
The script downloads the data from the original [GitHub repository](https://github.com/DanielaBWeiss/QA-ALIGN). |
|
|
|
### Format |
|
|
|
The dataset contains the following important features: |
|
|
|
* `abs_sent_id_1`, `abs_sent_id_2` - unique sentence ids, unique across all data sources. |
|
* `text_1`, `text_2`, `prev_text_1`, `prev_text_2` - the two candidate sentences for alignments. The "prev" (previous) sentences are for context (shown to workers and for the model). |
|
* `qas_1`, `qas_2` - the sets of QASRL QAs for each sentence. For test and dev they were created by workers, while in train, the QASRL parser generated them. |
|
* `alignments` - the aligned QAs that workers have matched. This is the list of qa-alignments, where a single alignment looks like this: |
|
|
|
```json |
|
{'sent1': [{'qa_uuid': '33_1ecbplus~!~8~!~195~!~12~!~charged~!~4082', |
|
'verb': 'charged', |
|
'verb_idx': 12, |
|
'question': 'Who was charged?', |
|
'answer': 'the two youths', |
|
'answer_range': '9:11'}], |
|
'sent2': [{'qa_uuid': '33_8ecbplus~!~3~!~328~!~11~!~accused~!~4876', |
|
'verb': 'accused', |
|
'verb_idx': 11, |
|
'question': 'Who was accused of something?', |
|
'answer': 'two men', |
|
'answer_range': '9:10'}]} |
|
``` |
|
Where the for each sentence, we save a list of the aligned QAs from that sentence. |
|
|
|
Note that this single alignment may contain multiple QAs for each sentence. While 96% of the data are one-to-one alignments, 4% contain many-to-many alignment (although most of the time it's a 2-to-1). |
|
|
|
|