SetFit with BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5

This is a SetFit model that can be used for Text Classification. This SetFit model uses BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5 as the Sentence Transformer embedding model. A LogisticRegression instance is used for classification.

The model has been trained using an efficient few-shot learning technique that involves:

Fine-tuning a Sentence Transformer with contrastive learning.
Training a classification head with features from the fine-tuned Sentence Transformer.

Model Details

Model Description

Model Type: SetFit
Sentence Transformer body: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5
Classification head: a LogisticRegression instance
Maximum Sequence Length: 512 tokens
Number of Classes: 5 classes

Model Sources

Repository: SetFit on GitHub
Paper: Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Prompts
Blogpost: SetFit: Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Prompts

Model Labels

Label	Examples
0	'###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: Image:Keyes-sharon-3.gif Image:Keyes sharon 2002.jpg Image:Keyessharon2002.jpg Image:041102speech keyes conceding defeat.jpg: . — Aphaia 6 July 2005 08:04 (UTC) Image:Keyes-sharon-3.gif Image:Keyes sharon 2002.jpg Image:Keyessharon2002.jpg Image:041102speech keyes conceding defeat.jpg [ edit ] All are unused and unverified (no source information). I asked the uploader if he or she would like to provide us information on the talk. -- Aphaia 02:16, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) Vote closes: Result: deleted. (2 deletes, one comment favorable to [MASK], no dissent) -- Aphaia 6 July 2005 08:04 (UTC) [MASK] . Why do we have any images being uploaded to Wikiquote? Offhand, I can't think of any ordinary image that would be appropriate for Wikiquote that wouldn't be at least as appropriate for Wikipedia, so they should all be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons instead. Perhaps we should disable image uploading here? — Jeff Q (talk) 00:30, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) Comment: A proposal worthy to consider. French Wikipedia allows its editors to upload images copyrighted and never used on encyclopediac artices (and most of such images will decorate their user pages or talks). Unless we have a similar policy and have our own facebook, and unless we don't use fair use image, I think Jeff Q's idea "upload disabled" is very reasonable. Some projects which don't allow Fair Use images, like French Wikinews, make upload function disabled for your information. -- Aphaia 01:43, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) [MASK]. And move the interesting discussion here about fair use and disabling uploads to a policy page or the Village Pump. Rmhermen 14:02, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: ' "###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: Nat Mongioi: — Jeff Q (talk) 14:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Nat Mongioi [ edit ] No quotes. This page was blanked by its creator shortly after its creation, and recently was tagged by another anon for speedy deletion, for which it does not qualify. — LrdChaos 20:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Vote closed. Result: [MASK] (4 deletes; no dissent). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 14:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] . — LrdChaos 20:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK]. 121a0012 02:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] this bio stub, likely a permanently quoteless article about someone without even a WP article. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 03:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK]. - InvisibleSun 01:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: " '###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: G-unit: — Jeffq 23:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] G-unit [ edit ] While there is a notable rap group called G-unit, and it seems this page is intended to be about them, it's mostly gibberish. None of the "quotes" turn up in a search except to here. — LrdChaos 20:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Vote closed. Result: [MASK] (4 Deletes; no dissent). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] unless someone cleans this up and adds some real quotes. — LrdChaos 20:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK]. InvisibleSun 06:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] , concur with above. ~ UDScott 19:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] . Concur with LrdChaos. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 01:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: '
1	"###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: Lloyd Banks: — Jeffq 13:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Lloyd Banks [ edit ] Not notable. ~ UDScott 13:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Vote closed. Result: [MASK] (2 Keeps; no dissent). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 13:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] . ~ UDScott 13:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] , I realized my error after posting this vote. This is probably a notable enough person to have here, but with just some expansion required. Per policy, I will leave the vote active however. ~ UDScott 13:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] . I've done some cleanup, including adding the WP intro, to properly identify this rapper. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 22:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: " "###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: Stanley Kubrick: ~ Kalki 14:24, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC) Stanley Kubrick [ edit ] Contains no quote. -- Aphaia 22:59, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC) A quote and information has been added here by someone, and I expect more shall eventually be. ~ Kalki 14:24, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: " '###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: AFI's 100 Years...100 Movie Quotes: — Aphaia 8 July 2005 08:24 (UTC) AFI's 100 Years. ..100 Movie Quotes [ edit ] In my opinion if I recall correctly we have a policy "not to create a sort of favorite lists". and it can't be more than a dead copy of AFI's list . -- Aphaia 08:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) Vote closed: Result: Kept (4 keeps, 2 deletes) -- Aphaia 8 July 2005 08:24 (UTC) [MASK] : And I am afraid if it is copyvio too. -- Aphaia 08:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) [MASK] : ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 09:10, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) [MASK] (Jeff's arguments persuaded me) ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 6 July 2005 07:54 (UTC) [MASK] : Sveden 21:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) [MASK] . Wikiquote is, by its nature, a "favorite quotes" list; recent objections to "favorite lists" were more about the Favorites article that was slated for deletion and about personal lists that don't belong in main article space, whereas this is a properly sourced published list. In the U.S., copyright protects the presentation, arrangement, and supporting material of lists (i.e., the 3-hour program presenting the AFI list), but not the list itself, if it's based on an obvious order, like poll data (see Feist vs. Rural ); the EU's database rights law may or may not apply, and its sui generis rationale seems ambiguous in this situation, at least as presented in the WP article. Furthermore, this list is also available on Wikipedia , where basic lists of these types (i.e., produced within copyrighted programs) have apparently passed numerous deletion and copyvio tests. (See the WP village pump archive for the latest rehashing of this issue on other such lists.) This strikes me as an obvious article that I had expected someone to add within 24 hours of the program's broadcast (as it was) and would be an obvious thing for a reader to look up here. I say we [MASK] it unless Wikipedia (which is much more likely to get this issue right) declares such lists as copyvios. — Jeff Q (talk) 23:23, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) [MASK] . Nice links, thanks JeffQ. With regard to the copyvio issue, until a formal argument is presented on why copying this specific list is illegal, I don't see why it should be deleted. With regard to the other reasons given, I didn't really understand them - perhaps someone could elaborated? Sams 00:11, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) [MASK] . It's important! The greatest movie quotes of all time. Isn't that worth something? We are a collection of quotes and this is the most famous collection of quotes. We need to [MASK] it. - B-101 16:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) I agree that this list is important, but it can hardly be considered the "most famous collection of quotes", except in a Warholian sense, when it's only a few days old. ☺ — Jeff Q (talk) 17:07, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: '
4	"###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: Fit Finlay: ~ Jeff Q (talk) 19:00, 4 February 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Fit Finlay [ edit ] No valid quotes. This appears to be another nonsense page created by this anon user. ~ UDScott 17:04, 21 January 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Vote closed. Result: move to Dave Finlay (2 Moves; no dissent). Already accomplished (see comment below). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 19:00, 4 February 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] , unless valid quotes are added. ~ UDScott 17:04, 21 January 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Move , to Dave Finlay ; concur with Jeff, now that he has made this a viable page. ~ UDScott 17:17, 23 January 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] can get quotes... Struck anon vote. ~ UDScott 17:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Move to Dave Finlay to match the WP article on this pro wrestler. I've added an appropriate intro and a less-inane set of quotes, both from WP, and added some useful infrastructure to make it a decent stub. I've also begged our anonymous friend to do some minimal work to make his/her apparent nonsense articles more useful to Wikiquote, lest we stop trying so hard to accomodate him/her and just [MASK] the usual junk. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 17:05, 23 January 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I was busily closing VFDs when I accidentally took action on this article 2 days before the close date by moving it to Dave Finlay . I could move it back, but since it seems this article will be moved there anyway, and the existing title is still active (and will remain so unless we reverse our current course and choose to [MASK]), I beg the community's indulgence to allow me not to move it back only to move it again in 2 days. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Seems reasonable to me Jeff. If there are any dissenting votes over the next couple of days (which I highly doubt), you could then take other action if it becomes necessary. ~ UDScott 16:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: " '###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: His Holiness the Dalai Lama: — Aphaia 16:37, 19 July 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] His Holiness the Dalai Lama [ edit ] Originally His Holiness the Dalai Lama Dalai Lama Now both are (double) redirects to Tenzin Gyatso to Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama (and that is why I found them). -- Aphaia 4 July 2005 09:15 (UTC) Vote closed. Results: His Holiness the Dalai Lama - deleted. (3 deletes, no disssent). Dalai Lama - turn to [MASK] to Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama . (2 redirects, 1 [MASK], no vote to [MASK]). Aphaia 16:37, 19 July 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] or Turn to disambiguation(s) because there were apparently his precedences ... I don't think it is a good idea we have such [MASK] with title, like "Pope", "British Queen" and so on. -- Aphaia 4 July 2005 09:15 (UTC) [MASK] ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 5 July 2005 06:49 (UTC) Two different fates for two different redirects: [MASK] "His Holiness the Dalai Lama". It does not following English Wikipedia title practices, as is currently demonstrated by its absence there. — Jeff Q (talk) 22:37, 9 July 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] "Dalai Lama" to current Tenzin Gyatso article, whichever that is. (I don't agree with the current suffix, as it seems to violate the WP MoS principle of avoiding honorifics and positions in article titles unless needed for disambiguation, but WP is currently ignoring it for Tenzin Gyatso, so I won't raise a fuss right now.) Unless and until we have quotes from another incarnation of the Dalai Lama, we don't really need "Dalai Lama" to be a disambiguation article. — Jeff Q (talk) 22:37, 9 July 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] As for Dalai Lama, concur Jeff. [MASK] it as [MASK] to Tenzin Gyatso .-- Aphaia 19:55, 13 July 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: ' '###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: James Oppenheim: -- Aphaia 02:07, 14 July 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] James Oppenheim [ edit ] Encyclopedic stub, no quotes, no obvious notability (wikipedia link is to an empty article). ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 30 June 2005 15:25 (UTC) Vote closed : Result: Transwiki to English Wikipedia.(2 transwiki, 1 [MASK] [with sugesstion of transwiki possibility], substantially no dissent)-- Aphaia 02:07, 14 July 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 30 June 2005 15:25 (UTC) And possibly move to wikipedia. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 3 July 2005 12:16 (UTC) Transwiki to Wikipedia ( w:James Oppenheim ). He is surely notable (google hits\xa0: 282,000 results), however of course less than Emily Dickenson or T.S. Eliot. ..... Later we will be able to have his quotes like "Bread and Roses". -- Aphaia 8 July 2005 08:37 (UTC) Transwiki to WP. — Jeff Q (talk) 22:23, 9 July 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Eik, I deleted it. Should it have been kept as a link page? If anyone thinks so, I willingly support to undelete it. -- Aphaia 09:05, 15 July 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Now this vote was moved to the WQ:VFDA. -- Aphaia 16:10, 19 July 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: '
2	"###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: Wanyes World Wanyes World Patry Tmie Exclleent: — Rmhermen 16:09, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) Wanyes World Wanyes World Patry Tmie Exclleent [ edit ] Wanyes World is not only incorrectly spelled but includes quotes from the film seemingly at random. Correct page already exists or I would have moved it. -- keshiklabs 1:00 28 Sep 2004 NOTE: actual nomination time: 05:03, 28 September 2004 (UTC) ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC) [ reply ] This article should probably be merged with Wayne's World , then made into a [MASK]. I might get around to doing so in the next week or so, but its not a priority for me. ~ Kalki 17:03, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC) Page was merged. Rmhermen 16:09, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: " "###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: Crusade: ~ Jeff Q (talk) 03:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Crusade [ edit ] This page was given the {{ vfd }} tag by User:Jamillian , but they didn't follow through on it here. I've left a message on their talk page about this, so hopefully they will come by and explain why they feel it should be deleted. — LrdChaos 17:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Vote closed . Result: [MASK] with Crusade (TV series) (3 Merges; 1 implicit [MASK]). I have merged the sole quote not already included in the target article, after appropriate reformatting. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 03:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] with Crusade (TV series) . Sorry to step on your toes with this, but I replaced the vfd tag with a [MASK] tag. I will restore the vfd tag, since we've started the process, but this seems to be a simple case of the need to [MASK] with an established page. ~ UDScott 17:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] with Crusade (TV series) , agree with UDScott. This just seems like a case of the two of us being too quick on RC patrol--I didn't notice you'd replaced the vfd tag with {{ [MASK] }} until after I'd already created this section and left a note for User:Jamillian. — LrdChaos 17:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] . Concur with UDScott and LrdChaos. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: " '###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: Faults of the rich: — Aphaia 00:18, 5 May 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Faults of the rich [ edit ] Was nominated for VfD but not listed. Contains only two quotes (although they are on-topic). Seems a bit short and even churlish to have its own article. Maybe its content can be moved to a more general article? — Jeff Q (talk) 22:37, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) VOTE CLOSED: Result: Merged to Health (2 Merges; no dissent) -- Aphaia 00:18, 5 May 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] with Wealth . Rmhermen 02:42, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) [MASK] , as Rmhermen suggests. — Jeff Q (talk) 08:05, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) Merged. A question: [MASK] doesn't meen "[MASK] as a [MASK]", so it should be deleted? Thanks. -- Aphaia 01:13, 5 May 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Following suggestion on WQ:AN , I [MASK] it as [MASK]. ;-) -- Aphaia 12:10, 6 May 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: '
3	"###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: The Prophet: — Jeff Q (talk) 06:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] The Prophet [ edit ] A notable work by a notable author. So what's the problem? It appears to be the entire book (linked here) . I've placed a copyright tag on the page; but should we really wait in hope for someone to come along and trim it? As with the earlier deletion of West Side Story in its entirety, it should be removed unless someone volunteers to make reductions. There are already some quotes from it on the Kahlil Gibran page (and perhaps that page's Attributed quotes, once sourced, would yield some others as well). - InvisibleSun 18:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Vote closed . Result: no consensus (1 revert; 1 implicit [MASK]; 1 comment). There doesn't seem to be any general community interest in pursuing this, so it stays as an article, but that doesn't prevent editors from addressing the concerns directly in the article and its talk page. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 06:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . This may or may not be a copyright violation (in the US), depending on whether the original work was published with or without a copyright notice and whether or not its copyright status was renewed. If it was published with notice, and the copyright status was renewed, then the book is still under copyright; otherwise, it is not. Finding out its status, however, may not be easy. If this is out of copyright, it should be transwiki'd to Wikisource; otherwise, deleted as a copyright violation. I'm going to hold off on voting until there's been some time to investigate the status of the work. — LrdChaos 18:53, 20 July 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] Revert to the 08:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC) version [21] by 219.65.137.236 ( talk · contributions ). This was a reasonable set of quotes before 202.152.11.194 ( talk · contributions ) turned it into an apparently complete copy. Regardless of whether or not this is a copyright violation, this strikes me as the best thing to do with our article. If it is not a copyvio, the current text can be transwikied to Wikisource before the reversion (or even after, given the edit history). BTW, I'd have just done the reversion to and posted the potential-copyvio info on its talk page to avoid a 2-week VfD review. But then, I'm an ornery cuss. ☺ ~ Jeff Q (talk) 22:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: " "###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: Image:P12.jpg, Image:P22.jpg, Image:P32.jpg, Image:P42.jpg: NO SIGNATURE Image:P12.jpg , Image:P22.jpg , Image:P32.jpg , Image:P42.jpg [ edit ] Screen captures from Platoon, apparently. We probably don't need all, maybe don't need any. Rmhermen 02:07, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) [MASK] I like we use fair use images as less as possible. -- Aphaia 14:28, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC) [MASK] all. I think that, if we want a fair-use Platoon image, there's a better one on Wikipedia. — Jeff Q (talk) 23:11, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: " '###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input: James Cramer: — Jeffq 10:52, 13 May 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] James Cramer [ edit ] Was nominated but not listed for VfD. Cramer is a CNBC pundit; quote page has only one quote (with QuickTime video link source). The single quote doesn't really fit in any theme except something like "outrageous statements from pundits". — Jeff Q (talk) 23:36, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) VOTE CLOSED. Result: no consensus (1 [MASK]; 1 [MASK]). — Jeff Q (talk) 10:52, 13 May 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] [MASK] for now. This may be augmented by quotes from Cramer shows Kudlow & Cramer or Mad Money . It could also be moved into a Pundits or similar article. — Jeff Q (talk) 23:36, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) [MASK] . I tagged this one and forgot to add it here. If someone expands it I have no problem with the subject. Rmhermen 02:42, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: '

Uses

Direct Use for Inference

First install the SetFit library:

pip install setfit

Then you can load this model and run inference.

from setfit import SetFitModel

# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SetFitModel.from_pretrained("research-dump/bge-base-en-v1.5_wikiquote_masked_outcome_prediction_masked")
# Run inference
preds = model("###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels: [delete, keep, redirect, merge, no_consensus] : ###Input:  Christopher Chippindale: Aphaia 23:30, 29 June 2005 (UTC) [ reply ] Christopher Chippindale [ edit ] Wikipedia is a link to a non-existing article and no quotes.  MosheZadka 06:38, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) Vote closed : Deleted (3 deletes, no dissent) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aphaia ( talk • contribs ) 23:30, 29 June 2005  (UTC) [MASK] MosheZadka 06:38, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) Comment: I've added a link to provide confirmation of this person's existence, for what it's worth.  — Jeff Q (talk) 11:22, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) Comment: If someone were to find a half-way verifiable quote and put it there, I would change my vote.  But as is, I couldn't find anything via a google search or otherwise.  MosheZadka 13:29, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) [MASK] .  -- RPickman 19:33, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) [MASK] .  No expectation of any quotes.  — Jeff Q (talk) 23:38, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page. ###Output: ")

Training Details

Training Set Metrics

Training set	Min	Median	Max
Word count	101	313.5930	3998

Label	Training Sample Count
0	402
1	46
2	5
3	12
4	19

Training Hyperparameters

batch_size: (8, 2)
num_epochs: (2, 2)
max_steps: -1
sampling_strategy: oversampling
num_iterations: 10
body_learning_rate: (1e-05, 1e-05)
head_learning_rate: 5e-05
loss: CosineSimilarityLoss
distance_metric: cosine_distance
margin: 0.25
end_to_end: True
use_amp: True
warmup_proportion: 0.1
l2_weight: 0.01
seed: 42
eval_max_steps: -1
load_best_model_at_end: False

Training Results

Epoch	Step	Training Loss	Validation Loss
0.0008	1	0.2005	-
0.4132	500	0.118	0.1672
0.8264	1000	0.0064	0.2326
1.2397	1500	0.0052	0.1932
1.6529	2000	0.0037	0.2023

Framework Versions

Python: 3.10.12
SetFit: 1.1.0
Sentence Transformers: 3.3.1
Transformers: 4.44.1
PyTorch: 2.2.1+cu121
Datasets: 2.21.0
Tokenizers: 0.19.1

Citation

BibTeX

@article{https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2209.11055,
    doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2209.11055},
    url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11055},
    author = {Tunstall, Lewis and Reimers, Nils and Jo, Unso Eun Seo and Bates, Luke and Korat, Daniel and Wasserblat, Moshe and Pereg, Oren},
    keywords = {Computation and Language (cs.CL), FOS: Computer and information sciences, FOS: Computer and information sciences},
    title = {Efficient Few-Shot Learning Without Prompts},
    publisher = {arXiv},
    year = {2022},
    copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International}
}

research-dump
/

bge-base-en-v1.5_wikiquote_masked_outcome_prediction_masked