promptID
int32
0
146k
pairID
stringlengths
2
7
premise
stringlengths
5
1.82k
premise_binary_parse
stringlengths
6
3.43k
premise_parse
stringlengths
23
6.45k
hypothesis
stringlengths
1
393
hypothesis_binary_parse
stringlengths
1
669
hypothesis_parse
stringlengths
19
1.15k
genre
stringclasses
5 values
label
class label
3 classes
template_name
stringclasses
11 values
template
stringclasses
11 values
rendered_input
stringlengths
46
2.02k
rendered_output
stringclasses
14 values
145,124
145124c
In recent years Maoist activity in the area has limited the number of people visiting Gorkha.
( ( In ( recent years ) ) ( ( ( Maoist activity ) ( in ( the area ) ) ) ( ( has ( limited ( ( the number ) ( of ( people ( visiting Gorkha ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (JJ recent) (NNS years))) (NP (NP (JJ Maoist) (NN activity)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN area)))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN limited) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN number)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBG visiting) (NP (NNP Gorkha)))))))) (. .)))
In recent years Maoist activity in the area has drawn in a great amount f visitors.
( ( In ( recent years ) ) ( ( ( Maoist activity ) ( in ( the area ) ) ) ( ( has ( drawn ( in ( ( a ( great amount ) ) ( f visitors ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (JJ recent) (NNS years))) (NP (NP (JJ Maoist) (NN activity)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN area)))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN drawn) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ great) (NN amount)) (X (X (SYM f)) (NP (NNS visitors))))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In recent years Maoist activity in the area has limited the number of people visiting Gorkha. Then the following statement: "In recent years Maoist activity in the area has drawn in a great amount f visitors. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
77,217
77217e
oh yeah i hadn't thought about international trials at all
( ( oh ( yeah i ) ) ( ( had n't ) ( ( thought ( about ( international trials ) ) ) ( at all ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ oh) (NN yeah) (NNS i)) (VP (VBD had) (RB n't) (VP (VBN thought) (PP (IN about) (NP (JJ international) (NNS trials))) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all))))))
I was not considering the case of international trials.
( I ( ( ( was not ) ( considering ( ( the case ) ( of ( international trials ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD was) (RB not) (VP (VBG considering) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN case)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ international) (NNS trials)))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: oh yeah i hadn't thought about international trials at all Then the following statement: "I was not considering the case of international trials." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
114,618
114618e
But I can't help feeling that it's rather a forlorn hope.
( But ( I ( ( ( ca n't ) ( help ( feeling ( that ( it ( ( 's rather ) ( a ( forlorn hope ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC But) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB help) (S (VP (VBG feeling) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (RB rather) (NP (DT a) (NN forlorn) (NN hope))))))))) (. .)))
"I can't help but think that maybe this is false and desperate hope..."
( `` ( I ( ( ( ( ( ( ca n't ) help ) but ) ( think ( that ( ( maybe this ) ( is ( ( ( false and ) desperate ) hope ) ) ) ) ) ) ... ) '' ) ) )
(ROOT (S (`` ``) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB help))) (CC but) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (RB maybe) (DT this)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (ADJP (JJ false) (CC and) (JJ desperate)) (NN hope))))))) (. ...) ('' '')))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: But I can't help feeling that it's rather a forlorn hope. Then the following statement: ""I can't help but think that maybe this is false and desperate hope..."" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
141,643
141643e
so i find it very interesting how about you
( so ( i ( ( find ( it ( ( very interesting ) how ) ) ) ( about you ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP find) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ interesting)) (ADVP (WRB how))) (PP (IN about) (NP (PRP you)))))))
I think it's really fascinating and I wonder how you feel about it.
( ( ( ( I ( think ( it ( 's ( really fascinating ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( I ( wonder ( how ( you ( feel ( about it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB really) (JJ fascinating))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP wonder) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP feel) (PP (IN about) (NP (PRP it)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: so i find it very interesting how about you Then the following statement: "I think it's really fascinating and I wonder how you feel about it." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
96,313
96313e
The National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS), a statistical sampling of migrant and seasonal
( ( The National ) ( ( ( ( Agricultural ( Workers Survey ) ) ( -LRB- ( NAWS -RRB- ) ) ) , ) ( ( a ( statistical sampling ) ) ( of ( ( migrant and ) seasonal ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP National)) (NP (NP (NNP Agricultural) (NNPS Workers) (NNP Survey)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP NAWS)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ statistical) (NN sampling)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN migrant) (CC and) (JJ seasonal)))))))
The survey was taken of agricultural workers.
( ( The survey ) ( ( was ( taken ( of ( agricultural workers ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN survey)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN taken) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ agricultural) (NNS workers))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS), a statistical sampling of migrant and seasonal Then the following statement: "The survey was taken of agricultural workers." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
51,833
51833c
The stone was taken as booty from a Crusader church in Acre (now Israel) when it was overrun by Arab forces.
( ( The stone ) ( ( was ( ( taken ( as ( booty ( from ( a ( Crusader church ) ) ) ) ) ) ( in ( ( Acre ( -LRB- ( ( now Israel ) -RRB- ) ) ) ( when ( it ( was ( overrun ( by ( Arab forces ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN stone)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN taken) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (NN booty)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT a) (NNP Crusader) (NN church))))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP Acre)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (ADVP (RB now)) (NNP Israel)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (NN overrun) (PP (IN by) (NP (JJ Arab) (NNS forces))))))))))) (. .)))
Arab forces did not take the stone from a crusader church.
( ( Arab forces ) ( ( ( did not ) ( ( take ( the stone ) ) ( from ( a ( crusader church ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Arab) (NNS forces)) (VP (VBD did) (RB not) (VP (VB take) (NP (DT the) (NN stone)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT a) (NN crusader) (NN church))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The stone was taken as booty from a Crusader church in Acre (now Israel) when it was overrun by Arab forces. Then the following statement: "Arab forces did not take the stone from a crusader church." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
26,984
26984n
Brady and this is the law that's before the the legislature right now is is referred to as the Brady Bill right
( ( ( Brady and ) this ) ( is ( ( the law ) ( that ( 's ( before ( ( the ( the ( legislature right ) ) ) ( now ( is ( is ( ( referred to ) ( as ( the ( Brady ( Bill right ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Brady)) (CC and) (NP (DT this))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN law)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (IN before) (S (NP (DT the) (DT the) (NN legislature) (NN right)) (ADVP (RB now)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN referred) (S (VP (TO to))) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT the) (NNP Brady) (NNP Bill) (NN right)))))))))))))))
The Brady Bill is expecting to pass.
( ( The ( Brady Bill ) ) ( ( is ( expecting ( to pass ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Brady) (NNP Bill)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG expecting) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB pass)))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Brady and this is the law that's before the the legislature right now is is referred to as the Brady Bill right Then the following statement: "The Brady Bill is expecting to pass." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
9,078
9078e
and it's very difficult for lay people for somebody who might just you know happen to be selected in our jury to understand what we're talking about
( and ( it ( 's ( very ( difficult ( for ( ( ( lay people ) ( for somebody ) ) ( who ( might ( just ( you ( know ( happen ( to ( be ( selected ( in ( our ( jury ( to ( understand ( what ( we ( 're ( talking about ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (PRN (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ difficult) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ lay) (NNS people)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN somebody))) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (NN might) (SBAR (RB just) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (VP (VB happen) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN selected) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ our) (NN jury) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB understand) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG talking) (IN about))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
What we are talking about is very difficult for a lay person to comprehend.
( ( What ( we ( are ( talking about ) ) ) ) ( ( ( is ( very ( difficult ( for ( a ( lay person ) ) ) ) ) ) ( to comprehend ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (WHNP (WP What)) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG talking) (IN about))))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ difficult) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ lay) (NN person)))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB comprehend))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and it's very difficult for lay people for somebody who might just you know happen to be selected in our jury to understand what we're talking about Then the following statement: "What we are talking about is very difficult for a lay person to comprehend." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
118,171
118171n
oh you went to Ohio State oh you're uh up in the Woody Hays country huh
( oh ( you ( went ( to ( ( Ohio State ) ( oh ( you ( 're ( ( uh up ) ( in ( the ( Woody ( Hays ( country huh ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB oh) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD went) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNP Ohio) (NNP State)) (SBAR (S (INTJ (UH oh)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG uh) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Woody) (NNP Hays) (NN country) (NN huh)))))))))))))))
I wouldn't really want to go to Ohio State, I heard it's a pretty tough school.
( ( I ( ( ( would n't ) really ) ( want ( to ( go ( to ( Ohio State ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( I ( ( heard ( it ( 's ( a ( ( pretty tough ) school ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD would) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VB want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB go) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Ohio) (NNP State))))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD heard) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ tough)) (NN school)))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: oh you went to Ohio State oh you're uh up in the Woody Hays country huh Then the following statement: "I wouldn't really want to go to Ohio State, I heard it's a pretty tough school." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
106,067
106067e
The whole thing would have come out, then, and he would have been in an awkward position, for no one would have believed that a man of his reputation could have been deceived into calling it heart disease."
( ( ( ( ( ( ( The ( whole thing ) ) ( would ( have ( ( ( come out ) , ) then ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( he ( would ( have ( been ( in ( ( ( an ( awkward position ) ) , ) ( for ( ( no one ) ( would ( have ( believed ( that ( ( ( a man ) ( of ( his reputation ) ) ) ( could ( have ( been ( deceived ( into ( ( calling it ) ( heart disease ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) '' )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (JJ whole) (NN thing)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN come) (PRT (RP out)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB then)))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ awkward) (NN position)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN for) (S (NP (DT no) (NN one)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN believed) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (DT a) (NN man)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN reputation)))) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (ADJP (VBN deceived) (PP (IN into) (S (VP (VBG calling) (NP (PRP it)) (NP (NN heart) (NN disease)))))))))))))))))))))) (. .) ('' '')))
His reputation made people think he would not believe it was heart disease.
( ( His reputation ) ( ( made ( people ( think ( he ( ( would not ) ( believe ( it ( was ( heart disease ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ His) (NN reputation)) (VP (VBD made) (SBAR (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD would) (RB not) (VP (VB believe) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NN heart) (NN disease))))))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The whole thing would have come out, then, and he would have been in an awkward position, for no one would have believed that a man of his reputation could have been deceived into calling it heart disease." Then the following statement: "His reputation made people think he would not believe it was heart disease." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
66,411
66411n
Start at the Place de l'Etoile (officially Place Charles-de-Gaulle, but nobody calls it that), preferably at the top of Napoleon's gigantic Arc de Triomphe, from which you'll get a good view of the 12-pointed star formed by the avenues radiating from the arch in a tour de force of geometric planning.
( ( ( ( ( ( Start ( at ( ( ( ( the ( Place ( de l'Etoile ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( officially ( ( ( Place Charles-de-Gaulle ) , ) ( but ( nobody ( calls ( it that ) ) ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) , ) preferably ) ) ) ( at ( the top ) ) ) ( of ( ( ( ( Napoleon 's ) ( gigantic ( Arc ( de Triomphe ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( from which ) ( you ( 'll ( get ( a ( good view ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( of ( the ( 12-pointed star ) ) ) ) ( formed ( by ( ( the avenues ) ( radiating ( from ( ( the arch ) ( in ( ( a ( tour ( de force ) ) ) ( of ( geometric planning ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (NNP Start)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN Place) (IN de) (NN l'Etoile)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (S (ADVP (RB officially)) (VP (VB Place) (NP (NN Charles-de-Gaulle)) (, ,) (SBAR (CC but) (S (NP (NN nobody)) (VP (VBZ calls) (S (NP (PRP it)) (NP (DT that)))))))) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB preferably)))) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NN top))) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Napoleon) (POS 's)) (NNP gigantic) (NNP Arc) (IN de) (NNP Triomphe)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHPP (IN from) (WHNP (WDT which))) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB get) (NP (DT a) (JJ good) (NN view)))))))) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ 12-pointed) (NN star))) (VP (VBN formed) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS avenues)) (VP (VBG radiating) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN arch)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN tour) (IN de) (NN force)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ geometric) (NN planning))))))))))) (. .)))
The gigantic Arc de Triomphe is the number one attraction in Paris these days.
( ( The ( gigantic ( Arc ( de Triomphe ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( is ( the ( number ( one attraction ) ) ) ) ( in Paris ) ) ( these days ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ gigantic) (NNP Arc) (NNP de) (NNP Triomphe)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT the) (NN number) (CD one) (NN attraction)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Paris))) (NP (DT these) (NNS days))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Start at the Place de l'Etoile (officially Place Charles-de-Gaulle, but nobody calls it that), preferably at the top of Napoleon's gigantic Arc de Triomphe, from which you'll get a good view of the 12-pointed star formed by the avenues radiating from the arch in a tour de force of geometric planning. Then the following statement: "The gigantic Arc de Triomphe is the number one attraction in Paris these days." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
98,878
98878c
At some point, reducing federal unified deficits or maintaining unified surpluses at the expense of federal R&D and education spending raises concerns about future workers' skills, technological advancement, and, thus, economic growth.
( ( At ( some point ) ) ( , ( ( ( ( reducing ( federal ( unified deficits ) ) ) or ) ( ( maintaining ( unified surpluses ) ) ( at ( ( the expense ) ( of ( federal ( R&D ( and ( education spending ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( raises ( concerns ( about ( ( ( ( ( ( ( future ( workers ' ) ) skills ) , ) ( technological advancement ) ) , ) and ) ( ( , ( thus , ) ) ( economic growth ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN At) (NP (DT some) (NN point))) (, ,) (S (VP (VP (VBG reducing) (NP (JJ federal) (JJ unified) (NNS deficits))) (CC or) (VP (VBG maintaining) (NP (JJ unified) (NNS surpluses)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN expense)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ federal) (NN R&D) (CC and) (NN education) (NN spending)))))))) (VP (VBZ raises) (NP (NP (NNS concerns)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (NP (JJ future) (NNS workers) (POS ')) (NNS skills)) (, ,) (NP (JJ technological) (NN advancement)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (PRN (, ,) (ADVP (RB thus)) (, ,)) (JJ economic) (NN growth)))))) (. .)))
There are no concerns about economic growth arising from the decision to not spend on education.
( There ( ( are ( ( no concerns ) ( about ( ( economic growth ) ( ( arising ( from ( the decision ) ) ) ( ( to not ) ( spend ( on education ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT no) (NNS concerns)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (JJ economic) (NN growth)) (VP (VBG arising) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NN decision))) (S (VP (TO to) (RB not) (VP (VB spend) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN education))))))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: At some point, reducing federal unified deficits or maintaining unified surpluses at the expense of federal R&D and education spending raises concerns about future workers' skills, technological advancement, and, thus, economic growth. Then the following statement: "There are no concerns about economic growth arising from the decision to not spend on education." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
61,667
61667n
Praise goes to its new emphasis on convenience--many recipes require just 20 minutes--and its inclusion of such ethnic dishes as tapas and Asian noodles.
( Praise ( ( goes ( to ( ( ( ( ( its ( new emphasis ) ) ( on convenience ) ) ( -- ( ( ( many recipes ) ( require ( ( just 20 ) minutes ) ) ) -- ) ) ) and ) ( ( its inclusion ) ( of ( ( such ( ethnic dishes ) ) ( as ( ( ( tapas and ) Asian ) noodles ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Praise)) (VP (VBZ goes) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ new) (NN emphasis)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN convenience)))) (PRN (: --) (S (NP (JJ many) (NNS recipes)) (VP (VBP require) (NP (QP (RB just) (CD 20)) (NNS minutes)))) (: --)) (CC and) (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN inclusion)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ such) (JJ ethnic) (NNS dishes)) (PP (IN as) (NP (ADJP (JJ tapas) (CC and) (JJ Asian)) (NNS noodles))))))))) (. .)))
It's nice that convenience is emphasized and foods are quicker to prepare.
( ( ( ( It ( ( 's nice ) ( that ( convenience ( is emphasized ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( foods ( are ( quicker ( to prepare ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ nice)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NN convenience)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN emphasized))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (NNS foods)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJR quicker) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB prepare))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Praise goes to its new emphasis on convenience--many recipes require just 20 minutes--and its inclusion of such ethnic dishes as tapas and Asian noodles. Then the following statement: "It's nice that convenience is emphasized and foods are quicker to prepare." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
129,580
129580n
Boilermakers are a skilled labor source that is fairly unique to utility work.
( Boilermakers ( ( are ( ( a ( skilled ( labor source ) ) ) ( that ( is ( fairly ( unique ( to ( utility work ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Boilermakers)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ skilled) (NN labor) (NN source)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB fairly) (JJ unique) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN utility) (NN work))))))))) (. .)))
The boilermakers industry is quite small, with very few skilled labor.
( ( The ( boilermakers industry ) ) ( ( ( ( is ( quite small ) ) , ) ( with ( ( very few ) ( skilled labor ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS boilermakers) (NN industry)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB quite) (JJ small)) (, ,) (PP (IN with) (NP (ADJP (RB very) (JJ few)) (JJ skilled) (NN labor)))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Boilermakers are a skilled labor source that is fairly unique to utility work. Then the following statement: "The boilermakers industry is quite small, with very few skilled labor." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
137,870
137870n
The museum is a must for those intending to visit the ancient sites, since the objects here add life to the now empty cities and palaces.
( ( The museum ) ( ( ( is ( a must ) ) ( for ( those ( intending ( to ( ( ( visit ( the ( ancient sites ) ) ) , ) ( since ( ( the objects ) ( here ( ( ( ( add life ) ( to ( the ( ( now empty ) cities ) ) ) ) and ) palaces ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN museum)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT a) (MD must))) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT those)) (VP (VBG intending) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB visit) (NP (DT the) (JJ ancient) (NNS sites)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN since) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS objects)) (ADVP (RB here)) (VP (VP (VBP add) (NP (NN life)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (ADJP (RB now) (JJ empty)) (NNS cities)))) (CC and) (VP (VBZ palaces))))))))))) (. .)))
Objects that used to be in ancient sites are not in museums so that they could be preserved.
( ( Objects ( that ( used ( to ( be ( in ( ancient sites ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( are not ) ( in museums ) ) ( so ( that ( they ( could ( be preserved ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Objects)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD used) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ ancient) (NNS sites)))))))))) (VP (VBP are) (RB not) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNS museums))) (SBAR (RB so) (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN preserved))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The museum is a must for those intending to visit the ancient sites, since the objects here add life to the now empty cities and palaces. Then the following statement: "Objects that used to be in ancient sites are not in museums so that they could be preserved." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
67,536
67536n
well i guess maybe we've covered covered the topic pretty good
( ( well ( i ( guess ( maybe ( we ( 've covered ) ) ) ) ) ) ( covered ( ( the topic ) ( pretty good ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (ADVP (RB well) (JJ i) (S (VP (VB guess) (S (ADVP (RB maybe)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN covered))))))) (VP (VBD covered)) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN topic)) (ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ good)))))
I think we can move on to the next topic.
( I ( ( think ( we ( can ( ( move on ) ( to ( the ( next topic ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB move) (PRT (RP on)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ next) (NN topic)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: well i guess maybe we've covered covered the topic pretty good Then the following statement: "I think we can move on to the next topic. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
1,902
1902n
Tennis is less widespread than in other major Western European countries, but it is growing in popularity.
( ( ( ( ( Tennis ( is ( less ( widespread ( than ( in ( other ( major ( Western ( European countries ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( it ( is ( growing ( in popularity ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NN Tennis)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RBR less) (JJ widespread) (PP (IN than) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ other) (JJ major) (JJ Western) (JJ European) (NNS countries))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG growing) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN popularity)))))) (. .)))
Tennis may be lesser played than in other countries, it is gaining a larger following recently.
( Tennis ( ( may ( be ( lesser ( played ( than ( ( in ( other countries ) ) ( , ( it ( is ( ( gaining ( a ( larger following ) ) ) recently ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Tennis)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJR lesser) (SBAR (S (VP (VBD played) (SBAR (IN than) (S (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ other) (NNS countries))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG gaining) (NP (DT a) (JJR larger) (NN following)) (ADVP (RB recently)))))))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Tennis is less widespread than in other major Western European countries, but it is growing in popularity. Then the following statement: "Tennis may be lesser played than in other countries, it is gaining a larger following recently." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
44,360
44360c
Miss Howard's evidence, unimportant as it was, had been given in such a downright straightforward manner that it had never occurred to me to doubt her sincerity.
( ( ( ( ( ( Miss ( Howard 's ) ) evidence ) , ) ( unimportant ( as ( it was ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( had ( been ( given ( in ( ( such ( a ( ( downright straightforward ) manner ) ) ) ( that ( it ( had ( never ( ( occurred ( to me ) ) ( to ( doubt ( her sincerity ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NP (NNP Miss) (NNP Howard) (POS 's)) (NN evidence)) (, ,) (ADJP (JJ unimportant) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN given) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (JJ such) (DT a) (ADJP (RB downright) (JJ straightforward)) (NN manner)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (ADVP (RB never)) (VBN occurred) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP me))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB doubt) (NP (PRP$ her) (NN sincerity)))))))))))))) (. .)))
I had suspicions about Miss Howard from the start. I never did like her.
( ( I ( ( ( had ( suspicions ( about ( Miss Howard ) ) ) ) ( from ( the start ) ) ) . ) ) ( I ( ( never ( did ( like her ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (NNS suspicions)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NNP Miss) (NNP Howard)))) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NN start)))) (. .)) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (ADVP (RB never)) (VBD did) (PP (IN like) (NP (PRP her)))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Miss Howard's evidence, unimportant as it was, had been given in such a downright straightforward manner that it had never occurred to me to doubt her sincerity. Then the following statement: "I had suspicions about Miss Howard from the start. I never did like her." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
15,013
15013e
The chateau was owned by a series of women including the beautiful Diane de Poitiers, mistress to Henri II, and Catherine de M??dicis.
( ( ( ( ( ( The chateau ) ( was ( owned ( by ( ( a series ) ( of ( women ( including ( ( ( the ( beautiful ( Diane ( de Poitiers ) ) ) ) , ) ( mistress ( to ( Henri II ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( Catherine ( de ( M ?? ) ) ) dicis ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN chateau)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN owned) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN series)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS women)) (PP (VBG including) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ beautiful) (NNP Diane) (FW de) (NNP Poitiers)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NN mistress)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Henri) (NNP II))))))))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (NNP Catherine) (IN de) (NNP M) (NNP ??)) (VP (VBZ dicis))) (. .)))
A series of women owned the chateau over time and at one point was owned by Diane de Poiters, Henri II's mistress.
( ( ( A series ) ( of ( women ( ( owned ( the chateau ) ) ( ( ( over time ) and ) ( at ( one point ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( was ( owned ( by ( ( ( Diane ( de Poiters ) ) , ) ( ( Henri ( II 's ) ) mistress ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT A) (NN series)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS women)) (VP (VBN owned) (NP (DT the) (NN chateau)) (PP (PP (IN over) (NP (NN time))) (CC and) (PP (IN at) (NP (CD one) (NN point)))))))) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN owned) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NNP Diane) (IN de) (NNP Poiters)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Henri) (NNP II) (POS 's)) (NN mistress)))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The chateau was owned by a series of women including the beautiful Diane de Poitiers, mistress to Henri II, and Catherine de M??dicis. Then the following statement: "A series of women owned the chateau over time and at one point was owned by Diane de Poiters, Henri II's mistress." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
114,895
114895n
and and and when they're available like that people who normally wouldn't do things like that but momentarily fly off the trigger
( ( ( ( ( and and ) and ) ( when ( they ( 're ( available ( like ( ( that people ) ( who ( normally ( ( would n't ) ( ( do things ) ( like that ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( momentarily ( ( fly off ) ( the trigger ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VP (VB and) (CC and) (VB and) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADJP (JJ available) (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (DT that) (NNS people)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (ADVP (RB normally)) (VP (MD would) (RB n't) (VP (VB do) (NP (NNS things)) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT that)))))))))))))) (CC but) (VP (ADVP (RB momentarily)) (VB fly) (PRT (RP off)) (NP (DT the) (NN trigger))))))
People snap and can murder others with guns.
( People ( ( ( snap and ) ( can ( ( murder others ) ( with guns ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS People)) (VP (VP (VBP snap)) (CC and) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB murder) (NP (NNS others)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NNS guns)))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and and and when they're available like that people who normally wouldn't do things like that but momentarily fly off the trigger Then the following statement: "People snap and can murder others with guns. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
72,623
72623n
that'd be neat well i got a patio and i tried to talk my husband into just buying a whole bunch of pots and planting them all in it you know because that's favorite thing is tomatoes to grow
( that ( 'd ( ( be ( ( neat well ) ( i ( got ( ( ( ( a patio ) and ) i ) ( tried ( to ( ( talk ( my husband ) ) ( into ( ( ( just ( buying ( ( a ( whole bunch ) ) ( of pots ) ) ) ) and ) ( planting them ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( all ( in it ) ) ( you ( know ( because ( that ( 's ( ( favorite thing ) ( is ( tomatoes ( to grow ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (MD 'd) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ neat) (RB well) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD got) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (DT a) (NN patio)) (CC and) (NP (FW i))) (VP (VBD tried) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB talk) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN husband)) (PP (IN into) (S (VP (VP (ADVP (RB just)) (VBG buying) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ whole) (NN bunch)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS pots))))) (CC and) (VP (VBG planting) (NP (PRP them)))))))))))))))) (SBAR (WHNP (DT all) (WHPP (IN in) (WHNP (PRP it)))) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (JJ favorite) (NN thing)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ tomatoes) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB grow))))))))))))))))))))
I want to put lots of plants on the patio.
( I ( ( want ( to ( put ( lots ( of ( plants ( on ( the patio ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB put) (NP (NP (NNS lots)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS plants)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN patio)))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: that'd be neat well i got a patio and i tried to talk my husband into just buying a whole bunch of pots and planting them all in it you know because that's favorite thing is tomatoes to grow Then the following statement: "I want to put lots of plants on the patio." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
97,448
97448e
At the intersection of Avenida Zarco and the main drag, Avenida Arriaga, stands a statue of Madeira's discoverer, Joao Goncalves Zarco often referred to as the First Captain.
( ( At ( ( the intersection ) ( of ( ( ( Avenida Zarco ) and ) ( the ( main drag ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( Avenida Arriaga ) ( , ( ( stands ( ( a statue ) ( of ( ( Madeira 's ) discoverer ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( Joao ( Goncalves Zarco ) ) ( often ( ( ( referred to ) ( as ( the ( First Captain ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN At) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN intersection)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Avenida) (NNP Zarco)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (JJ main) (NN drag)))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Avenida) (NNP Arriaga)) (, ,) (S (VP (VBZ stands) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN statue)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Madeira) (POS 's)) (NN discoverer)))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Joao) (NNPS Goncalves) (NNP Zarco)) (ADVP (RB often)) (VP (VBD referred) (PP (TO to)) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT the) (NNP First) (NNP Captain)))) (. .)))
Another name commonly used for Joao Goncalves Zarco is First Captain.
( ( ( Another name ) ( commonly ( used ( for ( Joao ( Goncalves Zarco ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( First Captain ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT Another) (NN name)) (VP (ADVP (RB commonly)) (VBN used) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNP Joao) (NNPS Goncalves) (NNP Zarco))))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NNP First) (NNP Captain))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: At the intersection of Avenida Zarco and the main drag, Avenida Arriaga, stands a statue of Madeira's discoverer, Joao Goncalves Zarco often referred to as the First Captain. Then the following statement: "Another name commonly used for Joao Goncalves Zarco is First Captain." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
18,504
18504n
Regardless of boiler size, an ACI system will require the same equipment.
( ( Regardless ( of ( boiler size ) ) ) ( , ( ( an ( ACI system ) ) ( ( will ( require ( the ( same equipment ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Regardless) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN boiler) (NN size)))) (, ,) (NP (DT an) (NNP ACI) (NN system)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB require) (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN equipment)))) (. .)))
The boiler size has no impact.
( ( The ( boiler size ) ) ( ( has ( no impact ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN boiler) (NN size)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (DT no) (NN impact))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Regardless of boiler size, an ACI system will require the same equipment. Then the following statement: "The boiler size has no impact." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
6,549
6549n
Nicole Kidman bares all!
( ( Nicole Kidman ) ( ( bares all ) ! ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Nicole) (NNP Kidman)) (VP (VBZ bares) (NP (DT all))) (. !)))
Nicole Kidman tells us everything from her deepest secrets to the shallowest.
( ( Nicole Kidman ) ( ( ( tells us ) ( ( everything ( from ( her ( deepest secrets ) ) ) ) ( to ( the shallowest ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Nicole) (NNP Kidman)) (VP (VBZ tells) (NP (PRP us)) (NP (NP (NN everything)) (PP (IN from) (NP (PRP$ her) (JJS deepest) (NNS secrets))) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN shallowest))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Nicole Kidman bares all! Then the following statement: "Nicole Kidman tells us everything from her deepest secrets to the shallowest. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
8,798
8798n
Other states got it instead.
( ( Other states ) ( ( ( got it ) instead ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Other) (NNS states)) (VP (VBD got) (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB instead))) (. .)))
In total, 10 states got it.
( ( In total ) ( , ( ( 10 states ) ( ( got it ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NN total))) (, ,) (NP (CD 10) (NNS states)) (VP (VBD got) (NP (PRP it))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Other states got it instead. Then the following statement: "In total, 10 states got it." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
9,613
9613e
especially around cities um uh do you live right in the city itself
( especially ( around ( cities ( um ( uh ( do ( you ( ( live ( right ( in ( the city ) ) ) ) itself ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (PP (RB especially) (IN around) (NP (NP (NNS cities)) (VP (VBN um) (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (VP (VB do) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP live) (PP (RB right) (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN city))) (NP (PRP itself)))))))))))
Do you live inside the city?
( ( ( Do you ) ( live ( inside ( the city ) ) ) ) ? )
(ROOT (SQ (VBP Do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB live) (PP (IN inside) (NP (DT the) (NN city)))) (. ?)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: especially around cities um uh do you live right in the city itself Then the following statement: "Do you live inside the city?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
10,811
10811n
The Sticks roared in.
( ( The Sticks ) ( ( roared in ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNPS Sticks)) (VP (VBD roared) (PRT (RP in))) (. .)))
They were running behind schedule.
( They ( ( were ( running ( behind schedule ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBG running) (PP (IN behind) (NP (NN schedule))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The Sticks roared in. Then the following statement: "They were running behind schedule." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
63,225
63225n
They're just cases of people who need help, but have no idea where to turn.
( They ( ( ( 're just ) ( cases ( of ( people ( who ( need ( ( ( ( help , ) but ) ( have ( no idea ) ) ) ( where ( to turn ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADVP (RB just)) (NP (NP (NNS cases)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS people)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (MD need) (VP (VP (VB help)) (, ,) (CC but) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT no) (NN idea))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB turn))))))))))))) (. .)))
Some people do know where to turn when they need help.
( ( Some people ) ( ( do ( know ( where ( to ( turn ( when ( they ( need help ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT Some) (NNS people)) (VP (VBP do) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB turn) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD need) (VP (VB help))))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: They're just cases of people who need help, but have no idea where to turn. Then the following statement: "Some people do know where to turn when they need help." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
112,174
112174c
The chain twirled and caught the woman's sword arm around her wrist and the guard of the rapier.
( ( The chain ) ( ( ( twirled and ) ( ( caught ( ( the ( woman 's ) ) ( sword arm ) ) ) ( around ( ( ( her wrist ) and ) ( ( the guard ) ( of ( the rapier ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN chain)) (VP (VP (VBD twirled)) (CC and) (VP (VBD caught) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN woman) (POS 's)) (NN sword) (NN arm)) (PP (IN around) (NP (NP (PRP$ her) (NN wrist)) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN guard)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN rapier)))))))) (. .)))
The chain caught the woman's legs.
( ( The chain ) ( ( caught ( ( the ( woman 's ) ) legs ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN chain)) (VP (VBD caught) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN woman) (POS 's)) (NNS legs))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The chain twirled and caught the woman's sword arm around her wrist and the guard of the rapier. Then the following statement: "The chain caught the woman's legs." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
112,222
112222e
Where it had come from or why it was hidden he did not know, but these books were in it.
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Where ( it ( had ( come from ) ) ) ) or ) ( why ( it ( was hidden ) ) ) ) ( he ( ( did not ) know ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( these books ) ( were ( in it ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (SBAR (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB Where)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN come) (PP (IN from)))))) (CC or) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB why)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN hidden)))))) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD did) (RB not) (VP (VB know)))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (DT these) (NNS books)) (VP (VBD were) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP it))))) (. .)))
He didn't know where the books came from.
( He ( ( ( did n't ) ( know ( where ( ( the books ) ( came from ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS books)) (VP (VBD came) (PP (IN from))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Where it had come from or why it was hidden he did not know, but these books were in it. Then the following statement: "He didn't know where the books came from." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
10,627
10627n
The filly was resting in the straw, her match-stick legs folded under her, and the mare was munching the extra feed of oats the Kentuckian had tipped in for her.
( ( ( ( ( ( The filly ) ( was ( resting ( in ( the straw ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( her ( match-stick legs ) ) ( folded ( under her ) ) ) , ) ) ) and ) ( ( the mare ) ( was ( munching ( ( the ( extra feed ) ) ( of ( oats ( ( the Kentuckian ) ( had ( tipped ( in ( for her ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN filly)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN resting) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN straw)))))) (PRN (, ,) (S (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ match-stick) (NNS legs)) (VP (VBD folded) (PP (IN under) (NP (PRP her))))) (, ,)) (CC and) (S (NP (DT the) (NN mare)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG munching) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ extra) (NN feed)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS oats)) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NNP Kentuckian)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN tipped) (PP (IN in) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP her)))))))))))))) (. .)))
The mare wasn't particularly hungry but kept eating anyway.
( ( ( ( ( The mare ) ( ( was n't ) ( particularly hungry ) ) ) but ) ( kept ( eating anyway ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN mare)) (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (ADJP (RB particularly) (JJ hungry)))) (CC but) (S (VP (VBN kept) (S (VP (VBG eating) (ADVP (RB anyway)))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The filly was resting in the straw, her match-stick legs folded under her, and the mare was munching the extra feed of oats the Kentuckian had tipped in for her. Then the following statement: "The mare wasn't particularly hungry but kept eating anyway." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
34,496
34496n
It can be visited by guided tour only, arranged upon the purchase of your ticket at the museum entrance.
( It ( ( can ( be ( visited ( by ( ( ( guided ( tour only ) ) , ) ( ( arranged ( upon ( ( the purchase ) ( of ( your ticket ) ) ) ) ) ( at ( the ( museum entrance ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN visited) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (CD guided) (NN tour) (RB only)) (, ,) (VP (VBN arranged) (PP (IN upon) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN purchase)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ your) (NN ticket))))) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NN museum) (NN entrance))))))))) (. .)))
You must be accompanied by a guide because the artifacts are very valuable.
( You ( ( must ( be ( ( accompanied ( by ( a guide ) ) ) ( because ( ( the artifacts ) ( are ( very valuable ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN accompanied) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT a) (NN guide))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS artifacts)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ valuable)))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: It can be visited by guided tour only, arranged upon the purchase of your ticket at the museum entrance. Then the following statement: "You must be accompanied by a guide because the artifacts are very valuable." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
55,914
55914n
and uh so you know it uh but you know they can always fool us you know they might do a good job
( and ( uh ( so ( you ( know ( it ( uh ( but ( you ( know ( they ( ( can always ) ( ( fool us ) ( you ( know ( they ( might ( do ( a ( good job ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (ADVP (ADVP (RB uh)) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ uh) (SBAR (CC but) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD can) (ADVP (RB always)) (VP (VB fool) (NP (PRP us)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD might) (VP (VB do) (NP (DT a) (JJ good) (NN job)))))))))))))))))))))))))
They could meet our expectations and do a bad job.
( They ( ( could ( ( ( meet ( our expectations ) ) and ) ( do ( a ( bad job ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VP (VB meet) (NP (PRP$ our) (NNS expectations))) (CC and) (VP (VB do) (NP (DT a) (JJ bad) (NN job))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and uh so you know it uh but you know they can always fool us you know they might do a good job Then the following statement: "They could meet our expectations and do a bad job." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
17,951
17951e
Some case study methodologists work with structured evaluation questions, structured data collection, and observers untrained as anthropologists or sociologists, but they believe that case studies offer a qualitative way of knowing that should not be merged with quantitative results.
( ( ( ( ( ( Some ( case study ) ) ( methodologists ( ( ( ( ( ( work ( with ( structured ( evaluation questions ) ) ) ) , ) ( structured ( data collection ) ) ) , ) and ) ( observers ( untrained ( as ( ( anthropologists or ) sociologists ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( they ( believe ( that ( ( case studies ) ( offer ( ( a ( qualitative way ) ) ( of ( knowing ( that ( ( should not ) ( be ( merged ( with ( quantitative results ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT Some) (NN case) (NN study)) (VP (VBZ methodologists) (NP (NP (NP (NN work)) (PP (IN with) (NP (JJ structured) (NN evaluation) (NNS questions)))) (, ,) (NP (JJ structured) (NN data) (NN collection)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (NNS observers)) (VP (VBN untrained) (PP (IN as) (NP (NNS anthropologists) (CC or) (NNS sociologists)))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP believe) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NN case) (NNS studies)) (VP (VBP offer) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ qualitative) (NN way)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG knowing) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (MD should) (RB not) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN merged) (PP (IN with) (NP (JJ quantitative) (NNS results))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
Structured evaluation questions, structured data collection, and observers untrained as anthropologists or sociologists are all things that study methodologists work with.
( ( ( ( ( ( ( Structured ( evaluation questions ) ) , ) ( structured ( data collection ) ) ) , ) and ) observers ) ( ( untrained ( as ( ( ( anthropologists or ) sociologists ) ( ( are ( all things ) ) ( that ( ( study methodologists ) ( work with ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJ Structured) (NN evaluation) (NNS questions)) (, ,) (NP (JJ structured) (NN data) (NN collection)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NNS observers))) (VP (VBZ untrained) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (NNS anthropologists) (CC or) (NNS sociologists)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (DT all) (NNS things)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NN study) (NNS methodologists)) (VP (VBP work) (PP (IN with))))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Some case study methodologists work with structured evaluation questions, structured data collection, and observers untrained as anthropologists or sociologists, but they believe that case studies offer a qualitative way of knowing that should not be merged with quantitative results. Then the following statement: "Structured evaluation questions, structured data collection, and observers untrained as anthropologists or sociologists are all things that study methodologists work with." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
76,616
76616e
The agency's work reflects integrity because it is professional, objective, factbased, nonpartisan, nonideological, fair and balanced.
( ( ( The ( agency 's ) ) work ) ( ( ( reflects integrity ) ( because ( it ( is ( professional ( , ( objective ( , ( factbased ( , ( nonpartisan ( , ( nonideological ( , ( ( fair and ) balanced ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN agency) (POS 's)) (NN work)) (VP (VBZ reflects) (NP (NN integrity)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (JJ professional) (, ,) (JJ objective) (, ,) (JJ factbased) (, ,) (NN nonpartisan) (, ,) (NN nonideological) (, ,) (NN fair) (CC and) (NN balanced)))))) (. .)))
The agency's work is ethical, professional and fair.
( ( ( The ( agency 's ) ) work ) ( ( is ( ethical ( , ( ( professional and ) fair ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN agency) (POS 's)) (NN work)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ ethical) (, ,) (JJ professional) (CC and) (JJ fair))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The agency's work reflects integrity because it is professional, objective, factbased, nonpartisan, nonideological, fair and balanced. Then the following statement: "The agency's work is ethical, professional and fair. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
108,929
108929n
2) I said no more than Blumenthal has already admitted.
( ( 2 -RRB- ) ( I ( ( ( said ( no more ) ) ( than ( Blumenthal ( ( has already ) admitted ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (LST (LS 2) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD said) (ADVP (DT no) (RBR more)) (SBAR (IN than) (S (NP (NNP Blumenthal)) (VP (VBZ has) (ADVP (RB already)) (VP (VBN admitted)))))) (. .)))
Blumenthal did something bad.
( Blumenthal ( ( did ( something bad ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Blumenthal)) (VP (VBD did) (S (NP (NN something)) (ADJP (JJ bad)))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: 2) I said no more than Blumenthal has already admitted. Then the following statement: "Blumenthal did something bad. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
56,322
56322c
and i don't think that that's fair i don't think it's fair you know to the kids and and to the people that are sick and i know that you know
( and ( i ( ( do n't ) ( think ( that ( that ( 's ( fair ( ( ( i ( ( do n't ) ( ( ( think ( it ( 's ( fair ( you ( know ( to ( the kids ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( and ( to ( ( the people ) ( that ( are sick ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( i ( know ( that ( you know ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB think) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ fair) (SBAR (S (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VP (VB think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ fair) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNS kids))))))))))) (CC and) (VP (VB and) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS people)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ sick))))))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know)))))))))))))))))))
Life's unfair, it doesn't matter if you're a kid or if you're sick.
( ( Life ( 's unfair ) ) ( , ( it ( ( ( does n't ) ( matter ( ( ( if ( you ( 're ( a kid ) ) ) ) or ) ( if ( you ( 're sick ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP Life)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ unfair)))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't) (VP (VB matter) (SBAR (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (NP (DT a) (NN kid))))) (CC or) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADJP (JJ sick)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and i don't think that that's fair i don't think it's fair you know to the kids and and to the people that are sick and i know that you know Then the following statement: "Life's unfair, it doesn't matter if you're a kid or if you're sick." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
144,852
144852e
When people compete by saving, the rich have a head start.
( ( When ( people ( compete ( by saving ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the rich ) ( ( have ( a ( head start ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When)) (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBP compete) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN saving)))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (JJ rich)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT a) (NN head) (NN start))) (. .)))
The rich have a head start when it comes to saving.
( ( The rich ) ( ( have ( ( a ( head start ) ) ( when ( it ( comes ( to saving ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ rich)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN head) (NN start)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ comes) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN saving)))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: When people compete by saving, the rich have a head start. Then the following statement: "The rich have a head start when it comes to saving. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
58
58n
Anyway, she was familiar with the fact that the addition of a bromide to a mixture containing strychnine would cause the precipitation of the latter.
( Anyway ( , ( she ( ( ( was ( familiar ( with ( the fact ) ) ) ) ( that ( ( ( the addition ) ( of ( ( a bromide ) ( to ( ( a mixture ) ( containing strychnine ) ) ) ) ) ) ( would ( cause ( ( the precipitation ) ( of ( the latter ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Anyway)) (, ,) (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ familiar) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (NN fact)))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN addition)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN bromide)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN mixture)) (VP (VBG containing) (NP (NN strychnine)))))))) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB cause) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN precipitation)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN latter))))))))) (. .)))
The reason she understood the impact of adding bromide to a mixture that contained strychnine was because she was a chemist.
( ( ( The reason ) ( she ( understood ( ( the impact ) ( of ( ( adding bromide ) ( to ( ( a mixture ) ( that ( contained strychnine ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( was ( because ( she ( was ( a chemist ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN reason)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD understood) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN impact)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG adding) (NP (NN bromide)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN mixture)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD contained) (ADJP (JJ strychnine))))))))))))))) (VP (VBD was) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT a) (NN chemist)))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Anyway, she was familiar with the fact that the addition of a bromide to a mixture containing strychnine would cause the precipitation of the latter. Then the following statement: "The reason she understood the impact of adding bromide to a mixture that contained strychnine was because she was a chemist." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
125,847
125847e
Notice the oil and wine jars in the shops, the bakers' ovens and flour-grinding mills shaped like giant cotton-reels (excavators found a donkey lying by one he'd been turning when Vesuvius erupted).
( ( ( Notice ( the ( oil ( and ( wine jars ) ) ) ) ) ( in ( the shops ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( ( ( the ( bakers ' ) ) ovens ) and ) ( flour-grinding mills ) ) ( ( shaped ( like ( ( giant cotton-reels ) ( -LRB- ( ( excavators ( found ( ( ( a donkey ) ( lying ( by one ) ) ) ( he ( 'd ( been ( turning ( when ( Vesuvius erupted ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Notice) (NP (DT the) (NN oil) (CC and) (NN wine) (NNS jars)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNS shops))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS bakers) (POS ')) (NNS ovens)) (CC and) (NP (JJ flour-grinding) (NNS mills))) (VP (VBN shaped) (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (JJ giant) (NNS cotton-reels)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (S (NP (NNS excavators)) (VP (VBD found) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN donkey)) (VP (VBG lying) (PP (IN by) (NP (CD one)))) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD 'd) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBG turning) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (NNP Vesuvius)) (VP (VBD erupted)))))))))))) (-RRB- -RRB-))))) (. .)))
In the shops you will find oil and wine jars.
( ( In ( the shops ) ) ( you ( ( will ( find ( ( ( oil and ) wine ) jars ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (DT the) (NNS shops))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB find) (NP (UCP (NN oil) (CC and) (NN wine)) (NNS jars)))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Notice the oil and wine jars in the shops, the bakers' ovens and flour-grinding mills shaped like giant cotton-reels (excavators found a donkey lying by one he'd been turning when Vesuvius erupted). Then the following statement: "In the shops you will find oil and wine jars." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
35,888
35888n
Some authorities on evaluation methods believe that case studies reflect the author's values in ways that can be difficult to detect.
( ( ( Some authorities ) ( on ( evaluation methods ) ) ) ( ( believe ( that ( ( case studies ) ( ( reflect ( ( the ( author 's ) ) values ) ) ( in ( ways ( that ( can ( be ( difficult ( to detect ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT Some) (NNS authorities)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN evaluation) (NNS methods)))) (VP (VBP believe) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NN case) (NNS studies)) (VP (VBP reflect) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN author) (POS 's)) (NNS values)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNS ways)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ difficult) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB detect))))))))))))))) (. .)))
It is sometimes easy to detect the author's bias in case studies.
( It ( ( ( is sometimes ) ( easy ( to ( detect ( ( ( the ( author 's ) ) bias ) ( in ( case studies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB sometimes)) (ADJP (JJ easy) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB detect) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN author) (POS 's)) (NN bias)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN case) (NNS studies))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Some authorities on evaluation methods believe that case studies reflect the author's values in ways that can be difficult to detect. Then the following statement: "It is sometimes easy to detect the author's bias in case studies." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
20,205
20205n
On Monday the Supreme Court ruled in Nixon vs.
( ( On Monday ) ( ( the ( Supreme Court ) ) ( ( ruled ( in Nixon ) ) vs. ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN On) (NP (NNP Monday))) (NP (DT the) (NNP Supreme) (NNP Court)) (VP (VBD ruled) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Nixon))) (PP (NN vs.)))))
The Supreme Court ruling was in favor of Nixon.
( ( The ( Supreme ( Court ruling ) ) ) ( ( was ( in ( favor ( of Nixon ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Supreme) (NNP Court) (NN ruling)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN favor)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Nixon)))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: On Monday the Supreme Court ruled in Nixon vs. Then the following statement: "The Supreme Court ruling was in favor of Nixon." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
84,677
84677n
It was, as Chambers saw it, a crisis of faith.
( It ( ( ( was , ) ( as ( Chambers ( ( ( saw it ) , ) ( ( a crisis ) ( of faith ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VP (VBD was)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (NNP Chambers)) (VP (VP (VBD saw) (NP (PRP it))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN crisis)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN faith)))))))) (. .)))
Chambers thought if they tried harder they wouldn't have a crisis of faith.
( Chambers ( ( thought ( if ( they ( ( tried harder ) ( they ( ( would n't ) ( have ( ( a crisis ) ( of faith ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Chambers)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD tried) (ADVP (RBR harder)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD would) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN crisis)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN faith)))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: It was, as Chambers saw it, a crisis of faith. Then the following statement: "Chambers thought if they tried harder they wouldn't have a crisis of faith." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
28,541
28541e
oh i i'm actually right on the Plano line
( ( oh ( i i ) ) ( ( 'm actually ) ( right ( on ( the ( Plano line ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (NP (FW oh) (FW i) (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP 'm) (ADVP (RB actually)) (ADJP (JJ right) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NNP Plano) (NN line))))))))))
I am on the border of Plano.
( I ( ( am ( on ( ( the border ) ( of Plano ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP am) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN border)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Plano)))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: oh i i'm actually right on the Plano line Then the following statement: "I am on the border of Plano." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
65,975
65975e
However, Tommy had plenty of time to cool down before they reached Holyhead, and the cheerful grin had returned to his countenance as they alighted at their destination.
( However ( , ( ( ( ( ( Tommy ( had ( ( plenty ( of time ) ) ( to ( ( cool down ) ( before ( they ( reached Holyhead ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( the ( cheerful grin ) ) ( had ( ( returned ( to ( his countenance ) ) ) ( as ( they ( alighted ( at ( their destination ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB However)) (, ,) (S (NP (NNP Tommy)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (RB plenty)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN time))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB cool) (PRT (RP down)) (SBAR (IN before) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD reached) (NP (NNP Holyhead))))))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (DT the) (JJ cheerful) (NN grin)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN returned) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN countenance))) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD alighted) (PP (IN at) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN destination))))))))) (. .)))
Tommy was with them when they arrived in Holyhead.
( Tommy ( ( ( was ( with them ) ) ( when ( they ( arrived ( in Holyhead ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Tommy)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP them))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD arrived) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Holyhead))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: However, Tommy had plenty of time to cool down before they reached Holyhead, and the cheerful grin had returned to his countenance as they alighted at their destination. Then the following statement: "Tommy was with them when they arrived in Holyhead." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
101,907
101907n
Located just north of the Wenatchee Valley Mall, the park had been threatened with closure for more than a year.
( ( ( Located ( just north ) ) ( of ( the ( Wenatchee ( Valley Mall ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the park ) ( ( had ( been ( ( threatened ( with ( closure ( for ( more ( than a ) ) ) ) ) ) year ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBN Located) (ADVP (RB just) (RB north)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Wenatchee) (NNP Valley) (NN Mall))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN park)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN threatened) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NN closure)) (PP (IN for) (NP (QP (JJR more) (IN than) (DT a)))))) (NP (NN year))))) (. .)))
There were many residents who didn't want the park to be closed.
( There ( ( were ( ( many residents ) ( who ( ( did n't ) ( want ( the ( park ( to ( be closed ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD were) (NP (NP (JJ many) (NNS residents)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB want) (NP (DT the) (NN park) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN closed)))))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Located just north of the Wenatchee Valley Mall, the park had been threatened with closure for more than a year. Then the following statement: "There were many residents who didn't want the park to be closed." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
419
419n
well today was really nice the past few days have been rather chilly uh we had a lot of rain recently i'm in Texas where are you
( ( well ( today ( was ( really ( nice ( ( the ( past ( few days ) ) ) ( have ( been ( rather ( chilly ( uh ( we ( ( had ( ( a lot ) ( of rain ) ) ) recently ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( i ( ( 'm ( in Texas ) ) ( where ( are you ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (VP (ADVP (RB well)) (NP (NN today)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB really) (JJ nice) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (JJ past) (JJ few) (NNS days)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (ADJP (RB rather) (JJ chilly) (SBAR (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN rain)))) (ADVP (RB recently))))))))))))) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP 'm) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Texas))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (VP (VBP are) (NP (PRP you)))))))))))
IT's cold and rainy in Texas.
( IT ( ( ( 's ( ( cold and ) rainy ) ) ( in Texas ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP IT)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ cold) (CC and) (JJ rainy)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Texas)))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: well today was really nice the past few days have been rather chilly uh we had a lot of rain recently i'm in Texas where are you Then the following statement: "IT's cold and rainy in Texas. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
65,319
65319e
because with Kelly at quarterback when he went down hurt they brought another young fellow in there
( because ( with ( ( Kelly ( at quarterback ) ) ( when ( he ( ( went down ) ( hurt ( they ( ( brought ( another ( young fellow ) ) ) ( in there ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (PP (RB because) (IN with) (NP (NP (NNP Kelly)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NN quarterback))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP down)) (S (VP (VB hurt) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD brought) (NP (DT another) (JJ young) (NN fellow)) (PP (IN in) (NP (RB there))))))))))))))
They brought another quarterback in when Kelly injured himself.
( They ( ( brought ( ( another quarterback ) ( in ( when ( Kelly ( injured himself ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD brought) (NP (NP (DT another) (NN quarterback)) (PP (IN in) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (NNP Kelly)) (VP (VBD injured) (NP (PRP himself)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: because with Kelly at quarterback when he went down hurt they brought another young fellow in there Then the following statement: "They brought another quarterback in when Kelly injured himself." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
69,812
69812n
Health Effects Institute, Cambridge MA, June 2000.
( ( ( ( Health ( Effects Institute ) ) , ) ( ( ( Cambridge MA ) , ) ( June 2000 ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (NNP Health) (NNPS Effects) (NNP Institute)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Cambridge) (NNP MA)) (, ,) (NP (NNP June) (CD 2000))) (. .)))
The Health Effects Institute is the most trusted Institute in MA.
( ( The ( Health ( Effects Institute ) ) ) ( ( is ( ( the ( ( most trusted ) Institute ) ) ( in MA ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Health) (NNPS Effects) (NNP Institute)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ trusted)) (NNP Institute)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP MA))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Health Effects Institute, Cambridge MA, June 2000. Then the following statement: "The Health Effects Institute is the most trusted Institute in MA." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
58,639
58639e
You saw him die and were dragged off with us and his body.
( You ( ( saw ( him ( ( die and ) ( were ( ( dragged off ) ( with ( ( us and ) ( his body ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBD saw) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP him)) (VP (VP (VBP die)) (CC and) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN dragged) (PRT (RP off)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (PRP us)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN body)))))))))) (. .)))
You watched him die and you were dragged of with his body.
( ( ( ( You ( watched ( him die ) ) ) and ) ( you ( were ( dragged ( of ( with ( his body ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBD watched) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP him)) (VP (VBP die)))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN dragged) (PP (IN of) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN body))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: You saw him die and were dragged off with us and his body. Then the following statement: "You watched him die and you were dragged of with his body." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
11,712
11712n
and if they're overcrowded well you know they shouldn't have gotten theirself there in the first place
( and ( if ( they ( 're ( ( overcrowded well ) ( you ( know ( they ( ( should n't ) ( have ( ( ( gotten theirself ) there ) ( in ( the ( first place ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB and) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADJP (JJ overcrowded) (RB well) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD should) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN gotten) (NP (NN theirself)) (ADVP (RB there)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ first) (NN place))))))))))))))))))
They are overcrowded because there are a lot of rapists in there.
( They ( ( are ( overcrowded ( because ( there ( are ( ( a lot ) ( of ( rapists ( in there ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ overcrowded) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS rapists)) (PP (IN in) (NP (RB there))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and if they're overcrowded well you know they shouldn't have gotten theirself there in the first place Then the following statement: "They are overcrowded because there are a lot of rapists in there. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
103,744
103744e
Did he know that we suspected him, I wondered.
( ( Did ( he ( know ( that ( we ( suspected him ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( I ( wondered . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBD Did) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD suspected) (NP (PRP him)))))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD wondered)) (. .)))
I pondered if he knew that we suspected him.
( I ( ( pondered ( if ( he ( knew ( that ( we ( suspected him ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD pondered) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD knew) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD suspected) (NP (PRP him))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Did he know that we suspected him, I wondered. Then the following statement: "I pondered if he knew that we suspected him." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
121,387
121387c
Midnight would bring a late train that I could scramble aboard.
( Midnight ( ( would ( ( bring ( a ( late train ) ) ) ( that ( I ( could ( scramble aboard ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Midnight)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB bring) (NP (DT a) (JJ late) (NN train)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB scramble) (ADVP (RB aboard)))))))) (. .)))
The train would arrive in the afternoon.
( ( The train ) ( ( would ( arrive ( in ( the afternoon ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN train)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB arrive) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN afternoon))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Midnight would bring a late train that I could scramble aboard. Then the following statement: "The train would arrive in the afternoon." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
127,005
127005n
and uh we were never much of uh a very uh family thing you know may like go skiing in Vermont or something
( and ( uh ( we ( ( ( were never ) much ) ( of ( uh ( ( a ( ( very uh ) ( family thing ) ) ) ( you ( know ( may ( like ( ( go skiing ) ( in ( ( Vermont or ) something ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (NP (NP (NNP uh)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD were) (ADVP (RB never)) (ADJP (JJ much)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG uh) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ uh)) (NN family) (NN thing)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (VP (MD may) (VP (VB like) (VP (VB go) (NP (NN skiing)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP Vermont)) (CC or) (NP (NN something))))))))))))))))))))))
Some families go skiing in Vermont on breaks.
( ( Some families ) ( ( go ( ( skiing ( in Vermont ) ) ( on breaks ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT Some) (NNS families)) (VP (VBP go) (S (VP (VBG skiing) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Vermont))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNS breaks)))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and uh we were never much of uh a very uh family thing you know may like go skiing in Vermont or something Then the following statement: "Some families go skiing in Vermont on breaks." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
61,318
61318n
Against all this, Morris shows footage of Leuchter chiseling at Auschwitz and even adds some of his own, along with slow-motion shots of hammers bashing rocks, walls, floors, etc.
( ( Against ( all this ) ) ( , ( Morris ( ( ( ( ( shows ( footage ( of Leuchter ) ) ) ( chiseling ( at Auschwitz ) ) ) and ) ( even ( adds ( ( ( some ( of ( his own ) ) ) , ) ( along ( with ( ( slow-motion shots ) ( of ( hammers ( bashing ( rocks ( , ( walls ( , ( ( floors , ) etc. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Against) (NP (PDT all) (DT this))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Morris)) (VP (VP (VBZ shows) (NP (NP (NN footage)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Leuchter)))) (S (VP (VBG chiseling) (PP (IN at) (NP (NNP Auschwitz)))))) (CC and) (VP (ADVP (RB even)) (VBZ adds) (NP (NP (DT some)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ own))) (, ,) (ADVP (IN along) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (JJ slow-motion) (NNS shots)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS hammers) (NNS bashing) (NNS rocks) (, ,) (NNS walls) (, ,) (NNS floors) (, ,) (FW etc.))))))))) (. .)))
The walls were very weak and easily bashed by the hammers.
( ( The walls ) ( ( ( were ( ( ( very weak ) and ) ( easily bashed ) ) ) ( by ( the hammers ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS walls)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (ADJP (RB very) (JJ weak)) (CC and) (ADJP (RB easily) (JJ bashed))) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NNS hammers)))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Against all this, Morris shows footage of Leuchter chiseling at Auschwitz and even adds some of his own, along with slow-motion shots of hammers bashing rocks, walls, floors, etc. Then the following statement: "The walls were very weak and easily bashed by the hammers." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
133,155
133155n
Rinnoji belongs to the Tendai sect of Buddhism.
( Rinnoji ( ( belongs ( to ( ( the ( Tendai sect ) ) ( of Buddhism ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Rinnoji)) (VP (VBZ belongs) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Tendai) (NN sect)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Buddhism)))))) (. .)))
The Buddhism religion is formed using different sects.
( ( The ( Buddhism religion ) ) ( ( is ( formed ( using ( different sects ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Buddhism) (NN religion)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN formed) (S (VP (VBG using) (NP (JJ different) (NNS sects)))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Rinnoji belongs to the Tendai sect of Buddhism. Then the following statement: "The Buddhism religion is formed using different sects." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
10,381
10381n
The impacts of policies or regulations are measured by the resulting differences between these two scenarios.
( ( ( The impacts ) ( of ( ( policies or ) regulations ) ) ) ( ( are ( measured ( by ( ( the ( resulting differences ) ) ( between ( these ( two scenarios ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS impacts)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS policies) (CC or) (NNS regulations)))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN measured) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (VBG resulting) (NNS differences)) (PP (IN between) (NP (DT these) (CD two) (NNS scenarios))))))) (. .)))
An in-depth comparative analysis is required to ensure the implementation of optimal policies.
( ( An ( in-depth ( comparative analysis ) ) ) ( ( is ( required ( to ( ensure ( ( the implementation ) ( of ( optimal policies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT An) (JJ in-depth) (JJ comparative) (NN analysis)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN required) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB ensure) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN implementation)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ optimal) (NNS policies))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The impacts of policies or regulations are measured by the resulting differences between these two scenarios. Then the following statement: "An in-depth comparative analysis is required to ensure the implementation of optimal policies." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
80,403
80403e
The similarity to Matinino Martinique only confuses things more.
( ( ( The similarity ) ( to ( Matinino Martinique ) ) ) ( only ( ( ( confuses things ) more ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN similarity)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Matinino) (NNP Martinique)))) (ADVP (RB only)) (VP (VBZ confuses) (NP (NNS things)) (ADVP (RBR more))) (. .)))
It is similar to another place, which causes confusion.
( It ( ( is ( similar ( to ( ( ( another place ) , ) ( which ( causes confusion ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ similar) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT another) (NN place)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBZ causes) (NP (NN confusion))))))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The similarity to Matinino Martinique only confuses things more. Then the following statement: "It is similar to another place, which causes confusion." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
111,227
111227n
I'd just love to give you a real, rattling good time.
( I ( ( ( 'd just ) ( love ( to ( ( give you ) ( a ( real ( , ( rattling ( good time ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD 'd) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VB love) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB give) (NP (PRP you)) (NP (DT a) (JJ real) (, ,) (JJ rattling) (JJ good) (NN time))))))) (. .)))
I want to take you out to a club and show you a good time.
( I ( ( want ( to ( ( ( ( ( ( take you ) out ) ( to ( a club ) ) ) and ) ( show you ) ) ( a ( good time ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB take) (NP (PRP you)) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT a) (NN club)))) (CC and) (VP (VB show) (NP (PRP you))) (NP (DT a) (JJ good) (NN time)))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I'd just love to give you a real, rattling good time. Then the following statement: "I want to take you out to a club and show you a good time." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
67,666
67666n
Ibiza, Formentera, and Menorca were all captured by loyalist forces, who used the islands as a base for their naval operations.
( ( Ibiza ( , ( Formentera ( , ( and Menorca ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( were all ) ( captured ( by ( ( ( loyalist forces ) , ) ( who ( ( ( used ( the islands ) ) ( as ( a base ) ) ) ( for ( their ( naval operations ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Ibiza) (, ,) (NNP Formentera) (, ,) (CC and) (NNP Menorca)) (VP (VBD were) (RB all) (VP (VBN captured) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (JJ loyalist) (NNS forces)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD used) (NP (DT the) (NNS islands)) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT a) (NN base))) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ naval) (NNS operations)))))))))) (. .)))
Three mediterranean islands were taken and used by loyalist forces in the course of the war.
( ( Three ( mediterranean islands ) ) ( ( were ( ( ( taken and ) used ) ( by ( ( loyalist forces ) ( in ( ( the course ) ( of ( the war ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (CD Three) (JJ mediterranean) (NNS islands)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN taken) (CC and) (VBN used) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (JJ loyalist) (NNS forces)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN course)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN war))))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Ibiza, Formentera, and Menorca were all captured by loyalist forces, who used the islands as a base for their naval operations. Then the following statement: "Three mediterranean islands were taken and used by loyalist forces in the course of the war." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
144,508
144508n
here's a nice uh twenty dollar gold eagle uh just just manufactured in Lebanon last year
( here ( ( 's ( a ( nice ( ( uh ( twenty dollar ) ) ( gold ( eagle uh ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( just just ) ( ( manufactured ( in Lebanon ) ) ( last year ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (ADVP (RB here)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (DT a) (JJ nice) (ADJP (NNP uh) (CD twenty) (NN dollar)) (JJ gold) (NN eagle) (NN uh))) (NP (NP (RB just) (RB just)) (VP (VBN manufactured) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Lebanon))) (NP (JJ last) (NN year))))))
This $20 gold eagle was manufactured in Lebanon last year, specifically in the capital city of Beirut.
( ( This ( ( $ 20 ) ( gold eagle ) ) ) ( ( was ( ( manufactured ( ( ( in ( Lebanon ( last year ) ) ) , ) specifically ) ) ( in ( ( the ( capital city ) ) ( of Beirut ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT This) (ADJP ($ $) (CD 20)) (NN gold) (NN eagle)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN manufactured) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP Lebanon)) (NP (JJ last) (NN year))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB specifically))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN capital) (NN city)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Beirut))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: here's a nice uh twenty dollar gold eagle uh just just manufactured in Lebanon last year Then the following statement: "This $20 gold eagle was manufactured in Lebanon last year, specifically in the capital city of Beirut." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
131,112
131112n
Rooms are decorated in either traditional or modern styles.
( Rooms ( ( are ( decorated ( in ( either ( traditional ( or ( modern styles ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Rooms)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN decorated) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT either) (JJ traditional) (CC or) (JJ modern) (NNS styles))))) (. .)))
Every single room is purple.
( ( Every ( single room ) ) ( ( is purple ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT Every) (JJ single) (NN room)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ purple))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Rooms are decorated in either traditional or modern styles. Then the following statement: "Every single room is purple." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
11,396
11396e
Where there is money, there is shopping or so it should seem.
( ( Where ( there ( is money ) ) ) ( , ( there ( ( is ( ( shopping or ) ( so ( it ( should seem ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB Where)) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NN money))))) (, ,) (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ is) (UCP (NP (NN shopping)) (CC or) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB seem))))))) (. .)))
People with money want to spend it.
( ( People ( with money ) ) ( ( want ( to ( spend it ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS People)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN money)))) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB spend) (NP (PRP it)))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Where there is money, there is shopping or so it should seem. Then the following statement: "People with money want to spend it." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
34,408
34408n
In the past when I encountered some outlandish inanity--often about taxes--I would sit down at my keyboard and write an answer.
( ( In ( ( the past ) ( when ( I ( encountered ( some ( outlandish inanity ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( -- ( ( often ( about taxes ) ) -- ) ) ( I ( ( would ( ( ( ( sit down ) ( at ( my keyboard ) ) ) and ) ( write ( an answer ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN past)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD encountered) (NP (DT some) (JJ outlandish) (NN inanity))))))) (PRN (: --) (PP (ADVP (RB often)) (IN about) (NP (NNS taxes))) (: --)) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VP (VB sit) (PRT (RP down)) (PP (IN at) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN keyboard)))) (CC and) (VP (VB write) (NP (DT an) (NN answer))))) (. .)))
It is too hard to write responses now, because there is so much crazy being said.
( It ( ( ( ( ( is ( too hard ) ) ( to ( ( write responses ) now ) ) ) , ) ( because ( there ( ( is ( so ( much crazy ) ) ) ( being said ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB too) (JJ hard)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB write) (NP (NNS responses)) (ADVP (RB now))))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB so) (RB much) (JJ crazy)) (S (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBD said)))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In the past when I encountered some outlandish inanity--often about taxes--I would sit down at my keyboard and write an answer. Then the following statement: "It is too hard to write responses now, because there is so much crazy being said." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
117,507
117507e
On the West Coast itself, your best bets are the resorts on Penang Pangkor or Langkawi islands.
( ( On ( ( the ( West Coast ) ) itself ) ) ( , ( ( your ( best bets ) ) ( ( are ( ( the resorts ) ( on ( Penang ( Pangkor ( or ( Langkawi islands ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN On) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP West) (NNP Coast)) (ADVP (PRP itself)))) (, ,) (NP (PRP$ your) (JJS best) (NNS bets)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS resorts)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP Penang) (NNP Pangkor) (CC or) (NNP Langkawi) (NNS islands))))) (. .)))
The best resorts on the West Coast are on Penang Pangkor or the Langkawi islands.
( ( ( The ( best resorts ) ) ( on ( the ( West Coast ) ) ) ) ( ( are ( on ( ( ( Penang Pangkor ) or ) ( the ( Langkawi islands ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJS best) (NNS resorts)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NNP West) (NNP Coast)))) (VP (VBP are) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (NNP Penang) (NNP Pangkor)) (CC or) (NP (DT the) (NNP Langkawi) (NNS islands))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: On the West Coast itself, your best bets are the resorts on Penang Pangkor or Langkawi islands. Then the following statement: "The best resorts on the West Coast are on Penang Pangkor or the Langkawi islands." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
126,789
126789e
that's uh condition of employment
( that ( 's ( ( uh condition ) ( of employment ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHADVP (IN that)) (SQ (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (JJ uh) (NN condition)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN employment)))))))
That is required to be employed.
( That ( ( is ( required ( to ( be employed ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN required) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN employed))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: that's uh condition of employment Then the following statement: "That is required to be employed." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
123,537
123537n
The weeklong trip, which must have cost thousands, resulted in a short piece.
( ( ( ( ( The ( weeklong trip ) ) , ) ( which ( must ( have ( cost thousands ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( resulted ( in ( a ( short piece ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ weeklong) (NN trip)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (MD must) (VP (VB have) (NP (NN cost) (NNS thousands)))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD resulted) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (JJ short) (NN piece)))) (. .)))
The trip was one week and cost thousands.
( ( The trip ) ( ( was ( ( ( one week ) and ) ( cost thousands ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN trip)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (CD one) (NN week)) (CC and) (NP (NN cost) (NNS thousands)))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The weeklong trip, which must have cost thousands, resulted in a short piece. Then the following statement: "The trip was one week and cost thousands." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
112,225
112225c
but then we started watching it and and like the new ones are pretty cool because because they got like uh like special like especially things that like fuck with your mind
( but ( then ( we ( ( ( ( started ( watching it ) ) and ) ( and ( like ( the ( new ones ) ) ) ) ) ( ( are ( pretty cool ) ) ( ( because because ) ( they ( got ( ( like uh ) ( like ( special ( like ( ( especially things ) ( that ( ( like fuck ) ( with ( your mind ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (S (CC but) (ADVP (RB then)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VP (VBD started) (S (VP (VBG watching) (NP (PRP it))))) (CC and) (PRN (CC and) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT the) (JJ new) (NNS ones)))) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ cool)) (SBAR (IN because) (IN because) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD got) (VP (VB like) (INTJ (UH uh)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (JJ special)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (RB especially) (NNS things)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP like) (NP (NN fuck)) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP$ your) (NN mind)))))))))))))))))))
There is nothing new or special about watching it.
( There ( ( is ( ( ( nothing new ) or ) ( special ( about ( watching it ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (ADJP (NN nothing) (JJ new)) (CC or) (ADJP (JJ special) (PP (IN about) (S (VP (VBG watching) (NP (PRP it)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: but then we started watching it and and like the new ones are pretty cool because because they got like uh like special like especially things that like fuck with your mind Then the following statement: "There is nothing new or special about watching it." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
85,490
85490c
yeah is that right
( yeah ( is ( that right ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN yeah)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB that) (JJ right)))))
Is that wrong?
( ( ( Is that ) wrong ) ? )
(ROOT (SQ (VBZ Is) (NP (DT that)) (ADJP (JJ wrong)) (. ?)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah is that right Then the following statement: "Is that wrong?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
69,640
69640c
Raves for this chronicle of the 1991 storm of the century that swallowed up a boatload of New England fishermen.
( ( ( ( Raves ( for ( this chronicle ) ) ) ( of ( the ( 1991 storm ) ) ) ) ( of ( ( the century ) ( that ( ( swallowed up ) ( ( a boatload ) ( of ( New ( England fishermen ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (NNS Raves)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT this) (NN chronicle))) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (CD 1991) (NN storm))) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN century)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBN swallowed) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN boatload)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP New) (NNP England) (NNS fishermen))))))))) (. .)))
The storm of the century was in 1958.
( ( ( The storm ) ( of ( the century ) ) ) ( ( was ( in 1958 ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN storm)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN century)))) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1958)))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Raves for this chronicle of the 1991 storm of the century that swallowed up a boatload of New England fishermen. Then the following statement: "The storm of the century was in 1958." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
33,391
33391n
Rock is taking his stereotype-bending routine global by staging his next standup special in Africa, a la Muhammad Ali's Rumble in the Jungle.
( Rock ( ( is ( ( taking ( his ( stereotype-bending ( routine global ) ) ) ) ( by ( ( staging ( his ( next ( standup special ) ) ) ) ( in ( ( Africa , ) ( ( ( a ( la ( Muhammad ( Ali 's ) ) ) ) Rumble ) ( in ( the Jungle ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Rock)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG taking) (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ stereotype-bending) (JJ routine) (NN global)) (PP (IN by) (S (VP (VBG staging) (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ next) (NN standup) (NN special)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP Africa)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NP (DT a) (NNP la) (NNP Muhammad) (NNP Ali) (POS 's)) (NNP Rumble)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN Jungle))))))))))) (. .)))
Rock finally takes his routine global by staging his next special in Africa.
( Rock ( finally ( ( takes ( ( his ( routine global ) ) ( by ( ( staging ( his ( next special ) ) ) ( in Africa ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Rock)) (ADVP (RB finally)) (VP (VBZ takes) (NP (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ routine) (JJ global)) (PP (IN by) (S (VP (VBG staging) (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ next) (NN special)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Africa)))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Rock is taking his stereotype-bending routine global by staging his next standup special in Africa, a la Muhammad Ali's Rumble in the Jungle. Then the following statement: "Rock finally takes his routine global by staging his next special in Africa." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
30,643
30643c
uh-huh yeah um that you know kind of goes along it it it's a small enough school where people can know each other and and they can work together to thwart off problems when when you've got a high school with you know three or four thousand students
( ( ( uh-huh ( yeah um ) ) ( that ( you ( know ( kind of ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( ( goes ( along it ) ) ( it ( it ( 's ( ( a ( small ( enough school ) ) ) ( where ( people ( can ( know ( each other ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( and ( they ( can ( ( work together ) ( to ( ( thwart off ) problems ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( when ( ( when ( you ( 've ( ( got ( a ( high school ) ) ) ( with you ) ) ) ) ) ( know ( ( ( ( three or ) four ) thousand ) students ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJ uh-huh) (NN yeah) (NN um)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (ADVP (NN kind) (IN of)))))) (VP (VP (VBZ goes) (PP (IN along) (NP (PRP it))) (NP (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ small) (JJ enough) (NN school)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB know) (NP (DT each) (JJ other)))))))))))) (CC and) (PRN (CC and) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB work) (PRT (RP together)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB thwart) (PRT (RP off)) (NP (NNS problems))))))))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN got) (NP (DT a) (JJ high) (NN school)) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP you))))))) (VP (VBP know) (NP (QP (CD three) (CC or) (CD four) (CD thousand)) (NNS students))))))))
The school is too big for people to really get to know each other.
( ( The school ) ( ( ( is ( too ( big ( for people ) ) ) ) ( to ( really ( get ( to ( know ( each other ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN school)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB too) (JJ big) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS people)))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (ADVP (RB really)) (VB get) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB know) (NP (DT each) (JJ other))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: uh-huh yeah um that you know kind of goes along it it it's a small enough school where people can know each other and and they can work together to thwart off problems when when you've got a high school with you know three or four thousand students Then the following statement: "The school is too big for people to really get to know each other." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
136,503
136503n
The volcano's name is thought to derive from an Ainu word for fire.
( ( ( The ( volcano 's ) ) name ) ( ( is ( thought ( to ( ( derive ( from ( an ( Ainu word ) ) ) ) ( for fire ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN volcano) (POS 's)) (NN name)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN thought) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB derive) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT an) (NNP Ainu) (NN word))) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN fire)))))))) (. .)))
The volcano was given its name two hundred years ago.
( ( The volcano ) ( ( was ( ( given ( its name ) ) ( ( ( two hundred ) years ) ago ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN volcano)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN given) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN name)) (ADVP (NP (QP (CD two) (CD hundred)) (NNS years)) (RB ago)))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The volcano's name is thought to derive from an Ainu word for fire. Then the following statement: "The volcano was given its name two hundred years ago." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
1,148
1148e
The soaring vaults of the sober interior have the monumentality of French or German Gothic.
( ( ( The ( soaring vaults ) ) ( of ( the ( sober interior ) ) ) ) ( ( have ( ( the monumentality ) ( of ( ( ( French or ) German ) Gothic ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (VBG soaring) (NNS vaults)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ sober) (NN interior)))) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN monumentality)) (PP (IN of) (NP (ADJP (NNP French) (CC or) (NNP German)) (NNS Gothic))))) (. .)))
German Gothic design is know for its soaring vaults.
( ( German ( Gothic design ) ) ( ( is ( know ( for ( its ( soaring vaults ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ German) (JJ Gothic) (NN design)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VB know) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP$ its) (VBG soaring) (NNS vaults))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The soaring vaults of the sober interior have the monumentality of French or German Gothic. Then the following statement: "German Gothic design is know for its soaring vaults." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
94,986
94986c
you know since the women's movement in the well seventies and you know we've come a long way but i think it's still a still good ways to go
( you ( know ( since ( ( ( ( ( ( the ( women 's ) ) movement ) ( in ( the well ) ) ) seventies ) and ) ( ( ( you ( know ( we ( 've ( come ( a ( long way ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( i ( think ( it ( ( 's still ) ( ( a ( ( still good ) ways ) ) ( to go ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (IN since) (S (S (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS women) (POS 's)) (NN movement)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN well)))) (VP (VBZ seventies))) (CC and) (S (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN come) (NP (DT a) (JJ long) (NN way)))))))) (CC but) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB still)) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB still) (JJ good)) (NNS ways)) (SBAR (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB go)))))))))))))))))
The women's movement solved everything and we don't need to do anything anymore.
( ( ( ( ( ( The ( women 's ) ) movement ) ( solved everything ) ) and ) ( we ( ( do n't ) ( need ( to ( ( do anything ) anymore ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS women) (POS 's)) (NN movement)) (VP (VBD solved) (NP (NN everything)))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (NN anything)) (ADVP (RB anymore)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: you know since the women's movement in the well seventies and you know we've come a long way but i think it's still a still good ways to go Then the following statement: "The women's movement solved everything and we don't need to do anything anymore." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
113,261
113261c
The increase in one asset is offset by an equal decrease in another asset (or by an equal increase in liabilities).
( ( ( The increase ) ( in ( one asset ) ) ) ( ( is ( ( offset ( by ( ( an ( equal decrease ) ) ( in ( another asset ) ) ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( or ( by ( ( an ( equal increase ) ) ( in liabilities ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN increase)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD one) (NN asset)))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN offset) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ equal) (NN decrease)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT another) (NN asset))))) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (FRAG (CC or) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ equal) (NN increase)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNS liabilities)))))) (-RRB- -RRB-)))) (. .)))
.When an asset increases it means there is no decreasing at all in other assets.
( ( . ( When ( ( an asset ) ( increases ( it ( means ( there ( is ( ( ( no decreasing ) ( at all ) ) ( in ( other assets ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB .) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When)) (S (NP (DT an) (NN asset)) (VP (VBZ increases) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ means) (SBAR (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT no) (VBG decreasing)) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ other) (NNS assets)))))))))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The increase in one asset is offset by an equal decrease in another asset (or by an equal increase in liabilities). Then the following statement: ".When an asset increases it means there is no decreasing at all in other assets." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
127,976
127976e
and uh of course it's a nine hundred number which that means they're going to charge you you know fifteen or twenty dollars just to make the phone call
( and ( uh ( of ( course ( it ( 's ( ( a ( ( nine hundred ) number ) ) ( which ( that ( means ( they ( 're ( going ( ( ( ( to ( ( charge you ) ( you ( know fifteen ) ) ) ) or ) ( ( twenty dollars ) just ) ) ( to ( make ( the ( phone call ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (ADVP (RB uh) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN course)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (QP (CD nine) (CD hundred))) (NN number)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBZ means) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (VP (TO to) (VP (VB charge) (NP (PRP you)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (NP (CD fifteen))))))) (CC or) (ADVP (NP (CD twenty) (NNS dollars)) (RB just)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (NP (DT the) (NN phone) (NN call))))))))))))))))))))))
They're going to charge you when you call the nine hundred phone number.
( They ( ( 're ( going ( to ( ( charge you ) ( when ( you ( call ( the ( ( nine hundred ) ( phone number ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB charge) (NP (PRP you)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP call) (NP (DT the) (ADJP (QP (CD nine) (CD hundred))) (NN phone) (NN number)))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and uh of course it's a nine hundred number which that means they're going to charge you you know fifteen or twenty dollars just to make the phone call Then the following statement: "They're going to charge you when you call the nine hundred phone number." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
91,502
91502c
i would i would love to go there i mean like again again not now but at some point to go see what what this is like i mean this this is am azing because this is this is an this is an example of an entirely different culture that wants to be like us like you said before as well so it'd be interesting to watch
( i ( ( ( would i ) ( would ( love ( to ( go ( there i ) ) ) ) ) ) ( mean ( like ( ( ( ( ( again again ) not ) now ) but ) ( at ( some ( point ( to ( go ( see ( ( ( what ( ( what ( this ( is ( like ( i ( mean this ) ) ) ) ) ) ( this ( is ( ( am azing ) ( because ( this ( is ( this ( is ( an ( this ( is ( ( an example ) ( of ( ( an ( ( entirely different ) culture ) ) ( that ( wants ( to ( ( be ( like us ) ) ( like ( you ( said before ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( as well ) ) ( so ( it ( 'd ( be ( interesting ( to watch ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (X (X (SYM i)) (NP (SQ (MD would) (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB love) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB go) (S (NP (EX there)) (ADJP (JJ i))))))))) (VP (VB mean) (PP (IN like) (UCP (ADVP (ADVP (RB again)) (RB again) (RB not) (ADVP (RB now))) (CC but) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT some) (NN point) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB go) (VP (VB see) (NP (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (DT this)) (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP mean) (NP (DT this)))))))) (NP (DT this)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (RB am) (VBG azing) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (DT this)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT this)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT an) (S (NP (DT this)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN example)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT an) (ADJP (RB entirely) (JJ different)) (NN culture)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ wants) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (PP (IN like) (NP (PRP us))) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD said) (ADVP (RB before)))))))))))))))))))))))))))) (CONJP (RB as) (RB well)) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD 'd) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ interesting) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB watch))))))))))))))))))))))
I think I would hate traveling there because it's so similar to our own culture.
( I ( ( think ( I ( would ( hate ( ( traveling there ) ( because ( it ( 's ( so ( similar ( to ( our ( own culture ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB hate) (S (VP (VBG traveling) (ADVP (RB there)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ similar) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP$ our) (JJ own) (NN culture)))))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: i would i would love to go there i mean like again again not now but at some point to go see what what this is like i mean this this is am azing because this is this is an this is an example of an entirely different culture that wants to be like us like you said before as well so it'd be interesting to watch Then the following statement: "I think I would hate traveling there because it's so similar to our own culture." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
89,854
89854n
oh Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles huh um-hum
( oh ( Teenage ( Mutant ( Ninja ( Turtles ( huh um-hum ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (FRAG (INTJ (UH oh))) (VP (VBZ Teenage)) (NP (NNP Mutant) (NNP Ninja) (NNP Turtles) (NNP huh) (NNP um-hum))))
The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles reboot.
( ( The ( Teenage ( Mutant ( Ninja Turtles ) ) ) ) ( reboot . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ Teenage) (NNP Mutant) (NNP Ninja) (NNP Turtles)) (VP (VBZ reboot)) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: oh Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles huh um-hum Then the following statement: "The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles reboot." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
61,795
61795e
In 1793, when the leaders of the Revolution declared the palace a national museum, the Louvre held 630 works of art; a recent inventory listed 250,000.
( ( In 1793 ) ( , ( ( when ( ( ( the leaders ) ( of ( the Revolution ) ) ) ( declared ( ( the palace ) ( a ( national museum ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the Louvre ) ( ( held ( ( ( ( 630 works ) ( of art ) ) ; ) ( ( a ( recent inventory ) ) ( listed 250,000 ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (CD 1793))) (, ,) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS leaders)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN Revolution)))) (VP (VBD declared) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN palace)) (NP (DT a) (JJ national) (NN museum)))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP Louvre)) (VP (VBD held) (NP (NP (NP (JJ 630) (NNS works)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN art)))) (: ;) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ recent) (NN inventory)) (VP (VBN listed) (NP (CD 250,000)))))) (. .)))
The leaders of the Revolution declared the palace a national museum.
( ( ( The leaders ) ( of ( the Revolution ) ) ) ( ( declared ( ( the palace ) ( a ( national museum ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS leaders)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN Revolution)))) (VP (VBD declared) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN palace)) (NP (DT a) (JJ national) (NN museum)))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In 1793, when the leaders of the Revolution declared the palace a national museum, the Louvre held 630 works of art; a recent inventory listed 250,000. Then the following statement: "The leaders of the Revolution declared the palace a national museum." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
116,634
116634c
She didn't wait long to come here.
( She ( ( ( did n't ) ( ( wait long ) ( to ( come here ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB wait) (ADVP (RB long)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB come) (ADVP (RB here))))))) (. .)))
She had to wait for three days.
( She ( ( had ( to ( wait ( for ( three days ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD had) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB wait) (PP (IN for) (NP (CD three) (NNS days))))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: She didn't wait long to come here. Then the following statement: "She had to wait for three days." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
7,375
7375n
These conferences will enable program staff to examine the degree to which gender, race, ethnicity and age have adversely affected the ability of some clients to obtain critical legal services from LSC recipients.
( ( ( These conferences ) ( will ( ( enable ( program staff ) ) ( to ( examine ( ( the degree ) ( to ( which gender ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( race ( , ( ( ethnicity and ) age ) ) ) ( ( ( have adversely ) ( ( affected ( ( the ability ) ( of ( some clients ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( obtain ( critical ( legal services ) ) ) ( from ( LSC recipients ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT These) (NNS conferences)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB enable) (NP (NN program) (NN staff)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB examine) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN degree)) (WHPP (TO to) (WHNP (WDT which) (NN gender)))))))))) (, ,) (NP (NN race) (, ,) (NN ethnicity) (CC and) (NN age)) (VP (VBP have) (ADVP (RB adversely)) (VP (VBN affected) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN ability)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT some) (NNS clients)))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB obtain) (NP (JJ critical) (JJ legal) (NNS services)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNP LSC) (NNS recipients)))))))) (. .)))
These conferences enable program staff to examine the degree which various demographics are able to obtain legal services through statistical analysis.
( ( These conferences ) ( ( enable ( ( program staff ) ( to ( examine ( ( the degree ) ( which ( ( various demographics ) ( are ( able ( to ( ( obtain ( legal services ) ) ( through ( statistical analysis ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT These) (NNS conferences)) (VP (VBP enable) (S (NP (NN program) (NN staff)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB examine) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN degree)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (NP (JJ various) (NNS demographics)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ able) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB obtain) (NP (JJ legal) (NNS services)) (PP (IN through) (NP (JJ statistical) (NN analysis))))))))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: These conferences will enable program staff to examine the degree to which gender, race, ethnicity and age have adversely affected the ability of some clients to obtain critical legal services from LSC recipients. Then the following statement: "These conferences enable program staff to examine the degree which various demographics are able to obtain legal services through statistical analysis." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
10,243
10243e
This process has never worked and it is too complicated.
( ( ( ( ( This process ) ( ( has never ) worked ) ) and ) ( it ( is ( too complicated ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT This) (NN process)) (VP (VBZ has) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBN worked)))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB too) (VBN complicated)))) (. .)))
The process is much too complex and it hasn't worked.
( ( ( ( ( The process ) ( is ( much ( too complex ) ) ) ) and ) ( it ( ( has n't ) worked ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN process)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB much) (RB too) (JJ complex)))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ has) (RB n't) (VP (VBN worked)))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: This process has never worked and it is too complicated. Then the following statement: "The process is much too complex and it hasn't worked." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
53,297
53297e
A victory by Deep Blue would indicate its superior computational skills, but not a capacity for conscious thought.
( ( ( A victory ) ( by ( Deep Blue ) ) ) ( ( would ( indicate ( ( ( ( its ( superior ( computational skills ) ) ) , ) ( but not ) ) ( ( a capacity ) ( for ( conscious thought ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT A) (NN victory)) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP Deep) (NNP Blue)))) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB indicate) (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ superior) (JJ computational) (NNS skills)) (, ,) (CONJP (CC but) (RB not)) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN capacity)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ conscious) (NN thought))))))) (. .)))
Deep Blue is capable of superior computational skills.
( ( Deep Blue ) ( ( is ( capable ( of ( superior ( computational skills ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Deep) (NNP Blue)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ capable) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ superior) (JJ computational) (NNS skills))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: A victory by Deep Blue would indicate its superior computational skills, but not a capacity for conscious thought. Then the following statement: "Deep Blue is capable of superior computational skills." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
105,957
105957n
And all of this in year-round sub-tropical spring weather with a southerly breeze and temperatures averaging 22?? C in summer and 17?? C in winter.
( And ( ( all ( of ( this ( in ( year-round ( sub-tropical spring ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( weather ( with ( ( ( ( a ( southerly breeze ) ) and ) temperatures ) ( averaging ( ( ( ( 22 ( ?? C ) ) ( in summer ) ) and ) ( ( 17 ( ?? C ) ) ( in winter ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC And) (NP (NP (DT all)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT this)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ year-round) (JJ sub-tropical) (NN spring)))))) (VP (VBP weather) (PP (IN with) (S (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ southerly) (NN breeze)) (CC and) (NP (NNS temperatures))) (VP (VBG averaging) (NP (NP (NP (CD 22) (NNP ??) (NNP C)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN summer)))) (CC and) (NP (NP (CD 17) (NNP ??) (NNP C)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN winter))))))))) (. .)))
THe weather is about 20 degrees C in the spring.
( ( THe weather ) ( ( ( is ( about ( 20 degrees ) ) ) ( C ( in ( the spring ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP THe) (NN weather)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (IN about) (NP (CD 20) (NNS degrees))) (NP (NP (NNP C)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN spring))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: And all of this in year-round sub-tropical spring weather with a southerly breeze and temperatures averaging 22?? C in summer and 17?? C in winter. Then the following statement: "THe weather is about 20 degrees C in the spring." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
8,390
8390c
oh i think that they should go ahead and go to the uh fourteen one i to me it's just fair you know and equal it seem like every area should have an equal voice
( ( oh i ) ( think ( that ( they ( should ( ( ( go ahead ) and ) ( ( go ( to ( the ( uh ( fourteen one ) ) ) ) ) ( ( i ( to me ) ) ( it ( 's ( ( ( just ( fair ( you know ) ) ) and ) ( equal ( it ( seem ( like ( ( every area ) ( should ( have ( an ( equal voice ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP oh) (NNP i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VP (VB go) (ADVP (RB ahead))) (CC and) (VP (VB go) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ uh) (CD fourteen) (CD one))) (NP (NP (FW i)) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP me))) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (ADJP (RB just) (JJ fair) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know))))) (CC and) (ADJP (JJ equal) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBP seem) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (DT every) (NN area)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT an) (JJ equal) (NN voice)))))))))))))))))))))))
No one should have a say.
( ( No one ) ( ( should ( have ( a say ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT No) (NN one)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB have) (NP (DT a) (NN say)))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: oh i think that they should go ahead and go to the uh fourteen one i to me it's just fair you know and equal it seem like every area should have an equal voice Then the following statement: "No one should have a say. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
123,236
123236n
'What do you think you are doing?'
( ` ( What ( ( ( ( do you ) ( think ( you ( are doing ) ) ) ) ? ) ' ) ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (`` `) (WHNP (WP What)) (SQ (VBP do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG doing))))))) (. ?) ('' ')))
You shouldn't be here.
( You ( ( ( should n't ) ( be here ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD should) (RB n't) (VP (VB be) (ADVP (RB here)))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: 'What do you think you are doing?' Then the following statement: "You shouldn't be here." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
69,392
69392e
I killed a child.
( I ( ( killed ( a child ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD killed) (NP (DT a) (NN child))) (. .)))
The child was dead because of me.
( ( The child ) ( ( was ( dead ( because ( of me ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN child)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ dead) (PP (RB because) (IN of) (NP (PRP me))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I killed a child. Then the following statement: "The child was dead because of me." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
128,952
128952e
yeah well you know even in our prison systems they're finding that they're they're having drugs smuggled into them
( yeah ( well ( you ( know ( even ( ( in ( our ( prison systems ) ) ) ( they ( 're ( finding ( that ( they ( 're ( they ( 're ( having ( drugs ( smuggled ( into them ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (S (ADVP (RB well)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (RB even) (S (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ our) (NN prison) (NNS systems))) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG finding) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG having) (NP (NP (NNS drugs)) (VP (VBN smuggled) (PP (IN into) (NP (PRP them)))))))))))))))))))))
Drugs are being brought into the prison system.
( Drugs ( ( are ( being ( brought ( into ( the ( prison system ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Drugs)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBN brought) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT the) (NN prison) (NN system)))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah well you know even in our prison systems they're finding that they're they're having drugs smuggled into them Then the following statement: "Drugs are being brought into the prison system. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
49,108
49108n
But wherever you are on the mountain's upper reaches, the views are glorious.
( But ( ( wherever ( you ( are ( on ( ( the ( mountain 's ) ) ( upper reaches ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the views ) ( ( are glorious ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC But) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB wherever)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP are) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN mountain) (POS 's)) (JJ upper) (NNS reaches)))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNS views)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ glorious))) (. .)))
The view from the top of the mountain is unparalleled.
( ( ( The view ) ( from ( ( the top ) ( of ( the mountain ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is unparalleled ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN view)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN top)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN mountain)))))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN unparalleled))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: But wherever you are on the mountain's upper reaches, the views are glorious. Then the following statement: "The view from the top of the mountain is unparalleled. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
102,379
102379c
You would, however, receive an affectionate reception if you were a domestic animal--sorry again, the term preferred by animal lovers is date.
( ( You ( would ( ( , ( however , ) ) ( ( receive ( an ( affectionate reception ) ) ) ( if ( you ( ( were ( ( ( a ( domestic animal ) ) -- ) sorry ) ) again ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( the ( term preferred ) ) ( by ( animal lovers ) ) ) ( ( is date ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD would) (VP (PRN (, ,) (ADVP (RB however)) (, ,)) (VB receive) (NP (DT an) (JJ affectionate) (NN reception)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD were) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ domestic) (NN animal)) (: --) (ADJP (JJ sorry))) (ADVP (RB again)))))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN term) (VBD preferred)) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN animal) (NNS lovers)))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NN date))) (. .)))
If you are a domestic animal, you will not be welcomed.
( ( If ( you ( are ( a ( domestic animal ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( you ( ( ( will not ) ( be welcomed ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN If) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (DT a) (JJ domestic) (NN animal))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD will) (RB not) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN welcomed)))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: You would, however, receive an affectionate reception if you were a domestic animal--sorry again, the term preferred by animal lovers is date. Then the following statement: "If you are a domestic animal, you will not be welcomed." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
57,747
57747n
Standard costing may be based on either absorption or direct costing principles, and may apply either to all or some cost elements.
( ( Standard costing ) ( ( ( ( ( may ( be ( based ( on ( ( either ( ( absorption or ) direct ) ) ( costing principles ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( may ( ( apply either ) ( to ( ( all or ) ( some ( cost elements ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Standard) (NNP costing)) (VP (VP (MD may) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN based) (PP (IN on) (NP (UCP (DT either) (NN absorption) (CC or) (JJ direct)) (JJ costing) (NNS principles)))))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB apply) (ADVP (RB either)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT all)) (CC or) (NP (DT some) (NN cost) (NNS elements))))))) (. .)))
It may apply to other standards as well.
( It ( ( may ( ( apply ( to ( other standards ) ) ) ( as well ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB apply) (PP (TO to) (NP (JJ other) (NNS standards))) (ADVP (RB as) (RB well)))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Standard costing may be based on either absorption or direct costing principles, and may apply either to all or some cost elements. Then the following statement: "It may apply to other standards as well." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
65,274
65274c
A Trying Time For Many Net Retailers
( ( A ( Trying Time ) ) ( For ( Many ( Net Retailers ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (DT A) (JJ Trying) (NN Time)) (PP (IN For) (NP (JJ Many) (JJ Net) (NNS Retailers)))))
It is a great time for a lot of retailers.
( It ( ( is ( ( a ( great time ) ) ( for ( ( a lot ) ( of retailers ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ great) (NN time)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS retailers))))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: A Trying Time For Many Net Retailers Then the following statement: "It is a great time for a lot of retailers." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
34,486
34486c
Within the text of the statements, provisions deleted as a result of other statements are marked with strikeouts and provisions affected by other statements are doubleunderlined.
( ( Within ( ( the text ) ( of ( the statements ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( provisions ( deleted ( as ( ( ( a result ) ( of ( other statements ) ) ) ( are ( marked ( with ( ( ( strikeouts and ) provisions ) ( affected ( by ( other statements ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( are doubleunderlined ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Within) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN text)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNS statements))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNS provisions)) (VP (VBN deleted) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (NP (DT a) (NN result)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ other) (NNS statements)))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN marked) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NNS strikeouts) (CC and) (NNS provisions)) (VP (VBN affected) (PP (IN by) (NP (JJ other) (NNS statements)))))))))))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN doubleunderlined))) (. .)))
The deleted provisions have been doubleunderlined.
( ( The ( deleted provisions ) ) ( ( have ( been doubleunderlined ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ deleted) (NNS provisions)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN doubleunderlined)))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Within the text of the statements, provisions deleted as a result of other statements are marked with strikeouts and provisions affected by other statements are doubleunderlined. Then the following statement: "The deleted provisions have been doubleunderlined." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
87,801
87801e
in fact i went up there visiting i had a friend at Davidson one time and i went up there visiting him and and he took me out running through the trails in the piney woods up there and i just loved it
( ( ( ( ( in fact ) ( ( ( i ( ( went up ) ( there ( visiting ( i ( ( had ( ( a friend ) ( at ( Davidson one ) ) ) ) time ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( i ( ( went up ) ( there ( visiting him ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( and ( he ( ( took me ) ( out ( ( ( ( running ( through ( ( the trails ) ( in ( the ( piney woods ) ) ) ) ) ) ( up there ) ) and ) ( i just ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( loved it ) )
(ROOT (SINV (S (S (PP (IN in) (NP (NN fact))) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP up)) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBG visiting) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN friend)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NNP Davidson) (CD one)))) (NP (NN time))))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP up)) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBG visiting) (NP (PRP him))))))) (CC and) (S (CC and) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD took) (NP (PRP me)) (PP (IN out) (S (VP (VP (VBG running) (PP (IN through) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS trails)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ piney) (NNS woods))))) (ADVP (RB up) (RB there))) (CC and) (VP (VBG i) (ADVP (RB just))))))))) (VP (VBD loved)) (NP (PRP it))))
I had a really great time when i went running with a friend in the piney woods near Davidson
( I ( had ( ( a ( ( really great ) time ) ) ( when ( i ( went ( running ( with ( ( a friend ) ( in ( ( the ( piney woods ) ) ( near Davidson ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB really) (JJ great)) (NN time)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD went) (S (VP (VBG running) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN friend)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ piney) (NNS woods)) (PP (IN near) (NP (NNP Davidson))))))))))))))))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: in fact i went up there visiting i had a friend at Davidson one time and i went up there visiting him and and he took me out running through the trails in the piney woods up there and i just loved it Then the following statement: "I had a really great time when i went running with a friend in the piney woods near Davidson" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
119,389
119389e
The ferry from Lumut, about 50 km (31 miles) south of Taiping, to Pangkor Island takes about 45 minutes.
( ( ( The ferry ) ( from ( ( ( ( Lumut , ) ( ( ( about 50 ) ( km ( ( -LRB- ( ( 31 miles ) -RRB- ) ) south ) ) ) ( of Taiping ) ) ) , ) ( to ( Pangkor Island ) ) ) ) ) ( ( takes ( ( about 45 ) minutes ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN ferry)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Lumut)) (, ,) (NP (NP (QP (RB about) (CD 50)) (NNP km) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (CD 31) (NNS miles)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (NN south)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Taiping)))) (, ,)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Pangkor) (NNP Island)))))) (VP (VBZ takes) (NP (QP (RB about) (CD 45)) (NNS minutes))) (. .)))
The ferry takes 45 minutes.
( ( The ferry ) ( ( takes ( 45 minutes ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN ferry)) (VP (VBZ takes) (NP (CD 45) (NNS minutes))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The ferry from Lumut, about 50 km (31 miles) south of Taiping, to Pangkor Island takes about 45 minutes. Then the following statement: "The ferry takes 45 minutes." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
7,208
7208n
Bell's inability to see a world beyond the context of military and economic Big Stuff is what dates this book most of all.
( ( ( Bell 's ) ( inability ( to ( ( see ( a world ) ) ( beyond ( ( the context ) ( of ( ( ( military and ) economic ) ( Big Stuff ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( what ( dates ( ( this book ) ( most ( of all ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Bell) (POS 's)) (NN inability) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (NP (DT a) (NN world)) (PP (IN beyond) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN context)) (PP (IN of) (NP (ADJP (JJ military) (CC and) (JJ economic)) (NNP Big) (NNP Stuff))))))))) (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBZ dates) (S (NP (DT this) (NN book)) (NP (NP (JJS most)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT all))))))))) (. .)))
Bell has an education in military and economic history.
( Bell ( ( has ( ( an education ) ( in ( military ( and ( economic history ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Bell)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN education)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ military) (CC and) (JJ economic) (NN history))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Bell's inability to see a world beyond the context of military and economic Big Stuff is what dates this book most of all. Then the following statement: "Bell has an education in military and economic history." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
60,257
60257e
People in Hollywood accept this instability as the cost of doing business.
( ( People ( in Hollywood ) ) ( ( ( accept ( this instability ) ) ( as ( ( the cost ) ( of ( doing business ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS People)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Hollywood)))) (VP (VBP accept) (NP (DT this) (NN instability)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN cost)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG doing) (NP (NN business)))))))) (. .)))
That is a cost of doing business that people in Hollywood accept.
( That ( ( is ( ( a cost ) ( of ( ( doing business ) ( that ( ( people ( in Hollywood ) ) accept ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN cost)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG doing) (NP (NN business)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (NNS people)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Hollywood)))) (VP (VBP accept))))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: People in Hollywood accept this instability as the cost of doing business. Then the following statement: "That is a cost of doing business that people in Hollywood accept." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
118,750
118750n
In the dark of night, their aim must be true.
( ( In ( ( the dark ) ( of night ) ) ) ( , ( ( their aim ) ( ( must ( be true ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN dark)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN night))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN aim)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ true)))) (. .)))
Their aim must be accurate in the dark, or else they will not succeed.
( ( ( ( ( ( Their aim ) ( must ( be ( accurate ( in ( the dark ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) or ) ( ( else they ) ( ( will not ) succeed ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP$ Their) (NN aim)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ accurate) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN dark))))))) (, ,) (CC or) (S (NP (RB else) (PRP they)) (VP (MD will) (RB not) (VP (VB succeed)))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In the dark of night, their aim must be true. Then the following statement: "Their aim must be accurate in the dark, or else they will not succeed." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
37,458
37458c
Thus you will find 191/2-mile Beach at Castle Peak Bay.
( Thus ( you ( ( will ( ( find ( 191/2-mile Beach ) ) ( at ( Castle ( Peak Bay ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Thus)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB find) (NP (JJ 191/2-mile) (NNP Beach)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NNP Castle) (NNP Peak) (NNP Bay))))) (. .)))
Thus you will find the half mile beach at Castle Peak Bay.
( Thus ( you ( ( will ( ( find ( the ( half ( mile beach ) ) ) ) ( at ( Castle ( Peak Bay ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Thus)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB find) (NP (DT the) (JJ half) (NN mile) (NN beach)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NNP Castle) (NNP Peak) (NNP Bay))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Thus you will find 191/2-mile Beach at Castle Peak Bay. Then the following statement: "Thus you will find the half mile beach at Castle Peak Bay." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False