promptID
int32
0
146k
pairID
stringlengths
2
7
premise
stringlengths
5
1.82k
premise_binary_parse
stringlengths
6
3.43k
premise_parse
stringlengths
23
6.45k
hypothesis
stringlengths
1
393
hypothesis_binary_parse
stringlengths
1
669
hypothesis_parse
stringlengths
19
1.15k
genre
stringclasses
5 values
label
class label
3 classes
template_name
stringclasses
11 values
template
stringclasses
11 values
rendered_input
stringlengths
46
2.02k
rendered_output
stringclasses
14 values
113,676
113676e
But should it?
( But ( ( should it ) ? ) )
(ROOT (SQ (CC But) (MD should) (NP (PRP it)) (. ?)))
Should it?
( ( Should it ) ? )
(ROOT (SQ (VP (VB Should) (NP (PRP it))) (. ?)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: But should it? Then the following statement: "Should it?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
125,712
125712e
What would have happened next?
( What ( ( would ( have ( happened next ) ) ) ? ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHNP (WP What)) (SQ (VP (MD would) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN happened) (ADVP (JJ next)))))) (. ?)))
I don't know what was bound to happen in the future.
( I ( ( ( do n't ) ( know ( what ( was ( bound ( to ( happen ( in ( the future ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN bound) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB happen) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN future)))))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: What would have happened next? Then the following statement: "I don't know what was bound to happen in the future." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
79,354
79354c
'My apartment.' I tossed her the keys.
( ` ( ( My apartment ) ( . ( ' ( I ( ( tossed ( her ( the keys ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (`` `) (S (VP (VBG My) (NP (NN apartment)))) (. .) ('' ') (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD tossed) (S (NP (PRP her)) (NP (DT the) (NNS keys)))) (. .)))
I didn't have my keys.
( I ( ( ( did n't ) ( have ( my keys ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (PRP$ my) (NNS keys)))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: 'My apartment.' I tossed her the keys. Then the following statement: "I didn't have my keys." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
40,900
40900n
i think it's uh i think if they want to do it you know if that's what interests them and they think you know they can handle it i think they ought to be able to do it
( i ( think ( ( ( ( it 's ) ( uh ( i ( think ( if ( they ( want ( to ( do it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( you ( know ( if ( that ( 's ( ( what interests ) ( ( ( them and ) they ) ( think ( you ( know ( they ( can ( handle it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( i ( think ( they ( ought ( to ( be ( able ( to ( do it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (S (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's))) (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (PRP it)))))))))) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what) (NNS interests)) (S (NP (PRP them) (CC and) (PRP they)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB handle) (NP (PRP it))))))))))))))))) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD ought) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ able) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (PRP it))))))))))))))))))
I think that women should be allowed to do anything they wish to, as long as they are capable.
( I ( ( think ( that ( women ( should ( be ( allowed ( to ( do ( anything ( they ( ( ( wish to ) , ) ( ( as long ) ( as ( they ( are capable ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNS women)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN allowed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (NP (NN anything)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP wish) (PP (TO to)) (, ,) (SBAR (ADVP (RB as) (RB long)) (IN as) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ capable)))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: i think it's uh i think if they want to do it you know if that's what interests them and they think you know they can handle it i think they ought to be able to do it Then the following statement: "I think that women should be allowed to do anything they wish to, as long as they are capable." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
139,546
139546e
Sure, I might be able to sell them to a used software store, but I wouldn't be able to get more than $5 or so because those stores must mark them up so substantially to cover their own costs.
( ( ( ( ( Sure ( , ( I ( might ( be ( able ( to ( ( sell them ) ( to ( a ( used ( software store ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( I ( ( would n't ) ( ( be ( able ( to ( get ( ( more ( than ( $ 5 ) ) ) ( or so ) ) ) ) ) ) ( because ( ( those stores ) ( must ( ( ( mark them ) up ) ( so ( substantially ( to ( cover ( their ( own costs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (INTJ (RB Sure)) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD might) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ able) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB sell) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT a) (JJ used) (NN software) (NN store)))))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD would) (RB n't) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ able) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (NP (NP (QP (JJR more) (IN than) ($ $) (CD 5))) (ADVP (CC or) (RB so))))))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (DT those) (NNS stores)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB mark) (NP (PRP them)) (PRT (RP up)) (ADVP (RB so) (RB substantially) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB cover) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ own) (NNS costs))))))))))))) (. .)))
I could probably sell them to a store but I wouldn't get much money because the software store has to make a profit too.
( ( ( ( I ( ( could probably ) ( ( sell them ) ( to ( a store ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( I ( ( would n't ) ( ( get ( much money ) ) ( because ( ( the ( software store ) ) ( has ( to ( ( make ( a profit ) ) too ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD could) (ADVP (RB probably)) (VP (VB sell) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT a) (NN store)))))) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD would) (RB n't) (VP (VB get) (NP (JJ much) (NN money)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (DT the) (NN software) (NN store)) (VP (VBZ has) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (NP (DT a) (NN profit)) (ADVP (RB too))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Sure, I might be able to sell them to a used software store, but I wouldn't be able to get more than $5 or so because those stores must mark them up so substantially to cover their own costs. Then the following statement: "I could probably sell them to a store but I wouldn't get much money because the software store has to make a profit too. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
125,946
125946c
129 She began slowly, walking up and down the room, her head a little bent, and that slim, supple figure of hers swaying gently as she walked.
( 129 ( She ( ( ( ( began slowly ) , ) ( ( walking ( ( up and ) down ) ) ( ( ( ( ( ( the room ) , ) ( ( her head ) ( a ( little bent ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( that ( slim ( , ( supple figure ) ) ) ) ( of ( hers ( ( swaying gently ) ( as ( she walked ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB 129)) (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD began) (ADVP (RB slowly)) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG walking) (PRT (RP up) (CC and) (RP down)) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN room)) (, ,) (NP (NP (PRP$ her) (NN head)) (NP (DT a) (JJ little) (NN bent))) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT that) (JJ slim) (, ,) (JJ supple) (NN figure)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS hers)) (VP (VBG swaying) (ADVP (RB gently)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD walked)))))))))))) (. .)))
She was agitated and make jerky movements as she walked around the room.
( She ( ( was ( ( agitated and ) ( ( make ( jerky movements ) ) ( as ( she ( walked ( around ( the room ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VP (VBN agitated)) (CC and) (VP (VB make) (NP (JJ jerky) (NNS movements)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD walked) (PP (IN around) (NP (DT the) (NN room))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: 129 She began slowly, walking up and down the room, her head a little bent, and that slim, supple figure of hers swaying gently as she walked. Then the following statement: "She was agitated and make jerky movements as she walked around the room. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
145,927
145927e
GAO will refer inquiries for any additional information to the congressional requester(s).
( GAO ( ( will ( ( refer ( inquiries ( for ( any ( additional information ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( the ( congressional requester ) ) ( -LRB- ( s -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP GAO)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB refer) (NP (NP (NNS inquiries)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT any) (JJ additional) (NN information)))) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ congressional) (NN requester)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (PRP s) (-RRB- -RRB-)))))) (. .)))
Inquires for more info will be sent to the congressional requester.
( ( Inquires ( for ( more info ) ) ) ( ( will ( be ( sent ( to ( the ( congressional requester ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Inquires)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJR more) (NN info)))) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN sent) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ congressional) (NN requester)))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: GAO will refer inquiries for any additional information to the congressional requester(s). Then the following statement: "Inquires for more info will be sent to the congressional requester." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
20,448
20448n
The incremental reforms that traditionalists favor to put the system's books in long-term balance all assume that the current trust fund balances, held in the form of Treasury bonds, are really being compounded and preserved.
( ( ( The ( incremental reforms ) ) ( that ( traditionalists ( favor ( to ( ( put ( ( the ( system 's ) ) books ) ) ( in ( long-term balance ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( all ( ( assume ( that ( ( ( ( ( the ( current ( trust ( fund balances ) ) ) ) , ) ( held ( in ( ( the form ) ( of ( Treasury bonds ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( are really ) ( being ( ( compounded and ) preserved ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ incremental) (NNS reforms)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNS traditionalists)) (VP (VBP favor) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB put) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN system) (POS 's)) (NNS books)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ long-term) (NN balance)))))))))) (ADVP (DT all)) (VP (VBP assume) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ current) (NN trust) (NN fund) (NNS balances)) (, ,) (VP (VBN held) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN form)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Treasury) (NNS bonds)))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBN compounded) (CC and) (VBN preserved))))))) (. .)))
The incremental reforms hold a very large importance to them.
( ( The ( incremental reforms ) ) ( ( hold ( ( a ( ( very large ) importance ) ) ( to them ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ incremental) (NNS reforms)) (VP (VBP hold) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ large)) (NN importance)) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP them))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The incremental reforms that traditionalists favor to put the system's books in long-term balance all assume that the current trust fund balances, held in the form of Treasury bonds, are really being compounded and preserved. Then the following statement: "The incremental reforms hold a very large importance to them." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
29,746
29746e
Once again Judea was conquered by foreign forces and Jerusalem reduced to rubble.
( ( Once again ) ( Judea ( ( was ( conquered ( by ( ( ( foreign forces ) and ) ( Jerusalem ( reduced ( to rubble ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Once) (RB again)) (NP (NNP Judea)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN conquered) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (JJ foreign) (NNS forces)) (CC and) (NP (NP (NNP Jerusalem)) (VP (VBN reduced) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN rubble))))))))) (. .)))
Not for the first time, Judea was conquered by foreign invaders.
( ( Not ( for ( the ( first time ) ) ) ) ( , ( Judea ( ( was ( conquered ( by ( foreign invaders ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (RB Not) (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJ first) (NN time))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Judea)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN conquered) (PP (IN by) (NP (JJ foreign) (NNS invaders))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Once again Judea was conquered by foreign forces and Jerusalem reduced to rubble. Then the following statement: "Not for the first time, Judea was conquered by foreign invaders." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
31,938
31938e
The previous record holder, Michael Collins , took in about $5 million less.
( ( ( ( ( The ( previous ( record holder ) ) ) , ) ( Michael Collins ) ) , ) ( ( took ( ( in ( about ( ( $ 5 ) million ) ) ) less ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ previous) (NN record) (NN holder)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Michael) (NNP Collins)) (, ,)) (VP (VBD took) (PP (IN in) (NP (QP (RB about) ($ $) (CD 5) (CD million))) (ADVP (RBR less)))) (. .)))
The last record holder made a few million less.
( ( The ( last ( record holder ) ) ) ( ( made ( a ( few ( million less ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ last) (NN record) (NN holder)) (VP (VBD made) (NP (DT a) (JJ few) (QP (CD million) (JJR less)))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The previous record holder, Michael Collins , took in about $5 million less. Then the following statement: "The last record holder made a few million less." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
28,221
28221n
you start um the dollar value on things
( you ( start ( ( um ( the ( dollar value ) ) ) ( on things ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP start) (VP (VB um) (NP (DT the) (NN dollar) (NN value)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNS things)))))))
You start with the dollar value and then move to different sort of values.
( You ( ( ( ( start ( with ( the ( dollar value ) ) ) ) and ) ( then ( move ( to ( ( different sort ) ( of values ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VP (VBP start) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (NN dollar) (NN value)))) (CC and) (VP (ADVP (RB then)) (VBP move) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (JJ different) (NN sort)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS values))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: you start um the dollar value on things Then the following statement: "You start with the dollar value and then move to different sort of values." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
60,374
60374e
In addition, many organizations required users to sign a statement that they had read and understood the organization's information security policies.
( ( In addition ) ( , ( ( many organizations ) ( ( ( ( ( required users ) ( to ( ( sign ( a statement ) ) ( that ( they ( had read ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( understood ( ( the ( organization 's ) ) ( information ( security policies ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NN addition))) (, ,) (NP (JJ many) (NNS organizations)) (VP (VP (VBD required) (NP (NNS users)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB sign) (NP (DT a) (NN statement)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN read))))))))) (CC and) (VP (VBD understood) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN organization) (POS 's)) (NN information) (NN security) (NNS policies)))) (. .)))
Many groups made users sign a statement saying they agreed to the security policies.
( ( Many groups ) ( ( made ( users ( sign ( ( a statement ) ( saying ( they ( agreed ( to ( the ( security policies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Many) (NNS groups)) (VP (VBD made) (S (NP (NNS users)) (VP (VB sign) (S (NP (DT a) (NN statement)) (VP (VBG saying) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD agreed) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN security) (NNS policies))))))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In addition, many organizations required users to sign a statement that they had read and understood the organization's information security policies. Then the following statement: "Many groups made users sign a statement saying they agreed to the security policies." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
68,738
68738e
But somehow you expect that from Republicans, whereas you don't expect it from big-name national Democrats, especially Northerners like George Mitchell.
( But ( somehow ( you ( ( ( ( expect ( that ( from Republicans ) ) ) , ) ( whereas ( you ( ( do n't ) ( ( expect it ) ( from ( ( ( big-name ( national Democrats ) ) , ) ( ( especially Northerners ) ( like ( George Mitchell ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC But) (ADVP (RB somehow)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP expect) (NP (NP (DT that)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNPS Republicans)))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN whereas) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB expect) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (JJ big-name) (JJ national) (NNS Democrats)) (, ,) (NP (NP (RB especially) (NNPS Northerners)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NNP George) (NNP Mitchell))))))))))) (. .)))
George Mitchell is a big name Democrat from the north.
( ( George Mitchell ) ( ( is ( ( a ( big ( name Democrat ) ) ) ( from ( the north ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP George) (NNP Mitchell)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ big) (NN name) (NNP Democrat)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NN north))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: But somehow you expect that from Republicans, whereas you don't expect it from big-name national Democrats, especially Northerners like George Mitchell. Then the following statement: "George Mitchell is a big name Democrat from the north." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
100,190
100190c
The principal excavated site, Zona Archeologica, is located on the northwest corner of the modern city.
( ( ( ( ( The ( principal ( excavated site ) ) ) , ) ( Zona Archeologica ) ) , ) ( ( is ( located ( on ( ( the ( northwest corner ) ) ( of ( the ( modern city ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ principal) (JJ excavated) (NN site)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Zona) (NNP Archeologica)) (, ,)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN located) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ northwest) (NN corner)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ modern) (NN city))))))) (. .)))
It's unknown where the Zona Archeologica is located.
( It ( ( ( 's unknown ) ( where ( ( the ( Zona Archeologica ) ) ( is located ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ unknown)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (DT the) (NNP Zona) (NNP Archeologica)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN located)))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The principal excavated site, Zona Archeologica, is located on the northwest corner of the modern city. Then the following statement: "It's unknown where the Zona Archeologica is located." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
122,669
122669c
He cuts back on the hot air, descends and yells to a man he spots on the ground.
( ( He ( ( ( ( ( ( cuts back ) ( on ( the ( hot air ) ) ) ) , ) descends ) and ) ( yells ( to ( a man ) ) ) ) ) ( he ( ( spots ( on ( the ground ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VP (VBZ cuts) (PRT (RP back)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (JJ hot) (NN air)))) (, ,) (VP (VBZ descends)) (CC and) (VP (VBZ yells) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT a) (NN man)))))) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ spots) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN ground)))) (. .)))
He increases the hot air in his balloon.
( He ( ( increases ( ( the ( hot air ) ) ( in ( his balloon ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBZ increases) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ hot) (NN air)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN balloon))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: He cuts back on the hot air, descends and yells to a man he spots on the ground. Then the following statement: "He increases the hot air in his balloon." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
45,724
45724e
I pulled my off-hand dagger and pushed it up under his chin into his brain.
( I ( ( ( ( pulled ( my ( off-hand dagger ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( ( pushed it ) up ) ( under ( his chin ) ) ) ( into ( his brain ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VP (VBD pulled) (NP (PRP$ my) (JJ off-hand) (NN dagger))) (CC and) (VP (VBD pushed) (NP (PRP it)) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (IN under) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN chin))) (PP (IN into) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN brain))))) (. .)))
I stabbed him in the head.
( I ( ( ( stabbed him ) ( in ( the head ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD stabbed) (NP (PRP him)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN head)))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I pulled my off-hand dagger and pushed it up under his chin into his brain. Then the following statement: "I stabbed him in the head." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
58,037
58037n
Everyone from the youngest to the oldest rests during the heat of the afternoon and makes the most of the cool evenings, often not going to bed until well after midnight.
( ( Everyone ( from ( ( the youngest ) ( to ( the oldest ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( ( ( rests ( during ( ( the heat ) ( of ( the afternoon ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( makes ( ( the most ) ( of ( the ( cool evenings ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( often not ) ( ( ( going ( to bed ) ) ( until well ) ) ( after midnight ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN Everyone)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS youngest)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJS oldest)))))) (VP (VP (VBZ rests) (PP (IN during) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN heat)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN afternoon)))))) (CC and) (VP (VBZ makes) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS most)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ cool) (NNS evenings))))) (, ,) (S (VP (ADVP (RB often) (RB not)) (VBG going) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN bed))) (PP (IN until) (ADVP (RB well))) (PP (IN after) (NP (NN midnight)))))) (. .)))
Most people enjoy the cooler weather in the evenings as opposed to the hot afternoons.
( ( Most people ) ( ( enjoy ( ( ( the ( cooler weather ) ) ( in ( the evenings ) ) ) ( as ( opposed ( to ( the ( hot afternoons ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJS Most) (NNS people)) (VP (VBP enjoy) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (JJR cooler) (NN weather)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNS evenings)))) (ADJP (RB as) (VBN opposed) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ hot) (NNS afternoons)))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Everyone from the youngest to the oldest rests during the heat of the afternoon and makes the most of the cool evenings, often not going to bed until well after midnight. Then the following statement: "Most people enjoy the cooler weather in the evenings as opposed to the hot afternoons." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
131,554
131554n
I followed his instructions, taking up my position by the baize door, and wondering what on earth lay behind the request.
( ( ( ( ( I ( ( ( followed ( his instructions ) ) , ) ( ( ( taking up ) ( my position ) ) ( by ( the ( baize door ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( ( wondering what ) ( on earth ) ) ( lay ( behind ( the request ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD followed) (NP (PRP$ his) (NNS instructions)) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG taking) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN position)) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (JJ baize) (NN door))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (S (VP (VBG wondering) (NP (WP what)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN earth))))) (VP (VBD lay) (PP (IN behind) (NP (DT the) (NN request))))) (. .)))
I was hoping this wasn't some sort of trick.
( I ( ( was ( hoping ( this ( ( was n't ) ( ( some sort ) ( of trick ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG hoping) (SBAR (S (NP (DT this)) (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (NP (NP (DT some) (NN sort)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN trick))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I followed his instructions, taking up my position by the baize door, and wondering what on earth lay behind the request. Then the following statement: "I was hoping this wasn't some sort of trick." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
143,249
143249c
Also, no self-respecting mobster wants his son to follow in his footsteps.
( Also ( , ( ( no ( self-respecting mobster ) ) ( ( wants ( his ( son ( to ( follow ( in ( his footsteps ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Also)) (, ,) (NP (DT no) (JJ self-respecting) (NN mobster)) (VP (VBZ wants) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN son) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB follow) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ his) (NNS footsteps)))))))) (. .)))
All mobsters would want their children to follow in their footsteps.
( ( All mobsters ) ( ( would ( ( want ( their children ) ) ( to ( follow ( in ( their footsteps ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT All) (NNS mobsters)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB want) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS children)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB follow) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS footsteps)))))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Also, no self-respecting mobster wants his son to follow in his footsteps. Then the following statement: "All mobsters would want their children to follow in their footsteps." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
24,173
24173n
At the east end of the Louvre is the Cour Carr??e, covering the original fortress built by Philippe Auguste in 1190 to protect Paris from river attack while he was away on a crusade.
( ( At ( ( the ( east end ) ) ( of ( the Louvre ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( ( is ( the ( Cour Carr ) ) ) ( ?? e ) ) , ) ( covering ( ( the ( original fortress ) ) ( ( built ( by ( ( Philippe Auguste ) ( in 1190 ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( ( protect Paris ) ( from ( river attack ) ) ) ( while ( he ( ( was away ) ( on ( a crusade ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (SINV (PP (IN At) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ east) (NN end)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Louvre))))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT the) (NNP Cour) (NNP Carr))) (NP (NNP ??) (NNP e)) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG covering) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ original) (NNS fortress)) (VP (VBN built) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NNP Philippe) (NNP Auguste)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1190))))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB protect) (NP (NNP Paris)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NN river) (NN attack))) (SBAR (IN while) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB away)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT a) (NN crusade))))))))))))) (. .)))
Philippe Auguste was the general for the French army.
( ( Philippe Auguste ) ( ( was ( ( the general ) ( for ( the ( French army ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Philippe) (NNP Auguste)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN general)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJ French) (NN army))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: At the east end of the Louvre is the Cour Carr??e, covering the original fortress built by Philippe Auguste in 1190 to protect Paris from river attack while he was away on a crusade. Then the following statement: "Philippe Auguste was the general for the French army." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
29,308
29308c
yeah she always had uh yeah she always had to have a lot of clothes
( yeah ( she ( always ( had ( ( uh yeah ) ( she ( always ( had ( to ( have ( ( a lot ) ( of clothes ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP she)) (ADVP (RB always)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (JJ uh) (NN yeah)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP she)) (ADVP (RB always)) (VP (VBD had) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS clothes)))))))))))))))))
She bought a couple of clothes a year.
( She ( ( ( bought ( ( a couple ) ( of clothes ) ) ) ( a year ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD bought) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN couple)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS clothes)))) (NP (DT a) (NN year))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah she always had uh yeah she always had to have a lot of clothes Then the following statement: "She bought a couple of clothes a year." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
129,324
129324e
Hundreds of dogs are euthanized every day.
( ( Hundreds ( of dogs ) ) ( ( are ( euthanized ( every day ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Hundreds)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS dogs)))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN euthanized) (NP (DT every) (NN day)))) (. .)))
Many dogs are euthanized each day.
( ( Many dogs ) ( ( are ( euthanized ( each day ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Many) (NNS dogs)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN euthanized) (NP (DT each) (NN day)))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Hundreds of dogs are euthanized every day. Then the following statement: "Many dogs are euthanized each day." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
107,985
107985c
Before long, the streets and alleys around the temple were filled with music halls, burlesque theaters, cabarets, gambling dens, and watering holes of every description.
( ( Before long ) ( , ( ( ( the ( ( streets and ) alleys ) ) ( around ( the temple ) ) ) ( ( were ( filled ( with ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( music halls ) , ) ( burlesque theaters ) ) , ) cabarets ) , ) ( gambling dens ) ) , ) and ) ( ( watering holes ) ( of ( every description ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (IN Before) (RB long)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NX (NX (NNS streets)) (CC and) (NX (NNS alleys)))) (PP (IN around) (NP (DT the) (NN temple)))) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN filled) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NN music) (NNS halls)) (, ,) (NP (JJ burlesque) (NNS theaters)) (, ,) (NP (NNS cabarets)) (, ,) (NP (NN gambling) (NNS dens)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (NN watering) (NNS holes)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT every) (NN description)))))))) (. .)))
Orphanages crowded the streets and alleys around the temple.
( Orphanages ( ( ( crowded ( the ( ( streets and ) alleys ) ) ) ( around ( the temple ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Orphanages)) (VP (VBD crowded) (NP (DT the) (NX (NX (NNS streets)) (CC and) (NX (NNS alleys)))) (PP (IN around) (NP (DT the) (NN temple)))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Before long, the streets and alleys around the temple were filled with music halls, burlesque theaters, cabarets, gambling dens, and watering holes of every description. Then the following statement: "Orphanages crowded the streets and alleys around the temple." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
142,601
142601e
In addition to the legislative support I've already discussed, GAO will be assessing whether it may need additional authority from the Congress to obtain certain types of records for conducting our work.
( ( ( In ( addition ( to ( the ( legislative support ) ) ) ) ) ( I ( ( 've already ) discussed ) ) ) ( , ( GAO ( ( will ( be ( assessing ( whether ( it ( may ( ( ( need ( additional authority ) ) ( from ( the Congress ) ) ) ( to ( ( obtain ( ( certain types ) ( of records ) ) ) ( for ( conducting ( our work ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (NN addition)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ legislative) (NN support))))) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 've) (ADVP (RB already)) (VP (VBN discussed)))) (, ,) (NP (NNP GAO)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBG assessing) (SBAR (IN whether) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB need) (NP (JJ additional) (NN authority)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NNP Congress))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB obtain) (NP (NP (JJ certain) (NNS types)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS records)))) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG conducting) (NP (PRP$ our) (NN work))))))))))))))) (. .)))
I have discussed the legislative support already.
( I ( ( have ( ( discussed ( the ( legislative support ) ) ) already ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN discussed) (NP (DT the) (JJ legislative) (NN support)) (ADVP (RB already)))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In addition to the legislative support I've already discussed, GAO will be assessing whether it may need additional authority from the Congress to obtain certain types of records for conducting our work. Then the following statement: "I have discussed the legislative support already." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
137,973
137973c
He has been looking into the 1996 campaign-finance scandals.
( He ( ( has ( been ( looking ( into ( the ( 1996 ( campaign-finance scandals ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBG looking) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT the) (CD 1996) (JJ campaign-finance) (NNS scandals)))))) (. .)))
He doesn't know anything about any scandals.
( He ( ( ( does n't ) ( ( know anything ) ( about ( any scandals ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (NP (NN anything)) (PP (IN about) (NP (DT any) (NNS scandals))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: He has been looking into the 1996 campaign-finance scandals. Then the following statement: "He doesn't know anything about any scandals." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
56,898
56898c
it's just it it's a really tough question and it you know it people have have really quieted down after everything started but i still think there's a lot of there's a lot of resentment
( it ( ( 's just ) ( it ( ( ( it ( 's ( a ( ( really tough ) question ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( it ( you ( know ( ( it people ) ( have ( ( have really ) ( ( quieted down ) ( after ( everything ( started ( but ( i ( still ( think ( there ( 's ( ( a lot ) ( of there ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( 's ( ( a lot ) ( of resentment ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB just)) (NP (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB really) (JJ tough)) (NN question)))) (CC and) (S (NP (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it) (NNS people)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBP have) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VBN quieted) (PRT (RP down)) (SBAR (IN after) (S (NP (NN everything)) (VP (VBD started) (SBAR (CC but) (S (NP (FW i)) (ADVP (RB still)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (RB there)))))))))))))))))))))) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN resentment))))))))))))
Everyone really hated the new policy.
( Everyone ( really ( ( hated ( the ( new policy ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Everyone)) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VBZ hated) (NP (DT the) (JJ new) (NN policy))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: it's just it it's a really tough question and it you know it people have have really quieted down after everything started but i still think there's a lot of there's a lot of resentment Then the following statement: "Everyone really hated the new policy." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
77,621
77621e
Since 1993, federal regulations have been modified to allow agencies
( ( Since 1993 ) ( , ( ( federal regulations ) ( have ( been ( modified ( to ( allow agencies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Since) (NP (CD 1993))) (, ,) (NP (JJ federal) (NNS regulations)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN modified) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB allow) (NP (NNS agencies))))))))))
Since 1993, federal regulations have been modified to allow agencies
( ( Since 1993 ) ( , ( ( federal regulations ) ( have ( been ( modified ( to ( allow agencies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Since) (NP (CD 1993))) (, ,) (NP (JJ federal) (NNS regulations)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN modified) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB allow) (NP (NNS agencies))))))))))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Since 1993, federal regulations have been modified to allow agencies Then the following statement: "Since 1993, federal regulations have been modified to allow agencies" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
37,984
37984e
The programs continue to receive very strong support from the MSBA, the court and the legislature.
( ( The programs ) ( ( continue ( to ( ( receive ( ( very strong ) support ) ) ( from ( ( ( ( ( the MSBA ) , ) ( the court ) ) and ) ( the legislature ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS programs)) (VP (VBP continue) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB receive) (NP (ADJP (RB very) (JJ strong)) (NN support)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP MSBA)) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN court)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (NN legislature)))))))) (. .)))
The MSBA gives strong support to the programs.
( ( The MSBA ) ( ( ( gives ( strong support ) ) ( to ( the programs ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP MSBA)) (VP (VBZ gives) (NP (JJ strong) (NN support)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNS programs)))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The programs continue to receive very strong support from the MSBA, the court and the legislature. Then the following statement: "The MSBA gives strong support to the programs." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
8,843
8843n
I thought about this for a minute, and decided that it didn't make me feel any better.
( I ( ( ( ( ( thought ( about ( this ( for ( a minute ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( decided ( that ( it ( ( did n't ) ( make ( me ( feel ( any better ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VP (VBD thought) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (DT this)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (NN minute)))))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (VBD decided) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB make) (S (NP (PRP me)) (VP (VB feel) (ADVP (DT any) (RBR better)))))))))) (. .)))
I thought about the drugs I took for a minute.
( I ( ( ( thought ( about ( the drugs ) ) ) ( I ( took ( for ( a minute ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD thought) (PP (IN about) (NP (DT the) (NNS drugs))) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD took) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (NN minute))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I thought about this for a minute, and decided that it didn't make me feel any better. Then the following statement: "I thought about the drugs I took for a minute." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
39,484
39484c
The streets is going to run with blood, so they say." He spoke with a grim relish.
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( The streets ) ( is ( going ( to ( run ( with blood ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) so ) ( they say ) ) . ) '' ) ( He ( spoke ( with ( a ( grim relish ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (S (NP (DT The) (NNS streets)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB run) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN blood))))))))) (, ,) (IN so) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP say)))) (. .) ('' '') (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD spoke) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT a) (JJ grim) (NN relish))))) (. .)))
He spoke with dread about blood gushing down the streets.
( He ( ( ( ( spoke ( with dread ) ) ( about blood ) ) ( ( gushing down ) ( the streets ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD spoke) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN dread))) (PP (IN about) (NP (NN blood))) (S (VP (VBG gushing) (PRT (RP down)) (NP (DT the) (NNS streets))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The streets is going to run with blood, so they say." He spoke with a grim relish. Then the following statement: "He spoke with dread about blood gushing down the streets." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
53,601
53601c
okay uh right here in Colorado Springs where i live
( okay ( ( ( uh ( right here ) ) ( in ( Colorado Springs ) ) ) ( where ( i live ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADJP (JJ okay)) (S (VP (VBG uh) (ADVP (RB right) (RB here)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Colorado) (NNP Springs))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP live))))))))
I have never heard of Colorado Springs.
( I ( ( ( have never ) ( heard ( of ( Colorado Springs ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBN heard) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Colorado) (NNP Springs))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: okay uh right here in Colorado Springs where i live Then the following statement: "I have never heard of Colorado Springs." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
29,177
29177c
so although you can i mean there's cookbooks and there's ways to do it it's a lot more expensive too i think you know the the the market is just not made for a vegan so but um
( so ( although ( you ( ( can i ) ( mean ( ( ( ( ( ( there ( 's cookbooks ) ) and ) ( there ( 's ( ways ( to ( do it ) ) ) ) ) ) ( it ( 's ( ( ( a lot ) more ) expensive ) ) ) ) ( too ( i ( think ( you ( know ( the the ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( the market ) ( ( is ( just not ) ) ( ( ( made ( for ( ( a vegan ) so ) ) ) but ) um ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADVP (RB so)) (SBAR (IN although) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (ADVP (RB i)) (VP (VB mean) (S (S (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NNS cookbooks)))) (CC and) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NNS ways) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (PRP it))))))))) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (ADVP (NP (DT a) (RB lot)) (RBR more)) (JJ expensive)))) (S (ADVP (RB too)) (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (NP (DT the) (DT the))))))) (S (NP (DT the) (NN market)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB just) (RB not)) (VP (VP (VBN made) (PP (IN for) (ADVP (NP (DT a) (NN vegan)) (RB so)))) (CC but) (VP (VBN um))))))))))))
Every shop sells cheap vegan food.
( ( Every shop ) ( ( sells ( cheap ( vegan food ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT Every) (NN shop)) (VP (VBZ sells) (NP (JJ cheap) (NN vegan) (NN food))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: so although you can i mean there's cookbooks and there's ways to do it it's a lot more expensive too i think you know the the the market is just not made for a vegan so but um Then the following statement: "Every shop sells cheap vegan food." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
119,831
119831e
The Handbook of 101 Poems of Lost Love and Sorrow is an anthology published by Morrow.
( ( ( The Handbook ) ( of ( ( 101 Poems ) ( of ( Lost ( ( Love and ) Sorrow ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( ( an anthology ) ( published ( by Morrow ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN Handbook)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (CD 101) (NNS Poems)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ Lost) (NN Love) (CC and) (NN Sorrow)))))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN anthology)) (VP (VBN published) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP Morrow)))))) (. .)))
Morrow published The Handbook of 101 Poems of Lost Love and Sorrow.
( Morrow ( ( published ( ( The Handbook ) ( of ( ( 101 Poems ) ( of ( Lost ( ( Love and ) Sorrow ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Morrow)) (VP (VBD published) (NP (NP (DT The) (NN Handbook)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (CD 101) (NNS Poems)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ Lost) (NN Love) (CC and) (NN Sorrow))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The Handbook of 101 Poems of Lost Love and Sorrow is an anthology published by Morrow. Then the following statement: "Morrow published The Handbook of 101 Poems of Lost Love and Sorrow." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
88,951
88951e
yeah isn't that funny i wasn't either i have uh
( yeah ( ( is n't ) ( that ( ( funny i ) ( ( ( was n't ) either ) ( i ( have uh ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN yeah)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB n't) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (JJ funny) (NNS i)) (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB either)) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN uh))))))))))))
That's quite funny and I wasn't either.
( ( ( ( That ( 's ( quite funny ) ) ) and ) ( I ( ( was n't ) either ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB quite) (JJ funny)))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB either)))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah isn't that funny i wasn't either i have uh Then the following statement: "That's quite funny and I wasn't either." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
118,507
118507c
Such services are usually provided by lawyers through various public interest programs at no fee or a reduced fee as part their ethical commitment under the Rules of Professional Conduct.
( ( Such services ) ( ( ( are usually ) ( ( provided ( by lawyers ) ) ( through ( ( ( ( various ( public ( interest programs ) ) ) ( at ( no fee ) ) ) or ) ( ( ( ( a ( reduced fee ) ) ( as ( part ( their ( ethical commitment ) ) ) ) ) ( under ( the Rules ) ) ) ( of ( Professional Conduct ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Such) (NNS services)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB usually)) (VP (VBN provided) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNS lawyers))) (PP (IN through) (NP (NP (NP (JJ various) (JJ public) (NN interest) (NNS programs)) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT no) (NN fee)))) (CC or) (NP (NP (DT a) (VBN reduced) (NN fee)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (NN part)) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ ethical) (NN commitment)))) (PP (IN under) (NP (DT the) (NNPS Rules))) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Professional) (NNP Conduct)))))))) (. .)))
Lawyers often give those services through public interest programs at a high cost.
( Lawyers ( often ( ( ( give ( those services ) ) ( through ( ( public ( interest programs ) ) ( at ( a ( high cost ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Lawyers)) (ADVP (RB often)) (VP (VBP give) (NP (DT those) (NNS services)) (PP (IN through) (NP (NP (JJ public) (NN interest) (NNS programs)) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT a) (JJ high) (NN cost)))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Such services are usually provided by lawyers through various public interest programs at no fee or a reduced fee as part their ethical commitment under the Rules of Professional Conduct. Then the following statement: "Lawyers often give those services through public interest programs at a high cost." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
210
210n
The owlish Bannen can twinkle without looking dear--there's something saturnine in that face.
( ( ( ( ( The ( owlish Bannen ) ) ( can ( twinkle ( without ( looking dear ) ) ) ) ) -- ) ( there ( 's ( ( something saturnine ) ( in ( that face ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (JJ owlish) (NN Bannen)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB twinkle) (PP (IN without) (S (VP (VBG looking) (ADJP (RB dear)))))))) (: --) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (NN something) (NN saturnine)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT that) (NN face)))))) (. .)))
When you happen to catch Bannen's eye, he sparkles.
( ( When ( you ( happen ( to ( catch ( ( Bannen 's ) eye ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( he ( sparkles . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP happen) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB catch) (NP (NP (NNP Bannen) (POS 's)) (NN eye)))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ sparkles)) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The owlish Bannen can twinkle without looking dear--there's something saturnine in that face. Then the following statement: "When you happen to catch Bannen's eye, he sparkles." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
103,598
103598e
'The balloonist yells back, You must work in information technology.
( ` ( ( ( The balloonist ) ( yells back ) ) ( , ( You ( ( must ( work ( in ( information technology ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (`` `) (S (NP (DT The) (NN balloonist)) (VP (VBZ yells) (PRT (RP back)))) (, ,) (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB work) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN information) (NN technology))))) (. .)))
The balloonist yelled "you must work in information technology"
( ( The balloonist ) ( yelled ( `` ( you ( ( must ( work ( in ( information technology ) ) ) ) '' ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN balloonist)) (VP (VBD yelled) (S (`` ``) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB work) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN information) (NN technology))))) ('' '')))))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: 'The balloonist yells back, You must work in information technology. Then the following statement: "The balloonist yelled "you must work in information technology" " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
129,656
129656e
so that they can pick and chose what they like uh you know there they've got one that they call a cafeteria plan i don't know whether you're familiar with that or not
( so ( ( ( that ( they ( ( ( can pick ) and ) ( chose ( what ( they ( like ( uh ( you ( know ( there ( they ( 've ( ( got one ) ( that ( they ( call ( ( a cafeteria ) ( plan ( i ( ( do n't ) ( know ( whether ( you ( 're ( familiar ( with that ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) or ) not ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADVP (RB so)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VP (MD can) (VP (VB pick))) (CC and) (VP (VBD chose) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP like) (SBAR (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (S (ADVP (RB there)) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN got) (NP (CD one)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP call) (SBAR (S (NP (DT a) (NN cafeteria)) (VP (VBP plan) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (IN whether) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADJP (JJ familiar) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT that))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) (CC or) (RB not))))
This company offers a meal plan.
( ( This company ) ( ( offers ( a ( meal plan ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT This) (NN company)) (VP (VBZ offers) (NP (DT a) (NN meal) (NN plan))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: so that they can pick and chose what they like uh you know there they've got one that they call a cafeteria plan i don't know whether you're familiar with that or not Then the following statement: "This company offers a meal plan." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
23,640
23640e
Apparently this was supposed to be a difficult subject, from the constant efforts of the writer to make his point clear.
( Apparently ( this ( ( was ( ( ( supposed ( to ( be ( a ( difficult subject ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( from ( ( the ( constant efforts ) ) ( of ( the ( writer ( to ( make ( ( his point ) clear ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Apparently)) (NP (DT this)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN supposed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (DT a) (JJ difficult) (JJ subject))))) (, ,) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ constant) (NNS efforts)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN writer) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (S (NP (PRP$ his) (NN point)) (ADJP (JJ clear)))))))))))) (. .)))
The writer had attempted to be easily understood in his writing.
( ( The writer ) ( ( had ( attempted ( to ( be ( easily ( understood ( in ( his writing ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN writer)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN attempted) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (ADVP (RB easily)) (VBN understood) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN writing))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Apparently this was supposed to be a difficult subject, from the constant efforts of the writer to make his point clear. Then the following statement: "The writer had attempted to be easily understood in his writing. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
113,480
113480n
The tobacco settlement--Issue 3--is dead for now, says Gwen Ifill ( Washington Week in Review ). The Senate just isn't in a barter mood, which is what [legislation] requires, Ifill says.
( ( ( ( The ( tobacco settlement ) ) ( -- ( ( Issue 3 ) -- ) ) ) ( ( is ( dead ( for ( now ( , ( ( says ( ( Gwen Ifill ) ( -LRB- ( ( ( Washington Week ) ( in Review ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( The Senate ) ( just ( ( is n't ) ( in ( a ( barter mood ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( which ( is ( what ( ( -LSB- ( legislation -RSB- ) ) requires ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( Ifill ( says . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN tobacco) (NN settlement)) (PRN (: --) (NP (NNP Issue) (CD 3)) (: --))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ dead) (SBAR (IN for) (SINV (FRAG (ADVP (RB now))) (, ,) (VP (VBZ says)) (NP (NP (NNP Gwen) (NNP Ifill)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NP (NNP Washington) (NNP Week)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Review)))) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (. .)))) (SBAR (SBAR (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Senate)) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB n't) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (NN barter) (NN mood)))))) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (JJ -LSB-) (NN legislation) (NNS -RSB-)) (VP (VBZ requires)))))))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Ifill)) (VP (VBZ says)) (. .)))
Gwen Ifill is correct in saying that the tobacco settlement is dead for now.
( ( Gwen Ifill ) ( ( is ( correct ( in ( saying ( that ( ( the ( tobacco settlement ) ) ( is ( dead ( for now ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Gwen) (NNP Ifill)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ correct) (PP (IN in) (S (VP (VBG saying) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN tobacco) (NN settlement)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ dead) (PP (IN for) (ADVP (RB now)))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The tobacco settlement--Issue 3--is dead for now, says Gwen Ifill ( Washington Week in Review ). The Senate just isn't in a barter mood, which is what [legislation] requires, Ifill says. Then the following statement: "Gwen Ifill is correct in saying that the tobacco settlement is dead for now." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
79,508
79508c
As the organizations became more results-oriented, they often
( As ( ( the organizations ) ( became ( ( ( more results-oriented ) , ) ( they often ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBAR (IN As) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS organizations)) (VP (VBD became) (S (S (ADVP (RBR more)) (ADJP (JJ results-oriented))) (, ,) (S (NP (PRP they)) (ADVP (RB often))))))))
They wanted to focus on employees instead of results.
( They ( ( wanted ( to ( focus ( on ( employees ( instead ( of results ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD wanted) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB focus) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (NNS employees)) (PP (RB instead) (IN of) (NP (NNS results))))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: As the organizations became more results-oriented, they often Then the following statement: "They wanted to focus on employees instead of results." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
111,444
111444n
Several weeks later he was asked then ordered to vacate the room to make room for high rollers, whereupon he promptly bought the property and fired the management.
( ( ( Several weeks ) later ) ( he ( ( was ( ( asked then ) ( ( ( ( ( ordered ( to ( vacate ( the ( room ( to ( ( make room ) ( for ( high rollers ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( whereupon ( he ( promptly ( bought ( the property ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( fired ( the management ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (NP (JJ Several) (NNS weeks)) (RB later)) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN asked) (ADVP (RB then)) (S (VP (VP (VBN ordered) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB vacate) (NP (DT the) (NN room) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (NP (NN room)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ high) (NNS rollers))))))))))) (, ,) (VP (VBN whereupon) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (ADVP (RB promptly)) (VP (VBD bought) (NP (DT the) (NN property)))))) (CC and) (VP (VBD fired) (NP (DT the) (NN management))))))) (. .)))
When Jones was ordered to vacate the premises, he bought the property.
( ( When ( Jones ( was ( ordered ( to ( vacate ( the premises ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( he ( ( bought ( the property ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When)) (S (NP (NNP Jones)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN ordered) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB vacate) (NP (DT the) (NNS premises))))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD bought) (NP (DT the) (NN property))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Several weeks later he was asked then ordered to vacate the room to make room for high rollers, whereupon he promptly bought the property and fired the management. Then the following statement: "When Jones was ordered to vacate the premises, he bought the property." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
108,208
108208n
well i'm not sure of anything i can't really think of anything else that we could recycle
( well ( ( i ( ( ( 'm not ) sure ) ( of ( anything ( i ( ( ( ca n't ) really ) ( think ( of ( anything else ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( that ( we ( could recycle ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (ADVP (RB well)) (VP (ADVP (RB i)) (VBP 'm) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ sure)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN anything)) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VB think) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN anything) (RB else)))))))))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB recycle)))))))
We already got rid of the paper and plastic last week, so there isn't anything else that we could put in the recycle bin.
( ( ( ( ( We ( already ( ( got ( rid ( of ( the ( ( paper and ) plastic ) ) ) ) ) ( last week ) ) ) ) , ) so ) ( there ( ( ( is n't ) ( anything else ) ) ( that ( we ( could ( put ( in ( the ( recycle bin ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (ADVP (RB already)) (VBD got) (ADJP (JJ rid) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN paper) (CC and) (NN plastic)))) (NP (JJ last) (NN week)))) (, ,) (IN so) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB n't) (ADJP (NN anything) (JJ else)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB put) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP recycle) (NNP bin))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: well i'm not sure of anything i can't really think of anything else that we could recycle Then the following statement: "We already got rid of the paper and plastic last week, so there isn't anything else that we could put in the recycle bin. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
135,049
135049c
and we really didn't didn't uh i mean that wasn't our consideration when when we bought it it was a complete blank lot they hadn't even built the house yet and we were new to the this whole process and all we knew is that it was a the cheapest house that this this tract development uh sold so it turned out to be pretty good and
( and ( we ( really ( ( did n't ) ( ( did n't ) ( uh ( i ( mean ( that ( ( ( was n't ) ( ( our consideration ) ( when ( ( when ( we ( ( bought it ) ( it ( was ( ( a ( complete ( blank lot ) ) ) ( ( ( they ( ( ( had n't ) even ) ( ( built ( the house ) ) yet ) ) ) and ) ( we ( were ( new ( to ( the ( ( ( this ( whole process ) ) and ) all ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( we ( knew ( is ( that ( it ( ( was ( a ( the ( cheapest house ) ) ) ) ( that ( ( this ( this ( tract ( development uh ) ) ) ) ( sold ( so ( it ( ( turned out ) ( to ( be ( pretty good ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC and) (NP (PRP we)) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB uh) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VB mean) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (NP (NP (PRP$ our) (NN consideration)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD bought) (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ complete) (JJ blank) (NN lot)) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD had) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB even)) (VP (VBN built) (NP (DT the) (NN house)) (ADVP (RB yet))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (JJ new) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NP (DT this) (JJ whole) (NN process)) (CC and) (NP (DT all)))))))))))))))) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD knew) (SBAR (S (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT a) (DT the) (JJS cheapest) (NN house)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT this) (DT this) (VBN tract) (NN development) (NNS uh)) (VP (VBD sold) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD turned) (PRT (RP out)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ good))))))))))))))))))))) (ADVP (CC and))))))))))))
When we bought the house, it was already built
( ( When ( we ( bought ( the house ) ) ) ) ( , ( it ( was ( already built ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When)) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD bought) (NP (DT the) (NN house))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (ADVP (RB already)) (VBN built)))))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and we really didn't didn't uh i mean that wasn't our consideration when when we bought it it was a complete blank lot they hadn't even built the house yet and we were new to the this whole process and all we knew is that it was a the cheapest house that this this tract development uh sold so it turned out to be pretty good and Then the following statement: "When we bought the house, it was already built" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
109,234
109234c
in fact i'm a little worried about this one coming up here we have a long weekend and it sounds like it's gonna be a little bit on the cool side
( ( in fact ) ( i ( ( 'm ( ( a little ) worried ) ) ( about ( ( this one ) ( coming ( up ( here ( ( ( we ( have ( a ( long weekend ) ) ) ) and ) ( it ( sounds ( like ( it ( 's ( gon ( na ( ( be ( ( a little ) bit ) ) ( on ( the ( cool side ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN in) (NP (NN fact))) (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADJP (NP (DT a) (RB little)) (JJ worried)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (DT this) (NN one)) (VP (VBG coming) (ADVP (RB up) (RB here) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT a) (JJ long) (NN weekend)))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ sounds) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBG gon) (S (VP (TO na) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (NP (DT a) (RB little)) (NN bit)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (JJ cool) (NN side)))))))))))))))))))))
I've heard that it's going to be warm this weekend.
( I ( ( 've ( heard ( that ( it ( 's ( going ( to ( ( be warm ) ( this weekend ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN heard) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ warm)) (NP (DT this) (NN weekend))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: in fact i'm a little worried about this one coming up here we have a long weekend and it sounds like it's gonna be a little bit on the cool side Then the following statement: "I've heard that it's going to be warm this weekend." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
93,004
93004c
To provide further leadership and accountability for management, Congress may wish to consider several
( ( To ( ( provide ( further ( ( leadership and ) accountability ) ) ) ( for management ) ) ) ( , ( Congress ( may ( wish ( to ( consider several ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (TO To) (VP (VB provide) (NP (JJ further) (NN leadership) (CC and) (NN accountability)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN management)))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Congress)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB wish) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB consider) (NP (JJ several)))))))))
Don't give the future leaders any accountability
( ( Do n't ) ( ( give ( the ( future leaders ) ) ) ( any accountability ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Do) (RB n't) (VP (VB give) (NP (DT the) (JJ future) (NNS leaders)) (NP (DT any) (NN accountability))))))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: To provide further leadership and accountability for management, Congress may wish to consider several Then the following statement: "Don't give the future leaders any accountability" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
96,401
96401c
The verdict?
( The ( verdict ? ) )
(ROOT (NP (DT The) (NN verdict) (. ?)))
The interim decision?
( The ( interim ( decision ? ) ) )
(ROOT (NP (DT The) (JJ interim) (NN decision) (. ?)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The verdict? Then the following statement: "The interim decision?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
15,404
15404c
Well, in about half an hour.
( Well ( , ( ( in ( ( about half ) ( an hour ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (INTJ (UH Well)) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (QP (RB about) (PDT half))) (NP (DT an) (NN hour))) (. .))))
I will go in 40 years.
( I ( ( will ( go ( in ( 40 years ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB go) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 40) (NNS years))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Well, in about half an hour. Then the following statement: "I will go in 40 years." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
138,574
138574e
This ability replicates, to the extent possible, the perspective of utility managers, regulatory personnel, and the public in reviewing important investment options for the utility industry and electricity consumers.
( ( This ability ) ( ( ( ( ( replicates , ) ( to ( the ( extent possible ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( ( ( ( ( ( the perspective ) ( of ( utility managers ) ) ) , ) ( regulatory personnel ) ) , ) and ) ( ( the public ) ( in ( ( reviewing ( important ( investment options ) ) ) ( for ( ( ( the ( utility industry ) ) and ) ( electricity consumers ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT This) (NN ability)) (VP (VBZ replicates) (, ,) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN extent) (JJ possible))) (, ,) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN perspective)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN utility) (NNS managers)))) (, ,) (NP (JJ regulatory) (NNS personnel)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN public)) (PP (IN in) (S (VP (VBG reviewing) (NP (JJ important) (NN investment) (NNS options)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN utility) (NN industry)) (CC and) (NP (NN electricity) (NNS consumers)))))))))) (. .)))
The perspective of utility managers is replicated in this ability.
( ( ( The perspective ) ( of ( utility managers ) ) ) ( ( is ( replicated ( in ( this ability ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN perspective)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN utility) (NNS managers)))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN replicated) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT this) (NN ability))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: This ability replicates, to the extent possible, the perspective of utility managers, regulatory personnel, and the public in reviewing important investment options for the utility industry and electricity consumers. Then the following statement: "The perspective of utility managers is replicated in this ability." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
113,179
113179n
And how am I supposed to feel? Good is right.
( ( And ( how ( ( ( am I ) ( supposed ( to feel ) ) ) ? ) ) ) ( Good ( ( is right ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBARQ (CC And) (WHADVP (WRB how)) (SQ (VBP am) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBN supposed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB feel)))))) (. ?)) (NP (NNP Good)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ right))) (. .)))
I know I'm supposed to feel good about my performance.
( I ( ( know ( I ( 'm ( supposed ( to ( ( feel good ) ( about ( my performance ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (VP (VBN supposed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB feel) (ADJP (JJ good)) (PP (IN about) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN performance))))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: And how am I supposed to feel? Good is right. Then the following statement: "I know I'm supposed to feel good about my performance." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
57,208
57208n
The fact that Schmucko was Monica Lewinsky's phrase placated no one.)
( ( ( The fact ) ( that ( Schmucko ( was ( ( Monica ( Lewinsky 's ) ) phrase ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( placated ( no one ) ) . ) -RRB- ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN fact)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP Schmucko)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (NNP Monica) (NNP Lewinsky) (POS 's)) (NN phrase)))))) (VP (VBZ placated) (NP (DT no) (NN one))) (. .) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
Monica Lewinsky's manner of speaking is very brash.
( ( ( ( Monica ( Lewinsky 's ) ) manner ) ( of speaking ) ) ( ( is ( very brash ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NP (NNP Monica) (NNP Lewinsky) (POS 's)) (NN manner)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN speaking)))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ brash))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The fact that Schmucko was Monica Lewinsky's phrase placated no one.) Then the following statement: "Monica Lewinsky's manner of speaking is very brash." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
126,026
126026n
I know this firsthand from my on cannabinoids and rats.
( I ( ( ( ( know ( this firsthand ) ) ( from my ) ) ( on ( ( cannabinoids and ) rats ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP know) (NP (DT this) (JJ firsthand)) (PP (IN from) (NP (PRP$ my))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNS cannabinoids) (CC and) (NNS rats)))) (. .)))
I have experimented on rats and cannabinoids.
( I ( ( have ( experimented ( on ( ( rats and ) cannabinoids ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN experimented) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNS rats) (CC and) (NNS cannabinoids))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I know this firsthand from my on cannabinoids and rats. Then the following statement: "I have experimented on rats and cannabinoids." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
81,721
81721e
and there's other places but like you said the the food doesn't matter it's you have such a good time there
( and ( there ( ( ( 's ( other places ) ) ( but ( like ( you ( said ( ( the ( the food ) ) ( ( does n't ) ( matter ( it ( 's ( you ( have ( such ( a ( good time ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) there ) ) )
(ROOT (PRN (CC and) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (JJ other) (NNS places))) (PRN (CC but) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD said) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (DT the) (NN food)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't) (VP (VB matter) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (PDT such) (DT a) (JJ good) (NN time)))))))))))))))) (ADVP (RB there))))))
The food doesn't matter as long as you have fun.
( ( The food ) ( ( ( does n't ) ( matter ( ( as long ) ( as ( you ( have fun ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN food)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't) (VP (VB matter) (ADVP (ADVP (RB as) (RB long)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NN fun)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and there's other places but like you said the the food doesn't matter it's you have such a good time there Then the following statement: "The food doesn't matter as long as you have fun. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
127,287
127287e
Consider first the regularities.
( ( Consider ( first ( the regularities ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Consider) (NP (JJ first) (DT the) (NN regularities))) (. .)))
Regularities should be looked at first.
( Regularities ( ( should ( be ( looked ( at first ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Regularities)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN looked) (PP (IN at) (NP (JJ first)))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Consider first the regularities. Then the following statement: "Regularities should be looked at first." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
64,924
64924e
Examining the elements of the definition also may help make this distinction clear.
( ( Examining ( ( the elements ) ( of ( the definition ) ) ) ) ( also ( ( may ( help ( make ( ( this distinction ) clear ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Examining) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS elements)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN definition)))))) (ADVP (RB also)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB help) (S (VP (VB make) (S (NP (DT this) (NN distinction)) (ADJP (JJ clear))))))) (. .)))
Examining the individual elements of the definition also may help make this distinction clear.
( ( Examining ( ( the ( individual elements ) ) ( of ( the definition ) ) ) ) ( also ( ( may ( help ( make ( ( this distinction ) clear ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Examining) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ individual) (NNS elements)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN definition)))))) (ADVP (RB also)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB help) (S (VP (VB make) (S (NP (DT this) (NN distinction)) (ADJP (JJ clear))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Examining the elements of the definition also may help make this distinction clear. Then the following statement: "Examining the individual elements of the definition also may help make this distinction clear." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
102,394
102394n
The same boast can be made by anyone in Kansas.
( ( The ( same boast ) ) ( ( can ( be ( made ( by ( anyone ( in Kansas ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ same) (NN boast)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN made) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NN anyone)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Kansas)))))))) (. .)))
The same boast Bush made can be made by any man in Kansas.
( ( ( The ( same boast ) ) ( Bush made ) ) ( ( can ( be ( made ( by ( ( any man ) ( in Kansas ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ same) (NN boast)) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Bush)) (VP (VBD made))))) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN made) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT any) (NN man)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Kansas)))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The same boast can be made by anyone in Kansas. Then the following statement: "The same boast Bush made can be made by any man in Kansas." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
71,772
71772e
If you want to look at the actual menu and see what else is offered, then you should ask for la carta.
( ( If ( you ( want ( to ( ( ( look ( at ( the ( actual menu ) ) ) ) and ) ( see ( what ( else ( is offered ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( then ( you ( ( should ( ask ( for ( la carta ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN If) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB look) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (JJ actual) (NN menu)))) (CC and) (VP (VB see) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (ADVP (RB else)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN offered)))))))))))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB then)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB ask) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT la) (NN carta))))) (. .)))
La carta means menu, and you should ask for it to see a physical copy.
( ( ( ( ( ( La carta ) ( means menu ) ) , ) and ) ( you ( should ( ask ( for ( it ( to ( see ( a ( physical copy ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP La) (NNP carta)) (VP (VBZ means) (NP (NN menu)))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB ask) (SBAR (IN for) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (NP (DT a) (JJ physical) (NN copy))))))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: If you want to look at the actual menu and see what else is offered, then you should ask for la carta. Then the following statement: "La carta means menu, and you should ask for it to see a physical copy." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
135,242
135242c
For other organizations, design review primarily involved reviewing a more detailed facility design prepared by an inhouse design team or a private A/E firm under contract.
( ( For ( other organizations ) ) ( , ( ( design review ) ( primarily ( ( involved ( reviewing ( ( a ( ( more detailed ) ( facility design ) ) ) ( ( prepared ( by ( ( ( an ( inhouse ( design team ) ) ) or ) ( a ( private ( A/E firm ) ) ) ) ) ) ( under contract ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN For) (NP (JJ other) (NNS organizations))) (, ,) (NP (NN design) (NN review)) (ADVP (RB primarily)) (VP (VBD involved) (S (VP (VBG reviewing) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ detailed)) (NN facility) (NN design)) (VP (VBN prepared) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ inhouse) (NN design) (NN team)) (CC or) (NP (DT a) (JJ private) (NNP A/E) (NN firm)))) (PP (IN under) (NP (NN contract)))))))) (. .)))
Designs are only generated by the owners nephew who is good at art.
( Designs ( ( ( are only ) ( generated ( by ( ( the ( owners nephew ) ) ( who ( is ( good ( at art ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Designs)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB only)) (VP (VBN generated) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS owners) (NN nephew)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ good) (PP (IN at) (NP (NN art))))))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: For other organizations, design review primarily involved reviewing a more detailed facility design prepared by an inhouse design team or a private A/E firm under contract. Then the following statement: "Designs are only generated by the owners nephew who is good at art." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
63,655
63655c
After rival Fujiwara factions had been struggling for years to gain control of the imperial throne, they turned to the Taira and Minamoto armies in 1156 to wage the four-year war that heralded the end of the golden age of the Heian court.
( ( After ( ( rival ( Fujiwara factions ) ) ( had ( been ( ( struggling ( for years ) ) ( to ( gain ( control ( of ( the ( imperial throne ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( they ( ( ( ( turned ( to ( the ( Taira ( and ( Minamoto armies ) ) ) ) ) ) ( in 1156 ) ) ( to ( wage ( ( the ( four-year war ) ) ( that ( heralded ( ( the end ) ( of ( ( the ( golden age ) ) ( of ( the ( Heian court ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN After) (S (NP (JJ rival) (NNP Fujiwara) (NNS factions)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBG struggling) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS years))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB gain) (NP (NP (NN control)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ imperial) (NN throne)))))))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD turned) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNP Taira) (CC and) (NNP Minamoto) (NNS armies))) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1156))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB wage) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ four-year) (NN war)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBN heralded) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN end)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ golden) (NN age)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Heian) (NN court)))))))))))))) (. .)))
After rival Fujiwara faction had struggled for years to gain power, they finally decided to make peace with their opponents, sending Japan into a Golden Age.
( ( After ( ( rival ( Fujiwara faction ) ) ( had ( ( struggled ( for years ) ) ( to ( gain power ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( they ( finally ( ( ( ( decided ( to ( ( make peace ) ( with ( their opponents ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( sending Japan ) ( into ( a ( Golden Age ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN After) (S (NP (JJ rival) (NN Fujiwara) (NN faction)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN struggled) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS years))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB gain) (NP (NN power))))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP they)) (ADVP (RB finally)) (VP (VBD decided) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (NP (NN peace)) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS opponents)))))) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG sending) (NP (NNP Japan)) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT a) (NNP Golden) (NNP Age)))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: After rival Fujiwara factions had been struggling for years to gain control of the imperial throne, they turned to the Taira and Minamoto armies in 1156 to wage the four-year war that heralded the end of the golden age of the Heian court. Then the following statement: "After rival Fujiwara faction had struggled for years to gain power, they finally decided to make peace with their opponents, sending Japan into a Golden Age." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
74,737
74737n
i've heard that that's really good for you to do
( i ( 've ( heard ( that ( that ( ( 's ( really ( good ( for you ) ) ) ) ( to do ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN heard) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB really) (JJ good) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP you)))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do)))))))))))
It's good for you to swim long distances.
( It ( ( ( 's ( good ( for you ) ) ) ( to ( swim ( long distances ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ good) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP you)))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB swim) (NP (JJ long) (NNS distances)))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: i've heard that that's really good for you to do Then the following statement: "It's good for you to swim long distances." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
32,520
32520c
Then we will be able to get at Kitchell, and the army will settle him for good and all!"
( ( ( ( ( ( Then ( we ( will ( be ( able ( to ( get ( at Kitchell ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( the army ) ( will ( ( settle him ) ( for ( ( good and ) all ) ) ) ) ) ) ! ) '' )
(ROOT (S (S (ADVP (RB Then)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ able) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (PP (IN at) (NP (NNP Kitchell)))))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (DT the) (NN army)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB settle) (NP (PRP him)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ good)) (CC and) (NP (DT all))))))) (. !) ('' '')))
We will never be able to get at Kitchell.
( We ( ( ( will never ) ( be ( able ( to ( get ( at Kitchell ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (MD will) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ able) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (PP (IN at) (NP (NNP Kitchell))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Then we will be able to get at Kitchell, and the army will settle him for good and all!" Then the following statement: "We will never be able to get at Kitchell." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
4,784
4784n
how do you feel about other other uh things like public uh safety buses bus drivers and and uh airplane drivers or or pilots rather you
( how ( ( do you ) ( ( feel ( about ( ( ( ( ( other ( other ( uh things ) ) ) ( like ( ( ( ( ( public ( uh safety ) ) ( buses ( bus drivers ) ) ) and ) and ) ( uh ( airplane drivers ) ) ) ) ) or ) or ) pilots ) ) ) ( rather you ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB how)) (SQ (VBP do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB feel) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (NP (JJ other) (JJ other) (JJ uh) (NNS things)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (NP (JJ public) (JJ uh) (NN safety)) (VP (VBG buses) (NP (NN bus) (NNS drivers)))) (CC and) (CC and) (NP (JJ uh) (NN airplane) (NNS drivers))))) (CC or) (CC or) (NP (NNS pilots)))) (PP (RB rather) (NP (PRP you)))))))
How do you feel about public service operators taking drug tests?
( How ( ( ( do you ) ( feel ( about ( ( public ( service operators ) ) ( taking ( drug tests ) ) ) ) ) ) ? ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB How)) (SQ (VBP do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB feel) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (JJ public) (NN service) (NNS operators)) (VP (VBG taking) (NP (NN drug) (NNS tests))))))) (. ?)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: how do you feel about other other uh things like public uh safety buses bus drivers and and uh airplane drivers or or pilots rather you Then the following statement: "How do you feel about public service operators taking drug tests?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
43,551
43551n
Not surprisingly, an Indian tribe, the Umatilla, has already demanded that the bones be reburied as if they were ancient native relics, and federal law backs them up.
( ( Not surprisingly ) ( , ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( an ( Indian tribe ) ) , ) ( the Umatilla ) ) , ) ( ( has already ) ( demanded ( that ( ( the bones ) ( be ( reburied ( as ( if ( they ( were ( ancient ( native relics ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( federal law ) ( ( backs them ) up ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Not) (RB surprisingly)) (, ,) (S (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ Indian) (NN tribe)) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP Umatilla)) (, ,)) (VP (VBZ has) (ADVP (RB already)) (VP (VBN demanded) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS bones)) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN reburied) (SBAR (RB as) (IN if) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD were) (NP (JJ ancient) (JJ native) (NNS relics)))))))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (JJ federal) (NN law)) (VP (VBZ backs) (NP (PRP them)) (PRT (RP up)))) (. .)))
The Indian tribe will have its demand granted soon.
( ( The ( Indian tribe ) ) ( ( will ( have ( ( its demand ) ( granted soon ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ Indian) (NN tribe)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN demand)) (VP (VBN granted) (ADVP (RB soon)))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Not surprisingly, an Indian tribe, the Umatilla, has already demanded that the bones be reburied as if they were ancient native relics, and federal law backs them up. Then the following statement: "The Indian tribe will have its demand granted soon." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
96,401
96401c
The verdict?
( The ( verdict ? ) )
(ROOT (NP (DT The) (NN verdict) (. ?)))
They didn't find the verdict.
( They ( ( ( did n't ) ( find ( the verdict ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB find) (NP (DT the) (NN verdict)))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The verdict? Then the following statement: "They didn't find the verdict. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
14,185
14185c
Hoiles is a big slab of a man, now 33, a veteran but not a star.
( Hoiles ( ( is ( ( ( ( a ( big slab ) ) ( of ( ( ( ( a man ) , ) now ) ( ( 33 , ) ( a veteran ) ) ) ) ) ( but not ) ) ( a star ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Hoiles)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ big) (NN slab)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN man)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB now)) (NP (NP (CD 33)) (, ,) (NP (DT a) (NN veteran)))))) (CONJP (CC but) (RB not)) (NP (DT a) (NN star)))) (. .)))
Hoiles is a star despite being a small guy.
( Hoiles ( ( ( is ( a star ) ) ( despite ( being ( a ( small guy ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Hoiles)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT a) (NN star)) (PP (IN despite) (S (VP (VBG being) (NP (DT a) (JJ small) (NN guy)))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Hoiles is a big slab of a man, now 33, a veteran but not a star. Then the following statement: "Hoiles is a star despite being a small guy." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
94,428
94428n
Somehow I'm confident they can work it out.
( Somehow ( I ( ( 'm ( confident ( they ( can ( ( work it ) out ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Somehow)) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADJP (JJ confident) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB work) (NP (PRP it)) (PRT (RP out)))))))) (. .)))
I'm confident in their ability to work it out as they're mentally strong people.
( I ( ( ( 'm ( confident ( in ( their ( ability ( to ( ( work it ) out ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( as ( they ( 're ( ( mentally strong ) people ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADJP (JJ confident) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN ability) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB work) (NP (PRP it)) (PRT (RP out)))))))) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (NP (ADJP (RB mentally) (JJ strong)) (NNS people)))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Somehow I'm confident they can work it out. Then the following statement: "I'm confident in their ability to work it out as they're mentally strong people." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
104,622
104622c
But he soon found that there were differences.
( But ( he ( soon ( ( found ( that ( there ( were differences ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC But) (NP (PRP he)) (ADVP (RB soon)) (VP (VBD found) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBD were) (NP (NNS differences)))))) (. .)))
He realized everything was the same.
( He ( ( realized ( everything ( was ( the same ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD realized) (SBAR (S (NP (NN everything)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT the) (JJ same)))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: But he soon found that there were differences. Then the following statement: "He realized everything was the same. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
134,256
134256c
In January 2000, the LSC Board of Directors approved LSC's 5-year Strategic Direction Plan.
( ( In ( January 2000 ) ) ( , ( ( ( the ( LSC Board ) ) ( of Directors ) ) ( ( approved ( ( LSC 's ) ( 5-year ( Strategic ( Direction Plan ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NNP January) (CD 2000))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP LSC) (NNP Board)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS Directors)))) (VP (VBD approved) (NP (NP (NNP LSC) (POS 's)) (JJ 5-year) (NNP Strategic) (NNP Direction) (NNP Plan))) (. .)))
The board sent the report back for revisions.
( ( The board ) ( ( ( ( sent ( the report ) ) back ) ( for revisions ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN board)) (VP (VBD sent) (NP (DT the) (NN report)) (ADVP (RB back)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS revisions)))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In January 2000, the LSC Board of Directors approved LSC's 5-year Strategic Direction Plan. Then the following statement: "The board sent the report back for revisions." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
2,361
2361e
(Of course I didn't know his name then.) I was suspicious I thought it was another trap.
( -LRB- ( ( ( Of course ) ( ( I ( ( did n't ) ( ( know ( his name ) ) ( then . ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ( ( I ( was suspicious ) ) ( I ( ( thought ( it ( was ( another trap ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (-LRB- -LRB-) (S (VP (VP (VBG Of) (NP (NN course))) (PRN (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN name)) (FRAG (ADVP (RB then)) (. .))))) (-RRB- -RRB-)))) (PRN (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ suspicious)))) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT another) (NN trap)))))) (. .)))
My suspicions made me suspect a trap.
( ( My suspicions ) ( ( made ( me ( suspect ( a trap ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ My) (NNS suspicions)) (VP (VBD made) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP me)) (VP (VBP suspect) (NP (DT a) (NN trap)))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: (Of course I didn't know his name then.) I was suspicious I thought it was another trap. Then the following statement: "My suspicions made me suspect a trap." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
18,335
18335c
The Administrator of the EPA has certified that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
( ( ( The Administrator ) ( of ( the EPA ) ) ) ( ( has ( certified ( that ( ( the ( final rule ) ) ( ( will not ) ( have ( ( a ( significant ( economic impact ) ) ) ( on ( ( a ( substantial number ) ) ( of ( small entities ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Administrator)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP EPA)))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN certified) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (JJ final) (NN rule)) (VP (MD will) (RB not) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ significant) (JJ economic) (NN impact)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ substantial) (NN number)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ small) (NNS entities)))))))))))) (. .)))
The epa administrator believes that the rule will hurt the economy.
( ( The ( epa administrator ) ) ( ( believes ( that ( ( the rule ) ( will ( hurt ( the economy ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN epa) (NN administrator)) (VP (VBZ believes) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN rule)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB hurt) (NP (DT the) (NN economy))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The Administrator of the EPA has certified that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Then the following statement: "The epa administrator believes that the rule will hurt the economy. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
75,677
75677n
Don Cazar had not really wanted another wrangler at all; he had wanted Shiloh and his foals.
( ( ( ( ( Don Cazar ) ( ( ( had not ) really ) ( ( wanted ( another wrangler ) ) ( at all ) ) ) ) ; ) ( he ( had ( wanted ( ( Shiloh and ) ( his foals ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP Don) (NNP Cazar)) (VP (VBD had) (RB not) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VBN wanted) (NP (DT another) (NN wrangler)) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all))))) (: ;) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN wanted) (NP (NP (NNP Shiloh)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ his) (NNS foals)))))) (. .)))
Cazar wasn't really a wrangler-loving kind of guy to begin with.
( Cazar ( ( ( ( was n't ) really ) ( ( ( a ( wrangler-loving kind ) ) ( of guy ) ) ( to ( begin with ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Cazar)) (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB really)) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ wrangler-loving) (NN kind)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN guy))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB begin) (PP (IN with))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Don Cazar had not really wanted another wrangler at all; he had wanted Shiloh and his foals. Then the following statement: "Cazar wasn't really a wrangler-loving kind of guy to begin with." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
24,762
24762c
uh it's just below Hot Springs
( uh ( it ( ( 's just ) ( below ( Hot Springs ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB uh) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB just)) (PP (IN below) (NP (NNP Hot) (NNP Springs)))))))))
Just above the river.
( ( Just ( above ( the river ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (FRAG (PP (RB Just) (IN above) (NP (DT the) (NN river))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: uh it's just below Hot Springs Then the following statement: "Just above the river." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
136,849
136849n
They are all busily battering at Mrs. Inglethorp's door.
( They ( ( ( are ( all busily ) ) ( battering ( at ( ( Mrs. ( Inglethorp 's ) ) door ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (DT all) (RB busily)) (NP (NP (VBG battering)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NNP Mrs.) (NNP Inglethorp) (POS 's)) (NN door))))) (. .)))
Mrs. Inglethorp is not in her room because she is buying milk.
( ( Mrs. Inglethorp ) ( ( ( ( is not ) ( in ( her room ) ) ) ( because ( she ( is ( buying milk ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Mrs.) (NNP Inglethorp)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ her) (NN room))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG buying) (NP (NN milk))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: They are all busily battering at Mrs. Inglethorp's door. Then the following statement: "Mrs. Inglethorp is not in her room because she is buying milk." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
119,818
119818n
It is also the case that newspapers, magazines, radio, and television are so financially dependent on consumer advertising that they're unlikely to lead the charge against this problem.
( It ( ( ( ( is also ) ( the case ) ) ( that ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( newspapers , ) magazines ) , ) radio ) , ) and ) television ) ( are ( ( so ( financially ( dependent ( on ( consumer advertising ) ) ) ) ) ( that ( they ( 're ( unlikely ( to ( lead ( ( the charge ) ( against ( this problem ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB also)) (NP (DT the) (NN case)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (NNS newspapers)) (, ,) (NP (NNS magazines)) (, ,) (NP (NN radio)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NN television))) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (ADJP (RB so) (RB financially) (JJ dependent) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN consumer) (NN advertising)))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADJP (JJ unlikely) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB lead) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN charge)) (PP (IN against) (NP (DT this) (NN problem)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
Television would cease to exist without consumer advertising.
( Television ( ( would ( cease ( to ( exist ( without ( consumer advertising ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Television)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB cease) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB exist) (PP (IN without) (NP (NN consumer) (NN advertising)))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: It is also the case that newspapers, magazines, radio, and television are so financially dependent on consumer advertising that they're unlikely to lead the charge against this problem. Then the following statement: "Television would cease to exist without consumer advertising." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
103,743
103743n
I pass over Alfred Inglethorp, who acted the bereaved widower in a manner that I felt to be disgusting in its hypocrisy.
( I ( ( pass ( over ( ( ( Alfred Inglethorp ) , ) ( who ( ( ( acted ( the ( bereaved widower ) ) ) ( in ( a manner ) ) ) ( that ( I ( felt ( to ( be ( disgusting ( in ( its hypocrisy ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP pass) (PP (IN over) (NP (NP (NNP Alfred) (NNP Inglethorp)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD acted) (NP (DT the) (JJ bereaved) (NN widower)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (NN manner))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD felt) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ disgusting) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN hypocrisy)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
I didn't even want to speak to Alfred who was pretending to be upset about the death.
( I ( ( ( ( did n't ) even ) ( want ( to ( speak ( to ( Alfred ( who ( was ( pretending ( to ( be ( upset ( about ( the death ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB even)) (VP (VB want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB speak) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNP Alfred)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG pretending) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN upset) (PP (IN about) (NP (DT the) (NN death)))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I pass over Alfred Inglethorp, who acted the bereaved widower in a manner that I felt to be disgusting in its hypocrisy. Then the following statement: "I didn't even want to speak to Alfred who was pretending to be upset about the death." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
127,530
127530c
The person in charge of setting it up?
( ( ( The person ) ( in ( charge ( of ( ( setting it ) up ) ) ) ) ) ? )
(ROOT (NP (NP (DT The) (NN person)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN charge)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG setting) (NP (PRP it)) (PRT (RP up))))))) (. ?)))
The animal in charge of the zoo?
( ( ( ( The animal ) ( in charge ) ) ( of ( the zoo ) ) ) ? )
(ROOT (NP (NP (DT The) (NN animal)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN charge))) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN zoo))) (. ?)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The person in charge of setting it up? Then the following statement: "The animal in charge of the zoo?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
19,043
19043c
Let's begin with the chin.
( ( Let 's ) ( ( begin ( with ( the chin ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Let) (POS 's)) (VP (VBP begin) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (NN chin)))) (. .)))
You should never start with the chin.
( You ( ( ( should never ) ( start ( with ( the chin ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD should) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VB start) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (NN chin))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Let's begin with the chin. Then the following statement: "You should never start with the chin." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
72,232
72232e
uh-huh uh-huh uh-huh you didn't need to get away from home then
( ( uh-huh ( uh-huh uh-huh ) ) ( you ( ( did n't ) ( need ( to ( ( ( get away ) ( from home ) ) then ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (NP (JJ uh-huh) (JJ uh-huh) (NN uh-huh)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (PRT (RP away)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NN home))) (ADVP (RB then))))))))))))
You didn't need to get away from home.
( You ( ( ( did n't ) ( need ( to ( ( get away ) ( from home ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (PRT (RP away)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NN home)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: uh-huh uh-huh uh-huh you didn't need to get away from home then Then the following statement: "You didn't need to get away from home." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
2,294
2294e
The critical assumption used in the EPA analysis is that program spending affects both supply and demand technologies in a way that interacts with the emission caps that are to be imposed in 2007.
( ( ( The ( critical assumption ) ) ( used ( in ( the ( EPA analysis ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( that ( ( program spending ) ( ( affects ( both ( supply ( and ( demand technologies ) ) ) ) ) ( in ( ( a way ) ( that ( interacts ( with ( ( the ( emission caps ) ) ( that ( are ( to ( be ( imposed ( in 2007 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ critical) (NN assumption)) (VP (VBN used) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP EPA) (NN analysis))))) (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NN program) (NN spending)) (VP (VBZ affects) (NP (DT both) (NN supply) (CC and) (NN demand) (NNS technologies)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN way)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ interacts) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN emission) (NNS caps)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP are) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN imposed) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 2007))))))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
Emission caps are affected by both supply and demand technologies.
( ( Emission caps ) ( ( are ( affected ( by ( both ( supply ( and ( demand technologies ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Emission) (NNS caps)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN affected) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT both) (NN supply) (CC and) (NN demand) (NNS technologies))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The critical assumption used in the EPA analysis is that program spending affects both supply and demand technologies in a way that interacts with the emission caps that are to be imposed in 2007. Then the following statement: "Emission caps are affected by both supply and demand technologies." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
54,890
54890n
he was always speaking in terms of you know American imperialism reasserting itself and i suppose it's a different attitude that we normally don't hear in the country
( he ( ( was always ) ( speaking ( in ( terms ( of ( ( ( you ( ( know ( American imperialism ) ) ( reasserting itself ) ) ) and ) ( i ( suppose ( it ( ( 's ( a ( different attitude ) ) ) ( that ( we ( normally ( ( do n't ) ( hear ( in ( the country ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB always)) (VP (VBG speaking) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNS terms)) (PP (IN of) (S (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (NP (JJ American) (NN imperialism)) (S (VP (VBG reasserting) (NP (PRP itself)))))) (CC and) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP suppose) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (DT a) (JJ different) (NN attitude)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP we)) (ADVP (RB normally)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB hear) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN country))))))))))))))))))))
I kind of agree with him that American imperialism is reasserting itself.
( I ( ( kind of ) ( ( ( agree ( with him ) ) ( that ( ( American imperialism ) ( is ( reasserting itself ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (NN kind) (IN of)) (VP (VBP agree) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP him))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP American) (NNP imperialism)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG reasserting) (NP (PRP itself))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: he was always speaking in terms of you know American imperialism reasserting itself and i suppose it's a different attitude that we normally don't hear in the country Then the following statement: "I kind of agree with him that American imperialism is reasserting itself." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
25,755
25755e
One of a chain of popular Argentine meat houses.
( ( ( One ( of ( a chain ) ) ) ( of ( popular ( Argentine ( meat houses ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (CD One)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (NN chain))) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ popular) (JJ Argentine) (NN meat) (NNS houses))) (. .)))
It is a chain restaurant in Argentina.
( It ( ( is ( ( a ( chain restaurant ) ) ( in Argentina ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN chain) (NN restaurant)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Argentina))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: One of a chain of popular Argentine meat houses. Then the following statement: "It is a chain restaurant in Argentina." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
55,650
55650c
Thus, successful organizations recognize-and implement reform efforts on the basis of-the essential connection between sound management and the programmatic results those organizations hope to achieve.
( Thus ( , ( ( successful organizations ) ( ( ( recognize-and ( ( ( implement ( reform efforts ) ) ( on ( the basis ) ) ) ( ( of-the ( essential connection ) ) ( between ( ( ( sound management ) and ) ( the ( programmatic results ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( those organizations ) ( hope ( to achieve ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Thus)) (, ,) (NP (JJ successful) (NNS organizations)) (VP (VBD recognize-and) (S (VP (VB implement) (NP (NN reform) (NNS efforts)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN basis)))) (NP (NP (JJ of-the) (JJ essential) (NN connection)) (PP (IN between) (NP (NP (JJ sound) (NN management)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (JJ programmatic) (NNS results)))))) (SBAR (S (NP (DT those) (NNS organizations)) (VP (VBP hope) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB achieve)))))))) (. .)))
There is no connection between management and results.
( There ( ( is ( ( no connection ) ( between ( ( management and ) results ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN connection)) (PP (IN between) (NP (NN management) (CC and) (NNS results))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Thus, successful organizations recognize-and implement reform efforts on the basis of-the essential connection between sound management and the programmatic results those organizations hope to achieve. Then the following statement: "There is no connection between management and results." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
113,306
113306e
Consisting of the Executive Directors of the state's 33 nonprofit civil legal services programs, this group has responsibility for ensuring implementation at the program level.
( ( Consisting ( of ( ( the ( Executive Directors ) ) ( of ( ( the ( state 's ) ) ( 33 ( nonprofit ( ( civil legal ) ( services programs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( this group ) ( ( has ( responsibility ( for ( ( ensuring implementation ) ( at ( the ( program level ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Consisting) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Executive) (NNS Directors)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN state) (POS 's)) (CD 33) (JJ nonprofit) (ADJP (JJ civil) (JJ legal)) (NNS services) (NNS programs))))))) (, ,) (NP (DT this) (NN group)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (NN responsibility)) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG ensuring) (NP (NN implementation)) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NN program) (NN level)))))))) (. .)))
The state has at least 33 legal services programs.
( ( The state ) ( ( has ( ( ( ( at least ) 33 ) ( legal services ) ) programs ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN state)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (QP (IN at) (JJS least) (CD 33)) (JJ legal) (NNS services)) (NP (NNS programs)))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Consisting of the Executive Directors of the state's 33 nonprofit civil legal services programs, this group has responsibility for ensuring implementation at the program level. Then the following statement: "The state has at least 33 legal services programs." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
118,911
118911e
John practiced for some time as a barrister, but had finally settled down to the more congenial life of a country squire.
( John ( ( ( ( ( ( practiced ( for ( some time ) ) ) ( as ( a barrister ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( had finally ) ( ( settled down ) ( to ( ( the ( ( more congenial ) life ) ) ( of ( a ( country squire ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP John)) (VP (VP (VBD practiced) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT some) (NN time))) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT a) (NN barrister)))) (, ,) (CC but) (VP (VBD had) (ADVP (RB finally)) (VP (VBN settled) (PRT (RP down)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ congenial)) (NN life)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (NN country) (NN squire)))))))) (. .)))
John was a lawyer for quite some time.
( John ( ( was ( ( a lawyer ) ( for ( quite ( some time ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP John)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lawyer)) (PP (IN for) (NP (PDT quite) (DT some) (NN time))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: John practiced for some time as a barrister, but had finally settled down to the more congenial life of a country squire. Then the following statement: "John was a lawyer for quite some time. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
74,074
74074c
yeah i think day care seems to be uh
( yeah ( i ( think ( ( day care ) ( seems ( to ( be uh ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (NN day) (NN care)) (VP (VBZ seems) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ uh))))))))))))))
Day care is not something that has ever crossed my mind.
( ( Day care ) ( ( ( is not ) ( something ( that ( ( has ever ) ( crossed ( my mind ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Day) (NN care)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (NP (NP (NN something)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ has) (ADVP (RB ever)) (VP (VBN crossed) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN mind)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah i think day care seems to be uh Then the following statement: "Day care is not something that has ever crossed my mind." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
111,944
111944c
Watch him, so he won't go into shock when he wakes up.
( ( ( ( ( Watch him ) , ) so ) ( he ( ( wo n't ) ( ( go ( into shock ) ) ( when ( he ( wakes up ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VB Watch) (NP (PRP him)))) (, ,) (IN so) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD wo) (RB n't) (VP (VB go) (PP (IN into) (NP (NN shock))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ wakes) (PRT (RP up)))))))) (. .)))
He is already awake
( He ( ( is already ) awake ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB already)) (ADJP (RB awake)))))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Watch him, so he won't go into shock when he wakes up. Then the following statement: "He is already awake" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
39,958
39958c
"A man can't tell what he can do until he tries."Drew still hedged.
( `` ( ( A man ) ( ( ( ( ( ( ca n't ) ( tell ( what ( he ( can ( do ( until ( he tries ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) `` ) ( Drew ( still hedged ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (`` ``) (NP (DT A) (NN man)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB tell) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB do) (SBAR (IN until) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ tries)))))))))) (. .) (`` ``) (SBAR (IN Drew) (S (ADVP (RB still)) (VP (VBD hedged)))) (. .)))
A man knows all the he can do.
( ( A man ) ( ( knows ( ( all the ) ( he ( can do ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (NN man)) (VP (VBZ knows) (NP (NP (PDT all) (DT the)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB do))))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: "A man can't tell what he can do until he tries."Drew still hedged. Then the following statement: "A man knows all the he can do." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
135,314
135314n
Seeking the powerful support of the Franks, Pope Leo III crowned their king, Charlemagne, Emperor of the West on Christmas Day in 800.
( ( Seeking ( ( the ( powerful support ) ) ( of ( the Franks ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( Pope ( Leo III ) ) ( ( ( crowned ( ( ( their king ) , ) ( ( Charlemagne ( , Emperor ) ) ( of ( the West ) ) ) ) ) ( on ( ( Christmas Day ) ( in 800 ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Seeking) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ powerful) (NN support)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNPS Franks)))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Pope) (NNP Leo) (NNP III)) (VP (VBD crowned) (NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN king)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Charlemagne) (, ,) (NNP Emperor)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP West))))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (NNP Christmas) (NNP Day)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 800)))))) (. .)))
Pope Leo III soon regretted his choice.
( ( Pope ( Leo III ) ) ( soon ( ( regretted ( his choice ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Pope) (NNP Leo) (NNP III)) (ADVP (RB soon)) (VP (VBN regretted) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN choice))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Seeking the powerful support of the Franks, Pope Leo III crowned their king, Charlemagne, Emperor of the West on Christmas Day in 800. Then the following statement: "Pope Leo III soon regretted his choice." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
106,329
106329e
I then had to remember where on my hard drive I had put the install files.
( I ( then ( ( had ( to ( remember ( where ( ( on ( my ( hard drive ) ) ) ( I ( had ( put ( the ( install files ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (RB then)) (VP (VBD had) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB remember) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP$ my) (JJ hard) (NN drive))) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN put) (NP (DT the) (JJ install) (NNS files)))))))))) (. .)))
I needed to remember where the files were saved on the hard drive.
( I ( ( needed ( to ( remember ( where ( ( the files ) ( were ( saved ( on ( the ( hard drive ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD needed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB remember) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS files)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN saved) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (JJ hard) (NN drive))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I then had to remember where on my hard drive I had put the install files. Then the following statement: "I needed to remember where the files were saved on the hard drive. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
131,397
131397e
On the way to Cimiez don't miss the Mus??e Chagall (Ave.
( ( On ( ( the way ) ( to Cimiez ) ) ) ( ( ( do n't ) miss ) ( ( the ( Mus ( ?? e ) ) ) ( Chagall ( -LRB- Ave. ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (PP (IN On) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN way)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Cimiez))))) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB miss))) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Mus) (NNP ??) (NNP e)) (NP (NNP Chagall) (-LRB- -LRB-) (NNP Ave.)))))
Keep an eye out for Muse Chagall avenue.
( ( ( Keep ( ( an eye ) out ) ) ( for ( Muse ( Chagall avenue ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB Keep) (ADVP (NP (DT an) (NN eye)) (IN out)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNP Muse) (NNP Chagall) (NN avenue)))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: On the way to Cimiez don't miss the Mus??e Chagall (Ave. Then the following statement: "Keep an eye out for Muse Chagall avenue." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
78,246
78246c
Chinchen is celebrated as the home of various aniseed liqueurs.
( Chinchen ( ( is ( celebrated ( as ( ( the home ) ( of ( various ( aniseed liqueurs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Chinchen)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN celebrated) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN home)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ various) (JJ aniseed) (NNS liqueurs))))))) (. .)))
Chinchen is a dry area with no alcohol.
( Chinchen ( ( is ( ( a ( dry area ) ) ( with ( no alcohol ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Chinchen)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ dry) (NN area)) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT no) (NN alcohol))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Chinchen is celebrated as the home of various aniseed liqueurs. Then the following statement: "Chinchen is a dry area with no alcohol." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
8,827
8827n
Drew had a fleeting prick of worry.
( Drew ( ( had ( ( a ( fleeting prick ) ) ( of worry ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Drew)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ fleeting) (NN prick)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN worry))))) (. .)))
Drew was worried for ten seconds.
( Drew ( ( was ( worried ( for ( ten seconds ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Drew)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN worried) (PP (IN for) (NP (CD ten) (NNS seconds))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Drew had a fleeting prick of worry. Then the following statement: "Drew was worried for ten seconds. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
68,774
68774e
yeah i do too especially as women get up in management and and can be in on those decision making you know when that subject comes up they can say yes that would be wonderful
( yeah ( ( ( i ( do ( ( too especially ) ( as ( women ( ( get up ) ( in management ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( and ( can ( be ( in ( on ( ( those decision ) ( making ( you ( know ( when ( ( that subject ) ( ( comes up ) ( they ( can ( say ( yes ( that ( would ( be wonderful ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (S (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (ADVP (ADVP (RB too) (RB especially)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (NNS women)) (VP (VBP get) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN management))))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (NNP and)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (PP (IN in) (IN on) (NP (NP (DT those) (NN decision)) (VP (VBG making) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (DT that) (NN subject)) (VP (VBZ comes) (PRT (RP up)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB say) (NP (NP (RB yes)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ wonderful)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
As women get more management position, they will get to make decisions that will be beneficial. I look forward to it.
( ( As ( women ( get ( more ( management position ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( they ( ( will ( get ( to ( make ( decisions ( that ( will ( be ( ( beneficial . ) ( I ( ( look forward ) ( to it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN As) (S (NP (NNS women)) (VP (VBP get) (NP (JJR more) (NN management) (NN position))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB get) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (NP (NP (NNS decisions)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (NNP beneficial) (. .)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP look) (ADVP (RB forward)) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP it))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah i do too especially as women get up in management and and can be in on those decision making you know when that subject comes up they can say yes that would be wonderful Then the following statement: "As women get more management position, they will get to make decisions that will be beneficial. I look forward to it." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
30,704
30704n
Less lucky than the one at Orange, the Roman theater (th??atre antique) has been reduced to ruins over the centuries, as builders carted away masonry for their houses, churches, and town walls ' but the remains, in a pleasant park, are quietly eloquent of its noble past and its stage still rings during the Arles Festival (July).
( ( ( ( ( ( ( Less ( lucky ( than ( ( the one ) ( at Orange ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( the ( Roman theater ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( th ( ?? ( atre antique ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ( has ( been ( ( ( reduced ( to ( ruins ( over ( the centuries ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( as ( builders ( ( ( carted away ) ( masonry ( for ( their ( houses ( , ( churches ( , ( and ( town walls ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ' ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( ( the remains ) ( , ( ( in ( a ( pleasant park ) ) ) ( , ( ( are quietly ) ( eloquent ( of ( its ( noble past ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( its stage ) ( still ( rings ( during ( ( the ( Arles Festival ) ) ( -LRB- ( July -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (S (ADJP (RBR Less) (JJ lucky) (PP (IN than) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN one)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NNP Orange))))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Roman) (NN theater)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (JJ th) (NN ??) (NN atre) (NN antique)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN reduced) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNS ruins)) (PP (IN over) (NP (DT the) (NNS centuries))))) (, ,) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (NNS builders)) (VP (VBD carted) (PRT (RP away)) (NP (NP (NN masonry)) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS houses) (, ,) (NNS churches) (, ,) (CC and) (NN town) (NNS walls)))) ('' ')))))))) (CC but) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS remains)) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (JJ pleasant) (NN park))) (, ,) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB quietly)) (ADJP (JJ eloquent) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ noble) (NN past)))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP$ its) (NN stage)) (ADVP (RB still)) (VP (VBZ rings) (PP (IN during) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Arles) (NNP Festival)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP July)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))))) (. .)))
The builders that carted away masonry from the Roman theater were not sentenced for their illegal activities.
( ( ( The builders ) ( that ( ( ( carted away ) masonry ) ( from ( the ( Roman theater ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( were not ) ( sentenced ( for ( their ( illegal activities ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS builders)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD carted) (PRT (RP away)) (NP (NN masonry)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NNP Roman) (NN theater))))))) (VP (VBD were) (RB not) (VP (VBN sentenced) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ illegal) (NNS activities))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Less lucky than the one at Orange, the Roman theater (th??atre antique) has been reduced to ruins over the centuries, as builders carted away masonry for their houses, churches, and town walls ' but the remains, in a pleasant park, are quietly eloquent of its noble past and its stage still rings during the Arles Festival (July). Then the following statement: "The builders that carted away masonry from the Roman theater were not sentenced for their illegal activities." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
132,717
132717n
yeah yeah uh mine are both out of school and uh
( ( yeah ( yeah ( uh mine ) ) ) ( ( are both ) ( out ( of ( ( school and ) uh ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (NN yeah) (NN yeah) (NN uh) (NN mine)) (VP (VBP are) (DT both) (ADJP (IN out) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN school) (CC and) (NN uh)))))))
My kids are grown.
( ( My kids ) ( ( are grown ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ My) (NNS kids)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN grown))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah yeah uh mine are both out of school and uh Then the following statement: "My kids are grown." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
23,850
23850e
In my experience, by the time his movie got through all the rewrite committees, it would star Julia Roberts and probably be called That Vatican Summer .
( ( In ( my experience ) ) ( , ( ( by ( ( the time ) ( ( his movie ) ( got ( through ( all ( the ( rewrite committees ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( it ( ( would ( ( ( ( star ( Julia Roberts ) ) and ) probably ) ( be ( called ( That ( Vatican Summer ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN experience))) (, ,) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN time)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP$ his) (NN movie)) (VP (VBD got) (PP (IN through) (NP (PDT all) (DT the) (JJ rewrite) (NNS committees)))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VP (VB star) (NP (NNP Julia) (NNP Roberts))) (CC and) (ADVP (RB probably)) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN called) (NP (DT That) (NNP Vatican) (NNPS Summer)))))) (. .)))
By the time his movie is done being edited, it will probably be called "That Vatican Summer" and star Julia Roberts!
( ( ( By ( the time ) ) ( ( his movie ) ( is ( done ( being edited ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( it ( ( ( will probably ) ( ( ( be ( called ( `` ( ( That ( Vatican Summer ) ) '' ) ) ) ) and ) ( star ( Julia Roberts ) ) ) ) ! ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (PP (IN By) (NP (DT the) (NN time))) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN movie)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN done) (S (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBN edited))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD will) (ADVP (RB probably)) (VP (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN called) (S (`` ``) (NP (DT That) (NNP Vatican) (NNPS Summer)) ('' '')))) (CC and) (VP (VB star) (NP (NNP Julia) (NNP Roberts))))) (. !)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In my experience, by the time his movie got through all the rewrite committees, it would star Julia Roberts and probably be called That Vatican Summer . Then the following statement: "By the time his movie is done being edited, it will probably be called "That Vatican Summer" and star Julia Roberts!" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
118,233
118233n
yeah hey that's a hey that's a hard job to get really
( yeah ( hey ( that ( 's ( ( a hey ) ( that ( 's ( a ( hard ( job ( to ( get really ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (NP (NP (NN hey)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN hey)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (DT a) (JJ hard) (NN job) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (ADVP (RB really)))))))))))))))))
That is a really hard job to get, I wish I could.
( ( That ( is ( a ( ( really hard ) ( job ( to get ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( I ( ( wish ( I could ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB really) (JJ hard)) (NN job) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP wish) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD could))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah hey that's a hey that's a hard job to get really Then the following statement: "That is a really hard job to get, I wish I could." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
68,733
68733n
But useful, functioning institutions are not created by a single stroke of the pen.
( But ( useful ( , ( ( functioning institutions ) ( ( ( are not ) ( created ( by ( ( a ( single stroke ) ) ( of ( the pen ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC But) (ADJP (JJ useful)) (, ,) (NP (NN functioning) (NNS institutions)) (VP (VBP are) (RB not) (VP (VBN created) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ single) (NN stroke)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN pen))))))) (. .)))
On average, institutions take at least five years and 100 employees to get off the ground.
( ( On average ) ( , ( institutions ( ( take ( ( ( ( ( ( at least ) five ) years ) and ) ( 100 employees ) ) ( to ( ( get off ) ( the ground ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN On) (NP (NN average))) (, ,) (NP (NNS institutions)) (VP (VBP take) (S (NP (NP (QP (IN at) (JJS least) (CD five)) (NNS years)) (CC and) (NP (CD 100) (NNS employees))) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (PRT (RP off)) (NP (DT the) (NN ground)))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: But useful, functioning institutions are not created by a single stroke of the pen. Then the following statement: "On average, institutions take at least five years and 100 employees to get off the ground." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
141,981
141981n
Dynamic Lord Curzon, viceroy from 1899 to 1905, was driven by a lofty imperial vision of the British role in India.
( ( ( ( ( Dynamic ( Lord Curzon ) ) , ) ( viceroy ( from ( 1899 ( to 1905 ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( was ( driven ( by ( ( a ( lofty ( imperial vision ) ) ) ( of ( ( the ( British role ) ) ( in India ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Dynamic) (NNP Lord) (NNP Curzon)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NN viceroy)) (PP (IN from) (NP (CD 1899) (TO to) (CD 1905)))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN driven) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ lofty) (JJ imperial) (NN vision)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ British) (NN role)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP India))))))))) (. .)))
An imperial vision of the British role in India and across the globe drove Dynamic Lord Curzon from 1899 to 1905
( ( ( An ( imperial vision ) ) ( of ( ( the ( British role ) ) ( ( ( in India ) and ) ( across ( the globe ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( drove ( ( Dynamic ( Lord Curzon ) ) ( from 1899 ) ) ) ( to 1905 ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT An) (JJ imperial) (NN vision)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ British) (NN role)) (PP (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP India))) (CC and) (PP (IN across) (NP (DT the) (NN globe))))))) (VP (VBD drove) (NP (NP (NNP Dynamic) (NNP Lord) (NNP Curzon)) (PP (IN from) (NP (CD 1899)))) (PP (TO to) (NP (CD 1905))))))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Dynamic Lord Curzon, viceroy from 1899 to 1905, was driven by a lofty imperial vision of the British role in India. Then the following statement: "An imperial vision of the British role in India and across the globe drove Dynamic Lord Curzon from 1899 to 1905" is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
111,583
111583e
As of December 31, 2001, Legal Services of Northwest Indiana, Inc. joined with Legal Services Organization of Indiana, Inc. (LSOI) by transferring its assets to LSOI.
( ( As ( of ( ( ( December 31 ) , ) 2001 ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( Legal Services ) ( of ( ( ( Northwest Indiana ) , ) Inc. ) ) ) ( ( ( joined ( with ( ( Legal ( Services Organization ) ) ( of ( ( Indiana ( , Inc. ) ) ( -LRB- ( LSOI -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( by ( ( transferring ( its assets ) ) ( to LSOI ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN As) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP December) (CD 31) (, ,) (CD 2001)))) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Legal) (NNPS Services)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Northwest) (NNP Indiana)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Inc.))))) (VP (VBD joined) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NNP Legal) (NNPS Services) (NNP Organization)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Indiana) (, ,) (NNP Inc.)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP LSOI)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))))) (PP (IN by) (S (VP (VBG transferring) (NP (PRP$ its) (NNS assets)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP LSOI))))))) (. .)))
Legal Services of Northwest Indiana, Inc. joined with the Organization of Indiana, Inc.
( ( ( Legal Services ) ( of ( ( ( Northwest Indiana ) , ) Inc. ) ) ) ( ( joined ( with ( ( the Organization ) ( of ( Indiana ( , Inc. ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Legal) (NNPS Services)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Northwest) (NNP Indiana)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Inc.))))) (VP (VBD joined) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Organization)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Indiana) (, ,) (NNP Inc.)))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: As of December 31, 2001, Legal Services of Northwest Indiana, Inc. joined with Legal Services Organization of Indiana, Inc. (LSOI) by transferring its assets to LSOI. Then the following statement: "Legal Services of Northwest Indiana, Inc. joined with the Organization of Indiana, Inc." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True