promptID
int32 0
146k
| pairID
stringlengths 2
7
| premise
stringlengths 5
1.82k
| premise_binary_parse
stringlengths 6
3.43k
| premise_parse
stringlengths 23
6.45k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 1
393
| hypothesis_binary_parse
stringlengths 1
669
| hypothesis_parse
stringlengths 19
1.15k
| genre
stringclasses 5
values | label
class label 3
classes | template_name
stringclasses 11
values | template
stringclasses 11
values | rendered_input
stringlengths 46
2.02k
| rendered_output
stringclasses 14
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8,141 | 8141e | One does, mister. | ( One ( ( ( does , ) mister ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP One)) (VP (VBZ does) (, ,) (ADVP (RB mister))) (. .))) | A person does. | ( ( A person ) ( does . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (NN person)) (VP (VBZ does)) (. .))) | fiction | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: One does, mister.
Then the following statement: "A person does." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
48,829 | 48829e | and that makes sense but like you said i mean it it seems simple and i think in a way it's so simple that people would be afraid to try it | ( and ( that ( ( ( makes sense ) but ) ( like ( you ( said ( i ( ( mean it ) ( ( ( it ( seems simple ) ) and ) ( i ( think ( in ( ( a way ) ( it ( ( 's ( so simple ) ) ( that ( people ( would ( be ( afraid ( to ( try it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (NP (NP (DT that)) (SBAR (S (VP (VP (VBZ makes) (NP (NN sense))) (CC but) (VP (VBP like) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD said) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VB mean) (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ seems) (ADJP (JJ simple)))) (CC and) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN way)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ simple)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ afraid) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB try) (NP (PRP it))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) | It think people would be afraid to try it because it's so simple. | ( It ( ( think ( people ( would ( be ( afraid ( to ( ( try it ) ( because ( it ( 's ( so simple ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ afraid) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB try) (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ simple)))))))))))))) (. .))) | telephone | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: and that makes sense but like you said i mean it it seems simple and i think in a way it's so simple that people would be afraid to try it
Then the following statement: "It think people would be afraid to try it because it's so simple." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
75,895 | 75895n | C. Commission Procedures Adapted to the Expeditious Consideration of Proposed Service Innovations | ( ( C. ( Commission Procedures ) ) ( Adapted ( to ( ( the ( Expeditious Consideration ) ) ( of ( Proposed ( Service Innovations ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP C.) (NNP Commission) (NNP Procedures)) (VP (VBN Adapted) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Expeditious) (NNP Consideration)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Proposed) (NNP Service) (NNP Innovations)))))))) | Commission procedures are adapted to the proposed postal service innovations. | ( ( Commission procedures ) ( ( are ( adapted ( to ( the ( proposed ( postal ( service innovations ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Commission) (NNS procedures)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN adapted) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ proposed) (JJ postal) (NN service) (NNS innovations))))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: C. Commission Procedures Adapted to the Expeditious Consideration of Proposed Service Innovations
Then the following statement: "Commission procedures are adapted to the proposed postal service innovations." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
82,257 | 82257n | Villains are picked off in order of ascending nastiness--sadistic brutes, followed by smarmy flacks, followed by twisted visionaries in expensive suits. | ( ( ( ( Villains ( are ( ( picked off ) ( in ( order ( of ( ascending nastiness ) ) ) ) ) ) ) -- ) ( ( ( ( ( sadistic brutes ) , ) ( followed ( by ( smarmy flacks ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( followed ( by ( twisted visionaries ) ) ) ( in ( expensive suits ) ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (NNS Villains)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN picked) (PRT (RP off)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN order)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG ascending) (NP (NNS nastiness)))))))))) (: --) (S (NP (NP (JJ sadistic) (NNS brutes)) (, ,) (VP (VBN followed) (PP (IN by) (NP (JJ smarmy) (NNS flacks)))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD followed) (PP (IN by) (NP (JJ twisted) (NNS visionaries))) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ expensive) (NNS suits))))) (. .))) | What start out as great ideas by visionaries become twisted into monstrous machines of suffering. | ( What ( ( ( start out ) ( as ( ( ( great ideas ) ( by visionaries ) ) ( ( become twisted ) ( into ( ( monstrous machines ) ( of suffering ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (SBARQ (WHNP (WP What)) (SQ (VP (VBP start) (PRT (RP out)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (NP (JJ great) (NNS ideas)) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNS visionaries)))) (VP (VBP become) (ADJP (JJ twisted)) (PP (IN into) (NP (NP (JJ monstrous) (NNS machines)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN suffering)))))))))) (. .))) | slate | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Villains are picked off in order of ascending nastiness--sadistic brutes, followed by smarmy flacks, followed by twisted visionaries in expensive suits.
Then the following statement: "What start out as great ideas by visionaries become twisted into monstrous machines of suffering." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
10,466 | 10466e | yep for when i read i read for enjoyment or escapism and i | ( yep ( for ( when ( i ( read ( i ( read ( for ( ( ( ( enjoyment or ) escapism ) and ) i ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (FRAG (NP (NN yep)) (PP (IN for) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD read) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP read) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NN enjoyment) (CC or) (NN escapism)) (CC and) (NP (FW i))))))))))))) | I read to escape or to enjoy myself. | ( I ( ( read ( ( ( to escape ) or ) ( to ( enjoy myself ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP read) (S (VP (VP (TO to) (VP (VB escape))) (CC or) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB enjoy) (NP (PRP myself))))))) (. .))) | telephone | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: yep for when i read i read for enjoyment or escapism and i
Then the following statement: "I read to escape or to enjoy myself." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
121,547 | 121547n | Its endemic to the entire profession, Snider Basically if youre rich, you can hire lawyers, and if youre poor, you can have one appointed. | ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Its endemic ) ( to ( ( ( the ( entire profession ) ) , ) Snider ) ) ) ( Basically ( ( if ( youre rich ) ) ( , ( you ( can ( hire lawyers ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( if ( youre poor ) ) ( , ( you ( can ( have ( one appointed ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (PRP$ Its) (NN endemic)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ entire) (NN profession)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Snider))))) (VP (VBD Basically) (SBAR (S (SBAR (IN if) (FRAG (ADJP (JJ youre) (JJ rich)))) (, ,) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB hire) (NP (NNS lawyers)))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (SBAR (IN if) (FRAG (ADJP (JJ youre) (JJ poor)))) (, ,) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (CD one)) (VP (VBN appointed)))))) (. .))) | Lawyers that are appointed are far superior to ones that are hired. | ( ( Lawyers ( that ( are appointed ) ) ) ( ( are ( far ( superior ( to ( ones ( that ( are hired ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Lawyers)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN appointed)))))) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RB far) (JJ superior) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNS ones)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN hired))))))))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Its endemic to the entire profession, Snider Basically if youre rich, you can hire lawyers, and if youre poor, you can have one appointed.
Then the following statement: "Lawyers that are appointed are far superior to ones that are hired." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
35,607 | 35607c | a uh special effects man who somehow gets involved in this um oh i'm not sure i can't remember It's been a while since i've seen it But he he gets involved in some sort of bad dealings with somebody and he has to go underground and he uses all of his special effects knowledge in doing what needs to be done | ( ( ( ( ( ( ( a ( uh ( special ( effects man ) ) ) ) ( who ( somehow ( gets ( involved ( in ( ( this um ) ( oh ( i ( ( 'm not ) ( sure ( i ( ( ca n't ) ( remember ( It ( 's ( been ( ( a while ) ( since i ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( 've ( seen it ) ) ) But ) ( ( he ( he gets ) ) ( ( involved ( in ( ( some sort ) ( of ( bad dealings ) ) ) ) ) ( with somebody ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( he ( has ( to ( go underground ) ) ) ) and ) ( he ( ( uses ( all ( of ( his ( special ( effects knowledge ) ) ) ) ) ) ( in ( doing ( what ( needs ( to ( be done ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ uh) (JJ special) (NNS effects) (NN man)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (ADVP (RB somehow)) (VP (VBZ gets) (ADJP (VBN involved) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT this) (NN um)) (SBAR (S (INTJ (UH oh)) (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ sure) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB remember) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBN been) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN while)) (PP (IN since) (NP (FW i))))))))))))))))))))))) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN seen) (NP (PRP it))))) (CC But) (S (NP (NP (PRP he)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ gets))))) (VP (VBD involved) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT some) (NN sort)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ bad) (NNS dealings))))) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN somebody))))) (CC and) (S (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ has) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB go) (ADVP (RB underground))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ uses) (NP (NP (DT all)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ special) (NNS effects) (NN knowledge)))) (PP (IN in) (S (VP (VBG doing) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBZ needs) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN done)))))))))))))))) | The special effects man is unable to use his skills for anything. | ( ( The ( special ( effects man ) ) ) ( ( is ( unable ( to ( ( use ( his skills ) ) ( for anything ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ special) (NNS effects) (NN man)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ unable) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB use) (NP (PRP$ his) (NNS skills)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN anything)))))))) (. .))) | telephone | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: a uh special effects man who somehow gets involved in this um oh i'm not sure i can't remember It's been a while since i've seen it But he he gets involved in some sort of bad dealings with somebody and he has to go underground and he uses all of his special effects knowledge in doing what needs to be done
Then the following statement: "The special effects man is unable to use his skills for anything." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
73,550 | 73550c | Nearby waters, particularly rich in prawns and red mullet, provide all manner of eating houses, both on the beach and in the town, with some of the best seafood on the coast. | ( ( ( ( ( Nearby waters ) , ) ( particularly ( rich ( in ( ( prawns and ) ( red mullet ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( ( ( provide ( ( all manner ) ( of ( eating houses ) ) ) ) , ) ( both ( ( ( on ( the beach ) ) and ) ( in ( ( ( the town ) , ) ( with ( some ( of ( ( the ( best seafood ) ) ( on ( the coast ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJ Nearby) (NNS waters)) (, ,) (ADJP (RB particularly) (JJ rich) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNS prawns)) (CC and) (NP (JJ red) (NN mullet))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBP provide) (NP (NP (DT all) (NN manner)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ eating) (NNS houses)))) (, ,) (PP (DT both) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN beach))) (CC and) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN town)) (, ,) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT some)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS best) (NN seafood)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN coast))))))))))) (. .))) | Prawns are not available locally. | ( Prawns ( ( ( ( are not ) available ) locally ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Prawns)) (VP (VBP are) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ available)) (ADVP (RB locally))) (. .))) | travel | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Nearby waters, particularly rich in prawns and red mullet, provide all manner of eating houses, both on the beach and in the town, with some of the best seafood on the coast.
Then the following statement: "Prawns are not available locally." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
45,258 | 45258n | it's it's clothing | ( it ( 's ( ( it 's ) clothing ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (PRP it) (POS 's)) (NN clothing))))) | it's keeping me warm | ( it ( 's ( keeping ( me warm ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBG keeping) (S (NP (PRP me)) (ADJP (JJ warm))))))) | telephone | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: it's it's clothing
Then the following statement: "it's keeping me warm" is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
1,972 | 1972c | No, not at all. | ( No ( , ( ( not ( at all ) ) . ) ) ) | (ROOT (FRAG (INTJ (UH No)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB not) (IN at) (RB all)) (. .))) | Yes, by all possible means definitely. | ( Yes ( , ( ( by all ) ( possible ( ( means definitely ) . ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (INTJ (UH Yes)) (, ,) (ADVP (IN by) (DT all)) (NP (JJ possible)) (VP (VBZ means) (ADVP (RB definitely))) (. .))) | fiction | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: No, not at all.
Then the following statement: "Yes, by all possible means definitely." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
93,419 | 93419e | It's speculated that aeons ago this may have been a forest extinguished by the eruption of some volcano now deep under the sea. | ( It ( ( 's ( speculated ( that ( aeons ( ( ago this ) ( may ( have ( been ( ( a forest ) ( ( extinguished ( by ( ( the eruption ) ( of ( some volcano ) ) ) ) ) ( now ( deep ( under ( the sea ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBN speculated) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNS aeons)) (ADVP (IN ago) (DT this)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN forest)) (VP (VBN extinguished) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN eruption)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT some) (NN volcano))))) (ADVP (RB now) (JJ deep) (PP (IN under) (NP (DT the) (NN sea))))))))))))) (. .))) | It is believed that there was a forest that was destroyed by the volcano ages ago. | ( It ( ( is ( believed ( that ( there ( was ( ( a forest ) ( that ( was ( ( destroyed ( by ( the ( volcano ages ) ) ) ) ago ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN believed) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN forest)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN destroyed) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NN volcano) (NNS ages))) (ADVP (IN ago)))))))))))) (. .))) | travel | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: It's speculated that aeons ago this may have been a forest extinguished by the eruption of some volcano now deep under the sea.
Then the following statement: "It is believed that there was a forest that was destroyed by the volcano ages ago. " is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
62,669 | 62669e | Sportscaster Marv Albert denied charges that he had assaulted and sodomized a female acquaintance. | ( ( Sportscaster ( Marv Albert ) ) ( ( ( denied charges ) ( that ( he ( had ( ( ( assaulted and ) sodomized ) ( a ( female acquaintance ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Sportscaster) (NNP Marv) (NNP Albert)) (VP (VBD denied) (NP (NNS charges)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN assaulted) (CC and) (VBN sodomized) (NP (DT a) (JJ female) (NN acquaintance))))))) (. .))) | There are rape and abuse charges against Marv Albert. | ( There ( ( are ( ( rape ( and ( abuse charges ) ) ) ( against ( Marv Albert ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (NN rape) (CC and) (NN abuse) (NNS charges)) (PP (IN against) (NP (NNP Marv) (NNP Albert))))) (. .))) | slate | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Sportscaster Marv Albert denied charges that he had assaulted and sodomized a female acquaintance.
Then the following statement: "There are rape and abuse charges against Marv Albert." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
135,140 | 135140n | Preventing developers from adding features is not as easy as it sounds. | ( ( ( Preventing developers ) ( from ( adding features ) ) ) ( ( ( ( is not ) ( as easy ) ) ( as ( it sounds ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Preventing) (NP (NNS developers)) (PP (IN from) (S (VP (VBG adding) (NP (NNS features))))))) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (ADJP (RB as) (JJ easy)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ sounds))))) (. .))) | Developers are legally allowed to add features. | ( Developers ( ( ( are legally ) ( allowed ( to ( add features ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Developers)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB legally)) (VP (VBN allowed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB add) (NP (NNS features))))))) (. .))) | slate | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Preventing developers from adding features is not as easy as it sounds.
Then the following statement: "Developers are legally allowed to add features." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
9,913 | 9913e | yeah it was it was delightful watching them uh learn they uh they went out with their individual personalities and picked it up in their own little way | ( yeah ( it ( was ( it ( ( was delightful ) ( ( watching them ) ( uh ( ( learn they ) ( uh ( they ( ( ( ( went out ) ( with ( their ( individual personalities ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( picked it ) up ) ( in ( their ( own ( little way ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB delightful)) (VP (VBG watching) (NP (PRP them)) (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (VP (VB learn) (NP (PRP they)) (SBAR (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ individual) (NNS personalities)))) (CC and) (VP (VBD picked) (NP (PRP it)) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ own) (JJ little) (NN way))))))))))))))))))) | I really enjoyed watching them and learn about them. | ( I ( really ( ( ( ( enjoyed ( watching them ) ) and ) ( learn ( about them ) ) ) . ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VP (VBD enjoyed) (S (VP (VBG watching) (NP (PRP them))))) (CC and) (VP (VBP learn) (PP (IN about) (NP (PRP them))))) (. .))) | telephone | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: yeah it was it was delightful watching them uh learn they uh they went out with their individual personalities and picked it up in their own little way
Then the following statement: "I really enjoyed watching them and learn about them." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
39,679 | 39679n | This involves a morning or afternoon of theory and shallow-water work, giving you an opportunity to try out the basic techniques before committing yourself a full open-water course. | ( This ( ( involves ( ( ( ( a ( ( morning or ) afternoon ) ) ( of ( theory ( and ( shallow-water work ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( ( ( giving you ) ( an opportunity ) ) ( to ( ( try out ) ( the ( basic techniques ) ) ) ) ) ( before ( committing ( yourself ( a ( full ( open-water course ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT This)) (VP (VBZ involves) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN morning) (CC or) (NN afternoon)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN theory) (CC and) (NN shallow-water) (NN work))) (, ,) (VP (VBG giving) (NP (PRP you)) (NP (DT an) (NN opportunity)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB try) (PRT (RP out)) (NP (DT the) (JJ basic) (NNS techniques))))) (PP (IN before) (S (VP (VBG committing) (S (NP (PRP yourself)) (NP (DT a) (JJ full) (JJ open-water) (NN course))))))))) (. .))) | It is necessary to master basic techniques before going into the full open water course otherwise it is dangerous. | ( ( It ( is ( necessary ( to ( ( master ( basic techniques ) ) ( before ( ( going ( into ( the ( full ( open ( water course ) ) ) ) ) ) otherwise ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( it ( ( is dangerous ) . ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ necessary) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB master) (NP (JJ basic) (NNS techniques)) (PP (IN before) (S (VP (VBG going) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT the) (JJ full) (JJ open) (NN water) (NN course))) (ADVP (RB otherwise))))))))))) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ dangerous))) (. .))) | travel | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: This involves a morning or afternoon of theory and shallow-water work, giving you an opportunity to try out the basic techniques before committing yourself a full open-water course.
Then the following statement: "It is necessary to master basic techniques before going into the full open water course otherwise it is dangerous." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
59,945 | 59945e | The point is not simply to wander aimlessly through Neil Simon country but also to establish that not so long ago to participate in an American election you needed to own property, pass a literacy test, and be a male relative. | ( ( The point ) ( ( ( ( is not ) simply ) ( ( ( ( to ( ( wander aimlessly ) ( through ( Neil ( Simon country ) ) ) ) ) ( but also ) ) ( to ( ( establish that ) ( not so ) ) ) ) ( ( long ago ) ( to ( participate ( in ( ( an ( American election ) ) ( you ( needed ( to ( ( ( ( ( ( own property ) , ) ( pass ( a ( literacy test ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( be ( a ( male relative ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN point)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (ADVP (RB simply)) (S (VP (VP (TO to) (VP (VB wander) (ADVP (RB aimlessly)) (PP (IN through) (NP (NNP Neil) (NNP Simon) (NN country))))) (CONJP (CC but) (RB also)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB establish) (NP (DT that)) (ADVP (RB not) (RB so)))) (S (ADVP (RB long) (RB ago)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB participate) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ American) (NN election)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD needed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB own) (NP (NN property))) (, ,) (VP (VB pass) (NP (DT a) (NN literacy) (NN test))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (VB be) (NP (DT a) (JJ male) (NN relative))))))))))))))))) (. .))) | Passing a literacy test is needed to participate in an American election. | ( ( Passing ( a ( literacy test ) ) ) ( ( is ( needed ( to ( participate ( in ( an ( American election ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Passing) (NP (DT a) (NN literacy) (NN test)))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN needed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB participate) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT an) (JJ American) (NN election)))))))) (. .))) | slate | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The point is not simply to wander aimlessly through Neil Simon country but also to establish that not so long ago to participate in an American election you needed to own property, pass a literacy test, and be a male relative.
Then the following statement: "Passing a literacy test is needed to participate in an American election." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
141,817 | 141817e | A These results indicate the sensitivity of the primary benefits estimate to alternative assumptions; results reflect the use of a three percent discount rate, where appropriate. | ( ( ( ( ( A ( These results ) ) ( ( indicate ( ( the sensitivity ) ( of ( the ( primary ( benefits estimate ) ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( alternative assumptions ) ) ) ) ; ) ( results ( ( ( reflect ( ( the use ) ( of ( a ( three ( percent ( discount rate ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( where appropriate ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (DT A) (DT These) (NNS results)) (VP (VBP indicate) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN sensitivity)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ primary) (NNS benefits) (NN estimate)))) (PP (TO to) (NP (JJ alternative) (NNS assumptions))))) (: ;) (S (NP (NNS results)) (VP (VBP reflect) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN use)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (CD three) (NN percent) (NN discount) (NN rate)))) (, ,) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (ADJP (JJ appropriate)))))) (. .))) | The results show the benefits are sensitive. | ( ( The results ) ( ( show ( ( the benefits ) ( are sensitive ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS results)) (VP (VBP show) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NNS benefits)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ sensitive)))))) (. .))) | government | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: A These results indicate the sensitivity of the primary benefits estimate to alternative assumptions; results reflect the use of a three percent discount rate, where appropriate.
Then the following statement: "The results show the benefits are sensitive." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
3,825 | 3825n | you get a chance to sit down in baseball every once in a while you know if you're not up for three innings or whatever but | ( you ( get ( ( a chance ) ( to ( ( ( sit down ) ( in baseball ) ) ( every ( once ( ( in ( a while ) ) ( you ( know ( if ( you ( ( ( 're not ) ( up ( for ( ( ( three innings ) or ) whatever ) ) ) ) but ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP get) (S (NP (DT a) (NN chance)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB sit) (ADVP (RB down)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN baseball))) (ADVP (DT every) (RB once) (SBAR (S (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (NN while))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (RB not) (ADVP (RB up) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (CD three) (NNS innings)) (CC or) (NP (NNP whatever))))) (ADVP (CC but))))))))))))))) | Baseball is popular because of the fact you can sit down during games periodically. | ( Baseball ( ( ( is popular ) ( because ( ( of ( the fact ) ) ( you ( can ( ( ( sit down ) ( during games ) ) periodically ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Baseball)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ popular)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN fact))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB sit) (PRT (RP down)) (PP (IN during) (NP (NNS games))) (ADVP (RB periodically))))))) (. .))) | telephone | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: you get a chance to sit down in baseball every once in a while you know if you're not up for three innings or whatever but
Then the following statement: "Baseball is popular because of the fact you can sit down during games periodically." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
142,063 | 142063n | Figure 3.3 shows the net U.S. ownership of foreign assets-the net international investment position13-and net income receipts on net U.S. assets abroad. | ( ( Figure 3.3 ) ( ( ( shows ( ( the ( net ( U.S. ownership ) ) ) ( of ( ( foreign ( assets-the ( net ( international ( investment ( position13-and ( net ( income receipts ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( on ( net ( U.S. assets ) ) ) ) ) ) ) abroad ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NN Figure) (CD 3.3)) (VP (VBZ shows) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ net) (NNP U.S.) (NN ownership)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ foreign) (JJ assets-the) (JJ net) (JJ international) (NN investment) (JJ position13-and) (JJ net) (NN income) (NNS receipts)) (PP (IN on) (NP (JJ net) (NNP U.S.) (NNS assets)))))) (ADVP (RB abroad))) (. .))) | Figure 3.3 shows the effect of U.S. ownership of foreign assets on the net international investment position. | ( ( Figure 3.3 ) ( ( shows ( ( ( the effect ) ( of ( U.S. ownership ) ) ) ( of ( ( foreign assets ) ( on ( the ( net ( international ( investment position ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NN Figure) (CD 3.3)) (VP (VBZ shows) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN effect)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP U.S.) (NN ownership))) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ foreign) (NNS assets)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (JJ net) (JJ international) (NN investment) (NN position))))))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Figure 3.3 shows the net U.S. ownership of foreign assets-the net international investment position13-and net income receipts on net U.S. assets abroad.
Then the following statement: "Figure 3.3 shows the effect of U.S. ownership of foreign assets on the net international investment position. " is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
68,814 | 68814c | Conceived with meticulous care, Katsura is one of Japan's masterpieces of subtle residential design and garden landscaping. | ( ( Conceived ( with ( meticulous care ) ) ) ( , ( Katsura ( ( is ( ( one ( of ( ( Japan 's ) masterpieces ) ) ) ( of ( subtle ( residential ( design ( and ( garden landscaping ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (S (VP (VBN Conceived) (PP (IN with) (NP (JJ meticulous) (NN care))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Katsura)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Japan) (POS 's)) (NNS masterpieces))) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ subtle) (JJ residential) (NN design) (CC and) (NN garden) (NN landscaping))))) (. .))) | Katsura is a horribly ugly place. | ( Katsura ( ( is ( a ( ( horribly ugly ) place ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Katsura)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB horribly) (JJ ugly)) (NN place))) (. .))) | travel | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Conceived with meticulous care, Katsura is one of Japan's masterpieces of subtle residential design and garden landscaping.
Then the following statement: "Katsura is a horribly ugly place." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
63,710 | 63710n | For large-scale simulations, one-way nesting of fine and coarse grids can be performed to allow simulation of sensitive areas with strong pollution spatial gradients using a fine grid resolution. | ( ( For ( large-scale simulations ) ) ( , ( ( ( one-way nesting ) ( of ( fine ( and ( coarse grids ) ) ) ) ) ( ( can ( be ( performed ( to ( ( allow ( simulation ( of ( sensitive areas ) ) ) ) ( with ( ( strong ( pollution ( spatial gradients ) ) ) ( using ( a ( fine ( grid resolution ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (IN For) (NP (JJ large-scale) (NNS simulations))) (, ,) (NP (NP (JJ one-way) (NNS nesting)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ fine) (CC and) (JJ coarse) (NNS grids)))) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN performed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB allow) (NP (NP (NN simulation)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ sensitive) (NNS areas)))) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (JJ strong) (NN pollution) (NN spatial) (NNS gradients)) (VP (VBG using) (NP (DT a) (JJ fine) (NN grid) (NN resolution))))))))))) (. .))) | For large scale simulations one way nesting or something else can be performed. | ( ( For ( large ( scale simulations ) ) ) ( ( ( ( one ( way nesting ) ) or ) ( something else ) ) ( ( can ( be performed ) ) . ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (IN For) (NP (JJ large) (NN scale) (NNS simulations))) (NP (NP (CD one) (NN way) (NNS nesting)) (CC or) (NP (NN something) (RB else))) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN performed)))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: For large-scale simulations, one-way nesting of fine and coarse grids can be performed to allow simulation of sensitive areas with strong pollution spatial gradients using a fine grid resolution.
Then the following statement: "For large scale simulations one way nesting or something else can be performed." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
8,127 | 8127c | well let's see other than gardening which i fiddle at i'm not very good at what else do i mostly just computer stuff | ( well ( let ( 's ( see ( ( other ( than ( gardening ( which ( ( ( i fiddle ) ( at i ) ) ( ( 'm not ) ( very ( good ( at ( ( what else ) ( ( ( do i ) mostly ) just ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( computer stuff ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (ADVP (RB well)) (VP (VB let) (S (NP (POS 's)) (VP (VB see) (NP (ADJP (JJ other) (PP (IN than) (NP (NP (NN gardening)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (NP (NP (FW i) (FW fiddle)) (PP (IN at) (NP (FW i)))) (VP (VBP 'm) (RB not) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ good) (PP (IN at) (S (WHNP (WP what) (RB else)) (VP (VBP do) (NP (FW i)) (ADVP (RB mostly)) (ADVP (RB just)))))))))))) (NN computer) (NN stuff))))))) | I am much better at gardening than at computer stuff. | ( I ( ( am ( ( much ( better ( at gardening ) ) ) ( than ( at ( computer stuff ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP am) (ADJP (ADJP (RB much) (JJR better) (PP (IN at) (NP (NN gardening)))) (PP (IN than) (PP (IN at) (NP (NN computer) (NN stuff)))))) (. .))) | telephone | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: well let's see other than gardening which i fiddle at i'm not very good at what else do i mostly just computer stuff
Then the following statement: "I am much better at gardening than at computer stuff." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
39,426 | 39426n | At the very least, Flytrap illustrates the need for less fact chasing and more analysis and illumination of the what should we do about it question. | ( ( At ( the ( very least ) ) ) ( , ( Flytrap ( ( illustrates ( ( ( the need ) ( for ( ( ( less ( fact chasing ) ) and ) ( more ( ( analysis and ) illumination ) ) ) ) ) ( ( of ( the what ) ) ( ( should we ) ( do ( about ( it question ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (IN At) (NP (DT the) (RB very) (JJS least))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Flytrap)) (VP (VBZ illustrates) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN need)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJR less) (NN fact) (NN chasing)) (CC and) (NP (JJR more) (NN analysis) (CC and) (NN illumination)))) (SBAR (WHPP (IN of) (WHNP (DT the) (WDT what))) (SINV (MD should) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VB do) (SBAR (IN about) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBP question))))))))) (. .))) | Flytrap has taught many people a few valuable lessons. | ( Flytrap ( ( has ( taught ( ( many people ) ( a ( few ( valuable lessons ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Flytrap)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN taught) (S (NP (JJ many) (NNS people)) (NP (DT a) (JJ few) (JJ valuable) (NNS lessons))))) (. .))) | slate | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: At the very least, Flytrap illustrates the need for less fact chasing and more analysis and illumination of the what should we do about it question.
Then the following statement: "Flytrap has taught many people a few valuable lessons." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
82,636 | 82636e | not inside now uh when we bought the house that we live in right now we had a company that came out and painted it that was one of the requirements from you know FHA | ( not ( inside ( now ( uh ( when ( we ( ( bought ( the house ) ) ( that ( we ( ( live ( in right ) ) ( now ( we ( had ( ( a company ) ( that ( ( ( came out ) and ) ( painted ( ( it ( that ( was ( one ( of ( ( the requirements ) ( from you ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( know FHA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (FRAG (RB not) (PP (IN inside) (S (VP (ADVP (RB now)) (VBG uh) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD bought) (NP (DT the) (NN house)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP live) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN right))) (SBAR (RB now) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN company)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VP (VBD came) (PRT (RP out))) (CC and) (VP (VBD painted) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS requirements)) (PP (IN from) (NP (PRP you)))))))))) (VP (VBP know) (NP (NNP FHA)))))))))))))))))))))))) | The FHA required that we had a company come out and paint our house after we bought it. | ( ( The FHA ) ( ( required ( that ( we ( ( had ( ( a company ) ( ( ( come out ) and ) ( paint ( our house ) ) ) ) ) ( after ( we ( bought it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP FHA)) (VP (VBD required) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD had) (S (NP (DT a) (NN company)) (VP (VP (VB come) (PRT (RP out))) (CC and) (VP (VB paint) (NP (PRP$ our) (NN house))))) (SBAR (IN after) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD bought) (NP (PRP it))))))))) (. .))) | telephone | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: not inside now uh when we bought the house that we live in right now we had a company that came out and painted it that was one of the requirements from you know FHA
Then the following statement: "The FHA required that we had a company come out and paint our house after we bought it. " is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
1,312 | 1312c | The variable cost of delivery depends on volume delivered, thus the comparison of variable costs between France and the U.S. is straightforward. | ( ( ( ( ( ( ( The ( variable cost ) ) ( of delivery ) ) ( depends ( on ( volume delivered ) ) ) ) , ) thus ) ( ( ( the comparison ) ( of ( ( variable costs ) ( between ( ( France and ) ( the U.S. ) ) ) ) ) ) ( is straightforward ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ variable) (NN cost)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN delivery)))) (VP (VBZ depends) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (NN volume)) (VP (VBN delivered)))))) (, ,) (RB thus) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN comparison)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ variable) (NNS costs)) (PP (IN between) (NP (NP (NNP France)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (NNP U.S.))))))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ straightforward)))) (. .))) | The variable cost of delivery depends on how many residents there are. | ( ( ( The ( variable cost ) ) ( of delivery ) ) ( ( depends ( on ( ( how many ) ( residents ( there are ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ variable) (NN cost)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN delivery)))) (VP (VBZ depends) (PP (IN on) (SBAR (WHADJP (WRB how) (JJ many)) (S (NP (NNS residents)) (ADVP (RB there)) (VP (VBP are)))))) (. .))) | government | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The variable cost of delivery depends on volume delivered, thus the comparison of variable costs between France and the U.S. is straightforward.
Then the following statement: "The variable cost of delivery depends on how many residents there are." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
69,893 | 69893n | no i'm kind of uh actually uh i think they've got the draft choices to make to make a good run at it but i i'm not sure how well they'll draft | ( ( no i ) ( ( 'm ( kind ( ( of uh ) actually ) ) ) ( ( ( uh ( i ( think ( they ( 've ( ( got ( the ( draft choices ) ) ) ( to ( make ( to ( ( make ( a ( good run ) ) ) ( at it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( ( i i ) ( ( ( 'm not ) sure ) ( ( how well ) ( they ( 'll draft ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT no) (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADVP (RB kind) (PP (IN of) (NP (INTJ (UH uh))) (ADVP (RB actually)))) (VP (VP (VBG uh) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN got) (NP (DT the) (NN draft) (NNS choices)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (NP (DT a) (JJ good) (NN run)) (PP (IN at) (NP (PRP it))))))))))))))))) (CC but) (VP (NP (NP (FW i) (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP 'm) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ sure)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how) (RB well)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB draft)))))))))))))) | I'm not sure of how well they'll draft because they didn't do such a good job last year. | ( I ( ( ( 'm not ) ( sure ( of ( ( how well ) ( they ( 'll ( draft ( because ( they ( ( did n't ) ( ( do ( such ( a ( good job ) ) ) ) ( last year ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ sure) (PP (IN of) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how) (RB well)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB draft) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB do) (NP (PDT such) (DT a) (JJ good) (NN job)) (NP (JJ last) (NN year))))))))))))) (. .))) | telephone | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: no i'm kind of uh actually uh i think they've got the draft choices to make to make a good run at it but i i'm not sure how well they'll draft
Then the following statement: "I'm not sure of how well they'll draft because they didn't do such a good job last year. " is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
74,867 | 74867e | Ships from around the Mediterranean docked at the double harbor. | ( ( Ships ( from ( around ( the Mediterranean ) ) ) ) ( ( docked ( at ( the ( double harbor ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Ships)) (PP (IN from) (PP (IN around) (NP (DT the) (NNP Mediterranean))))) (VP (VBD docked) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (JJ double) (NN harbor)))) (. .))) | The double harbor was docked from ships from all over the Mediterranean. | ( ( The ( double harbor ) ) ( ( was ( ( docked ( from ships ) ) ( from ( all ( over ( the Mediterranean ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ double) (NN harbor)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN docked) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNS ships))) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT all)) (PP (IN over) (NP (DT the) (NNP Mediterranean))))))) (. .))) | travel | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Ships from around the Mediterranean docked at the double harbor.
Then the following statement: "The double harbor was docked from ships from all over the Mediterranean." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
51,698 | 51698c | The amendment failed, as did the overall bill; and when the bill came up for a vote again this year, no similar amendment was offered. | ( ( ( ( ( ( The amendment ) ( ( failed , ) ( as ( did ( the ( overall bill ) ) ) ) ) ) ; ) and ) ( ( when ( ( the bill ) ( ( ( came ( up ( for ( a vote ) ) ) ) again ) ( this year ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( no ( similar amendment ) ) ( was offered ) ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN amendment)) (VP (VBD failed) (, ,) (SBAR (IN as) (S (VP (VBD did) (NP (DT the) (JJ overall) (NN bill))))))) (: ;) (CC and) (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (DT the) (NN bill)) (VP (VBD came) (ADVP (RB up) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (NN vote)))) (ADVP (RB again)) (NP (DT this) (NN year))))) (, ,) (NP (DT no) (JJ similar) (NN amendment)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN offered)))) (. .))) | The amendment was the reason the bill passed. | ( ( The amendment ) ( ( was ( ( the reason ) ( ( the bill ) passed ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN amendment)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN reason)) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NN bill)) (VP (VBD passed)))))) (. .))) | slate | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The amendment failed, as did the overall bill; and when the bill came up for a vote again this year, no similar amendment was offered.
Then the following statement: "The amendment was the reason the bill passed." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
78,689 | 78689c | Wine profits were huge, and by 1800 exports had reached nine million bottles per year. | ( ( Wine profits ) ( ( ( ( ( were huge ) , ) and ) ( ( by ( 1800 exports ) ) ( had ( reached ( ( ( nine million ) bottles ) ( per year ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Wine) (NNS profits)) (VP (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (JJ huge))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (PP (IN by) (NP (CD 1800) (NNS exports))) (VBD had) (VP (VBN reached) (NP (NP (QP (CD nine) (CD million)) (NNS bottles)) (PP (IN per) (NP (NN year))))))) (. .))) | Wine exporting shrank sharply. | ( ( Wine exporting ) ( ( shrank sharply ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Wine) (NNP exporting)) (VP (VBD shrank) (ADVP (RB sharply))) (. .))) | travel | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Wine profits were huge, and by 1800 exports had reached nine million bottles per year.
Then the following statement: "Wine exporting shrank sharply." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
118,428 | 118428n | Rather than a formal church, Hinduism is a guide to a virtuous life and a structure for social relationships. | ( ( Rather ( than ( a ( formal church ) ) ) ) ( , ( Hinduism ( ( is ( ( ( ( a guide ) ( to ( a ( virtuous life ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( a structure ) ( for ( social relationships ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (RB Rather) (PP (IN than) (NP (DT a) (JJ formal) (NN church)))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Hinduism)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NP (DT a) (NN guide)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT a) (JJ virtuous) (NN life)))) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN structure)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ social) (NNS relationships)))))) (. .))) | Rather than a formal church, Hinduism is a guide to a virtuous life and a structure for social relationships which has hurt its ability to expand. | ( ( Rather ( than ( a ( formal church ) ) ) ) ( , ( Hinduism ( ( is ( ( a guide ) ( to ( ( ( a ( virtuous life ) ) and ) ( ( ( a structure ) ( for ( social relationships ) ) ) ( which ( has ( hurt ( its ( ability ( to expand ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (RB Rather) (PP (IN than) (NP (DT a) (JJ formal) (NN church)))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Hinduism)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN guide)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ virtuous) (NN life)) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN structure)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ social) (NNS relationships))) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN hurt) (NP (PRP$ its) (NN ability) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB expand)))))))))))))) (. .))) | travel | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Rather than a formal church, Hinduism is a guide to a virtuous life and a structure for social relationships.
Then the following statement: "Rather than a formal church, Hinduism is a guide to a virtuous life and a structure for social relationships which has hurt its ability to expand." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
4,211 | 4211e | Rather, they would need to know the specific Web addresses already. | ( Rather ( , ( they ( ( would ( need ( to ( ( know ( the ( specific ( Web addresses ) ) ) ) already ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Rather)) (, ,) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB know) (NP (DT the) (JJ specific) (NNP Web) (NNS addresses)) (ADVP (RB already))))))) (. .))) | Someone needs to know specific web addresses | ( Someone ( needs ( to ( know ( specific ( web addresses ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NN Someone)) (VP (VBZ needs) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB know) (NP (JJ specific) (NN web) (NNS addresses)))))))) | slate | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Rather, they would need to know the specific Web addresses already.
Then the following statement: "Someone needs to know specific web addresses" is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
29,670 | 29670n | um yeah yeah well that's probably true to so | ( ( ( um ( yeah yeah ) ) well ) ( that ( ( 's probably ) ( true ( to so ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (VP (VB um) (NP (JJ yeah) (NN yeah)) (ADVP (RB well)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB probably)) (ADJP (JJ true) (PP (TO to) (ADVP (RB so)))))))))) | That is probably right but it may be wrong. | ( ( ( ( That ( ( is probably ) right ) ) but ) ( it ( may ( be wrong ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB probably)) (ADJP (JJ right)))) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ wrong))))) (. .))) | telephone | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: um yeah yeah well that's probably true to so
Then the following statement: "That is probably right but it may be wrong. " is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
48,533 | 48533e | The horse had likely already felt the large man's fear. | ( ( The horse ) ( ( ( had likely ) ( already ( felt ( ( the ( large ( man 's ) ) ) fear ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN horse)) (VP (VBD had) (ADVP (RB likely)) (VP (ADVP (RB already)) (VBN felt) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ large) (NN man) (POS 's)) (NN fear)))) (. .))) | The horse seemed to sense the fear of the large man. | ( ( The horse ) ( ( seemed ( to ( sense ( ( the fear ) ( of ( the ( large man ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN horse)) (VP (VBD seemed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB sense) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN fear)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ large) (NN man)))))))) (. .))) | fiction | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The horse had likely already felt the large man's fear.
Then the following statement: "The horse seemed to sense the fear of the large man." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
88,793 | 88793c | The exception is the OXO Good Grips teakettle, designed by the New York firm Smart Design and introduced last year. | ( ( The exception ) ( ( is ( ( ( the ( OXO ( Good ( Grips teakettle ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( ( designed ( by ( the ( New ( York ( firm ( Smart Design ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( introduced ( last year ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN exception)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP OXO) (NNP Good) (NNP Grips) (NN teakettle)) (, ,) (VP (VP (VBN designed) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NNP New) (NNP York) (NN firm) (NNP Smart) (NNP Design)))) (CC and) (VP (VBN introduced) (NP (JJ last) (NN year)))))) (. .))) | The Good Grips teakettle was designed by a team in California. | ( ( The ( Good ( Grips teakettle ) ) ) ( ( was ( designed ( by ( ( a team ) ( in California ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Good) (NNP Grips) (NN teakettle)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN designed) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN team)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP California))))))) (. .))) | slate | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The exception is the OXO Good Grips teakettle, designed by the New York firm Smart Design and introduced last year.
Then the following statement: "The Good Grips teakettle was designed by a team in California. " is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
116,396 | 116396n | Later, in 454 b.c. , the treasury was transferred to Athens and its deposits were used to finance the construction of many of the major buildings and temples of the Classical Age. | ( Later ( , ( ( ( ( ( in ( 454 b.c. ) ) ( , ( ( the treasury ) ( was ( transferred ( to Athens ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( its deposits ) ( were ( used ( to ( finance ( ( the construction ) ( of ( many ( of ( ( the ( major ( ( buildings and ) temples ) ) ) ( of ( the ( Classical Age ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Later)) (, ,) (S (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP 454) (NNP b.c.))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN treasury)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN transferred) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Athens)))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP$ its) (NNS deposits)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN used) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB finance) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN construction)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ many)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ major) (NNS buildings) (CC and) (NNS temples)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Classical) (NNP Age)))))))))))))) (. .))) | The buildings and temples in Athens could not have been built without the treasury. | ( ( ( The ( ( buildings and ) temples ) ) ( in Athens ) ) ( ( ( could not ) ( have ( been ( built ( without ( the treasury ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS buildings) (CC and) (NNS temples)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Athens)))) (VP (MD could) (RB not) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN built) (PP (IN without) (NP (DT the) (NN treasury))))))) (. .))) | travel | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Later, in 454 b.c. , the treasury was transferred to Athens and its deposits were used to finance the construction of many of the major buildings and temples of the Classical Age.
Then the following statement: "The buildings and temples in Athens could not have been built without the treasury." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
108,284 | 108284e | I'll show you." | ( I ( ( ( 'll ( show you ) ) . ) '' ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB show) (NP (PRP you)))) (. .) ('' ''))) | "You will see." | ( `` ( You ( ( ( will see ) . ) '' ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (`` ``) (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB see))) (. .) ('' ''))) | fiction | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: I'll show you."
Then the following statement: ""You will see."" is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
67,878 | 67878n | Our simulation results reflect unified budget deficits/surpluses. | ( ( Our ( simulation results ) ) ( ( reflect ( unified ( budget deficits/surpluses ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ Our) (NN simulation) (NNS results)) (VP (VBP reflect) (NP (JJ unified) (NN budget) (NNS deficits/surpluses))) (. .))) | There was many simulations with results on budget deficits. | ( There ( ( was ( ( many simulations ) ( with ( results ( on ( budget deficits ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (JJ many) (NNS simulations)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NNS results)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN budget) (NNS deficits))))))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Our simulation results reflect unified budget deficits/surpluses.
Then the following statement: "There was many simulations with results on budget deficits." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
12,541 | 12541n | government accounts within the unified budget. | ( government ( ( accounts ( within ( the ( unified budget ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NN government)) (VP (VBZ accounts) (PP (IN within) (NP (DT the) (JJ unified) (NN budget)))) (. .))) | The government accounts tend to grow significantly more when the budget is unified. | ( ( The ( government accounts ) ) ( ( tend ( to ( ( grow ( significantly more ) ) ( when ( ( the budget ) ( is unified ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN government) (NNS accounts)) (VP (VBP tend) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB grow) (ADJP (RB significantly) (JJR more)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (DT the) (NN budget)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (VBN unified))))))))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: government accounts within the unified budget.
Then the following statement: "The government accounts tend to grow significantly more when the budget is unified." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
28,272 | 28272n | The fine Romanesque cloister was moved here from a nearby convent that suffered damage in the Civil War. | ( ( The ( fine ( Romanesque cloister ) ) ) ( ( was ( ( moved here ) ( from ( ( a ( nearby convent ) ) ( that ( ( suffered damage ) ( in ( the ( Civil War ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ fine) (JJ Romanesque) (NN cloister)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN moved) (ADVP (RB here)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ nearby) (NN convent)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD suffered) (NP (NN damage)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Civil) (NNP War)))))))))) (. .))) | The communists had attempted to destroy the convent during the Civil War. | ( ( The communists ) ( ( had ( attempted ( to ( ( destroy ( the convent ) ) ( during ( the ( Civil War ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS communists)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN attempted) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB destroy) (NP (DT the) (NN convent)) (PP (IN during) (NP (DT the) (NNP Civil) (NNP War)))))))) (. .))) | travel | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The fine Romanesque cloister was moved here from a nearby convent that suffered damage in the Civil War.
Then the following statement: "The communists had attempted to destroy the convent during the Civil War." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
106,661 | 106661n | Why? What's doing back at the house? | ( ( Why ? ) ( ( What ( 's ( ( doing back ) ( at ( the house ) ) ) ) ) ? ) ) | (ROOT (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB Why) (. ?)) (S (NP (WP What)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBG doing) (ADVP (RB back)) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NN house)))))) (. ?))) | Why do you need to head back to the house, exactly? | ( Why ( ( ( do you ) ( need ( to ( ( head back ) ( to ( ( ( the house ) , ) exactly ) ) ) ) ) ) ? ) ) | (ROOT (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB Why)) (SQ (VBP do) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB head) (PRT (RP back)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN house)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB exactly))))))))) (. ?))) | fiction | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Why? What's doing back at the house?
Then the following statement: "Why do you need to head back to the house, exactly?" is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
89,119 | 89119e | This first critical success factor focuses on the role of the senior executive of the enterprise in developing a culture that includes the CIO in senior-level decision making and that assumes the potential of IT in creating value for the enterprise. | ( ( This ( first ( critical ( success factor ) ) ) ) ( ( ( focuses ( on ( ( the role ) ( of ( ( the ( senior executive ) ) ( of ( the enterprise ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( in ( developing ( ( a culture ) ( that ( ( includes ( ( ( ( the CIO ) ( in ( senior-level ( decision making ) ) ) ) and ) ( that ( assumes ( ( the potential ) ( of IT ) ) ) ) ) ) ( in ( ( creating value ) ( for ( the enterprise ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT This) (JJ first) (JJ critical) (NN success) (NN factor)) (VP (VBZ focuses) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN role)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ senior) (NN executive)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN enterprise))))))) (PP (IN in) (S (VP (VBG developing) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN culture)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ includes) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP CIO)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ senior-level) (NN decision) (NN making)))) (CC and) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ assumes) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN potential)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP IT)))))))) (PP (IN in) (S (VP (VBG creating) (NP (NN value)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN enterprise)))))))))))))) (. .))) | Senior executives must create a culture where the CIO is involved in major decision making. | ( ( Senior executives ) ( ( must ( ( create ( a culture ) ) ( where ( ( the CIO ) ( is ( involved ( in ( major ( decision making ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (JJ Senior) (NNS executives)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB create) (NP (DT a) (NN culture)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (DT the) (NNP CIO)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN involved) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ major) (NN decision) (NN making))))))))) (. .))) | government | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: This first critical success factor focuses on the role of the senior executive of the enterprise in developing a culture that includes the CIO in senior-level decision making and that assumes the potential of IT in creating value for the enterprise.
Then the following statement: "Senior executives must create a culture where the CIO is involved in major decision making." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
26,820 | 26820e | You know where they are? persisted the German. | ( You ( ( know ( ( where ( ( they are ) ? ) ) ( persisted ( the German ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (SINV (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB where)) (SQ (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP are))) (. ?)) (VP (VBD persisted)) (NP (DT the) (JJ German))))) (. .))) | You know their location? asked the German. | ( You ( ( know ( ( ( their location ) ? ) ( asked ( the German ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP know) (S (NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN location)) (. ?) (S (VP (VBD asked) (NP (DT the) (JJ German))))))) (. .))) | fiction | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: You know where they are? persisted the German.
Then the following statement: "You know their location? asked the German." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
74,826 | 74826n | They are collected by the Minerals Management Service (MMS) of the Department of the Interior, which | ( They ( are ( ( collected ( by ( ( ( ( ( the ( Minerals ( Management Service ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( MMS -RRB- ) ) ) ( of ( the Department ) ) ) ( of ( the Interior ) ) ) , ) ) ) which ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN collected) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNPS Minerals) (NNP Management) (NNP Service)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP MMS)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Department))) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Interior))) (, ,))) (FRAG (WHNP (WDT which))))))) | They are then passed on to other parts of the Department of the Interior. | ( They ( ( ( are then ) ( passed ( on ( to ( ( other parts ) ( of ( ( the Department ) ( of ( the Interior ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB then)) (VP (VBN passed) (PP (IN on) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (JJ other) (NNS parts)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Department)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Interior)))))))))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: They are collected by the Minerals Management Service (MMS) of the Department of the Interior, which
Then the following statement: "They are then passed on to other parts of the Department of the Interior." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
28,305 | 28305c | The gallery is set in the 18th-century Charlemont House, built for Lord Charlemont by Sir William Chambers. | ( ( The gallery ) ( ( is ( set ( in ( ( ( the ( 18th-century ( Charlemont House ) ) ) , ) ( ( built ( for ( Lord Charlemont ) ) ) ( by ( Sir ( William Chambers ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN gallery)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN set) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ 18th-century) (NNP Charlemont) (NNP House)) (, ,) (VP (VBN built) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNP Lord) (NNP Charlemont))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP Sir) (NNP William) (NNP Chambers)))))))) (. .))) | THe gallery is in the Smith House. | ( ( THe gallery ) ( ( is ( in ( the ( Smith House ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP THe) (NN gallery)) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Smith) (NNP House)))) (. .))) | travel | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The gallery is set in the 18th-century Charlemont House, built for Lord Charlemont by Sir William Chambers.
Then the following statement: "THe gallery is in the Smith House." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
68,073 | 68073e | To receive facsimile copies of the daily list or any list from the past 30 days, please call (202) 512-6000 using a touchtone phone. | ( ( To ( ( receive ( ( facsimile copies ) ( of ( ( ( the ( daily list ) ) or ) ( any list ) ) ) ) ) ( from ( the ( past ( 30 days ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( please ( ( ( call -LRB-202-RRB- 512-6000 ) ( using ( a ( touchtone phone ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (S (VP (TO To) (VP (VB receive) (NP (NP (JJ facsimile) (NNS copies)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ daily) (NN list)) (CC or) (NP (DT any) (NN list))))) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (JJ past) (CD 30) (NNS days)))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP please)) (VP (VBP call) (NP (CD -LRB-202-RRB- 512-6000)) (S (VP (VBG using) (NP (DT a) (JJ touchtone) (NN phone))))) (. .))) | Copies are available by fax. | ( Copies ( ( are ( available ( by fax ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Copies)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ available) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN fax))))) (. .))) | government | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: To receive facsimile copies of the daily list or any list from the past 30 days, please call (202) 512-6000 using a touchtone phone.
Then the following statement: "Copies are available by fax. " is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
2,618 | 2618e | OLYMPIA (AP) - The Washington Supreme Court is asking the Legislature to approve a $90 surcharge on a court filing fee to help provide legal help for the poor in civil cases, Chief Justice Gerry Alexander said Wednesday. | ( ( ( ( OLYMPIA ( -LRB- ( AP -RRB- ) ) ) - ) ( ( The ( Washington ( Supreme Court ) ) ) ( is ( asking ( ( the Legislature ) ( to ( ( approve ( ( a ( ( $ 90 ) surcharge ) ) ( on ( a ( court ( filing fee ) ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( ( ( ( help provide ) ( ( legal help ) ( for ( the poor ) ) ) ) ( in ( civil cases ) ) ) , ) ( ( Chief ( Justice ( Gerry Alexander ) ) ) ( said Wednesday ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (NP (NP (NNP OLYMPIA)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP AP)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (: -) (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Washington) (NNP Supreme) (NNP Court)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG asking) (S (NP (DT the) (NNP Legislature)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB approve) (NP (NP (DT a) (ADJP ($ $) (CD 90)) (NN surcharge)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT a) (NN court) (NN filing) (NN fee)))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB help) (VB provide) (NP (NP (JJ legal) (NN help)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJ poor)))) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ civil) (NNS cases))) (, ,) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Chief) (NNP Justice) (NNP Gerry) (NNP Alexander)) (VP (VBD said) (NP (NNP Wednesday)))))))))))))))) (. .))) | Chief Justice Gerry Alexander said The Washington Supreme Court wants to charge $90 for court filing. | ( ( Chief ( Justice ( Gerry Alexander ) ) ) ( ( said ( ( The ( Washington ( Supreme Court ) ) ) ( wants ( to ( charge ( ( $ 90 ) ( for ( court filing ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Chief) (NNP Justice) (NNP Gerry) (NNP Alexander)) (VP (VBD said) (SBAR (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Washington) (NNP Supreme) (NNP Court)) (VP (VBZ wants) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB charge) (NP (NP ($ $) (CD 90)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN court) (NN filing))))))))))) (. .))) | government | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: OLYMPIA (AP) - The Washington Supreme Court is asking the Legislature to approve a $90 surcharge on a court filing fee to help provide legal help for the poor in civil cases, Chief Justice Gerry Alexander said Wednesday.
Then the following statement: "Chief Justice Gerry Alexander said The Washington Supreme Court wants to charge $90 for court filing." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
132,037 | 132037c | Black commentators (e.g. | ( Black ( commentators ( -LRB- e.g. ) ) ) | (ROOT (NP (NP (NNP Black)) (NP (NNP commentators) (-LRB- -LRB-) (NNP e.g.)))) | White commentators. | ( White ( commentators . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP White)) (VP (VBZ commentators)) (. .))) | slate | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Black commentators (e.g.
Then the following statement: "White commentators." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
6,470 | 6470e | About three dozen cases, involving 123 people facing eviction, were handled, according to Volunteer Lawyer Project Director Barbara Romeo. | ( ( ( ( ( ( About ( three dozen ) ) cases ) , ) ( involving ( ( 123 people ) ( facing eviction ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( were ( ( handled , ) ( according ( to ( Volunteer ( Lawyer ( Project ( Director ( Barbara Romeo ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (QP (RB About) (CD three) (NN dozen)) (NNS cases)) (, ,) (VP (VBG involving) (NP (NP (CD 123) (NNS people)) (VP (VBG facing) (NP (NN eviction))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN handled) (, ,) (PP (VBG according) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Volunteer) (NNP Lawyer) (NNP Project) (NNP Director) (NNP Barbara) (NNP Romeo)))))) (. .))) | Barb Romeo is responsible for handling over 20 eviction cases. | ( ( Barb Romeo ) ( ( is ( responsible ( for ( handling ( over ( 20 ( eviction cases ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Barb) (NNP Romeo)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ responsible) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG handling) (PP (IN over) (NP (CD 20) (NN eviction) (NNS cases)))))))) (. .))) | government | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: About three dozen cases, involving 123 people facing eviction, were handled, according to Volunteer Lawyer Project Director Barbara Romeo.
Then the following statement: "Barb Romeo is responsible for handling over 20 eviction cases. " is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
106,880 | 106880c | Maryland ranks at the top of the list nationally in the level of funding for civil legal assistance in the state. | ( Maryland ( ( ( ranks ( at ( ( the top ) ( of ( the list ) ) ) ) ) ( nationally ( in ( ( the level ) ( of ( funding ( for ( ( civil ( legal assistance ) ) ( in ( the state ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Maryland)) (VP (VBZ ranks) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN top)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN list))))) (PP (ADVP (RB nationally)) (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN level)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN funding)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ civil) (JJ legal) (NN assistance)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN state)))))))))) (. .))) | MAryland ranks at the bottom of the list nationally | ( MAryland ( ( ranks ( at ( ( the bottom ) ( of ( the list ) ) ) ) ) nationally ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP MAryland)) (VP (VBZ ranks) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN bottom)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN list))))) (ADVP (RB nationally))))) | government | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Maryland ranks at the top of the list nationally in the level of funding for civil legal assistance in the state.
Then the following statement: "MAryland ranks at the bottom of the list nationally " is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
38,539 | 38539e | Here's Ole Tar wantin' his special grub Drew went on to Shiloh's stall. | ( ( ( Here 's ) ( Ole ( Tar wantin ) ) ) ( ' ( ( his ( special ( grub Drew ) ) ) ( ( ( went on ) ( to ( ( Shiloh 's ) stall ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (FRAG (NP (NP (NNP Here) (POS 's)) (JJ Ole) (JJ Tar) (NN wantin))) ('' ') (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ special) (NN grub) (NN Drew)) (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP on)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NNP Shiloh) (POS 's)) (NN stall)))) (. .))) | Here's Tar, wanting his special food. | ( Here ( ( ( ( 's Tar ) , ) ( wanting ( his ( special food ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (SINV (ADVP (RB Here)) (VP (VBZ 's)) (NP (NNP Tar)) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG wanting) (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ special) (NN food)))) (. .))) | fiction | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Here's Ole Tar wantin' his special grub Drew went on to Shiloh's stall.
Then the following statement: "Here's Tar, wanting his special food." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
47,191 | 47191e | He offered me one of the tiny Russian cigarettes he himself occasionally smoked. | ( He ( ( ( offered me ) ( ( one ( of ( ( the ( tiny ( Russian cigarettes ) ) ) he ) ) ) ( himself ( occasionally smoked ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD offered) (NP (PRP me)) (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ tiny) (JJ Russian) (NNS cigarettes)) (NP (PRP he)))) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP himself)) (ADVP (RB occasionally)) (VP (VBD smoked)))))) (. .))) | He offered me one of the cigarettes that he sometime smoked. | ( He ( ( ( offered me ) ( one ( of ( ( the cigarettes ) ( that ( he ( sometime smoked ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD offered) (NP (PRP me)) (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS cigarettes)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP he)) (ADVP (RB sometime)) (VP (VBD smoked)))))))) (. .))) | fiction | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: He offered me one of the tiny Russian cigarettes he himself occasionally smoked.
Then the following statement: "He offered me one of the cigarettes that he sometime smoked." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
111,451 | 111451c | Drew was puzzled. | ( Drew ( ( was puzzled ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Drew)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN puzzled))) (. .))) | Drew understood completely. | ( Drew ( ( understood completely ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Drew)) (VP (VBD understood) (ADVP (RB completely))) (. .))) | fiction | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Drew was puzzled.
Then the following statement: "Drew understood completely." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
32,105 | 32105n | 8 After 2010, we assumed discretionary spending would grow at the same rate as GDP. | ( ( 8 ( After 2010 ) ) ( , ( we ( ( assumed ( ( discretionary spending ) ( would ( grow ( at ( ( the ( same rate ) ) ( as GDP ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (NP (CD 8)) (IN After) (NP (CD 2010))) (, ,) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD assumed) (SBAR (S (NP (JJ discretionary) (NN spending)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB grow) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN rate)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NNP GDP)))))))))) (. .))) | GDP and discretionary spending were expected to grow by 20 percent after 2010. | ( ( ( GDP and ) ( discretionary spending ) ) ( ( were ( expected ( to ( ( grow ( by ( 20 percent ) ) ) ( after 2010 ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP GDP)) (CC and) (NP (JJ discretionary) (NN spending))) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN expected) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB grow) (PP (IN by) (NP (CD 20) (NN percent))) (PP (IN after) (NP (CD 2010)))))))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: 8 After 2010, we assumed discretionary spending would grow at the same rate as GDP.
Then the following statement: "GDP and discretionary spending were expected to grow by 20 percent after 2010." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
105,485 | 105485c | and so i was so proud after he got me extricated he looked at went out there to check it over and he just laughed he said Sissy i'm sorry but we're going to redo this | ( and ( so ( i ( ( was ( so proud ) ) ( after ( he ( got ( me ( extricated ( ( ( he ( looked ( at ( ( went out ) ( there ( to ( ( check it ) over ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( he ( just ( laughed ( he ( said ( ( Sissy i ) ( 'm sorry ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( we ( 're ( going ( to ( redo this ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (ADVP (RB so) (JJ i) (S (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ proud)) (SBAR (IN after) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD got) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP me)) (VP (VBD extricated) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD looked) (PP (IN at) (S (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP out)) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB check) (NP (PRP it)) (PRT (RP over)))))))))) (CC and) (S (S (NP (PRP he)) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VBD laughed) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD said) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Sissy) (NNP i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADJP (JJ sorry)))))))))) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB redo) (NP (DT this)))))))))))))))))))))) | My pride was nill after he got me extricated, good thing there was nothing else to redo. | ( ( ( My pride ) ( ( was nill ) ( after ( he ( got ( me extricated ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( good thing ) ( there ( ( ( ( was nothing ) else ) ( to redo ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP$ My) (NN pride)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ nill)) (SBAR (IN after) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD got) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP me)) (VP (VBD extricated))))))))) (, ,) (NP (JJ good) (NN thing)) (ADVP (RB there)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (NN nothing)) (ADJP (RB else)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB redo))))) (. .))) | telephone | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: and so i was so proud after he got me extricated he looked at went out there to check it over and he just laughed he said Sissy i'm sorry but we're going to redo this
Then the following statement: "My pride was nill after he got me extricated, good thing there was nothing else to redo." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
14,758 | 14758c | and i don't know that sounds to to me more like the front office problem than coaching problem but then the team was sold | ( and ( i ( ( do n't ) ( know ( that ( ( ( ( sounds ( to ( to me ) ) ) ( more ( like ( ( the ( front ( office problem ) ) ) ( than ( coaching problem ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( ( then ( the team ) ) ( was sold ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (VP (VBZ sounds) (PP (TO to) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP me)))) (PP (RBR more) (IN like) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ front) (NN office) (NN problem)) (PP (IN than) (NP (NN coaching) (NN problem)))))) (CC but) (VP (ADVP (RB then) (NP (DT the) (NN team))) (VBD was) (VP (VBN sold))))))))))))) | it was clear the coach was to blame. | ( it ( ( was ( clear ( ( the coach ) ( was ( to blame ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ clear) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NN coach)) (VP (VBD was) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB blame))))))))) (. .))) | telephone | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: and i don't know that sounds to to me more like the front office problem than coaching problem but then the team was sold
Then the following statement: "it was clear the coach was to blame. " is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
49,336 | 49336e | We are not ready to call it quits. | ( We ( ( ( are not ) ( ready ( to ( call ( it quits ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (VBP are) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ ready) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB call) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ quits))))))))) (. .))) | We aren't ready to stop. | ( We ( ( ( are n't ) ( ready ( to stop ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (VBP are) (RB n't) (ADJP (JJ ready) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB stop)))))) (. .))) | government | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: We are not ready to call it quits.
Then the following statement: "We aren't ready to stop." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
45,869 | 45869n | Ben and Nicolette split, and Nicolette began seeing a married plumber who was doing work on Clark's house. | ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Ben and ) Nicolette ) split ) , ) and ) ( Nicolette ( began ( seeing ( ( a ( married plumber ) ) ( who ( was ( ( doing work ) ( on ( ( Clark 's ) house ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP Ben) (CC and) (NNP Nicolette)) (VP (VBD split))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (NNP Nicolette)) (VP (VBD began) (S (VP (VBG seeing) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ married) (NN plumber)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG doing) (NP (NN work)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (NNP Clark) (POS 's)) (NN house)))))))))))) (. .))) | Nicolette and Clark are friends. | ( ( ( Nicolette and ) Clark ) ( ( are friends ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Nicolette) (CC and) (NNP Clark)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NNS friends))) (. .))) | slate | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Ben and Nicolette split, and Nicolette began seeing a married plumber who was doing work on Clark's house.
Then the following statement: "Nicolette and Clark are friends." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
66,028 | 66028n | The Legal Services Corporation Act authorizes petitioner Legal Services Corporation (LSC) to distribute funds appropriated by Congress to local grantee organizations providing free legal assistance to indigent clients in, inter alia, welfare benefits claims. | ( ( The ( Legal ( Services ( Corporation Act ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( ( authorizes ( ( petitioner ( Legal ( Services Corporation ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( LSC -RRB- ) ) ) ) ( to ( distribute ( funds ( ( appropriated ( by Congress ) ) ( to ( ( local ( grantee organizations ) ) ( ( providing ( free ( legal assistance ) ) ) ( to ( ( indigent clients ) in ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( inter ( alia ( , ( welfare ( benefits claims ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Legal) (NNP Services) (NNP Corporation) (NNP Act)) (VP (VBZ authorizes) (NP (NP (NNP petitioner) (NNP Legal) (NNPS Services) (NNP Corporation)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP LSC)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB distribute) (NP (NP (NNS funds)) (VP (VBN appropriated) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP Congress))) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (JJ local) (NN grantee) (NNS organizations)) (VP (VBG providing) (NP (JJ free) (JJ legal) (NN assistance)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB indigent) (NP (NNS clients)) (PP (IN in))))))))))))) (, ,) (S (VP (VB inter) (NP (NN alia) (, ,) (NN welfare) (NNS benefits) (NNS claims))))) (. .))) | LSC is allowed to give money to organizations that help people with welfare benefits claims. | ( LSC ( ( is ( allowed ( to ( ( ( give money ) ( to organizations ) ) ( that ( ( ( help people ) ( with ( welfare benefits ) ) ) claims ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP LSC)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN allowed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB give) (NP (NN money)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNS organizations))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (NN help) (NNS people)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN welfare) (NNS benefits)))) (VP (VBZ claims))))))))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The Legal Services Corporation Act authorizes petitioner Legal Services Corporation (LSC) to distribute funds appropriated by Congress to local grantee organizations providing free legal assistance to indigent clients in, inter alia, welfare benefits claims.
Then the following statement: "LSC is allowed to give money to organizations that help people with welfare benefits claims." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
42,286 | 42286e | The most beautiful you will meet during the next convention. | ( ( The ( ( most beautiful ) you ) ) ( ( will ( meet ( during ( the ( next convention ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ beautiful)) (NN you)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB meet) (PP (IN during) (NP (DT the) (JJ next) (NN convention))))) (. .))) | The most beautiful thing you will see during the next convention. | ( ( The ( most ( beautiful thing ) ) ) ( you ( ( will ( see ( during ( the ( next convention ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (RBS most) (JJ beautiful) (NN thing)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB see) (PP (IN during) (NP (DT the) (JJ next) (NN convention))))) (. .))) | fiction | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The most beautiful you will meet during the next convention.
Then the following statement: "The most beautiful thing you will see during the next convention." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
72,162 | 72162e | The notion of increasing returns has been around since Adam Smith, and it was written about at length by Alfred Marshall in 1890. | ( ( ( ( ( ( ( The notion ) ( of ( increasing returns ) ) ) ( has ( ( been around ) ( since ( Adam Smith ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( it ( was ( ( ( written about ) ( at length ) ) ( by ( ( Alfred Marshall ) ( in 1890 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN notion)) (PP (IN of) (NP (VBG increasing) (NNS returns)))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (ADVP (RB around)) (PP (IN since) (NP (NNP Adam) (NNP Smith)))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN written) (PRT (RP about)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NN length))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (NNP Alfred) (NNP Marshall)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1890)))))))) (. .))) | The idea of increasing returns has been in existence since Adam Smith. | ( ( ( The idea ) ( of ( increasing returns ) ) ) ( ( has ( ( been ( in existence ) ) ( since ( Adam Smith ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN idea)) (PP (IN of) (NP (VBG increasing) (NNS returns)))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN existence))) (PP (IN since) (NP (NNP Adam) (NNP Smith))))) (. .))) | slate | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The notion of increasing returns has been around since Adam Smith, and it was written about at length by Alfred Marshall in 1890.
Then the following statement: "The idea of increasing returns has been in existence since Adam Smith." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
23,006 | 23006c | It is even becoming something of a commuter town owning or renting an apartment here costs a fraction of what it would in Hong Kong. | ( It ( ( ( is even ) ( becoming ( something ( of ( ( a ( commuter town ) ) ( ( ( owning or ) renting ) ( ( an apartment ) ( here ( costs ( ( a fraction ) ( of ( what ( it ( would ( in ( Hong Kong ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB even)) (VP (VBG becoming) (NP (NP (NN something)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN commuter) (NN town)) (VP (VBG owning) (CC or) (VBG renting) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN apartment)) (SBAR (S (VP (ADVP (RB here)) (VBZ costs) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN fraction)) (PP (IN of) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD would) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Hong) (NNP Kong)))))))))))))))))) (. .))) | The rent prices are some of the highest in the world in this city. | ( ( The ( rent prices ) ) ( ( are ( some ( of ( ( the highest ) ( in ( ( the world ) ( in ( this city ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN rent) (NNS prices)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT some)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS highest)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN world)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT this) (NN city))))))))) (. .))) | travel | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: It is even becoming something of a commuter town owning or renting an apartment here costs a fraction of what it would in Hong Kong.
Then the following statement: "The rent prices are some of the highest in the world in this city." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
109,399 | 109399n | that's pathetic that's pathetic it's | ( that ( ( 's pathetic ) ( that ( 's ( pathetic ( it 's ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ pathetic)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ pathetic) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's)))))))))))) | That's stupid | ( That ( 's stupid ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ stupid))))) | telephone | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: that's pathetic that's pathetic it's
Then the following statement: "That's stupid" is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
142,696 | 142696c | Of course it is true that for a given level of spending, lowering one tax will require raising another. | ( ( Of course ) ( it ( ( ( is true ) ( that ( ( for ( ( a ( given level ) ) ( of spending ) ) ) ( , ( ( lowering ( one tax ) ) ( will ( require ( raising another ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (IN Of) (NP (NN course))) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ true)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT a) (VBN given) (NN level)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN spending))))) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG lowering) (NP (CD one) (NN tax)))) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB require) (S (VP (VBG raising) (NP (DT another))))))))) (. .))) | We could probably lower all taxes and nothing would change. | ( ( ( ( We ( ( could probably ) ( lower ( all taxes ) ) ) ) and ) ( nothing ( would change ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (MD could) (ADVP (RB probably)) (VP (VB lower) (NP (DT all) (NNS taxes))))) (CC and) (S (NP (NN nothing)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB change)))) (. .))) | slate | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Of course it is true that for a given level of spending, lowering one tax will require raising another.
Then the following statement: "We could probably lower all taxes and nothing would change." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
40,310 | 40310n | However, participation in a taxpayer clinic is not solely limited to tax experts since these programs provide extensive training and mentoring. | ( However ( , ( ( participation ( in ( a ( taxpayer clinic ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( is not ) ( solely ( limited ( to ( tax experts ) ) ) ) ) ( since ( ( these programs ) ( provide ( extensive ( ( training and ) mentoring ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (ADVP (RB However)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NN participation)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (NN taxpayer) (NN clinic)))) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (ADJP (RB solely) (JJ limited) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN tax) (NNS experts)))) (SBAR (IN since) (S (NP (DT these) (NNS programs)) (VP (VBP provide) (NP (JJ extensive) (NN training) (CC and) (NN mentoring)))))) (. .))) | Any educated person may participate in a taxpayer clinic. | ( ( Any ( educated person ) ) ( ( may ( participate ( in ( a ( taxpayer clinic ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT Any) (VBN educated) (NN person)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB participate) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (NN taxpayer) (NN clinic))))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: However, participation in a taxpayer clinic is not solely limited to tax experts since these programs provide extensive training and mentoring.
Then the following statement: "Any educated person may participate in a taxpayer clinic." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
46,797 | 46797n | A statement that successfully picks its way across this dangerous terrain is said to exhibit an economy of truth , and a person who has uttered such a statement is said to have been economical with the truth . These characterizations, too, were originally conferred with a sense of professional appreciation (I first heard them on the lips of some Jesuit friends), but they have also been pulled out of truth's orbit and into the atmosphere of mendacity. | ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( A statement ) ( that ( successfully ( picks ( ( ( its way ) ( across ( this ( dangerous terrain ) ) ) ) ( is ( said ( to ( exhibit ( ( an economy ) ( of truth ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( ( ( a person ) ( who ( has ( uttered ( ( such ( a statement ) ) ( is ( said ( to ( have ( ( been economical ) ( with ( the truth ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ( ( ( These characterizations ) , ) too ) ) ) , ) ( ( were ( originally ( conferred ( with ( ( a sense ) ( of ( professional appreciation ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( I ( first ( ( heard them ) ( on ( ( the lips ) ( of ( some ( Jesuit friends ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( they ( ( have also ) ( been ( ( pulled out ) ( ( ( of ( ( truth 's ) orbit ) ) and ) ( into ( ( the atmosphere ) ( of mendacity ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (NP (DT A) (NN statement)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (ADVP (RB successfully)) (VP (VBZ picks) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN way)) (PP (IN across) (NP (DT this) (JJ dangerous) (NN terrain)))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN said) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB exhibit) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN economy)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN truth))))))))))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NP (NP (DT a) (NN person)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBD uttered) (SBAR (S (NP (PDT such) (DT a) (NN statement)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN said) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (ADJP (JJ economical)) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (NN truth)))))))))))))))) (. .) (NP (NP (DT These) (NNS characterizations)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB too)))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (RB originally) (JJ conferred) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN sense)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ professional) (NN appreciation)))))) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (RB first)) (VP (VBD heard) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS lips)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT some) (NNP Jesuit) (NNS friends))))))) (-RRB- -RRB-)))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP have) (ADVP (RB also)) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN pulled) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN truth) (POS 's)) (NN orbit))) (CC and) (PP (IN into) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN atmosphere)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN mendacity)))))))))) (. .))) | Someone who is economical with the truth cannot be honest. | ( ( Someone ( who ( is ( economical ( with ( the truth ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( can not ) ( be honest ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN Someone)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ economical) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (NN truth)))))))) (VP (MD can) (RB not) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ honest)))) (. .))) | slate | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: A statement that successfully picks its way across this dangerous terrain is said to exhibit an economy of truth , and a person who has uttered such a statement is said to have been economical with the truth . These characterizations, too, were originally conferred with a sense of professional appreciation (I first heard them on the lips of some Jesuit friends), but they have also been pulled out of truth's orbit and into the atmosphere of mendacity.
Then the following statement: "Someone who is economical with the truth cannot be honest." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
42,649 | 42649n | The price index (weighted price) for basic mail in 1996 was 39. | ( ( ( ( The ( price index ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( weighted price ) -RRB- ) ) ) ( for ( ( basic mail ) ( in 1996 ) ) ) ) ( ( was 39 ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NP (DT The) (NN price) (NN index)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (JJ weighted) (NN price)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ basic) (NN mail)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1996)))))) (VP (VBD was) (NP (CD 39))) (. .))) | The price index for mail in 1996 was one of the highest ones on the market. | ( ( ( The ( price index ) ) ( for ( mail ( in 1996 ) ) ) ) ( ( was ( one ( of ( ( the ( highest ones ) ) ( on ( the market ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN price) (NN index)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NN mail)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 1996)))))) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS highest) (NNS ones)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN market))))))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The price index (weighted price) for basic mail in 1996 was 39.
Then the following statement: "The price index for mail in 1996 was one of the highest ones on the market." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
137,181 | 137181c | Reed's departure will diminish the movement's influence. | ( ( ( Reed 's ) departure ) ( ( will ( diminish ( ( the ( movement 's ) ) influence ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Reed) (POS 's)) (NN departure)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB diminish) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN movement) (POS 's)) (NN influence)))) (. .))) | Reed leaving will make the movement more powerful. | ( ( Reed leaving ) ( ( will ( make ( ( the movement ) ( more powerful ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Reed) (NNP leaving)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB make) (S (NP (DT the) (NN movement)) (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ powerful))))) (. .))) | slate | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Reed's departure will diminish the movement's influence.
Then the following statement: "Reed leaving will make the movement more powerful." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
41,369 | 41369c | The whole thing's damned awkward! | ( ( The ( whole thing ) ) ( ( 's ( damned awkward ) ) ! ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ whole) (NN thing)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB damned) (JJ awkward))) (. !))) | The situation is completely acceptable. | ( ( The situation ) ( ( is ( completely acceptable ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN situation)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB completely) (JJ acceptable))) (. .))) | fiction | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The whole thing's damned awkward!
Then the following statement: "The situation is completely acceptable." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
85,774 | 85774c | yeah yeah up in uh New England it's uh uh you know three or four or five months tops after that you're in the house | ( yeah ( ( yeah up ) ( in ( ( uh ( New England ) ) ( it ( 's ( ( uh uh ) ( you ( know ( ( ( three or ) ( four ( or ( five months ) ) ) ) ( tops ( after ( that ( you ( 're ( in ( the house ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (VP (VB yeah) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNP uh) (NNP New) (NNP England)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (S (INTJ (UH uh) (UH uh)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (CD three)) (CC or) (NP (CD four) (CC or) (CD five) (NNS months))) (VP (VBZ tops) (SBAR (RB after) (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN house))))))))))))))))))))) | Over in New York you have ten months tops before you even set foot in that building. | ( ( Over ( in ( New York ) ) ) ( you ( ( have ( ( ten months ) ( tops ( before ( you ( even ( ( set foot ) ( in ( that building ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (IN Over) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP New) (NNP York)))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (CD ten) (NNS months)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBZ tops) (SBAR (IN before) (S (NP (PRP you)) (ADVP (RB even)) (VP (VBD set) (NP (NN foot)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT that) (NN building))))))))))) (. .))) | telephone | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: yeah yeah up in uh New England it's uh uh you know three or four or five months tops after that you're in the house
Then the following statement: "Over in New York you have ten months tops before you even set foot in that building." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
1,988 | 1988n | GAO's significant human capital imbalances and risks stem from dramatic budgetary cuts, downsizing, hiring freezes, and other related actions from 1992 through1997. | ( ( ( GAO 's ) ( significant ( human ( capital ( ( imbalances and ) risks ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( stem ( from ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( dramatic ( budgetary cuts ) ) , ) downsizing ) , ) ( hiring freezes ) ) , ) and ) ( other ( related actions ) ) ) ) ) ( from ( 1992 through1997 ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP GAO) (POS 's)) (JJ significant) (JJ human) (NN capital) (NNS imbalances) (CC and) (NNS risks)) (VP (VBP stem) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (JJ dramatic) (JJ budgetary) (NNS cuts)) (, ,) (NP (NN downsizing)) (, ,) (NP (NN hiring) (NNS freezes)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (JJ other) (JJ related) (NNS actions)))) (PP (IN from) (NP (CD 1992) (NNS through1997)))) (. .))) | The budgetary cuts were dramatic. | ( ( The ( budgetary cuts ) ) ( ( were dramatic ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ budgetary) (NNS cuts)) (VP (VBD were) (ADJP (JJ dramatic))) (. .))) | government | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: GAO's significant human capital imbalances and risks stem from dramatic budgetary cuts, downsizing, hiring freezes, and other related actions from 1992 through1997.
Then the following statement: "The budgetary cuts were dramatic." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
144,617 | 144617e | Some city delivery routes, called curb line routes, use vehicles to provide curbside delivery to a mail receptacle along the curb as is done by rural routes. | ( ( ( ( ( Some ( city ( delivery routes ) ) ) , ) ( called ( curb ( line routes ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( use ( vehicles ( to ( ( ( provide ( curbside delivery ) ) ( to ( ( a ( mail receptacle ) ) ( along ( the curb ) ) ) ) ) ( as ( is ( done ( by ( rural routes ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT Some) (NN city) (NN delivery) (NNS routes)) (, ,) (VP (VBN called) (S (VP (VB curb) (NP (NN line) (NNS routes))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBP use) (S (NP (NNS vehicles)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB provide) (NP (JJ curbside) (NN delivery)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN mail) (NN receptacle)) (PP (IN along) (NP (DT the) (NN curb))))) (SBAR (IN as) (S (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN done) (PP (IN by) (NP (JJ rural) (NNS routes))))))))))) (. .))) | In some of the cities, vehicles are used for delivering mail along the curb. | ( ( In ( some ( of ( the cities ) ) ) ) ( , ( vehicles ( ( are ( used ( for ( ( delivering mail ) ( along ( the curb ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT some)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNS cities))))) (, ,) (NP (NNS vehicles)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN used) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG delivering) (NP (NN mail)) (PP (IN along) (NP (DT the) (NN curb)))))))) (. .))) | government | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Some city delivery routes, called curb line routes, use vehicles to provide curbside delivery to a mail receptacle along the curb as is done by rural routes.
Then the following statement: "In some of the cities, vehicles are used for delivering mail along the curb." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
6,839 | 6839c | Be sure to plan ahead through the Tourist Information Office or a Delhi travel agency, because admission to the park is by permit only. | ( ( ( ( Be ( sure ( to ( ( plan ahead ) ( through ( ( ( the ( Tourist ( Information Office ) ) ) or ) ( a ( Delhi ( travel agency ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( because ( ( admission ( to ( the park ) ) ) ( ( is ( by permit ) ) only ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (VP (VP (VB Be) (ADJP (JJ sure) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB plan) (ADVP (RB ahead)) (PP (IN through) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Tourist) (NNP Information) (NNP Office)) (CC or) (NP (DT a) (NNP Delhi) (NN travel) (NN agency))))))))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (NP (NN admission)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN park)))) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN by) (NP (NN permit))) (ADVP (RB only)))))) (. .))) | You can walk right in; the park is open to the public. | ( ( ( ( You ( can ( ( walk right ) in ) ) ) ; ) ( ( the park ) ( is ( open ( to ( the public ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB walk) (ADVP (RB right)) (PP (IN in))))) (: ;) (S (NP (DT the) (NN park)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ open) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN public)))))) (. .))) | travel | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Be sure to plan ahead through the Tourist Information Office or a Delhi travel agency, because admission to the park is by permit only.
Then the following statement: "You can walk right in; the park is open to the public." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
88,598 | 88598n | hundreds of thousand you can't even give them away | ( hundreds ( of ( thousand ( you ( ( ( ca n't ) even ) ( ( give them ) away ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (NP (NP (NNS hundreds)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (CD thousand)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB even)) (VP (VB give) (NP (PRP them)) (ADVP (RB away)))))))))) | A lot, so you can't even give them away, you have to think of other things | ( ( A lot ) ( , ( ( so ( you ( ( ( ca n't ) even ) ( ( give them ) away ) ) ) ) ( , ( you ( have ( to ( think ( of ( other things ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (NN lot)) (, ,) (SBAR (RB so) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB even)) (VP (VB give) (NP (PRP them)) (ADVP (RB away)))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP have) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB think) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ other) (NNS things))))))))) | telephone | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: hundreds of thousand you can't even give them away
Then the following statement: "A lot, so you can't even give them away, you have to think of other things" is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
138,042 | 138042n | when i was much younger it was uh less important to consider retirement and less important to consider medical benefits but as i grow older and my family grows it the medical benefits are more important and the retirement is more important | ( ( ( ( ( ( when ( i ( was ( much younger ) ) ) ) ( it ( ( was uh ) ( ( ( less ( important ( to ( consider retirement ) ) ) ) and ) ( less ( important ( to ( consider ( medical benefits ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( ( as ( i ( grow ( ( ( older and ) ( my family ) ) ( grows it ) ) ) ) ) ( ( the ( medical benefits ) ) ( are ( more important ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( the retirement ) ( is ( more important ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (S (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (RB much) (JJR younger))))) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB uh)) (ADJP (ADJP (RBR less) (JJ important) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB consider) (NP (NN retirement)))))) (CC and) (ADJP (RBR less) (JJ important) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB consider) (NP (JJ medical) (NNS benefits))))))))) (CC but) (S (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP grow) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (JJR older)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN family))) (VP (VBZ grows) (NP (PRP it)))))))) (NP (DT the) (JJ medical) (NNS benefits)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ important)))) (CC and) (S (NP (DT the) (NN retirement)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ important)))))) | Young people don't understand the importance of planning for your future health. | ( ( Young people ) ( ( ( do n't ) ( understand ( ( the importance ) ( of ( planning ( for ( your ( future health ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Young) (NNS people)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB understand) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN importance)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG planning) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP$ your) (JJ future) (NN health))))))))) (. .))) | telephone | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: when i was much younger it was uh less important to consider retirement and less important to consider medical benefits but as i grow older and my family grows it the medical benefits are more important and the retirement is more important
Then the following statement: "Young people don't understand the importance of planning for your future health." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
134,026 | 134026n | Convenient that they were here, I thought, then remembered vaguely: Derry and I planned this. | ( ( Convenient ( that ( they ( were here ) ) ) ) ( , ( I ( ( ( ( ( thought , ) ( then ( remembered vaguely ) ) ) : ) ( ( ( Derry and ) I ) ( planned this ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (S (VP (VB Convenient) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD were) (ADVP (RB here))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD thought) (, ,) (ADVP (RB then) (RB remembered) (RB vaguely)) (: :) (S (NP (NNP Derry) (CC and) (PRP I)) (VP (VBD planned) (NP (DT this))))) (. .))) | I remembered Derry and I had set this whole plan up. | ( I ( ( remembered ( ( ( Derry and ) I ) ( had ( ( set ( this ( whole plan ) ) ) up ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD remembered) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Derry) (CC and) (PRP I)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN set) (NP (DT this) (JJ whole) (NN plan)) (PRT (RP up))))))) (. .))) | fiction | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Convenient that they were here, I thought, then remembered vaguely: Derry and I planned this.
Then the following statement: "I remembered Derry and I had set this whole plan up." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
48,882 | 48882n | we we went in and did what we set out to do i i have there's there's been like a lot of things said about if it was a political well if it was a war for oil or a a war for ideals and seems to be real mixed between those two things | ( ( we ( we ( ( ( went in ) and ) ( did ( what ( we ( ( set out ) ( to ( do ( i i ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( have ( there ( 's ( there ( ( ( 's ( been ( like ( ( ( a lot ) ( of things ) ) ( ( said about ) ( if ( it ( ( was ( a ( political well ) ) ) ( if ( it ( was ( ( ( ( a war ) ( for oil ) ) or ) ( ( a ( a war ) ) ( for ideals ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( seems ( to ( be ( real ( mixed ( between ( those ( two things ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (PRP we)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP in))) (CC and) (VP (VBD did) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD set) (PRT (RP out)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (FW i) (FW i))))))))))))) (VP (VBP have) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBN been) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS things)))) (VP (VBD said) (PRT (RP about)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT a) (JJ political) (NN well)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (NP (DT a) (NN war)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN oil)))) (CC or) (NP (NP (DT a) (DT a) (NN war)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS ideals)))))))))))))))) (CC and) (VP (VBZ seems) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (RB real) (JJ mixed) (PP (IN between) (NP (DT those) (CD two) (NNS things)))))))))))))))) | The war on Iraq was highly controversial at the time. | ( ( ( The war ) ( on Iraq ) ) ( ( ( was ( highly controversial ) ) ( at ( the time ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN war)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP Iraq)))) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB highly) (JJ controversial)) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NN time)))) (. .))) | telephone | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: we we went in and did what we set out to do i i have there's there's been like a lot of things said about if it was a political well if it was a war for oil or a a war for ideals and seems to be real mixed between those two things
Then the following statement: "The war on Iraq was highly controversial at the time." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
11,836 | 11836n | The modern unity of France was in the making. | ( ( ( The ( modern unity ) ) ( of France ) ) ( ( was ( in ( the making ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ modern) (NN unity)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP France)))) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN making)))) (. .))) | The unification of France has been planned since 1990. | ( ( ( The unification ) ( of France ) ) ( ( has ( been ( planned ( since 1990 ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN unification)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP France)))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN planned) (PP (IN since) (NP (CD 1990)))))) (. .))) | travel | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The modern unity of France was in the making.
Then the following statement: "The unification of France has been planned since 1990." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
122,289 | 122289n | Signatory countries will be prohibited from buying chemicals--those with only residual military use that are not banned--from nonsignatory countries. | ( ( Signatory countries ) ( ( will ( be ( prohibited ( from ( buying ( ( chemicals ( -- ( ( those ( with ( ( only ( residual ( military use ) ) ) ( that ( ( are not ) banned ) ) ) ) ) -- ) ) ) ( from ( nonsignatory countries ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (JJ Signatory) (NNS countries)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN prohibited) (PP (IN from) (S (VP (VBG buying) (NP (NP (NNS chemicals)) (PRN (: --) (NP (NP (DT those)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (RB only) (JJ residual) (JJ military) (NN use)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP are) (RB not) (VP (VBN banned)))))))) (: --)) (PP (IN from) (NP (JJ nonsignatory) (NNS countries)))))))))) (. .))) | There are ways around the ban on buying chemicals from nonsignatory countries. | ( There ( ( are ( ways ( around ( ( the ban ) ( on ( ( buying chemicals ) ( from ( nonsignatory countries ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (NNS ways)) (PP (IN around) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN ban)) (PP (IN on) (S (VP (VBG buying) (NP (NNS chemicals)) (PP (IN from) (NP (JJ nonsignatory) (NNS countries)))))))))) (. .))) | slate | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Signatory countries will be prohibited from buying chemicals--those with only residual military use that are not banned--from nonsignatory countries.
Then the following statement: "There are ways around the ban on buying chemicals from nonsignatory countries." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
26,694 | 26694e | i guess the one that really got me too was that uh let's say your spouse is on a particular drug and you know what that is and then you end up with the same problem and you take their leftover medicine that's not allowed | ( i ( guess ( ( the one ) ( that ( really ( got ( ( ( me ( too ( was ( that ( uh ( let ( 's ( say ( ( ( ( your spouse ) ( is ( on ( a ( particular drug ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( you ( know ( what ( ( ( that is ) and ) ( then ( you ( ( end up ) ( with ( the ( same problem ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( you ( take ( ( their ( leftover medicine ) ) ( that ( ( 's not ) allowed ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP guess) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN one)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (ADVP (RB really)) (VP (VBD got) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP me)) (ADVP (RB too)) (VP (VBD was) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP uh)) (VP (VBD let) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP 's)) (VP (VBP say) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP$ your) (NN spouse)) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT a) (JJ particular) (NN drug))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBZ is))) (CC and) (S (ADVP (RB then)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP end) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN problem))))))))))))))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP take) (NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NN leftover) (NN medicine)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (RB not) (VP (VBN allowed))))))))))))))))) | Your spouse is not allowed to take the leftover medicine | ( ( Your spouse ) ( ( is not ) ( allowed ( to ( take ( the ( leftover medicine ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ Your) (NN spouse)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (VP (VBN allowed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB take) (NP (DT the) (NN leftover) (NN medicine))))))))) | telephone | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: i guess the one that really got me too was that uh let's say your spouse is on a particular drug and you know what that is and then you end up with the same problem and you take their leftover medicine that's not allowed
Then the following statement: "Your spouse is not allowed to take the leftover medicine" is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
137,203 | 137203c | Now, after years of litigation, a frustrated Schultz plans to put the house on the market. | ( Now ( , ( ( after ( years ( of litigation ) ) ) ( , ( ( a ( frustrated Schultz ) ) ( ( plans ( to ( ( put ( the house ) ) ( on ( the market ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Now)) (, ,) (PP (IN after) (NP (NP (NNS years)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN litigation))))) (, ,) (NP (DT a) (JJ frustrated) (NNP Schultz)) (VP (VBZ plans) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB put) (NP (DT the) (NN house)) (PP (IN on) (NP (DT the) (NN market))))))) (. .))) | Schultz is happy living in his home. | ( Schultz ( ( ( is happy ) ( living ( in ( his home ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Schultz)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ happy)) (S (VP (VBG living) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN home)))))) (. .))) | slate | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Now, after years of litigation, a frustrated Schultz plans to put the house on the market.
Then the following statement: "Schultz is happy living in his home." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
92,645 | 92645n | yeah there was a little girl picked up in Rowlett from uh from her front yard and her dad was working in the back yard and had just left her few minutes in the front yard and somebody apparently drove up and took her and they never saw her again | ( yeah ( there ( was ( ( a ( little girl ) ) ( ( ( ( picked up ) ( in Rowlett ) ) ( from uh ) ) ( from ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( her ( front yard ) ) and ) ( her dad ) ) ( ( ( was ( working ( in ( the ( back yard ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( had just ) ( ( left ( her ( few minutes ) ) ) ( in ( the ( front yard ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( somebody ( ( ( apparently ( drove up ) ) and ) ( took her ) ) ) ) and ) ( they ( never ( ( saw her ) again ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (SBAR (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ little) (NN girl)) (VP (VBN picked) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Rowlett))) (PP (IN from) (NP (INTJ (UH uh)))) (PP (IN from) (S (S (NP (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ front) (NN yard)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ her) (NN dad))) (VP (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG working) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ back) (NN yard))))) (CC and) (VP (VBD had) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VBN left) (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ few) (NNS minutes)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (JJ front) (NN yard))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (NN somebody)) (VP (VP (ADVP (RB apparently)) (VBD drove) (PRT (RP up))) (CC and) (VP (VBD took) (NP (PRP her))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP they)) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBD saw) (NP (PRP her)) (ADVP (RB again)))))))))))))) | A little girl in Rowlett was abducted and never found, the parents blame themselves. | ( ( ( ( A ( little girl ) ) ( in Rowlett ) ) ( was ( ( abducted and ) ( never found ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the parents ) ( ( blame themselves ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT A) (JJ little) (NN girl)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Rowlett)))) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VP (VBN abducted)) (CC and) (VP (ADVP (RB never)) (VBN found))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNS parents)) (VP (VBP blame) (NP (PRP themselves))) (. .))) | telephone | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: yeah there was a little girl picked up in Rowlett from uh from her front yard and her dad was working in the back yard and had just left her few minutes in the front yard and somebody apparently drove up and took her and they never saw her again
Then the following statement: "A little girl in Rowlett was abducted and never found, the parents blame themselves." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
104,027 | 104027e | you know that's sixteen hours because one would come in the morning and one would be at night i mean in the afternoon and then that night it wouldn't need one | ( you ( know ( ( ( that ( ( 's ( sixteen hours ) ) ( because ( ( ( one ( would ( come ( in ( the morning ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( one ( would ( be ( at ( ( night ( i mean ) ) ( in ( the afternoon ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( then ( that ( night ( it ( ( would n't ) ( need one ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NN sixteen) (NNS hours)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (S (NP (PRP one)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB come) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN morning)))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP one)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (FW night) (FW i) (NN mean)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN afternoon))))))))))))) (CC and) (SBAR (ADVP (RB then)) (IN that) (S (NP (NN night)) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD would) (RB n't) (VP (VB need) (NP (CD one)))))))))) | I wouldn't need anyone at night. | ( I ( ( ( would n't ) ( ( need anyone ) ( at night ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD would) (RB n't) (VP (VB need) (NP (NN anyone)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NN night))))) (. .))) | telephone | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: you know that's sixteen hours because one would come in the morning and one would be at night i mean in the afternoon and then that night it wouldn't need one
Then the following statement: "I wouldn't need anyone at night." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
67,336 | 67336e | Of the once white walls of Memphis, little remains, but it was capital of Egypt until the end of the sixth Dynasty (c. 2200 b.c. ). The two major relics are a monumental statue of Ramses II lying proseate after losing its feet, and an alabaster sphinx dating from 1400 b.c. | ( ( Of ( ( the ( ( once white ) walls ) ) ( of Memphis ) ) ) ( ( , ( ( ( ( little remains ) , ) but ) ( it ( ( ( was ( capital ( of Egypt ) ) ) ( until ( ( the end ) ( of ( ( the ( sixth Dynasty ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( c. ( 2200 b.c. ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( ( The ( two ( major relics ) ) ) ( are ( ( a ( monumental statue ) ) ( of ( ( Ramses II ) ( ( lying proseate ) ( after ( losing ( its feet ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( an ( alabaster sphinx ) ) ( dating ( from ( 1400 b.c. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (IN Of) (NP (NP (DT the) (ADJP (RB once) (JJ white)) (NNS walls)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Memphis))))) (PRN (, ,) (S (S (NP (RB little)) (VP (VBZ remains))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (NN capital)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Egypt)))) (PP (IN until) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN end)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ sixth) (NX (NNP Dynasty))) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP c.) (NNP 2200) (NNP b.c.)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))))) (. .)))) (S (NP (DT The) (CD two) (JJ major) (NNS relics)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ monumental) (NN statue)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Ramses) (NNP II)) (VP (VBG lying) (NP (NN proseate)) (PP (IN after) (S (VP (VBG losing) (NP (PRP$ its) (NNS feet))))))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (DT an) (NN alabaster) (NN sphinx)) (VP (VBG dating) (PP (IN from) (NP (CD 1400) (NN b.c.))))))) | Very little remains of Memphis' previously white walls. | ( Very ( little ( ( remains ( of ( ( Memphis ' ) ( ( previously white ) walls ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Very)) (NP (RB little)) (VP (VBZ remains) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Memphis) (POS ')) (ADJP (RB previously) (JJ white)) (NNS walls)))) (. .))) | travel | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Of the once white walls of Memphis, little remains, but it was capital of Egypt until the end of the sixth Dynasty (c. 2200 b.c. ). The two major relics are a monumental statue of Ramses II lying proseate after losing its feet, and an alabaster sphinx dating from 1400 b.c.
Then the following statement: "Very little remains of Memphis' previously white walls." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
4,310 | 4310n | The capital of the Gododdin was Din Eidyn (the Fort of Eidyn, almost certainly the Castle Rock), whose name lives on in the Edin- of Edinburgh. | ( ( ( The capital ) ( of ( the Gododdin ) ) ) ( ( was ( ( ( ( ( Din Eidyn ) -LRB- ) ( ( the Fort ) ( of ( ( ( Eidyn ( , ( ( almost certainly ) ( ( the ( Castle Rock ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( whose name ) ( ( lives on ) ( in ( the Edin ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) - ) ( of Edinburgh ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN capital)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNP Gododdin)))) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Din) (NNP Eidyn)) (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Fort)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Eidyn)) (PRN (, ,) (ADVP (RB almost) (RB certainly)) (NP (DT the) (NNP Castle) (NNP Rock)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WP$ whose) (NN name)) (S (VP (VBZ lives) (PRT (RP on)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNP Edin))))))))) (: -)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Edinburgh))))) (. .))) | Edinburgh was named for Din Eidyn because it was probably the Castle Rock, an important place in Gododdin. | ( Edinburgh ( ( was ( ( named ( for ( Din Eidyn ) ) ) ( because ( it ( ( was probably ) ( ( ( the ( Castle Rock ) ) , ) ( ( an ( important place ) ) ( in Gododdin ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Edinburgh)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN named) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNP Din) (NNP Eidyn))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB probably)) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Castle) (NNP Rock)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ important) (NN place)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Gododdin)))))))))) (. .))) | travel | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The capital of the Gododdin was Din Eidyn (the Fort of Eidyn, almost certainly the Castle Rock), whose name lives on in the Edin- of Edinburgh.
Then the following statement: "Edinburgh was named for Din Eidyn because it was probably the Castle Rock, an important place in Gododdin." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
140,721 | 140721n | The Galleria provides a sheltered, much trafficked pedestrian passage from the Duomo to another holy entity, the revered 18th-century La Scala theater, high temple of opera. | ( ( The Galleria ) ( ( provides ( ( a ( sheltered ( , ( much ( trafficked ( pedestrian passage ) ) ) ) ) ) ( from ( ( the ( ( Duomo ( to ( ( ( ( another ( holy entity ) ) , ) ( the ( revered ( 18th-century ( La ( Scala theater ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ) ) ( high temple ) ) ) ( of opera ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Galleria)) (VP (VBZ provides) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ sheltered) (, ,) (JJ much) (JJ trafficked) (NN pedestrian) (NN passage)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (ADJP (JJ Duomo) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT another) (JJ holy) (NN entity)) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (JJ revered) (JJ 18th-century) (NNP La) (NNP Scala) (NN theater)) (, ,)))) (JJ high) (NN temple)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN opera))))))) (. .))) | The theater sees over 500,000 visitors each year. | ( ( The theater ) ( ( sees ( over ( ( 500,000 visitors ) ( each year ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN theater)) (VP (VBZ sees) (PP (IN over) (NP (NP (CD 500,000) (NNS visitors)) (NP (DT each) (NN year))))) (. .))) | travel | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The Galleria provides a sheltered, much trafficked pedestrian passage from the Duomo to another holy entity, the revered 18th-century La Scala theater, high temple of opera.
Then the following statement: "The theater sees over 500,000 visitors each year." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
50,473 | 50473e | I, Hercule Poirot, affirm that the man who entered the chemist's shop, and purchased strychnine at six o'clock on Monday last was not Mr. Inglethorp, for at six o'clock on that day Mr. Inglethorp was escorting Mrs. Raikes back to her home from a neighbouring farm. | ( ( ( ( I , ) ( Hercule Poirot ) ) , ) ( ( affirm ( that ( ( ( the man ) ( who ( ( ( ( entered ( ( the ( chemist 's ) ) shop ) ) , ) and ) ( ( ( purchased strychnine ) ( at ( six o'clock ) ) ) ( on ( Monday last ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( was not ) ( ( ( Mr. Inglethorp ) , ) ( for ( at ( ( six o'clock ) ( ( on ( that day ) ) ( ( Mr. Inglethorp ) ( was ( ( ( ( escorting ( Mrs. Raikes ) ) back ) ( to ( her home ) ) ) ( from ( a ( neighbouring farm ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (PRP I)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Hercule) (NNP Poirot)) (, ,)) (VP (VBP affirm) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN man)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VP (VBD entered) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN chemist) (POS 's)) (NN shop))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (VBD purchased) (NP (NN strychnine)) (PP (IN at) (NP (CD six) (RB o'clock))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP Monday) (JJ last)))))))) (VP (VBD was) (RB not) (VP (NP (NNP Mr.) (NNP Inglethorp)) (, ,) (PP (IN for) (IN at) (NP (NP (CD six) (RB o'clock)) (SBAR (WHPP (IN on) (WHNP (WDT that) (NN day))) (S (NP (NNP Mr.) (NNP Inglethorp)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG escorting) (NP (NNP Mrs.) (NNP Raikes)) (PRT (RP back)) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP$ her) (NN home))) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT a) (VBG neighbouring) (NN farm)))))))))))))) (. .))) | I can confirm that the man who entered the chemist's shop was not Mr Inglethorp. | ( I ( ( can ( confirm ( that ( ( ( the man ) ( who ( entered ( ( the ( chemist 's ) ) shop ) ) ) ) ( ( was not ) ( Mr Inglethorp ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB confirm) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN man)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD entered) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN chemist) (POS 's)) (NN shop)))))) (VP (VBD was) (RB not) (NP (NNP Mr) (NNP Inglethorp))))))) (. .))) | fiction | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: I, Hercule Poirot, affirm that the man who entered the chemist's shop, and purchased strychnine at six o'clock on Monday last was not Mr. Inglethorp, for at six o'clock on that day Mr. Inglethorp was escorting Mrs. Raikes back to her home from a neighbouring farm.
Then the following statement: "I can confirm that the man who entered the chemist's shop was not Mr Inglethorp." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
830 | 830n | Democrats persuasively called Livingston's resignation a surrender to a developing sexual McCarthyism, portrayed Clinton as a fellow victim of this McCarthyism, and argued that Clinton should be spared expulsion as a first step toward ending the madness. | ( Democrats ( persuasively ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( called ( ( Livingston 's ) resignation ) ) ( a surrender ) ) ( to ( a ( developing ( sexual McCarthyism ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( portrayed Clinton ) ( as ( ( a ( fellow victim ) ) ( of ( this McCarthyism ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( argued ( that ( Clinton ( should ( be ( ( spared expulsion ) ( as ( ( a ( first step ) ) ( toward ( ending ( the madness ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNPS Democrats)) (ADVP (RB persuasively)) (VP (VP (VBD called) (NP (NP (NNP Livingston) (POS 's)) (NN resignation)) (NP (DT a) (NN surrender)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT a) (JJ developing) (JJ sexual) (NN McCarthyism)))) (, ,) (VP (VBD portrayed) (NP (NNP Clinton)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ fellow) (NN victim)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT this) (NNP McCarthyism)))))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (VBD argued) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNP Clinton)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN spared) (NP (NN expulsion)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ first) (NN step)) (PP (IN toward) (S (VP (VBG ending) (NP (DT the) (NN madness)))))))))))))) (. .))) | Democrats thought Clinton cheating on his wife was no big deal. | ( Democrats ( ( thought ( ( ( Clinton cheating ) ( on ( his wife ) ) ) ( was ( no ( big deal ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNPS Democrats)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (NNP Clinton) (NNP cheating)) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN wife)))) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT no) (JJ big) (NN deal)))))) (. .))) | slate | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Democrats persuasively called Livingston's resignation a surrender to a developing sexual McCarthyism, portrayed Clinton as a fellow victim of this McCarthyism, and argued that Clinton should be spared expulsion as a first step toward ending the madness.
Then the following statement: "Democrats thought Clinton cheating on his wife was no big deal." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
13,574 | 13574c | oh no that's funny | ( ( oh no ) ( that ( 's funny ) ) ) | (ROOT (FRAG (ADVP (RB oh) (RB no)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ funny))))))) | That is hilarious. | ( That ( ( is hilarious ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ hilarious))) (. .))) | telephone | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: oh no that's funny
Then the following statement: "That is hilarious. " is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
135,309 | 135309n | It's simply bare-faced fortune hunting; but there you are, she is her own mistress, and she's married him." | ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( It ( ( 's simply ) ( bare-faced ( fortune hunting ) ) ) ) ; ) ( but ( there ( you are ) ) ) ) , ) ( she ( is ( her ( own mistress ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( she ( 's ( married him ) ) ) ) . ) '' ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB simply)) (NP (JJ bare-faced) (NN fortune) (NN hunting)))) (: ;) (S (CC but) (ADVP (RB there)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP are))) (, ,) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (PRP$ her) (JJ own) (NN mistress)))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBN married) (NP (PRP him))))) (. .) ('' ''))) | She is in a sexually intimate relationship with him. | ( She ( ( is ( in ( ( a ( sexually ( intimate relationship ) ) ) ( with him ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBZ is) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT a) (RB sexually) (JJ intimate) (NN relationship)) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP him)))))) (. .))) | fiction | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: It's simply bare-faced fortune hunting; but there you are, she is her own mistress, and she's married him."
Then the following statement: "She is in a sexually intimate relationship with him." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
143,478 | 143478n | Oftentimes, these polar opposites come Ise-Shima, the most sacred of all sanctuaries of Shinto (Japan's ancient, nature-worshipping indigenous religion) reinforces Japan's profoundly intimate links with the Sun Goddess and her grandson, the God of the Earth. | ( Oftentimes ( , ( ( these ( polar opposites ) ) ( ( come ( ( Ise-Shima , ) ( ( ( the ( most sacred ) ) ( of ( ( all sanctuaries ) ( of Shinto ) ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( ( Japan 's ) ( ancient ( , ( nature-worshipping ( indigenous religion ) ) ) ) ) ( -RRB- ( reinforces ( ( ( ( ( Japan 's ) ( ( profoundly intimate ) links ) ) ( with ( the ( Sun Goddess ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( ( her grandson ) , ) ( ( the God ) ( of ( the Earth ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Oftentimes)) (, ,) (NP (DT these) (JJ polar) (NNS opposites)) (VP (VBP come) (NP (NP (NNP Ise-Shima)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (NP (DT the) (RBS most) (JJ sacred)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT all) (NNS sanctuaries)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Shinto)))))) (S (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NP (NNP Japan) (POS 's)) (JJ ancient) (, ,) (NN nature-worshipping) (NNS indigenous) (NN religion)) (-RRB- -RRB-) (VP (VBZ reinforces) (NP (NP (NP (NP (NNP Japan) (POS 's)) (ADJP (RB profoundly) (JJ intimate)) (NNS links)) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (NNP Sun) (NNPS Goddess)))) (CC and) (NP (NP (PRP$ her) (NN grandson)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP God)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN Earth))))))))))) (. .))) | Shinto is a Japanese religion that worships nature and believes in peace. | ( Shinto ( ( is ( ( a ( Japanese religion ) ) ( that ( ( ( worships nature ) and ) ( believes ( in peace ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Shinto)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ Japanese) (NN religion)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VP (VBZ worships) (NP (NN nature))) (CC and) (VP (VBZ believes) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN peace))))))))) (. .))) | travel | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Oftentimes, these polar opposites come Ise-Shima, the most sacred of all sanctuaries of Shinto (Japan's ancient, nature-worshipping indigenous religion) reinforces Japan's profoundly intimate links with the Sun Goddess and her grandson, the God of the Earth.
Then the following statement: "Shinto is a Japanese religion that worships nature and believes in peace." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
139,608 | 139608n | Court Merrigan from TeleRead wrote: 'You not likely come across anything quite like Password Incorrect any time soon. | ( ( ( Court Merrigan ) ( from TeleRead ) ) ( ( ( ( wrote : ) ` ) ( You ( ( not likely ) ( ( come ( across anything ) ) ( quite ( ( like ( Password Incorrect ) ) ( ( any time ) soon ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Court) (NNP Merrigan)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NNP TeleRead)))) (VP (VBD wrote) (: :) (`` `) (S (NP (PRP You)) (ADJP (RB not) (JJ likely)) (S (VP (VBN come) (PP (IN across) (NP (NN anything))) (ADVP (RB quite) (PP (IN like) (NP (NNP Password) (NNP Incorrect)) (ADVP (NP (DT any) (NN time)) (RB soon)))))))) (. .))) | Court Merrigan thought Password Incorrect was very funny. | ( ( Court Merrigan ) ( ( thought ( ( Password Incorrect ) ( was ( very funny ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Court) (NNP Merrigan)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Password) (NNP Incorrect)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ funny)))))) (. .))) | fiction | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Court Merrigan from TeleRead wrote: 'You not likely come across anything quite like Password Incorrect any time soon.
Then the following statement: "Court Merrigan thought Password Incorrect was very funny." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
126,373 | 126373n | Uprisings in the towns and countryside began to pose serious threats to the shogun's authority. | ( ( Uprisings ( in ( ( ( the towns ) and ) countryside ) ) ) ( ( began ( to ( ( pose ( serious threats ) ) ( to ( ( the ( shogun 's ) ) authority ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Uprisings)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS towns)) (CC and) (NP (NN countryside))))) (VP (VBD began) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB pose) (NP (JJ serious) (NNS threats)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN shogun) (POS 's)) (NN authority))))))) (. .))) | The authority of the shogun was under no threat from foreign interests. | ( ( ( The authority ) ( of ( the shogun ) ) ) ( ( was ( under ( ( no threat ) ( from ( foreign interests ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN authority)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN shogun)))) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN under) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN threat)) (PP (IN from) (NP (JJ foreign) (NNS interests)))))) (. .))) | travel | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Uprisings in the towns and countryside began to pose serious threats to the shogun's authority.
Then the following statement: "The authority of the shogun was under no threat from foreign interests." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
3,335 | 3335c | She was still sweet as they make them. | ( She ( ( ( ( was still ) sweet ) ( as ( they ( make them ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB still)) (ADJP (JJ sweet)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP make) (NP (PRP them)))))) (. .))) | She was as bitter as they get. | ( She ( ( ( was ( as bitter ) ) ( as ( they get ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB as) (JJ bitter)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP get))))) (. .))) | fiction | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: She was still sweet as they make them.
Then the following statement: "She was as bitter as they get." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
52,860 | 52860n | well and some of the issues are so emotional | ( ( ( well and ) ( some ( of ( the issues ) ) ) ) ( are ( so emotional ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN well)) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT some)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNS issues))))) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ emotional))))) | Some issues are too emotional. | ( ( Some issues ) ( ( are ( too emotional ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT Some) (NNS issues)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RB too) (JJ emotional))) (. .))) | telephone | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: well and some of the issues are so emotional
Then the following statement: "Some issues are too emotional." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
86,347 | 86347e | but in the fall i had to spend a couple of weekends out there on you know two separate weekends just getting rid of leaves | ( but ( in ( ( the fall ) ( i ( ( had ( to ( ( ( ( spend ( ( a couple ) ( of weekends ) ) ) ( out there ) ) ( on you ) ) ( know ( two ( separate weekends ) ) ) ) ) ) ( just ( ( getting rid ) ( of leaves ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (FRAG (CC but) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN fall)) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD had) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB spend) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN couple)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS weekends)))) (PP (IN out) (NP (RB there))) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP you))) (S (VP (VB know) (NP (CD two) (JJ separate) (NNS weekends))))))) (S (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VBG getting) (ADJP (JJ rid)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS leaves)))))))))))) | I spent a lot of time in the fall just clearing the leaves. | ( I ( ( ( spent ( ( a lot ) ( of time ) ) ) ( in ( ( the fall ) ( just ( clearing ( the leaves ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD spent) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN time)))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN fall)) (VP (ADVP (RB just)) (VBG clearing) (NP (DT the) (NNS leaves)))))) (. .))) | telephone | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: but in the fall i had to spend a couple of weekends out there on you know two separate weekends just getting rid of leaves
Then the following statement: "I spent a lot of time in the fall just clearing the leaves." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
103,328 | 103328n | Blackmail is saying you'll tell unless you are given money. | ( Blackmail ( ( is ( saying ( you ( 'll ( tell ( unless ( you ( are ( given money ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Blackmail)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG saying) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB tell) (SBAR (IN unless) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN given) (NP (NN money)))))))))))) (. .))) | Blackmailers may press for even more money over time. | ( Blackmailers ( ( may ( press ( for ( ( even ( more money ) ) ( over time ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNS Blackmailers)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB press) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (RB even) (JJR more) (NN money)) (PP (IN over) (NP (NN time))))))) (. .))) | fiction | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Blackmail is saying you'll tell unless you are given money.
Then the following statement: "Blackmailers may press for even more money over time." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
82,062 | 82062c | However, there was a problem. | ( However ( , ( there ( ( was ( a problem ) ) . ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (ADVP (RB However)) (, ,) (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT a) (NN problem))) (. .))) | Everything went off without a hitch. | ( Everything ( ( ( went off ) ( without ( a hitch ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NNP Everything)) (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP off)) (PP (IN without) (NP (DT a) (NN hitch)))) (. .))) | travel | 2contradiction
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: However, there was a problem.
Then the following statement: "Everything went off without a hitch." is true, false, or inconclusive? | False |
69,017 | 69017n | The excavations are actually less impressive than those at most other Turkish sites, but for those who have enjoyed Homer's Iliad and Odyssey it is a magical place, where the stones are haunted by the spirits of Helen and Paris, Achilles, and Agamemnon. | ( ( ( ( ( ( The excavations ) ( ( are actually ) ( less ( impressive ( than ( those ( at ( most ( other ( Turkish sites ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( for ( those ( who ( have ( enjoyed ( ( Homer 's ) ( ( Iliad and ) Odyssey ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( it ( is ( ( ( a ( magical place ) ) , ) ( where ( ( the stones ) ( are ( haunted ( by ( ( the spirits ) ( of ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Helen and ) Paris ) , ) Achilles ) , ) and ) Agamemnon ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) | (ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NNS excavations)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB actually)) (ADJP (RBR less) (JJ impressive) (PP (IN than) (NP (NP (DT those)) (PP (IN at) (NP (RBS most) (JJ other) (JJ Turkish) (NNS sites)))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT those)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN enjoyed) (NP (NP (NNP Homer) (POS 's)) (NN Iliad) (CC and) (NN Odyssey)))))))) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ magical) (NN place)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (DT the) (NNS stones)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN haunted) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS spirits)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Helen) (CC and) (NNP Paris)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Achilles)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NNP Agamemnon))))))))))))) (. .))) | People who enjoyed Homer's Illiad find it to be a haunted location and are scared to return at night. | ( ( People ( who ( enjoyed ( ( Homer 's ) Illiad ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( ( find it ) ( to ( be ( a ( haunted location ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( are ( scared ( to ( return ( at night ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS People)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD enjoyed) (NP (NP (NNP Homer) (POS 's)) (NN Illiad)))))) (VP (VP (VBP find) (NP (PRP it)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (NP (DT a) (VBN haunted) (NN location)))))) (CC and) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ scared) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB return) (PP (IN at) (NP (NN night))))))))) (. .))) | travel | 1neutral
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The excavations are actually less impressive than those at most other Turkish sites, but for those who have enjoyed Homer's Iliad and Odyssey it is a magical place, where the stones are haunted by the spirits of Helen and Paris, Achilles, and Agamemnon.
Then the following statement: "People who enjoyed Homer's Illiad find it to be a haunted location and are scared to return at night." is true, false, or inconclusive? | Inconclusive |
14,309 | 14309e | The papacy in Rome had lost prestige with the dissolution of the Jesuits and the crippling loss of revenue from the Hapsburg Church reforms. | ( ( ( The papacy ) ( in Rome ) ) ( ( had ( ( ( lost prestige ) ( with ( ( ( ( the dissolution ) ( of ( the Jesuits ) ) ) and ) ( ( the ( crippling loss ) ) ( of revenue ) ) ) ) ) ( from ( the ( Hapsburg ( Church reforms ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN papacy)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Rome)))) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN lost) (NP (NN prestige)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN dissolution)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNPS Jesuits)))) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ crippling) (NN loss)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN revenue)))))) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NNP Hapsburg) (NNP Church) (NNS reforms))))) (. .))) | The papacy was falling and not doing well. | ( ( The papacy ) ( ( was ( ( ( falling and ) not ) ( doing well ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN papacy)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VP (VBG falling)) (CC and) (RB not) (VP (VBG doing) (ADVP (RB well))))) (. .))) | travel | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: The papacy in Rome had lost prestige with the dissolution of the Jesuits and the crippling loss of revenue from the Hapsburg Church reforms.
Then the following statement: "The papacy was falling and not doing well." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |
132,902 | 132902e | Inside the basilica, in the choir, you can see some fine 13th- and 14th-century sculptures and stained-glass windows. | ( ( Inside ( the basilica ) ) ( , ( ( in ( the choir ) ) ( , ( you ( ( can ( see ( ( ( ( some ( fine 13th ) ) - ) and ) ( ( ( 14th-century sculptures ) and ) ( stained-glass windows ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) ) | (ROOT (S (PP (IN Inside) (NP (DT the) (NN basilica))) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN choir))) (, ,) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB see) (NP (NP (DT some) (JJ fine) (NN 13th)) (: -) (CC and) (NP (NP (JJ 14th-century) (NNS sculptures)) (CC and) (NP (NN stained-glass) (NNS windows)))))) (. .))) | There are stained-glass windows visible in the basilica. | ( There ( ( ( are ( ( stained-glass windows ) visible ) ) ( in ( the basilica ) ) ) . ) ) | (ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (NP (CD stained-glass) (NNS windows)) (JJ visible)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN basilica)))) (. .))) | travel | 0entailment
| take the following as truth | Take the following as truth: {{premise}}
Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }} | Take the following as truth: Inside the basilica, in the choir, you can see some fine 13th- and 14th-century sculptures and stained-glass windows.
Then the following statement: "There are stained-glass windows visible in the basilica." is true, false, or inconclusive? | True |