promptID
int32
0
146k
pairID
stringlengths
2
7
premise
stringlengths
5
1.82k
premise_binary_parse
stringlengths
6
3.43k
premise_parse
stringlengths
23
6.45k
hypothesis
stringlengths
1
393
hypothesis_binary_parse
stringlengths
1
669
hypothesis_parse
stringlengths
19
1.15k
genre
stringclasses
5 values
label
class label
3 classes
template_name
stringclasses
11 values
template
stringclasses
11 values
rendered_input
stringlengths
46
2.02k
rendered_output
stringclasses
14 values
81,313
81313n
In the 1994 Disney film, the actor Nathan Lane supplied the voice of Timon in much the same style as his flamboyantly gay character in The Birdcage . When I saw the Broadway version of the musical, the audience roared at Timon's even more exaggerated gay mannerisms.
( ( In ( the ( 1994 ( Disney film ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the ( actor ( Nathan Lane ) ) ) ( ( ( ( supplied ( ( the voice ) ( of Timon ) ) ) ( in ( ( much ( the ( same style ) ) ) ( as ( ( his ( flamboyantly ( gay character ) ) ) ( in ( The ( Birdcage . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( When ( I ( saw ( ( the ( Broadway version ) ) ( of ( ( ( the musical ) , ) ( ( the audience ) ( roared ( at ( ( Timon 's ) ( ( even ( more exaggerated ) ) ( gay mannerisms ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (DT the) (CD 1994) (NNP Disney) (NN film))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN actor) (NNP Nathan) (NNP Lane)) (VP (VBD supplied) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN voice)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Timon)))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (RB much) (DT the) (JJ same) (NN style)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ flamboyantly) (JJ gay) (NN character)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT The) (NNP Birdcage) (. .))))))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB When)) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD saw) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Broadway) (NN version)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN musical)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN audience)) (VP (VBN roared) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NNP Timon) (POS 's)) (ADJP (RB even) (RBR more) (JJ exaggerated)) (JJ gay) (NNS mannerisms)))))))))))) (. .)))
The Broadway audience was amused by the gay mannerisms of Timon due to cultural cues.
( ( The ( Broadway audience ) ) ( ( was ( amused ( by ( ( the ( gay mannerisms ) ) ( of ( Timon ( ( due ( to cultural ) ) cues ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Broadway) (NN audience)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (VBN amused) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ gay) (NNS mannerisms)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ Timon) (ADJP (JJ due) (TO to) (JJ cultural)) (NNS cues))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In the 1994 Disney film, the actor Nathan Lane supplied the voice of Timon in much the same style as his flamboyantly gay character in The Birdcage . When I saw the Broadway version of the musical, the audience roared at Timon's even more exaggerated gay mannerisms. Then the following statement: "The Broadway audience was amused by the gay mannerisms of Timon due to cultural cues." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
93,195
93195c
and then uh my mother who went to pick us up we had a barbecue and it was it was cool it was like you know you see a lot of deer up there
( and ( then ( uh ( ( my mother ) ( who ( ( went ( to ( ( pick us ) ( up ( ( ( we ( had ( a barbecue ) ) ) and ) ( it ( was ( it ( was ( cool ( it ( was ( like ( you ( know ( you ( see ( ( a lot ) ( of deer ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( up there ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (ADVP (RB then) (S (VP (VBG uh) (NP (NP (PRP$ my) (NN mother)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBD went) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB pick) (NP (PRP us)) (PP (IN up) (S (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (DT a) (NN barbecue)))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ cool) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP see) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS deer)))))))))))))))))))))))) (ADVP (RB up) (RB there)))))))))))
There are lions to see.
( There ( ( are ( lions ( to see ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ lions) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see)))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and then uh my mother who went to pick us up we had a barbecue and it was it was cool it was like you know you see a lot of deer up there Then the following statement: "There are lions to see." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
67,400
67400c
He will happily decorate any TV or radio story with a veneer of American history.
( He ( ( ( will happily ) ( ( decorate ( any ( TV ( or ( radio story ) ) ) ) ) ( with ( ( a veneer ) ( of ( American history ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (MD will) (ADVP (RB happily)) (VP (VB decorate) (NP (DT any) (NN TV) (CC or) (NN radio) (NN story)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN veneer)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ American) (NN history))))))) (. .)))
He will decorate TV stories with German history.
( He ( ( will ( ( decorate ( TV stories ) ) ( with ( German history ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB decorate) (NP (NN TV) (NNS stories)) (PP (IN with) (NP (JJ German) (NN history))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: He will happily decorate any TV or radio story with a veneer of American history. Then the following statement: "He will decorate TV stories with German history." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
20,997
20997n
Reporting supplementary stewardship information in two categories will not be deemed double counting.
( ( ( Reporting ( supplementary ( stewardship information ) ) ) ( in ( two categories ) ) ) ( ( ( will not ) ( be ( deemed ( double counting ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Reporting) (NN supplementary) (NN stewardship) (NN information)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD two) (NNS categories)))) (VP (MD will) (RB not) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN deemed) (NP (JJ double) (NN counting))))) (. .)))
It is acceptable practice to report the stewardship in two categories.
( It ( ( is ( acceptable ( practice ( to ( report ( ( the stewardship ) ( in ( two categories ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (JJ acceptable) (NN practice) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB report) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN stewardship)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD two) (NNS categories))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Reporting supplementary stewardship information in two categories will not be deemed double counting. Then the following statement: "It is acceptable practice to report the stewardship in two categories." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
29
29e
oh he was sitting at the table with them
( oh ( he ( was ( sitting ( at ( ( the table ) ( with them ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB oh) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG sitting) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN table)) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP them))))))))))))
He was sitting at the table with them.
( He ( ( was ( sitting ( at ( ( the table ) ( with them ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG sitting) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN table)) (PP (IN with) (NP (PRP them))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: oh he was sitting at the table with them Then the following statement: "He was sitting at the table with them." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
21,509
21509n
They look up slate in their index and see that it often occurs on the same page as roof, so they suggest this as a possible refinement of the search.
( ( ( ( ( They ( ( ( ( look up ) ( slate ( in ( their index ) ) ) ) and ) ( see ( that ( it ( often ( occurs ( on ( ( the ( same page ) ) ( as roof ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) so ) ( they ( suggest ( this ( as ( ( a ( possible refinement ) ) ( of ( the search ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VP (VBP look) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (NP (NN slate)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN index))))) (CC and) (VP (VBP see) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB often)) (VP (VBZ occurs) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN page)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NN roof))))))))))) (, ,) (IN so) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP suggest) (NP (NP (DT this)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ possible) (NN refinement)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN search)))))))) (. .)))
They wanted to make sure the readers found what they were looking for.
( They ( ( wanted ( to ( make ( sure ( ( the readers ) ( found ( what ( they ( were ( looking for ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBD wanted) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (ADJP (JJ sure) (SBAR (S (NP (DT the) (NNS readers)) (VP (VBD found) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBG looking) (PP (IN for)))))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: They look up slate in their index and see that it often occurs on the same page as roof, so they suggest this as a possible refinement of the search. Then the following statement: "They wanted to make sure the readers found what they were looking for." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
65,558
65558n
because certainly they're not using it for juices and stuff i mean they use the junk for that it makes me wonder gosh if they're using junk for that what are we getting here
( because ( ( ( certainly ( they ( ( 're not ) ( ( using it ) ( for juices ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( stuff i ) ( mean ( they ( use ( ( the junk ) ( ( for that ) ( it ( makes ( me ( ( wonder gosh ) ( if ( they ( 're ( ( using junk ) ( for ( that ( what ( are ( we ( getting here ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBAR (IN because) (S (S (ADVP (RB certainly)) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (RB not) (VP (VBG using) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS juices)))))) (CC and) (S (NP (NN stuff) (NNS i)) (VP (VBP mean) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP use) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN junk)) (SBAR (WHPP (IN for) (WHNP (WDT that))) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ makes) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP me)) (VP (VBP wonder) (NP (NN gosh)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG using) (NP (NN junk)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (DT that)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBG getting) (ADVP (RB here))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
They are using it for the wrong reasons.
( They ( ( are ( ( using it ) ( for ( the ( wrong reasons ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG using) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (JJ wrong) (NNS reasons))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: because certainly they're not using it for juices and stuff i mean they use the junk for that it makes me wonder gosh if they're using junk for that what are we getting here Then the following statement: "They are using it for the wrong reasons." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
109,360
109360e
In five minutes a brisk young doctor arrived, hastily summoned.
( ( In ( five minutes ) ) ( ( a ( brisk ( young doctor ) ) ) ( ( ( arrived , ) ( hastily summoned ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (CD five) (NNS minutes))) (NP (DT a) (JJ brisk) (JJ young) (NN doctor)) (VP (VBD arrived) (, ,) (S (VP (ADVP (RB hastily)) (VBN summoned)))) (. .)))
A young doctor arrived within just five minutes.
( ( A ( young doctor ) ) ( ( arrived ( within ( just ( five minutes ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (JJ young) (NN doctor)) (VP (VBD arrived) (PP (IN within) (NP (RB just) (CD five) (NNS minutes)))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In five minutes a brisk young doctor arrived, hastily summoned. Then the following statement: "A young doctor arrived within just five minutes." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
113,744
113744e
The Geku-Jin-en Sacred Park, at the foot of Mt. Takakura, is an integral part of the sanctuary and a beautiful place for a quiet stroll.
( ( ( ( ( The ( Geku-Jin-en ( Sacred Park ) ) ) , ) ( at ( ( the foot ) ( of ( Mt. Takakura ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( is ( ( ( ( an ( integral part ) ) ( of ( the sanctuary ) ) ) and ) ( ( a ( beautiful place ) ) ( for ( a ( quiet stroll ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP Geku-Jin-en) (NNP Sacred) (NNP Park)) (, ,) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN foot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Mt.) (NNP Takakura))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ integral) (NN part)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN sanctuary)))) (CC and) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ beautiful) (NN place)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ quiet) (NN stroll)))))) (. .)))
The Geku-jin-en Sacred Park is pretty and a nice place to walk.
( ( The ( Geku-jin-en ( Sacred Park ) ) ) ( ( ( ( is pretty ) and ) ( ( a ( nice place ) ) ( to walk ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Geku-jin-en) (NNP Sacred) (NNP Park)) (VP (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ pretty))) (CC and) (VP (NP (DT a) (JJ nice) (NN place)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB walk)))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The Geku-Jin-en Sacred Park, at the foot of Mt. Takakura, is an integral part of the sanctuary and a beautiful place for a quiet stroll. Then the following statement: "The Geku-jin-en Sacred Park is pretty and a nice place to walk." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
390
390n
and maybe and i knew i wanted to be in engineering so i was looking for a good engineering school so i ended up going to Tech in Lubbock
( and ( ( ( maybe and ) ( i ( knew i ) ) ) ( wanted ( to ( ( be ( in engineering ) ) ( so ( i ( was ( ( looking ( for ( a ( good ( engineering school ) ) ) ) ) ( so ( i ( ( ended up ) ( ( going ( to Tech ) ) ( in Lubbock ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (PRN (CC and) (S (NP (NP (NNP maybe)) (CC and) (NP (FW i) (FW knew) (FW i))) (VP (VBD wanted) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN engineering))) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG looking) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ good) (NN engineering) (NN school))) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD ended) (PRT (RP up)) (S (VP (VBG going) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Tech))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Lubbock)))))))))))))))))))
Tech in Lubbock was my first choice for college.
( ( Tech ( in Lubbock ) ) ( ( was ( ( my ( first choice ) ) ( for college ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Tech)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Lubbock)))) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (PRP$ my) (JJ first) (NN choice)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN college))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and maybe and i knew i wanted to be in engineering so i was looking for a good engineering school so i ended up going to Tech in Lubbock Then the following statement: "Tech in Lubbock was my first choice for college. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
37,173
37173c
no i guess i didn't see those
( ( no i ) ( guess ( i ( ( did n't ) ( see those ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT no) (FW i)) (VP (VBP guess) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB see) (NP (DT those)))))))))
Yes, I saw exactly what you are talking about.
( Yes ( , ( I ( ( saw ( ( exactly what ) ( you ( are ( talking about ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (INTJ (UH Yes)) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD saw) (SBAR (WHADJP (RB exactly) (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG talking) (IN about)))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: no i guess i didn't see those Then the following statement: "Yes, I saw exactly what you are talking about." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
105,351
105351c
in the price gee nice huh that sounds good
( in ( ( the ( price ( gee ( nice huh ) ) ) ) ( that ( sounds good ) ) ) )
(ROOT (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN price) (NN gee) (JJ nice) (NN huh)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ sounds) (ADJP (JJ good))))))))
That sounds like a horribly expensive idea.
( That ( ( sounds ( like ( a ( ( horribly expensive ) idea ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ sounds) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB horribly) (JJ expensive)) (NN idea)))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: in the price gee nice huh that sounds good Then the following statement: "That sounds like a horribly expensive idea." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
142,888
142888e
Character is everything
( Character ( is everything ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Character)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NN everything)))))
Character is what matters most.
( Character ( ( is ( what ( matters most ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Character)) (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBZ matters) (ADVP (RBS most)))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Character is everything Then the following statement: "Character is what matters most." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
41,349
41349n
i say we because i live here if that might not turn around in the next you know fifteen twenty years
( i ( ( say we ) ( because ( i ( ( live here ) ( if ( that ( ( might not ) ( ( turn around ) ( in ( ( the next ) ( you ( know ( fifteen ( twenty years ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP say) (NP (PRP we)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP live) (ADVP (RB here)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (MD might) (RB not) (VP (VB turn) (PRT (RP around)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ next)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (NP (CD fifteen) (CD twenty) (NNS years)))))))))))))))))
In the next fifteen to twenty years, things could be different
( ( In ( ( the ( next fifteen ) ) ( to ( twenty years ) ) ) ) ( , ( things ( could ( be different ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ next) (NN fifteen)) (PP (TO to) (NP (CD twenty) (NNS years))))) (, ,) (NP (NNS things)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ different))))))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: i say we because i live here if that might not turn around in the next you know fifteen twenty years Then the following statement: "In the next fifteen to twenty years, things could be different" is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
41,750
41750n
With lunch over, Red slipped out of the room, with a microscopic motion at Slim to follow.
( ( With ( lunch over ) ) ( , ( Red ( ( ( ( ( slipped out ) ( of ( the room ) ) ) , ) ( with ( ( ( a ( microscopic motion ) ) ( at Slim ) ) ( to follow ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN With) (ADJP (NN lunch) (JJ over))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Red)) (VP (VBD slipped) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN room))) (, ,) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ microscopic) (NN motion)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NNP Slim))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB follow))))))) (. .)))
Slim didn't see the motion Red had made.
( Slim ( ( ( did n't ) ( see ( ( the motion ) ( Red ( had made ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Slim)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB see) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN motion)) (SBAR (S (NP (NNP Red)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN made)))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: With lunch over, Red slipped out of the room, with a microscopic motion at Slim to follow. Then the following statement: "Slim didn't see the motion Red had made." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
116,330
116330e
For many of these cases, it was overwhelmingly likely that the client and the service would have been eligible to be counted as a closed case but for the lack of proper documentation.
( ( For ( many ( of ( these cases ) ) ) ) ( , ( it ( ( ( was ( overwhelmingly likely ) ) ( that ( ( ( ( the client ) and ) ( the service ) ) ( would ( have ( ( been ( eligible ( to ( be ( counted ( as ( a ( closed case ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( but ( for ( ( the lack ) ( of ( proper documentation ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN For) (NP (NP (JJ many)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT these) (NNS cases))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB overwhelmingly) (JJ likely)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN client)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (NN service))) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (ADJP (JJ eligible) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN counted) (PP (IN as) (NP (DT a) (VBN closed) (NN case)))))))) (PP (CC but) (IN for) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN lack)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ proper) (NN documentation))))))))))) (. .)))
Many of the cases were closed due to lack of proper documentation.
( ( Many ( of ( the cases ) ) ) ( ( were ( closed ( due ( to ( lack ( of ( proper documentation ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJ Many)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNS cases)))) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN closed) (PP (JJ due) (TO to) (NP (NP (NN lack)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ proper) (NN documentation))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: For many of these cases, it was overwhelmingly likely that the client and the service would have been eligible to be counted as a closed case but for the lack of proper documentation. Then the following statement: "Many of the cases were closed due to lack of proper documentation. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
63,061
63061n
Kyoto's two biggest flea markets are held at Toji temple (the 21st of each month) and at Kitano Temmangu shrine (25th), but there are many others.
( ( ( ( ( ( ( Kyoto 's ) ( two ( biggest ( flea markets ) ) ) ) ( are ( held ( ( ( at ( ( Toji temple ) ( -LRB- ( ( ( the 21st ) ( of ( each month ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) and ) ( at ( ( Kitano ( Temmangu shrine ) ) ( -LRB- ( 25th -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( there ( are ( many others ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (NNP Kyoto) (POS 's)) (CD two) (JJS biggest) (NN flea) (NNS markets)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN held) (PP (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NNP Toji) (NNP temple)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ 21st)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT each) (NN month)))) (-RRB- -RRB-)))) (CC and) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NNP Kitano) (NNP Temmangu) (NNP shrine)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP 25th)) (-RRB- -RRB-)))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (JJ many) (NNS others)))) (. .)))
The people of Kyoto love flea markets more than going to the movies.
( ( ( The people ) ( of Kyoto ) ) ( ( love ( ( ( flea markets ) more ) ( than ( going ( to ( the movies ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS people)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Kyoto)))) (VP (VBP love) (PP (ADVP (NP (CD flea) (NNS markets)) (RBR more)) (IN than) (S (VP (VBG going) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNS movies))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Kyoto's two biggest flea markets are held at Toji temple (the 21st of each month) and at Kitano Temmangu shrine (25th), but there are many others. Then the following statement: "The people of Kyoto love flea markets more than going to the movies." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
7,885
7885c
Like the emblem on its coat of arms, the Ile de la Cite takes the form of a boat, with the romantic tree-shaded place du Vert Galant as its prow pointing downstream.
( ( Like ( ( the emblem ) ( on ( ( its coat ) ( of arms ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the ( Ile ( de ( la Cite ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( ( takes ( ( the form ) ( of ( a boat ) ) ) ) , ) ( with ( the ( romantic ( tree-shaded ( place ( du ( Vert Galant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( as ( ( its prow ) ( pointing downstream ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Like) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN emblem)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN coat)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS arms))))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP Ile) (NNP de) (NNP la) (NNP Cite)) (VP (VBZ takes) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN form)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (NN boat)))) (, ,) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT the) (JJ romantic) (JJ tree-shaded) (NN place) (NNP du) (NNP Vert) (NNP Galant))) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN prow)) (VP (VBG pointing) (NP (JJ downstream)))))) (. .)))
The building doesn't look like a boat at all.
( ( The building ) ( ( ( does n't ) ( ( look ( like ( a boat ) ) ) ( at all ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN building)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't) (VP (VB look) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT a) (NN boat))) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all)))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Like the emblem on its coat of arms, the Ile de la Cite takes the form of a boat, with the romantic tree-shaded place du Vert Galant as its prow pointing downstream. Then the following statement: "The building doesn't look like a boat at all." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
2,665
2665c
I grabbed a hot-dog, threw the vendor some change and vanished from sight in the space of two seconds.
( I ( ( ( ( ( ( grabbed ( a hot-dog ) ) , ) ( threw ( ( the vendor ) ( some change ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( vanished ( from sight ) ) ( in ( ( the space ) ( of ( two seconds ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VP (VBD grabbed) (NP (DT a) (JJ hot-dog))) (, ,) (VP (VBD threw) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN vendor)) (NP (DT some) (NN change)))) (CC and) (VP (VBN vanished) (PP (IN from) (NP (NN sight))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN space)) (PP (IN of) (NP (CD two) (NNS seconds))))))) (. .)))
I stayed and ate my hot dog in public.
( I ( ( ( stayed and ) ( ( ate ( my ( hot dog ) ) ) ( in public ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VP (VBD stayed)) (CC and) (VP (VBD ate) (NP (PRP$ my) (JJ hot) (NN dog)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN public))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I grabbed a hot-dog, threw the vendor some change and vanished from sight in the space of two seconds. Then the following statement: "I stayed and ate my hot dog in public." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
115,537
115537e
finding out about different people and i've i've always liked that show probably the very best
( ( ( ( finding out ) ( about ( ( ( different people ) and ) i ) ) ) ( 've ( i ( ( 've always ) ( liked ( that show ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( probably the ) ( very best ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (VP (VBG finding) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (JJ different) (NNS people)) (CC and) (NP (FW i))))) (VP (VBP 've) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP 've) (ADVP (RB always)) (VP (VBN liked) (NP (DT that) (NN show)))))))) (NP (NP (RB probably) (DT the)) (ADJP (RB very) (JJS best)))))
I like the show that's about finding out about different kinds of people.
( I ( ( like ( ( the show ) ( that ( 's ( about ( ( finding out ) ( about ( ( different kinds ) ( of people ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP like) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN show)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (PP (IN about) (S (VP (VBG finding) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (JJ different) (NNS kinds)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS people))))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: finding out about different people and i've i've always liked that show probably the very best Then the following statement: "I like the show that's about finding out about different kinds of people." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
90,331
90331n
but what you don't forget is the growing up it's really the period when people become adults i mean people who don't go to college become adults in other ways but really it's the entry into adulthood i think and i think that the best way to choose a college is to decide what kind of environment you want to
( ( ( ( ( but ( ( what ( you ( ( do n't ) forget ) ) ) ( is ( ( ( the growing ) up ) ( it ( ( 's really ) ( ( the period ) ( when ( ( people ( ( become adults ) ( ( i ( mean people ) ) ( who ( ( do n't ) ( go ( to college ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( become ( adults ( in ( other ways ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( really ( it ( 's ( ( ( the entry ) ( into ( adulthood i ) ) ) think ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( i ( think ( that ( ( the ( best way ) ) ( to ( choose ( ( a college ) ( is ( to ( decide ( ( ( what kind ) ( of environment ) ) ( you ( want to ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (CC but) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB forget))))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (VBG growing) (RP up)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB really)) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN period)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBN become) (NP (NNS adults)) (NP (NP (FW i) (FW mean) (NNS people)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB go) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN college)))))))))) (VP (VBP become) (NP (NP (NNS adults)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ other) (NNS ways)))))))))))))) (CC but) (S (ADVP (RB really)) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN entry)) (PP (IN into) (NP (JJ adulthood) (FW i))) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP think))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (JJS best) (NN way)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB choose) (SBAR (S (NP (DT a) (NN college)) (VP (VBZ is) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB decide) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what) (NN kind) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN environment)))) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP want) (PP (TO to)))))))))))))))))))
but what you don't forget is the growing up, the college age is when people become adults, i mean people who don't go to college become adults in other ways but really it's the entry into adulthood, and i think that's the best way to choose a college: decide what kind of environment you want to be in.
( ( ( ( ( but ( ( what ( you ( ( do n't ) forget ) ) ) ( is ( ( ( ( the growing ) up ) ( , ( ( the ( college age ) ) ( is ( when ( people ( become ( ( adults , ) ( ( i ( mean people ) ) ( who ( ( do n't ) ( go ( to college ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( become ( adults ( in ( other ways ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) really ) ( ( ( ( it ( 's ( ( the entry ) ( into adulthood ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( i ( think ( that ( 's ( ( the ( best way ) ) ( to ( ( ( choose ( a college ) ) : ) ( decide ( ( ( what kind ) ( of environment ) ) ( you ( want ( to ( be in ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (CC but) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB forget))))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (VBG growing) (RP up)) (PRN (, ,) (S (NP (DT the) (NN college) (NN age)) (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBP become) (NP (NP (NNS adults)) (, ,) (NP (NP (FW i) (FW mean) (NNS people)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB go) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN college))))))))))))))) (VP (VBN become) (NP (NP (NNS adults)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ other) (NNS ways)))))))) (CC but) (ADVP (RB really)) (S (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN entry)) (PP (IN into) (NP (NN adulthood)))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS best) (NN way)) (SBAR (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB choose) (NP (DT a) (NN college))) (: :) (VP (VB decide) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what) (NN kind) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN environment)))) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (PP (IN in)))))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: but what you don't forget is the growing up it's really the period when people become adults i mean people who don't go to college become adults in other ways but really it's the entry into adulthood i think and i think that the best way to choose a college is to decide what kind of environment you want to Then the following statement: "but what you don't forget is the growing up, the college age is when people become adults, i mean people who don't go to college become adults in other ways but really it's the entry into adulthood, and i think that's the best way to choose a college: decide what kind of environment you want to be in." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
93,918
93918e
He estimated the course of the sun, amazed to find that there was no panic in him, and doubly amazed that he could think at all over the torture that wracked his body.
( He ( ( estimated ( ( the course ) ( of ( ( ( the sun ) , ) ( amazed ( to ( ( ( ( find ( that ( there ( was ( ( no panic ) ( in him ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( doubly amazed ) ( that ( he ( could ( ( think ( at all ) ) ( over ( ( the torture ) ( that ( wracked ( his body ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD estimated) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN course)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN sun)) (, ,) (VP (VBN amazed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB find) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN panic)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP him)))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (ADJP (RB doubly) (JJ amazed)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB think) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all)) (PP (IN over) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN torture)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD wracked) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN body)))))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
He was amazed at how calm he was.
( He ( ( was ( amazed ( at ( ( how calm ) ( he was ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN amazed) (PP (IN at) (SBAR (WHADJP (WRB how) (ADJP (JJ calm))) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD was))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: He estimated the course of the sun, amazed to find that there was no panic in him, and doubly amazed that he could think at all over the torture that wracked his body. Then the following statement: "He was amazed at how calm he was." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
128,763
128763n
see i do that to make myself go to sleep at night
( see ( i ( do ( that ( to ( make ( myself ( go ( to ( sleep ( at night ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB see) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (S (NP (PRP myself)) (VP (VB go) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB sleep) (PP (IN at) (NP (NN night))))))))))))))))))
A warm cup of herbal tea helps me sleep as well.
( ( ( A ( warm cup ) ) ( of ( herbal tea ) ) ) ( ( helps ( me ( sleep ( as well ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT A) (JJ warm) (NN cup)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ herbal) (NN tea)))) (VP (VBZ helps) (S (NP (PRP me)) (VP (VB sleep) (ADVP (RB as) (RB well))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: see i do that to make myself go to sleep at night Then the following statement: "A warm cup of herbal tea helps me sleep as well." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
111,858
111858n
would go outside and he'd turn into a zombie and walk around like he didn't know what was going on but he's used to it now i think he's i mean
( ( would ( ( ( go outside ) ( and ( he ( 'd ( ( ( turn ( into ( a zombie ) ) ) and ) ( ( walk around ) ( like ( he ( ( did n't ) ( know ( what ( was ( going ( on ( but ( he ( 's ( used ( to it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( now ( i ( think ( he ( 's i ) ) ) ) ) ) ) mean )
(ROOT (SINV (VP (MD would) (VP (VB go) (ADVP (RB outside)) (PRN (CC and) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD 'd) (VP (VP (VB turn) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT a) (NN zombie)))) (CC and) (VP (VB walk) (PRT (RP around)) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG going) (PP (IN on) (SBAR (CC but) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBN used) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP it))))))))))))))))))))) (SBAR (RB now) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (FW i)))))))))) (NP (NN mean))))
He became used to pretending to be a zombie.
( He ( ( became ( used ( to ( pretending ( to ( be ( a zombie ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD became) (VP (VBN used) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB pretending) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (NP (DT a) (NN zombie)))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: would go outside and he'd turn into a zombie and walk around like he didn't know what was going on but he's used to it now i think he's i mean Then the following statement: "He became used to pretending to be a zombie." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
96,940
96940e
The young swordsman continued.
( ( The ( young swordsman ) ) ( continued . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ young) (NN swordsman)) (VP (VBD continued)) (. .)))
He carried on.
( He ( ( carried on ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD carried) (PRT (RP on))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The young swordsman continued. Then the following statement: " He carried on. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
75,238
75238c
um-hum yeah that's not quite so so easy yeah yeah
( ( um-hum yeah ) ( that ( ( ( 's not ) ( quite so ) ) ( ( so easy ) ( yeah yeah ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (X (NP (JJ um-hum) (NN yeah)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (RB not) (ADVP (RB quite) (RB so)) (NP (ADJP (RB so) (JJ easy)) (NN yeah) (NN yeah)))))))
It can be completed in a minute, piece of cake!
( It ( ( can ( be ( completed ( in ( ( ( a minute ) , ) ( piece ( of cake ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ! ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN completed) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN minute)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NN piece)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN cake))))))))) (. !)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: um-hum yeah that's not quite so so easy yeah yeah Then the following statement: "It can be completed in a minute, piece of cake!" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
75,026
75026e
The monastery was built at a tumultuous time in Christian history and its design was based on that of a castle, to act as a protection of the faith and its treasures, as well as for worship.
( ( ( ( ( The monastery ) ( was ( built ( at ( ( a ( tumultuous time ) ) ( in ( Christian history ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( its design ) ( was ( ( ( based ( on ( that ( of ( a castle ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( to ( act ( ( ( ( as ( ( a protection ) ( of ( ( ( the faith ) and ) ( its treasures ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( as ( well as ) ) ) ( for worship ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (NN monastery)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN built) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ tumultuous) (NN time)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ Christian) (NN history)))))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP$ its) (NN design)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN based) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT that)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT a) (NN castle))))) (, ,) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB act) (PP (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN protection)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN faith)) (CC and) (NP (PRP$ its) (NNS treasures)))))) (, ,) (CONJP (RB as) (RB well) (IN as)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN worship)))))))))) (. .)))
The monastery was built to resemble a castle in part due to defensive concerns.
( ( The monastery ) ( ( was ( built ( to ( resemble ( ( ( a castle ) ( in part ) ) ( due ( to ( defensive concerns ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN monastery)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN built) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB resemble) (S (NP (NP (DT a) (NN castle)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN part)))) (ADJP (JJ due) (PP (TO to) (NP (JJ defensive) (NNS concerns)))))))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The monastery was built at a tumultuous time in Christian history and its design was based on that of a castle, to act as a protection of the faith and its treasures, as well as for worship. Then the following statement: "The monastery was built to resemble a castle in part due to defensive concerns." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
134,778
134778n
you're kidding me
( you ( 're ( kidding me ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (VP (VBG kidding) (NP (PRP me))))))
You definitely do not mean what you just said.
( You ( definitely ( ( ( do not ) ( mean ( what ( you ( just said ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (ADVP (RB definitely)) (VP (VBP do) (RB not) (VP (VB mean) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VBD said)))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: you're kidding me Then the following statement: "You definitely do not mean what you just said." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
32,692
32692e
A logical corollary is that inflation cannot be triggered by increasing wages, farm prices, or health care costs.
( ( A ( logical corollary ) ) ( ( is ( that ( inflation ( ( can not ) ( be ( triggered ( by ( increasing ( ( ( ( ( wages , ) ( farm prices ) ) , ) or ) ( health ( care costs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (JJ logical) (NN corollary)) (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NN inflation)) (VP (MD can) (RB not) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN triggered) (PP (IN by) (S (VP (VBG increasing) (NP (NP (NNS wages)) (, ,) (NP (NN farm) (NNS prices)) (, ,) (CC or) (NP (NN health) (NN care) (NNS costs)))))))))))) (. .)))
Inflation is not caused by a rise in salaries, farm prices, or the cost of medical care.
( Inflation ( ( ( is not ) ( caused ( by ( ( a rise ) ( in ( ( ( ( ( salaries , ) ( farm prices ) ) , ) or ) ( ( the cost ) ( of ( medical care ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Inflation)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (VP (VBN caused) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN rise)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NNS salaries)) (, ,) (NP (NN farm) (NNS prices)) (, ,) (CC or) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN cost)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ medical) (NN care)))))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: A logical corollary is that inflation cannot be triggered by increasing wages, farm prices, or health care costs. Then the following statement: "Inflation is not caused by a rise in salaries, farm prices, or the cost of medical care. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
28,602
28602e
Tommy felt the strain telling on his nerves.
( Tommy ( ( felt ( ( the strain ) ( telling ( on ( his nerves ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Tommy)) (VP (VBD felt) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN strain)) (VP (VBG telling) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP$ his) (NNS nerves)))))) (. .)))
Tommy was under a lot of stress
( Tommy ( was ( under ( ( a lot ) ( of stress ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Tommy)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN under) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN stress))))))))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Tommy felt the strain telling on his nerves. Then the following statement: "Tommy was under a lot of stress" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
101,625
101625e
In the days of Philippe d'Orleans, Prince Regent while Louis XV was a child, the Palais-Royal was the scene of notorious orgies.
( ( In ( ( the days ) ( of ( Philippe d'Orleans ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( Prince Regent ) ( ( while ( ( Louis XV ) ( was ( a child ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the Palais-Royal ) ( ( was ( ( the scene ) ( of ( notorious orgies ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS days)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Philippe) (NNS d'Orleans))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Prince) (NNP Regent)) (SBAR (IN while) (S (NP (NNP Louis) (NNP XV)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT a) (NN child))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN Palais-Royal)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN scene)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ notorious) (NNS orgies))))) (. .)))
The Palais-Royal was a place of notorious orgies during the time of Prince regent Philippe d'Orleans.
( ( The Palais-Royal ) ( ( ( was ( ( a place ) ( of ( notorious orgies ) ) ) ) ( during ( ( the time ) ( of ( Prince ( regent ( Philippe d'Orleans ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN Palais-Royal)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN place)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ notorious) (NNS orgies)))) (PP (IN during) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN time)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Prince) (NNP regent) (NNP Philippe) (NNS d'Orleans)))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In the days of Philippe d'Orleans, Prince Regent while Louis XV was a child, the Palais-Royal was the scene of notorious orgies. Then the following statement: "The Palais-Royal was a place of notorious orgies during the time of Prince regent Philippe d'Orleans." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
88,426
88426c
yes that that sounds wonderful i we uh we have family reunions not on a regular basis and there's mostly in my wife's family uh my family's very small
( yes ( that ( that ( sounds ( ( wonderful i ) ( we ( uh ( ( ( we ( ( have ( family reunions ) ) ( not ( on ( a ( regular basis ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( there ( ( ( 's mostly ) ( in ( ( my ( wife 's ) ) family ) ) ) ( uh ( ( my family ) ( 's ( very small ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (RB yes)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBZ sounds) (NP (NP (JJ wonderful) (NNS i)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD uh) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NN family) (NNS reunions)) (PP (RB not) (IN on) (NP (DT a) (JJ regular) (NN basis))))) (CC and) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADVP (RB mostly)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (PRP$ my) (NN wife) (POS 's)) (NN family))) (SBAR (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN family)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ small))))))))))))))))))
I have a fairly large family, like my wife's.
( I ( ( ( ( have ( a ( ( fairly large ) family ) ) ) , ) ( like ( ( my wife ) 's ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB fairly) (JJ large)) (NN family)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (PRP$ my) (NN wife)) (VP (VBZ 's))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yes that that sounds wonderful i we uh we have family reunions not on a regular basis and there's mostly in my wife's family uh my family's very small Then the following statement: "I have a fairly large family, like my wife's." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
38,178
38178c
Finally, you can get an excellent view of the cityscape from the Cairo Tower (El-Borg), designed like a minaret, though it does stand significantly higher at 182 m (600 ft) above the city.
( Finally ( , ( you ( ( can ( ( get ( ( an ( excellent view ) ) ( of ( the cityscape ) ) ) ) ( from ( ( ( ( the ( Cairo Tower ) ) ( -LRB- ( El-Borg -RRB- ) ) ) , ) ( ( ( designed ( like ( a minaret ) ) ) , ) ( though ( it ( does ( ( stand ( ( significantly higher ) ( at ( ( 182 m ) ( -LRB- ( ( 600 ft ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) ( above ( the city ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Finally)) (, ,) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB get) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ excellent) (NN view)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN cityscape)))) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Cairo) (NNP Tower)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP El-Borg)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (, ,) (VP (VBN designed) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT a) (NN minaret))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN though) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ does) (VP (VB stand) (ADJP (ADJP (RB significantly) (JJR higher)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (QP (CD 182) (CD m))) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (QP (CD 600) (CD ft))) (-RRB- -RRB-))))) (PP (IN above) (NP (DT the) (NN city)))))))))))) (. .)))
You can't see anything from the Cairo Tower.
( You ( ( ( ca n't ) ( ( see anything ) ( from ( the ( Cairo Tower ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB see) (NP (NN anything)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NNP Cairo) (NNP Tower))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Finally, you can get an excellent view of the cityscape from the Cairo Tower (El-Borg), designed like a minaret, though it does stand significantly higher at 182 m (600 ft) above the city. Then the following statement: "You can't see anything from the Cairo Tower." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
41,459
41459e
DEFINITIONS.
( DEFINITIONS . )
(ROOT (NP (NNS DEFINITIONS) (. .)))
The line states the word definitions.
( ( The line ) ( ( states ( the ( word definitions ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN line)) (VP (VBZ states) (NP (DT the) (NN word) (NNS definitions))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: DEFINITIONS. Then the following statement: "The line states the word definitions. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
13,425
13425n
The business CIOs work together to determine how IT can be used to reach customers across business lines.
( ( The ( business CIOs ) ) ( ( ( work together ) ( to ( determine ( how ( IT ( can ( be ( used ( to ( ( reach customers ) ( across ( business lines ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN business) (NNS CIOs)) (VP (VBP work) (ADVP (RB together)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB determine) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (NP (PRP IT)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN used) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB reach) (NP (NNS customers)) (PP (IN across) (NP (NN business) (NNS lines))))))))))))))) (. .)))
Many CIOs are required to figure out how IT can bring more customers.
( ( Many CIOs ) ( ( are ( required ( to ( ( figure out ) ( how ( IT ( can ( bring ( more customers ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Many) (NNS CIOs)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN required) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB figure) (PRT (RP out)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (NP (PRP IT)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB bring) (NP (JJR more) (NNS customers))))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The business CIOs work together to determine how IT can be used to reach customers across business lines. Then the following statement: "Many CIOs are required to figure out how IT can bring more customers." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
90,821
90821n
Ca'daan found the shimmy movements confusing and disturbing.
( ( Ca ( ` daan ) ) ( ( found ( ( the ( shimmy movements ) ) ( ( confusing and ) disturbing ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJS Ca) (`` `) (NNS daan)) (VP (VBD found) (S (NP (DT the) (JJ shimmy) (NNS movements)) (ADJP (VBG confusing) (CC and) (JJ disturbing)))) (. .)))
Ca'daan idn't understand what the person was trying to convey.
( ( Ca ( ` daan ) ) ( ( ( id n't ) ( understand ( what ( ( the person ) ( was ( trying ( to convey ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJS Ca) (`` `) (NNS daan)) (VP (VBP id) (RB n't) (VP (VB understand) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (DT the) (NN person)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG trying) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB convey)))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Ca'daan found the shimmy movements confusing and disturbing. Then the following statement: "Ca'daan idn't understand what the person was trying to convey." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
107,462
107462n
That lowered their interest rate to 9 percent.
( That ( ( ( lowered ( their ( interest rate ) ) ) ( to ( 9 percent ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBD lowered) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN interest) (NN rate)) (PP (TO to) (NP (CD 9) (NN percent)))) (. .)))
The previous interest rate was at 50 percent.
( ( The ( previous ( interest rate ) ) ) ( ( was ( at ( 50 percent ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ previous) (NN interest) (NN rate)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN at) (NP (CD 50) (NN percent)))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: That lowered their interest rate to 9 percent. Then the following statement: "The previous interest rate was at 50 percent. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
32,916
32916e
yeah and they just stop making them now
( ( ( yeah and ) they ) ( just ( stop ( ( making them ) now ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN yeah)) (CC and) (NP (PRP they))) (VP (ADVP (RB just)) (VBP stop) (S (VP (VBG making) (NP (PRP them)) (ADVP (RB now)))))))
They just stop making them now.
( They ( just ( ( stop ( ( making them ) now ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VBP stop) (S (VP (VBG making) (NP (PRP them)) (ADVP (RB now))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah and they just stop making them now Then the following statement: "They just stop making them now." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
51,637
51637c
Temple Bar is also home to a wealth of artists and musicians, and there are crafts and art workshops, galleries, and music centers.
( ( ( ( ( ( Temple Bar ) ( ( is also ) ( home ( to ( ( a wealth ) ( of ( ( artists and ) musicians ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( there ( are ( ( ( ( ( ( crafts ( and ( art workshops ) ) ) , ) galleries ) , ) and ) ( music centers ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP Temple) (NNP Bar)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB also)) (NP (NP (NN home)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN wealth)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS artists) (CC and) (NNS musicians)))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (NNS crafts) (CC and) (NN art) (NNS workshops)) (, ,) (NP (NNS galleries)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NN music) (NNS centers))))) (. .)))
Temple Bar is completely devoid of any musicians or artists.
( ( Temple Bar ) ( ( is ( completely ( devoid ( of ( any ( ( musicians or ) artists ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Temple) (NNP Bar)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB completely) (JJ devoid) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT any) (NNS musicians) (CC or) (NNS artists))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Temple Bar is also home to a wealth of artists and musicians, and there are crafts and art workshops, galleries, and music centers. Then the following statement: "Temple Bar is completely devoid of any musicians or artists. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
110,492
110492e
right i'm only twenty one
( ( right i ) ( 'm ( only ( twenty one ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ right) (NNS i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (NP (RB only) (CD twenty) (CD one)))))
I'm still relatively young.
( I ( ( ( 'm still ) ( relatively young ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADVP (RB still)) (ADJP (RB relatively) (JJ young))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: right i'm only twenty one Then the following statement: "I'm still relatively young." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
67,914
67914c
: Long before the blockbuster movie, Jubilee!
( : ( ( Long ( before ( ( ( the ( blockbuster movie ) ) , ) Jubilee ) ) ) ! ) )
(ROOT (NP (: :) (NP (NNP Long)) (PP (IN before) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ blockbuster) (NN movie)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Jubilee)))) (. !)))
This came after the blockbuster movie.
( This ( ( came ( after ( the ( blockbuster movie ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT This)) (VP (VBD came) (PP (IN after) (NP (DT the) (JJ blockbuster) (NN movie)))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: : Long before the blockbuster movie, Jubilee! Then the following statement: "This came after the blockbuster movie." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
21,015
21015n
Meanwhile, they have misrepresented my argument.
( Meanwhile ( , ( they ( ( have ( misrepresented ( my argument ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Meanwhile)) (, ,) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBD misrepresented) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN argument)))) (. .)))
Out of jealousy, they have purposely misquoted my reasoning.
( ( Out ( of jealousy ) ) ( , ( they ( ( ( have purposely ) ( misquoted ( my reasoning ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Out) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN jealousy)))) (, ,) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP have) (ADVP (RB purposely)) (VP (VBN misquoted) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN reasoning)))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Meanwhile, they have misrepresented my argument. Then the following statement: "Out of jealousy, they have purposely misquoted my reasoning." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
60,998
60998c
Great Jehosaphat!
( Great ( Jehosaphat ! ) )
(ROOT (NP (NNP Great) (NNP Jehosaphat) (. !)))
David Letterman!
( David ( Letterman ! ) )
(ROOT (NP (NNP David) (NNP Letterman) (. !)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Great Jehosaphat! Then the following statement: "David Letterman!" is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
121,583
121583c
In that respect, participants also discussed the need for auditors to expand their focus on internal control to include controls over performance data in order to better meet the needs of investors for assurances on financial statements and for understanding all business risks.
( ( In ( that respect ) ) ( , ( participants ( also ( ( ( ( discussed ( the need ) ) ( for auditors ) ) ( to ( ( expand ( their focus ) ) ( ( ( on ( internal ( control ( to ( ( ( include controls ) ( over ( performance data ) ) ) ( ( in order ) ( to ( better ( meet ( ( the needs ) ( of ( investors ( for ( assurances ( on ( financial statements ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( for ( understanding ( all ( business risks ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (DT that) (NN respect))) (, ,) (NP (NNS participants)) (ADVP (RB also)) (VP (VBD discussed) (NP (DT the) (NN need)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS auditors))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB expand) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN focus)) (PP (PP (IN on) (NP (JJ internal) (NN control) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB include) (NP (NNS controls)) (PP (IN over) (NP (NN performance) (NNS data))) (SBAR (IN in) (NN order) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (ADVP (RBR better)) (VB meet) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS needs)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS investors)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NNS assurances)) (PP (IN on) (NP (JJ financial) (NNS statements))))))))))))))))) (CC and) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG understanding) (NP (DT all) (NN business) (NNS risks)))))))))) (. .)))
Participants failed to discuss the need for performance data controls to be included in discussion of internal controls.
( Participants ( ( failed ( to ( ( discuss ( the need ) ) ( for ( ( performance data ) ( controls ( to ( be ( included ( in ( discussion ( of ( internal controls ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Participants)) (VP (VBD failed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB discuss) (NP (DT the) (NN need)) (SBAR (IN for) (S (NP (NN performance) (NNS data)) (VP (VBZ controls) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN included) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN discussion)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ internal) (NNS controls)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In that respect, participants also discussed the need for auditors to expand their focus on internal control to include controls over performance data in order to better meet the needs of investors for assurances on financial statements and for understanding all business risks. Then the following statement: "Participants failed to discuss the need for performance data controls to be included in discussion of internal controls." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
27,604
27604e
so Garland how nice is it now it's been a while since i've been there
( so ( ( Garland ( how ( nice ( ( ( is it ) now ) ( it ( 's ( been ( ( a while ) ( since i ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( 've ( been there ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (NP (NNP Garland)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB how)) (S (NP (JJ nice)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB now)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBN been) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN while)) (PP (IN since) (NP (FW i)))))))))))) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN been) (ADVP (RB there)))))))
How nice is it? I haven't been there in a while.
( ( ( How nice ) ( ( is it ) ? ) ) ( I ( ( ( have n't ) ( ( been there ) ( in ( a while ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBARQ (WHADJP (WRB How) (ADJP (JJ nice))) (SQ (VBZ is) (NP (PRP it))) (. ?)) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (RB n't) (VP (VBN been) (ADVP (RB there)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (NN while))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: so Garland how nice is it now it's been a while since i've been there Then the following statement: "How nice is it? I haven't been there in a while." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
96,272
96272c
i going to have to keep that in mind for my future because i hope to have lots of dinner parties because i like to i mean i'm
( ( i ( going ( to ( ( have ( to ( ( keep ( that ( in mind ) ) ) ( for ( my future ) ) ) ) ) ( because ( i ( hope ( to ( ( have ( lots ( of ( dinner parties ) ) ) ) ( because ( i ( like ( to ( i ( mean i ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 'm )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB have) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB keep) (NP (NP (DT that)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN mind)))) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP$ my) (NN future)))))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP hope) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (NNS lots)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN dinner) (NNS parties)))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP like) (VP (TO to) (NP (FW i) (FW mean) (FW i))))))))))))))))) (VP (VBP 'm))))
That tip will go in one ear and out the other.
( ( That tip ) ( ( will ( go ( ( ( in ( one ear ) ) and ) ( out ( the other ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That) (NN tip)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB go) (PP (PP (IN in) (NP (CD one) (NN ear))) (CC and) (PP (IN out) (NP (DT the) (JJ other)))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: i going to have to keep that in mind for my future because i hope to have lots of dinner parties because i like to i mean i'm Then the following statement: "That tip will go in one ear and out the other." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
14,705
14705c
But Spock's equivocations were not evasions.
( But ( ( ( Spock 's ) equivocations ) ( ( ( were not ) evasions ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC But) (NP (NP (NNP Spock) (POS 's)) (NNS equivocations)) (VP (VBD were) (RB not) (ADJP (JJ evasions))) (. .)))
Spock uses the equivocations as evasions.
( Spock ( ( ( uses ( the equivocations ) ) ( as evasions ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Spock)) (VP (VBZ uses) (NP (DT the) (NNS equivocations)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NNS evasions)))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: But Spock's equivocations were not evasions. Then the following statement: "Spock uses the equivocations as evasions." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
113,813
113813n
is kind of nice but
( is ( kind ( of ( nice but ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NN kind)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ nice)) (ADVP (CC but)))))))
It is pretty enjoyable.
( It ( ( is ( pretty enjoyable ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB pretty) (JJ enjoyable))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: is kind of nice but Then the following statement: "It is pretty enjoyable." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
17,500
17500e
On the arts side, there are videotapes of great performances of great operas.
( ( On ( the ( arts side ) ) ) ( , ( there ( ( are ( videotapes ( of ( ( great performances ) ( of ( great operas ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN On) (NP (DT the) (NNS arts) (NN side))) (, ,) (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (NNS videotapes)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ great) (NNS performances)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ great) (NNS operas))))))) (. .)))
Someone taped the great operas.
( Someone ( ( taped ( the ( great operas ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Someone)) (VP (VBD taped) (NP (DT the) (JJ great) (NNS operas))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: On the arts side, there are videotapes of great performances of great operas. Then the following statement: "Someone taped the great operas." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
2,685
2685e
We can fill that entire lifetime with pleasures.
( We ( ( can ( ( fill ( that ( entire lifetime ) ) ) ( with pleasures ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB fill) (NP (DT that) (JJ entire) (NN lifetime)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NNS pleasures))))) (. .)))
We can stuff that lifetime with pleasures.
( We ( ( can ( ( stuff ( that lifetime ) ) ( with pleasures ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB stuff) (NP (DT that) (NN lifetime)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NNS pleasures))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: We can fill that entire lifetime with pleasures. Then the following statement: "We can stuff that lifetime with pleasures." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
79,135
79135c
yeah so i don't know you know speaking speaking about making a three hour time commitment i don't know
( yeah ( so ( i ( ( do n't ) ( know ( you ( know ( speaking ( speaking ( about ( making ( ( a ( three ( hour ( time commitment ) ) ) ) ( i ( ( do n't ) know ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB know) (VP (VBG speaking) (S (VP (VBG speaking) (PP (IN about) (S (VP (VBG making) (NP (NP (DT a) (CD three) (NN hour) (NN time) (NN commitment)) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB know)))))))))))))))))))))
I have a lot of time to spare, so three hours is nothing.
( ( ( ( ( I ( ( have ( ( a lot ) ( of time ) ) ) ( to spare ) ) ) , ) so ) ( ( three hours ) ( is nothing ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN time)))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB spare)))))) (, ,) (IN so) (S (NP (CD three) (NNS hours)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NN nothing)))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: yeah so i don't know you know speaking speaking about making a three hour time commitment i don't know Then the following statement: "I have a lot of time to spare, so three hours is nothing." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
131,880
131880e
Successful organizations we studied based their strategic planning, to a large extent, on the interests and expectations of their stakeholders.
( ( ( Successful organizations ) ( we studied ) ) ( ( ( ( ( ( based ( their ( strategic planning ) ) ) , ) ( to ( a ( large extent ) ) ) ) , ) ( on ( ( the ( ( interests and ) expectations ) ) ( of ( their stakeholders ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJ Successful) (NNS organizations)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD studied))))) (VP (VBD based) (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ strategic) (NN planning)) (, ,) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT a) (JJ large) (NN extent))) (, ,) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS interests) (CC and) (NNS expectations)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS stakeholders)))))) (. .)))
Stakeholders play a key role in a company.
( Stakeholders ( ( play ( ( a ( key role ) ) ( in ( a company ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Stakeholders)) (VP (VBP play) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ key) (NN role)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (NN company))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Successful organizations we studied based their strategic planning, to a large extent, on the interests and expectations of their stakeholders. Then the following statement: "Stakeholders play a key role in a company." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
1,352
1352e
Tommy felt that if this solitary confinement went on much longer he would go mad.
( Tommy ( ( felt ( that ( ( if ( ( this ( solitary confinement ) ) ( ( went on ) ( much longer ) ) ) ) ( he ( would ( go mad ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Tommy)) (VP (VBD felt) (SBAR (IN that) (S (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (DT this) (JJ solitary) (NN confinement)) (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP on)) (ADVP (RB much) (RB longer))))) (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB go) (ADJP (JJ mad))))))) (. .)))
Tommy is a prisoner
( Tommy ( is ( a prisoner ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Tommy)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT a) (NN prisoner)))))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Tommy felt that if this solitary confinement went on much longer he would go mad. Then the following statement: "Tommy is a prisoner" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
40,891
40891n
There was general agreement among the participants that the root causes of the accountability breakdowns are systemic in nature, complex, and will require leadership and alterations to the current models in each of the four interrelated areas to transition to an overall system that is more focused on protecting the public interest and, in that regard, accountability.
( There ( ( ( was ( ( general agreement ) ( among ( the participants ) ) ) ) ( that ( ( ( the ( root causes ) ) ( of ( the ( accountability breakdowns ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( are ( ( ( systemic ( in nature ) ) , ) complex ) ) , ) and ) ( will ( ( ( require ( ( leadership and ) alterations ) ) ( to ( ( the ( current models ) ) ( in ( each ( of ( ( the ( four ( interrelated areas ) ) ) ( to transition ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( an ( overall system ) ) ( that ( is ( more ( focused ( on ( protecting ( ( ( ( the ( public interest ) ) and ) ( , ( ( in ( that regard ) ) , ) ) ) accountability ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (JJ general) (NN agreement)) (PP (IN among) (NP (DT the) (NNS participants)))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN root) (NNS causes)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN accountability) (NNS breakdowns)))) (VP (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN systemic) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN nature))) (, ,) (ADJP (JJ complex)))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB require) (NP (NN leadership) (CC and) (NNS alterations)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ current) (NNS models)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT each)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (CD four) (JJ interrelated) (NNS areas)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN transition))))))))) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ overall) (NN system)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RBR more) (VBN focused) (PP (IN on) (S (VP (VBG protecting) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ public) (NN interest)) (CC and) (PRN (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT that) (NN regard))) (, ,)) (NP (NN accountability)))))))))))))))))) (. .)))
Accountability issues are systemic and need to be addressed by leaders.
( ( Accountability issues ) ( ( ( ( are systemic ) and ) ( need ( to ( be ( addressed ( by leaders ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Accountability) (NNS issues)) (VP (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ systemic))) (CC and) (VP (VBP need) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN addressed) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNS leaders))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: There was general agreement among the participants that the root causes of the accountability breakdowns are systemic in nature, complex, and will require leadership and alterations to the current models in each of the four interrelated areas to transition to an overall system that is more focused on protecting the public interest and, in that regard, accountability. Then the following statement: "Accountability issues are systemic and need to be addressed by leaders." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
113,920
113920e
i think so you're right well it's interesting uh that uh people have the generally the same view of credit cards no matter where you go
( i ( think ( so ( you ( 're ( right ( well ( it ( ( ( 's interesting ) ( uh ( that ( uh ( people ( have ( ( the ( ( generally the ) ( same view ) ) ) ( of ( credit cards ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( no matter ) ( where ( you go ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADVP (RB right) (RB well) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ interesting)) (S (VP (VBG uh) (SBAR (IN that) (S (INTJ (UH uh)) (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (DT the) (ADJP (RB generally) (DT the)) (JJ same) (NN view)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN credit) (NNS cards))))))))) (SBAR (ADVP (DT no) (NN matter)) (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP go))))))))))))))
You are correct, people think the same about credit cards
( You ( are ( ( correct , ) ( people ( ( think ( the same ) ) ( about ( credit cards ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (ADJP (JJ correct)) (, ,) (SBAR (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBP think) (NP (DT the) (JJ same)) (PP (IN about) (NP (NN credit) (NNS cards))))))))))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: i think so you're right well it's interesting uh that uh people have the generally the same view of credit cards no matter where you go Then the following statement: "You are correct, people think the same about credit cards" is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
48,197
48197e
A fellow can't spend all his time on them.
( ( A fellow ) ( ( ( ca n't ) ( ( spend ( all ( his time ) ) ) ( on them ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (NN fellow)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB spend) (NP (PDT all) (PRP$ his) (NN time)) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP them))))) (. .)))
A fellow cannot give them all his attention.
( ( A fellow ) ( ( ( can not ) ( ( give them ) ( all ( his attention ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (NN fellow)) (VP (MD can) (RB not) (VP (VB give) (NP (PRP them)) (NP (PDT all) (PRP$ his) (NN attention)))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: A fellow can't spend all his time on them. Then the following statement: "A fellow cannot give them all his attention." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
69,767
69767e
Children's clothes are fun and stylish too, though you may balk at the prices.
( ( ( Children 's ) clothes ) ( ( ( ( are ( ( fun and ) ( stylish too ) ) ) , ) ( though ( you ( may ( balk ( at ( the prices ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Children) (POS 's)) (NNS clothes)) (VP (VBP are) (UCP (NP (NN fun)) (CC and) (ADJP (JJ stylish) (RB too))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN though) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB balk) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NNS prices)))))))) (. .)))
Not only adult clothes are fun and stylish.
( ( Not ( only ( adult clothes ) ) ) ( ( are ( ( fun and ) stylish ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (RB Not) (RB only) (JJ adult) (NNS clothes)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ fun) (CC and) (JJ stylish))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Children's clothes are fun and stylish too, though you may balk at the prices. Then the following statement: "Not only adult clothes are fun and stylish." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
53,544
53544n
it was a marketing ploy
( it ( was ( a ( marketing ploy ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT a) (NN marketing) (NN ploy)))))
That might have been a stunt to get business.
( That ( ( might ( have ( been ( a ( stunt ( to ( get business ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (MD might) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (NP (DT a) (NN stunt) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (NP (NN business))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: it was a marketing ploy Then the following statement: "That might have been a stunt to get business." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
76,872
76872n
The music is a swell of longing, regret, and nostalgia.
( ( The music ) ( ( is ( ( a swell ) ( of ( ( ( ( ( longing , ) regret ) , ) and ) nostalgia ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN music)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN swell)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NN longing)) (, ,) (NP (NN regret)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NN nostalgia)))))) (. .)))
The composer of this piece thought of his childhood when writing it.
( ( ( The composer ) ( of ( this piece ) ) ) ( ( ( thought ( of ( his childhood ) ) ) ( when ( writing it ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN composer)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT this) (NN piece)))) (VP (VBD thought) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN childhood))) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (VP (VBG writing) (NP (PRP it)))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The music is a swell of longing, regret, and nostalgia. Then the following statement: "The composer of this piece thought of his childhood when writing it." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
54,156
54156n
On the utility's side of the meter, the heat rates for new combined cycle power plants are assumed to be less compared to the standard case assumptions.
( ( On ( ( ( the ( utility 's ) ) side ) ( of ( the meter ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( the ( heat rates ) ) ( for ( new ( combined ( cycle ( power plants ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( are ( assumed ( to ( ( be less ) ( compared ( to ( the ( standard ( case assumptions ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN On) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN utility) (POS 's)) (NN side)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN meter))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN heat) (NNS rates)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ new) (JJ combined) (NN cycle) (NN power) (NNS plants)))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN assumed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJR less)) (PP (VBN compared) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ standard) (NN case) (NNS assumptions))))))))) (. .)))
The heat rates are less because the number of restrictions has decreased in recent years.
( ( The ( heat rates ) ) ( ( are ( less ( because ( ( ( the number ) ( of restrictions ) ) ( has ( decreased ( in ( recent years ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN heat) (NNS rates)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (ADJP (JJR less)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN number)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS restrictions)))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN decreased) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ recent) (NNS years))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: On the utility's side of the meter, the heat rates for new combined cycle power plants are assumed to be less compared to the standard case assumptions. Then the following statement: "The heat rates are less because the number of restrictions has decreased in recent years." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
105,631
105631n
right and in fact i think it'd be harmful if my if you know if my daughter or my any of my kids saw it so that has to be brought into the picture too you know you just can't blatantly say let's let's show it and and the the right people will see it and it'll deter them from committing a crime all lot of the wrong people are going to see it too and uh
( ( right and ) ( in ( fact ( i ( think ( it ( 'd ( ( be harmful ) ( ( ( if ( ( my ( if ( you ( know ( if ( ( ( ( my daughter ) or ) ( my ( any ( of ( my kids ) ) ) ) ) ( ( saw it ) ( so ( that ( has ( to ( be ( brought ( into ( ( ( ( ( ( ( the picture ) too ) ( you ( know ( you ( just ( ( ( ca n't ) blatantly ) ( say ( ( let 's ) ( let ( 's ( show it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( and ( ( the ( the ( right people ) ) ) ( will ( see it ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( it ( 'll ( ( deter them ) ( from ( committing ( ( ( a crime ) ( all lot ) ) ( of ( the ( wrong people ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( are ( going ( to ( ( see it ) too ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) uh ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (UCP (ADJP (JJ right)) (CC and) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN fact)) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD 'd) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ harmful)) (SBAR (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (NP (PRP$ my)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (NP (PRP$ my) (NN daughter)) (CC or) (NP (PRP$ my) (NP (NP (DT any)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP$ my) (NNS kids)))))) (VP (VBD saw) (NP (PRP it)) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (DT that)) (VP (VBZ has) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN brought) (PP (IN into) (S (S (ADVP (NP (DT the) (NN picture)) (RB too)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB blatantly)) (VP (VB say) (S (NP (NNP let) (POS 's)) (VP (VB let) (S (NP (POS 's)) (VP (NN show) (NP (PRP it)))))))))))) (CC and) (S (CC and) (NP (DT the) (DT the) (JJ right) (NNS people)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB see) (NP (PRP it))))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB deter) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (IN from) (S (VP (VBG committing) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN crime)) (NP (DT all) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ wrong) (NNS people)))))))))))))))))))))))))) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (RB too))))))))) (CC and) (FRAG (INTJ (UH uh)))))))))))))))
It is inappropriate to be watched by children.
( It ( ( is ( inappropriate ( to ( be ( watched ( by children ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ inappropriate) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN watched) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNS children))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: right and in fact i think it'd be harmful if my if you know if my daughter or my any of my kids saw it so that has to be brought into the picture too you know you just can't blatantly say let's let's show it and and the the right people will see it and it'll deter them from committing a crime all lot of the wrong people are going to see it too and uh Then the following statement: "It is inappropriate to be watched by children." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
69,925
69925n
A few hours after Japan's attack on the American fleet at Pearl Harbor in December 1941, a dozen Japanese battalions began an assault on Hong Kong; Hong Kong's minimal air force was destroyed on the airfield at Kai Tak within five minutes.
( ( ( ( ( ( A ( few hours ) ) ( after ( ( ( Japan 's ) attack ) ( on ( ( the ( American fleet ) ) ( at ( ( Pearl Harbor ) ( in ( December 1941 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( a dozen ) ( Japanese battalions ) ) ( ( began ( an assault ) ) ( on ( Hong Kong ) ) ) ) ) ) ; ) ( ( ( Hong ( Kong 's ) ) ( minimal ( air force ) ) ) ( was ( destroyed ( on ( ( the airfield ) ( at ( ( Kai Tak ) ( within ( five minutes ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (PP (NP (DT A) (JJ few) (NNS hours)) (IN after) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Japan) (POS 's)) (NN attack)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ American) (NN fleet)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NNP Pearl) (NNP Harbor)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP December) (CD 1941))))))))) (, ,) (NP (QP (DT a) (NN dozen)) (JJ Japanese) (NNS battalions)) (VP (VBD began) (NP (DT an) (NN assault)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNP Hong) (NNP Kong))))) (: ;) (S (NP (NP (NNP Hong) (NNP Kong) (POS 's)) (JJ minimal) (NN air) (NN force)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN destroyed) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN airfield)) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NNP Kai) (NNP Tak)) (PP (IN within) (NP (CD five) (NNS minutes)))))))))) (. .)))
Both attacks were coordinated by the same person.
( ( Both attacks ) ( ( were ( coordinated ( by ( the ( same person ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT Both) (NNS attacks)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBN coordinated) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN person))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: A few hours after Japan's attack on the American fleet at Pearl Harbor in December 1941, a dozen Japanese battalions began an assault on Hong Kong; Hong Kong's minimal air force was destroyed on the airfield at Kai Tak within five minutes. Then the following statement: "Both attacks were coordinated by the same person." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
129,334
129334e
well as a matter of fact i just got rid of a car because of the requirement to do some major repairs
( well ( as ( ( ( a matter ) ( of ( fact i ) ) ) ( just ( ( got rid ) ( of ( ( a car ) ( because ( of ( the ( requirement ( to ( do ( some ( major repairs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADVP (RB well)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (NP (DT a) (NN matter)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN fact) (NNS i)))) (ADVP (RB just)) (VP (VBD got) (ADJP (JJ rid)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN car)) (PP (RB because) (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN requirement) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (DT some) (JJ major) (NNS repairs))))))))))))))
I decided not to hold on to a car due to the expense of fixing it.
( I ( ( decided ( not ( to ( ( hold on ) ( to ( ( a car ) ( due ( to ( ( the expense ) ( of ( fixing it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD decided) (S (RB not) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB hold) (PRT (RP on)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN car)) (ADJP (JJ due) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN expense)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG fixing) (NP (PRP it)))))))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: well as a matter of fact i just got rid of a car because of the requirement to do some major repairs Then the following statement: "I decided not to hold on to a car due to the expense of fixing it. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
125,303
125303e
I'm sorry, sir, but it's clean gone.
( ( ( ( ( I ( ( ( 'm sorry ) , ) sir ) ) , ) but ) ( it ( ( 's clean ) gone ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADJP (JJ sorry)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB sir)))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ clean)) (S (VP (VBN gone))))) (. .)))
It is gone.
( It ( ( is gone ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN gone))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I'm sorry, sir, but it's clean gone. Then the following statement: "It is gone. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
83,501
83501e
Alcohol use and trauma.
( Alcohol ( ( ( use and ) trauma ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Alcohol)) (VP (VBP use) (CC and) (VBP trauma)) (. .)))
Alcohol use is related to trauma.
( ( Alcohol use ) ( ( is ( related ( to trauma ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Alcohol) (NN use)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN related) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN trauma))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Alcohol use and trauma. Then the following statement: "Alcohol use is related to trauma." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
122,685
122685e
Yet once again, Clinton's critics are lumping it into a pattern.
( Yet ( ( once again ) ( , ( ( ( Clinton 's ) critics ) ( ( are ( ( lumping it ) ( into ( a pattern ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC Yet) (ADVP (RB once) (RB again)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Clinton) (POS 's)) (NNS critics)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG lumping) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT a) (NN pattern))))) (. .)))
There's a clear pattern in the criticism lobbied at Clinton.
( There ( ( 's ( ( a ( clear pattern ) ) ( in ( ( the criticism ) ( lobbied ( at Clinton ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ clear) (NN pattern)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN criticism)) (VP (VBN lobbied) (PP (IN at) (NP (NNP Clinton)))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Yet once again, Clinton's critics are lumping it into a pattern. Then the following statement: "There's a clear pattern in the criticism lobbied at Clinton." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
133,593
133593e
Ornithologists, bring your binoculars.
( Ornithologists ( , ( ( bring ( your binoculars ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Ornithologists)) (, ,) (VP (VB bring) (NP (PRP$ your) (NNS binoculars))) (. .)))
Bird lovers should bring binoculars.
( ( Bird lovers ) ( ( should ( bring binoculars ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Bird) (NNS lovers)) (VP (MD should) (VP (VB bring) (NP (NNS binoculars)))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Ornithologists, bring your binoculars. Then the following statement: "Bird lovers should bring binoculars." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
43,115
43115c
In the late afternoon of the third day the Kentuckian was walking a long-legged bay on a lead when León climbed to the top pole of the corral.
( ( In ( ( the ( late afternoon ) ) ( of ( the ( third day ) ) ) ) ) ( ( the Kentuckian ) ( ( was ( ( walking ( a ( long-legged bay ) ) ) ( on ( ( a lead ) ( when ( León ( climbed ( to ( ( the ( top pole ) ) ( of ( the corral ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ late) (NN afternoon)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ third) (NN day))))) (NP (DT the) (NNP Kentuckian)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG walking) (NP (DT a) (JJ long-legged) (NN bay)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN lead)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (NNP León)) (VP (VBD climbed) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ top) (NN pole)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN corral)))))))))))) (. .)))
Léon was always too afraid to climb to the top pole of the corral.
( Léon ( ( ( was always ) ( too ( afraid ( to ( climb ( to ( ( the ( top pole ) ) ( of ( the corral ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Léon)) (VP (VBD was) (ADVP (RB always)) (ADJP (RB too) (JJ afraid) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB climb) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ top) (NN pole)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN corral)))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In the late afternoon of the third day the Kentuckian was walking a long-legged bay on a lead when León climbed to the top pole of the corral. Then the following statement: "Léon was always too afraid to climb to the top pole of the corral." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
41,585
41585n
With a population of 120,000, it is a larger city than most expect to find on such a tiny island, but in fact you can walk across the center in just 10 to 15 minutes.
( ( ( ( ( ( With ( ( a population ) ( of 120,000 ) ) ) ( , ( it ( ( is ( a ( larger city ) ) ) ( than ( most ( expect ( to ( find ( on ( such ( a ( tiny island ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( in fact ) ( you ( can ( walk ( across ( ( the center ) ( in ( ( just ( ( 10 to ) 15 ) ) minutes ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (PP (IN With) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN population)) (PP (IN of) (NP (CD 120,000))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT a) (JJR larger) (NN city)) (SBAR (IN than) (S (NP (JJS most)) (VP (VBP expect) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB find) (PP (IN on) (NP (PDT such) (DT a) (JJ tiny) (NN island))))))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (PP (IN in) (NP (NN fact))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB walk) (PP (IN across) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN center)) (PP (IN in) (NP (QP (RB just) (CD 10) (TO to) (CD 15)) (NNS minutes)))))))) (. .)))
People don't use cars in the area because you can walk to the center in 10 minutes.
( People ( ( ( do n't ) ( ( ( use cars ) ( in ( the area ) ) ) ( because ( you ( can ( walk ( to ( ( the center ) ( in ( 10 minutes ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS People)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB use) (NP (NNS cars)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN area))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB walk) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN center)) (PP (IN in) (NP (CD 10) (NNS minutes))))))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: With a population of 120,000, it is a larger city than most expect to find on such a tiny island, but in fact you can walk across the center in just 10 to 15 minutes. Then the following statement: "People don't use cars in the area because you can walk to the center in 10 minutes." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
9,611
9611c
and i thought that was really neat
( and ( i ( thought ( that ( was ( really neat ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB really) (JJ neat)))))))))))
I found it boring.
( I ( ( found ( it boring ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD found) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADJP (JJ boring)))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: and i thought that was really neat Then the following statement: "I found it boring." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
92,198
92198c
Perhaps we are now seeing a new social phenomenon--trophy kids.
( Perhaps ( we ( ( ( are now ) ( seeing ( ( ( a ( new ( social phenomenon ) ) ) -- ) ( trophy kids ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Perhaps)) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB now)) (VP (VBG seeing) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ new) (JJ social) (NN phenomenon)) (: --) (NP (NN trophy) (NNS kids))))) (. .)))
Trophy kids have been around for a while.
( ( Trophy kids ) ( ( have ( ( been around ) ( for ( a while ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Trophy) (NNS kids)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (ADVP (RB around)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (NN while))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Perhaps we are now seeing a new social phenomenon--trophy kids. Then the following statement: "Trophy kids have been around for a while." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
53,029
53029e
You've all got people in your lives who need your attention a whole lot more than pandas do.
( You ( ( ( 've all ) ( got ( ( people ( in ( your lives ) ) ) ( who ( ( need ( your attention ) ) ( ( ( a ( whole lot ) ) more ) ( than ( pandas do ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP 've) (RB all) (VP (VBN got) (NP (NP (NNS people)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ your) (NNS lives))) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBP need) (NP (PRP$ your) (NN attention)) (ADVP (ADVP (NP (DT a) (JJ whole) (NN lot)) (RBR more)) (SBAR (IN than) (S (NP (NNS pandas)) (VP (VBP do))))))))))) (. .)))
Pandas aren't as important as the other people in your lives.
( Pandas ( ( ( ( are n't ) ( as important ) ) ( as ( ( the ( other people ) ) ( in ( your lives ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Pandas)) (VP (VBP are) (RB n't) (ADJP (RB as) (JJ important)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ other) (NNS people)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ your) (NNS lives)))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: You've all got people in your lives who need your attention a whole lot more than pandas do. Then the following statement: "Pandas aren't as important as the other people in your lives." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
59,768
59768c
magazines and stuff where you dress your animals up and take them to a party i haven't gone that far i'm not that bonkers you know my cats do not wear clothes and
( ( ( magazines and ) stuff ) ( where ( you ( ( ( ( dress ( your animals ) ) up ) and ) ( ( take them ) ( to ( ( a party ) ( i ( ( have n't ) ( gone ( that ( far ( i ( ( 'm not ) ( that ( bonkers ( you ( know ( ( my cats ) ( ( do not ) ( wear ( clothes and ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (NNS magazines) (CC and) (NN stuff)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VP (VB dress) (NP (PRP$ your) (NNS animals)) (PRT (RP up))) (CC and) (VP (VB take) (NP (PRP them)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN party)) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP have) (RB n't) (VP (VBN gone) (SBAR (IN that) (S (ADVP (RB far)) (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (RB not) (ADJP (RB that) (JJ bonkers) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP$ my) (NNS cats)) (VP (VBP do) (RB not) (VP (VB wear) (S (NP (NNS clothes)) (VP (VB and))))))))))))))))))))))))))
My cats have different outfits every single day.
( ( My cats ) ( ( ( have ( different outfits ) ) ( every ( single day ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ My) (NNS cats)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (JJ different) (NNS outfits)) (NP (DT every) (JJ single) (NN day))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: magazines and stuff where you dress your animals up and take them to a party i haven't gone that far i'm not that bonkers you know my cats do not wear clothes and Then the following statement: "My cats have different outfits every single day." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
8,969
8969e
If this option is exercised, GAO will send a letter to the original requester and each co-requester documenting this agreement.
( ( If ( ( this option ) ( is exercised ) ) ) ( , ( GAO ( ( will ( ( ( send ( a letter ) ) ( to ( ( ( the ( original requester ) ) and ) ( each co-requester ) ) ) ) ( documenting ( this agreement ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN If) (S (NP (DT this) (NN option)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN exercised))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP GAO)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB send) (NP (DT a) (NN letter)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ original) (NN requester)) (CC and) (NP (DT each) (NN co-requester)))) (S (VP (VBG documenting) (NP (DT this) (NN agreement)))))) (. .)))
GAO will send a letter if this option is exercised.
( GAO ( ( will ( ( send ( a letter ) ) ( if ( ( this option ) ( is exercised ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP GAO)) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB send) (NP (DT a) (NN letter)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (DT this) (NN option)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN exercised))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: If this option is exercised, GAO will send a letter to the original requester and each co-requester documenting this agreement. Then the following statement: "GAO will send a letter if this option is exercised." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
81,782
81782n
According to the Association, 200 companies responded.
( ( According ( to ( the Association ) ) ) ( , ( ( 200 companies ) ( responded . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (VBG According) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NNP Association)))) (, ,) (NP (CD 200) (NNS companies)) (VP (VBD responded)) (. .)))
The Association had very trustworthy sources of information.
( ( The Association ) ( ( had ( ( ( very trustworthy ) sources ) ( of information ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Association)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (ADJP (RB very) (JJ trustworthy)) (NNS sources)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN information))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: According to the Association, 200 companies responded. Then the following statement: "The Association had very trustworthy sources of information." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
18,260
18260c
GWBush.com and another Zack Exley site squeaked by this, and since the campaign couldn't buy it, they decided to get rid of it.
( ( ( ( ( ( ( GWBush.com and ) ( another ( Zack ( Exley site ) ) ) ) ( squeaked ( by this ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( since ( ( the campaign ) ( ( could n't ) ( buy it ) ) ) ) ( , ( they ( decided ( to ( ( get rid ) ( of it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (NNP GWBush.com)) (CC and) (NP (DT another) (NNP Zack) (NNP Exley) (NN site))) (VP (VBD squeaked) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT this))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (SBAR (IN since) (S (NP (DT the) (NN campaign)) (VP (MD could) (RB n't) (VP (VB buy) (NP (PRP it)))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD decided) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB get) (ADJP (JJ rid)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP it)))))))) (. .)))
Zack Exley came to an agreement to sell the domain name for a reasonable fee.
( ( Zack Exley ) ( ( ( came ( to ( an agreement ) ) ) ( to ( ( sell ( the ( domain name ) ) ) ( for ( a ( reasonable fee ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Zack) (NNP Exley)) (VP (VBD came) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT an) (NN agreement))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB sell) (NP (DT the) (NN domain) (NN name)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ reasonable) (NN fee))))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: GWBush.com and another Zack Exley site squeaked by this, and since the campaign couldn't buy it, they decided to get rid of it. Then the following statement: "Zack Exley came to an agreement to sell the domain name for a reasonable fee." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
118,276
118276c
8. Bauer showed bad judgment by letting the allegations of an appearance of impropriety become a political problem.
( ( 8 . ) ( Bauer ( ( ( showed ( bad judgment ) ) ( by ( letting ( ( ( the allegations ) ( of ( ( an appearance ) ( of impropriety ) ) ) ) ( become ( a ( political problem ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (CD 8) (. .)) (ADVP (RB Bauer)) (VP (VBD showed) (NP (JJ bad) (NN judgment)) (PP (IN by) (S (VP (VBG letting) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS allegations)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN appearance)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN impropriety)))))) (VP (VB become) (NP (DT a) (JJ political) (NN problem)))))))) (. .)))
Bauer showed excellent judgement, it was the right thing to do.
( ( Bauer ( showed ( excellent judgement ) ) ) ( , ( it ( ( was ( the ( right ( thing ( to do ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP Bauer)) (VP (VBD showed) (NP (JJ excellent) (NN judgement)))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT the) (JJ right) (NN thing) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do)))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: 8. Bauer showed bad judgment by letting the allegations of an appearance of impropriety become a political problem. Then the following statement: "Bauer showed excellent judgement, it was the right thing to do." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
63,798
63798n
Our salvation this night, said Jon.
( ( ( Our salvation ) ( this night ) ) ( , ( ( said Jon ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (PRP$ Our) (NN salvation)) (NP (DT this) (NN night))) (, ,) (VP (VBD said) (NP (NNP Jon))) (. .)))
An hero has come and saved Jon.
( ( An hero ) ( ( has ( ( ( come and ) saved ) Jon ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT An) (NN hero)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN come) (CC and) (VBN saved) (NP (NNP Jon)))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Our salvation this night, said Jon. Then the following statement: "An hero has come and saved Jon." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
95,250
95250n
Naples is where pizza began (the region is the nation's number one supplier of mozzarella), and flavorful home-cooking of fresh ingredients has been raised to an art form.
( ( ( ( ( Naples ( is ( where ( pizza ( began ( -LRB- ( ( ( the region ) ( is ( ( ( the ( nation 's ) ) ( number ( one supplier ) ) ) ( of mozzarella ) ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( ( flavorful home-cooking ) ( of ( fresh ingredients ) ) ) ( has ( been ( raised ( to ( an ( art form ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP Naples)) (VP (VBZ is) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (NN pizza)) (VP (VP (VBD began)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (S (NP (DT the) (NN region)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN nation) (POS 's)) (NN number) (CD one) (NN supplier)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN mozzarella)))))) (-RRB- -RRB-))))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (NP (JJ flavorful) (NN home-cooking)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ fresh) (NNS ingredients)))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN raised) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT an) (NN art) (NN form))))))) (. .)))
No trip to Naples is complete without trying pizza with fresh ingredients.
( ( ( No trip ) ( to Naples ) ) ( ( is ( complete ( without ( ( trying pizza ) ( with ( fresh ingredients ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT No) (NN trip)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Naples)))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ complete) (PP (IN without) (S (VP (VBG trying) (NP (NN pizza)) (PP (IN with) (NP (JJ fresh) (NNS ingredients)))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Naples is where pizza began (the region is the nation's number one supplier of mozzarella), and flavorful home-cooking of fresh ingredients has been raised to an art form. Then the following statement: "No trip to Naples is complete without trying pizza with fresh ingredients." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
108,131
108131e
Elsewhere, groups of lawyers have come up with innovative ways to reach people in need of legal help.
( Elsewhere ( , ( ( groups ( of lawyers ) ) ( ( have ( ( ( come up ) ( with ( innovative ways ) ) ) ( to ( ( reach people ) ( in ( need ( of ( legal help ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Elsewhere)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNS groups)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS lawyers)))) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN come) (PRT (RP up)) (PP (IN with) (NP (JJ innovative) (NNS ways))) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB reach) (NP (NNS people)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN need)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ legal) (NN help)))))))))) (. .)))
Lawyers have innovative ways to reach people in need of help.
( Lawyers ( ( have ( innovative ( ways ( to ( ( reach people ) ( in ( need ( of help ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Lawyers)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (JJ innovative) (NNS ways) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB reach) (NP (NNS people)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN need)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN help)))))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Elsewhere, groups of lawyers have come up with innovative ways to reach people in need of legal help. Then the following statement: "Lawyers have innovative ways to reach people in need of help." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
19,120
19120c
One section had been ripped down by the lash of wind from a huge piece of the sky, which now lay among the ruins with a few stars glowing inside it.
( ( One section ) ( ( had ( been ( ( ( ripped down ) ( by ( ( the lash ) ( of wind ) ) ) ) ( from ( ( a ( huge piece ) ) ( of ( ( ( the sky ) , ) ( which ( now ( ( lay ( among ( the ruins ) ) ) ( with ( ( a ( few stars ) ) ( glowing ( inside it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (CD One) (NN section)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN ripped) (PRT (RP down)) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN lash)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN wind))))) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ huge) (NN piece)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN sky)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT which)) (S (ADVP (RB now)) (VP (VBD lay) (PP (IN among) (NP (DT the) (NNS ruins))) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ few) (NNS stars)) (VP (VBG glowing) (PP (IN inside) (NP (PRP it)))))))))))))))) (. .)))
All the stars had died out inside the piece of sky that lay among the ruins.
( ( All ( the stars ) ) ( ( had ( ( died out ) ( inside ( ( ( the piece ) ( of sky ) ) ( that ( lay ( among ( the ruins ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PDT All) (DT the) (NNS stars)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN died) (PRT (RP out)) (PP (IN inside) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN piece)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN sky))) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBD lay) (PP (IN among) (NP (DT the) (NNS ruins)))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: One section had been ripped down by the lash of wind from a huge piece of the sky, which now lay among the ruins with a few stars glowing inside it. Then the following statement: "All the stars had died out inside the piece of sky that lay among the ruins." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
36,572
36572n
The hammer he swung must have weighed fifteen stones.
( ( ( The hammer ) ( he swung ) ) ( ( must ( have ( weighed ( fifteen stones ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN hammer)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD swung))))) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN weighed) (NP (CD fifteen) (NNS stones))))) (. .)))
He swung the hammer, even though it was quite heavy for him.
( He ( ( ( ( swung ( the hammer ) ) , ) ( even ( though ( it ( ( was ( quite heavy ) ) ( for him ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD swung) (NP (DT the) (NN hammer)) (, ,) (SBAR (RB even) (IN though) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB quite) (JJ heavy)) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP him))))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The hammer he swung must have weighed fifteen stones. Then the following statement: "He swung the hammer, even though it was quite heavy for him." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
14,271
14271e
Deep economic problems are supposed to be a punishment for deep economic sins, not an accidental byproduct of swings in the birth rate.
( ( Deep ( economic problems ) ) ( ( are ( supposed ( to ( be ( ( a punishment ) ( for ( ( ( deep ( economic sins ) ) , ) ( ( not ( an ( accidental byproduct ) ) ) ( of ( swings ( in ( the ( birth rate ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (JJ Deep) (JJ economic) (NNS problems)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN supposed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN punishment)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ deep) (JJ economic) (NNS sins)) (, ,) (NP (NP (RB not) (DT an) (JJ accidental) (NN byproduct)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS swings)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN birth) (NN rate)))))))))))))) (. .)))
There are deep economic problems.
( There ( ( are ( deep ( economic problems ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (JJ deep) (JJ economic) (NNS problems))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Deep economic problems are supposed to be a punishment for deep economic sins, not an accidental byproduct of swings in the birth rate. Then the following statement: "There are deep economic problems." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
10,920
10920n
Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori has worked well enough to send countless young men to their deaths through the ages.
( ( ( Dulce et ) decorum ) ( ( est ( ( pro ( patria mori ) ) ( has ( ( worked ( well enough ) ) ( to ( ( ( send ( countless ( young men ) ) ) ( to ( their deaths ) ) ) ( through ( the ages ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Dulce) (CC et) (NNP decorum)) (VP (VBP est) (SBAR (S (NP (JJ pro) (NN patria) (NNS mori)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN worked) (ADVP (RB well) (RB enough)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB send) (NP (JJ countless) (JJ young) (NNS men)) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS deaths))) (PP (IN through) (NP (DT the) (NNS ages))))))))))) (. .)))
DUlce et decorum est pro patria mori has sent countless young men fighting in a war to their deaths through the ages.
( ( ( DUlce et ) decorum ) ( ( est ( ( pro ( patria mori ) ) ( has ( sent ( ( countless ( young men ) ) ( ( fighting ( in ( ( a war ) ( to ( their deaths ) ) ) ) ) ( through ( the ages ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP DUlce) (CC et) (NNP decorum)) (VP (VBP est) (SBAR (S (NP (JJ pro) (NN patria) (NNS mori)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN sent) (NP (NP (JJ countless) (JJ young) (NNS men)) (VP (VBG fighting) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN war)) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS deaths))))) (PP (IN through) (NP (DT the) (NNS ages)))))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori has worked well enough to send countless young men to their deaths through the ages. Then the following statement: "DUlce et decorum est pro patria mori has sent countless young men fighting in a war to their deaths through the ages. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
68,843
68843e
He has two law partners, Lori Mannicci and Linda Gardner.
( He ( ( has ( ( ( ( ( two ( law partners ) ) , ) ( Lori Mannicci ) ) and ) ( Linda Gardner ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (CD two) (NN law) (NNS partners)) (, ,) (NP (NNP Lori) (NNP Mannicci)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Linda) (NNP Gardner)))) (. .)))
He has partners in law.
( He ( ( has ( partners ( in law ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBZ has) (NP (NP (NNS partners)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN law))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: He has two law partners, Lori Mannicci and Linda Gardner. Then the following statement: "He has partners in law." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
135,064
135064c
i think you're right i don't think we're i think we're we'd we'd overstep our bounds if we went in and did that
( i ( think ( you ( 're ( right ( i ( ( do n't ) ( think ( we ( 're ( i ( think ( we ( 're ( we ( ( 'd ( we ( 'd ( overstep ( our bounds ) ) ) ) ) ( if ( we ( ( ( went in ) and ) ( did that ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADJP (JJ right) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP 're) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP think) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP 're) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBD 'd) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (MD 'd) (VP (VB overstep) (NP (PRP$ our) (NNS bounds))))) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP in))) (CC and) (VP (VBD did) (WHNP (WDT that))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
You're wrong, doing that wouldn't be overstepping our bounds.
( You ( ( ( ( 're wrong ) , ) ( doing ( that ( ( would n't ) ( be ( overstepping ( our bounds ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADJP (JJ wrong)) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG doing) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (MD would) (RB n't) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBG overstepping) (NP (PRP$ our) (NNS bounds)))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: i think you're right i don't think we're i think we're we'd we'd overstep our bounds if we went in and did that Then the following statement: "You're wrong, doing that wouldn't be overstepping our bounds. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
82,418
82418e
I remembered the name as being that of the lawyer to whom Mrs. Inglethorp had written the night before.
( I ( ( ( remembered ( the name ) ) ( as ( being ( that ( of ( ( the lawyer ) ( ( to whom ) ( ( Mrs. Inglethorp ) ( had ( ( written ( the night ) ) before ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD remembered) (NP (DT the) (NN name)) (PP (IN as) (S (VP (VBG being) (NP (NP (DT that)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN lawyer)) (SBAR (WHPP (TO to) (WHNP (WP whom))) (S (NP (NNP Mrs.) (NNP Inglethorp)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN written) (NP (DT the) (NN night)) (PP (IN before))))))))))))) (. .)))
Mrs. Inglethorp has been in contact with a lawyer lately.
( ( Mrs. Inglethorp ) ( ( has ( ( been ( in ( contact ( with ( a lawyer ) ) ) ) ) lately ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Mrs.) (NNP Inglethorp)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN contact)) (PP (IN with) (NP (DT a) (NN lawyer))))) (ADVP (RB lately)))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: I remembered the name as being that of the lawyer to whom Mrs. Inglethorp had written the night before. Then the following statement: "Mrs. Inglethorp has been in contact with a lawyer lately. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
8,736
8736n
Francaise? he hazarded.
( ( Francaise ? ) ( ( he hazarded ) . ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADJP (JJ Francaise) (. ?)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD hazarded))) (. .)))
He knew her name as they'd previously met.
( He ( ( ( knew ( her name ) ) ( as ( they ( ( 'd previously ) met ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP He)) (VP (VBD knew) (NP (PRP$ her) (NN name)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD 'd) (ADVP (RB previously)) (VP (VBN met)))))) (. .)))
fiction
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Francaise? he hazarded. Then the following statement: "He knew her name as they'd previously met." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
78,249
78249n
The Rooney system is working in Queens, as it has in Bethlehem.
( ( The ( Rooney system ) ) ( ( is ( ( ( working ( in Queens ) ) , ) ( as ( it ( has ( in Bethlehem ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Rooney) (NN system)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBG working) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Queens))) (, ,) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Bethlehem))))))))) (. .)))
The Rooney system has worked in Queens and Bethlehem and will be implemented everywhere now.
( ( The ( Rooney system ) ) ( ( ( ( has ( worked ( in ( ( Queens and ) Bethlehem ) ) ) ) and ) ( will ( be ( ( implemented everywhere ) now ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Rooney) (NN system)) (VP (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN worked) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Queens) (CC and) (NNP Bethlehem))))) (CC and) (VP (MD will) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN implemented) (ADVP (RB everywhere)) (ADVP (RB now)))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The Rooney system is working in Queens, as it has in Bethlehem. Then the following statement: "The Rooney system has worked in Queens and Bethlehem and will be implemented everywhere now." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
96,349
96349e
My dear Evelyn, cried Mrs. Cavendish, "this can't be true!" Miss Howard nodded grimly.
( ( ( ( ( ( My ( dear Evelyn ) ) , ) ( cried ( Mrs. Cavendish ) ) ) , ) ( `` ( this ( ( ( ( ca n't ) ( be true ) ) ! ) '' ) ) ) ) ( ( Miss Howard ) ( ( nodded grimly ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (PRP$ My) (ADJP (RB dear)) (NN Evelyn)) (, ,) (VP (VBN cried) (NP (NNP Mrs.) (NNP Cavendish))) (, ,)) (`` ``) (NP (DT this)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ true)))) (. !) ('' '')) (NP (NNP Miss) (NNP Howard)) (VP (VBD nodded) (NP (NNS grimly))) (. .)))
"It can't be true, Evelyn!" Mrs. Cavendish yelled.
( `` ( ( It ( ( ca n't ) ( ( ( be true ) , ) Evelyn ) ) ) ( ! ( '' ( ( Mrs. Cavendish ) ( yelled . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (`` ``) (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ true)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB Evelyn))))) (. !) ('' '') (NP (NNP Mrs.) (NNP Cavendish)) (VP (VBD yelled)) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: My dear Evelyn, cried Mrs. Cavendish, "this can't be true!" Miss Howard nodded grimly. Then the following statement: ""It can't be true, Evelyn!" Mrs. Cavendish yelled. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
47,345
47345e
You are sure of what you say? asked the Coroner sternly.
( You ( ( are ( sure ( ( ( of what ) ( ( you say ) ? ) ) ( asked ( the ( Coroner sternly ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ sure) (SBAR (SINV (SBARQ (WHPP (IN of) (WHNP (WP what))) (SQ (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB say))) (. ?)) (VP (VBD asked)) (NP (DT the) (NNP Coroner) (NN sternly)))))) (. .)))
The Coroner pressed the witness to be absolutely sure of what he was saying.
( ( The Coroner ) ( ( pressed ( the ( witness ( to ( be ( absolutely ( sure ( of ( what ( he ( was saying ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Coroner)) (VP (VBD pressed) (NP (DT the) (NN witness) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (RB absolutely) (JJ sure) (PP (IN of) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG saying)))))))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: You are sure of what you say? asked the Coroner sternly. Then the following statement: "The Coroner pressed the witness to be absolutely sure of what he was saying. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
9,855
9855c
Now Spanish and English are interchangeable.
( Now ( ( ( Spanish and ) English ) ( ( are interchangeable ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Now)) (NP (NNP Spanish) (CC and) (NNP English)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ interchangeable))) (. .)))
Very few people speak Spanish and English.
( Very ( ( few people ) ( ( speak ( ( Spanish and ) English ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Very)) (NP (JJ few) (NNS people)) (VP (VBP speak) (ADJP (JJ Spanish) (CC and) (JJ English))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Now Spanish and English are interchangeable. Then the following statement: "Very few people speak Spanish and English." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
104,290
104290c
The methodology included 90 interviews, observations, and data analysis from the population of 94 court districts selected purposively for their characteristics on significant variables.
( ( The methodology ) ( ( ( included ( ( ( ( ( ( 90 interviews ) , ) observations ) , ) and ) ( data analysis ) ) ) ( from ( ( the population ) ( of ( ( 94 ( court districts ) ) ( ( ( selected purposively ) ( for ( their characteristics ) ) ) ( on ( significant variables ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN methodology)) (VP (VBD included) (NP (NP (CD 90) (NNS interviews)) (, ,) (NP (NNS observations)) (, ,) (CC and) (NP (NN data) (NN analysis))) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN population)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (CD 94) (NN court) (NNS districts)) (VP (VBN selected) (ADVP (RB purposively)) (PP (IN for) (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS characteristics))) (PP (IN on) (NP (JJ significant) (NNS variables))))))))) (. .)))
We only had about 10 observations for the method.
( We ( only ( ( had ( ( ( about 10 ) observations ) ( for ( the method ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (ADVP (RB only)) (VP (VBD had) (NP (NP (QP (RB about) (CD 10)) (NNS observations)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN method))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The methodology included 90 interviews, observations, and data analysis from the population of 94 court districts selected purposively for their characteristics on significant variables. Then the following statement: "We only had about 10 observations for the method." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
121,236
121236c
San Pietro in Vincoli (St.Peter in Chains) might not attract a second look if it didn't contain one of the greatest of Michelangelo's sculptures, his formidable Moses.
( ( ( ( San Pietro ) ( in Vincoli ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( St.Peter ( in Chains ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ( ( ( might not ) ( ( attract ( a ( second look ) ) ) ( if ( it ( ( did n't ) ( contain ( one ( of ( ( the greatest ) ( of ( ( ( ( Michelangelo 's ) sculptures ) , ) ( his ( formidable Moses ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NP (NNP San) (NNP Pietro)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Vincoli)))) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NP (NNP St.Peter)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Chains)))) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (VP (MD might) (RB not) (VP (VB attract) (NP (DT a) (JJ second) (NN look)) (SBAR (IN if) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD did) (RB n't) (VP (VB contain) (NP (NP (CD one)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS greatest)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Michelangelo) (POS 's)) (NNS sculptures)) (, ,) (NP (PRP$ his) (JJ formidable) (NNS Moses))))))))))))) (. .)))
Michelangelo's David resides within San Pietro in Vincoli.
( ( ( Michelangelo 's ) David ) ( ( resides ( within ( ( San Pietro ) ( in Vincoli ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Michelangelo) (POS 's)) (NNP David)) (VP (VBZ resides) (PP (IN within) (NP (NP (NNP San) (NNP Pietro)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Vincoli)))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: San Pietro in Vincoli (St.Peter in Chains) might not attract a second look if it didn't contain one of the greatest of Michelangelo's sculptures, his formidable Moses. Then the following statement: "Michelangelo's David resides within San Pietro in Vincoli." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
7,140
7140e
The romance gods are fickle.
( ( The ( romance gods ) ) ( ( are fickle ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN romance) (NNS gods)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ fickle))) (. .)))
The romance gods are indecisive.
( ( The ( romance gods ) ) ( ( are indecisive ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN romance) (NNS gods)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ indecisive))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The romance gods are fickle. Then the following statement: "The romance gods are indecisive. " is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
98,960
98960n
What's in this for Bradley?
( What ( ( 's ( in ( this ( for Bradley ) ) ) ) ? ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHNP (WP What)) (SQ (VBZ 's) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT this)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNP Bradley)))))) (. ?)))
Does Bradley get nothing from this?
( Does ( Bradley ( ( ( get nothing ) ( from this ) ) ? ) ) )
(ROOT (SQ (NNP Does) (NP (NNP Bradley)) (VP (VB get) (NP (NN nothing)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT this)))) (. ?)))
slate
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: What's in this for Bradley? Then the following statement: "Does Bradley get nothing from this?" is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
62,571
62571c
The biggest town in the National Park, the population of Keswick (pronounced kezzick ) swells each summer as hikers, boaters, and sightseers arrive.
( ( ( ( The ( biggest town ) ) ( in ( ( ( the ( National Park ) ) , ) ( ( the population ) ( of Keswick ) ) ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( ( pronounced kezzick ) -RRB- ) ) ) ( ( swells ( ( ( each summer ) ( as ( hikers ( , ( boaters ( , ( and sightseers ) ) ) ) ) ) ) arrive ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NP (DT The) (JJS biggest) (NN town)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP National) (NNP Park)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN population)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Keswick))))))) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (JJ pronounced) (NN kezzick)) (-RRB- -RRB-))) (VP (VBZ swells) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (DT each) (NN summer)) (PP (IN as) (NP (NNS hikers) (, ,) (NNS boaters) (, ,) (CC and) (NNS sightseers)))) (VP (VBP arrive))))) (. .)))
There aren't any towns in national parks, only animals and plants.
( There ( ( ( are n't ) ( ( any towns ) ( in ( ( ( ( ( national parks ) , ) ( only animals ) ) and ) plants ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (RB n't) (NP (NP (DT any) (NNS towns)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (JJ national) (NNS parks)) (, ,) (NP (JJ only) (NNS animals)) (CC and) (NP (NNS plants)))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: The biggest town in the National Park, the population of Keswick (pronounced kezzick ) swells each summer as hikers, boaters, and sightseers arrive. Then the following statement: "There aren't any towns in national parks, only animals and plants." is true, false, or inconclusive?
False
56,536
56536e
well i'm i'm a west Texan Lubbock Midland Odessa
( ( well ( i ( 'm i ) ) ) ( ( 'm ( a west ) ) ( Texan ( Lubbock ( Midland Odessa ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (S (ADVP (RB well)) (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (NP (FW i)))) (VP (VBP 'm) (NP (DT a) (NN west))) (NP (NNP Texan) (NNP Lubbock) (NNP Midland) (NNP Odessa))))
I'm from west Texas.
( I ( ( 'm ( from ( west Texas ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (PP (IN from) (NP (JJ west) (NNP Texas)))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: well i'm i'm a west Texan Lubbock Midland Odessa Then the following statement: "I'm from west Texas." is true, false, or inconclusive?
True
107,068
107068n
In 1962 the colonial authorities closed the border with China, but even this did not altogether stem the flow of The next arrivals were the Vietnamese boat people.
( ( ( ( ( ( In 1962 ) ( ( the ( colonial authorities ) ) ( ( closed ( the border ) ) ( with China ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( even ( this ( ( ( did not ) altogether ) ( stem ( ( the flow ) ( of ( The ( next arrivals ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( were ( the ( Vietnamese ( boat people ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (PP (IN In) (NP (CD 1962))) (NP (DT the) (JJ colonial) (NNS authorities)) (VP (VBD closed) (NP (DT the) (NN border)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NNP China))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (SBAR (RB even) (S (NP (DT this)) (VP (VBD did) (RB not) (ADVP (RB altogether)) (VP (VB stem) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN flow)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT The) (JJ next) (NNS arrivals)))))))) (VP (VBD were) (NP (DT the) (JJ Vietnamese) (NN boat) (NNS people)))) (. .)))
The Vietnamese people were looking for refuge from their home country.
( ( The ( Vietnamese people ) ) ( ( were ( ( looking ( for refuge ) ) ( from ( their ( home country ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ Vietnamese) (NNS people)) (VP (VBD were) (VP (VBG looking) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN refuge))) (PP (IN from) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN home) (NN country))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: In 1962 the colonial authorities closed the border with China, but even this did not altogether stem the flow of The next arrivals were the Vietnamese boat people. Then the following statement: "The Vietnamese people were looking for refuge from their home country." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive
110,691
110691n
Snorkelling and Scuba Diving
( ( Snorkelling and ) ( Scuba Diving ) )
(ROOT (NP (NP (NN Snorkelling)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Scuba) (NNP Diving))))
Water activities are offered by the host including scuba and snorkeling.
( ( Water activities ) ( ( are ( offered ( by ( ( the host ) ( including ( ( scuba and ) snorkeling ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Water) (NNS activities)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBN offered) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN host)) (PP (VBG including) (NP (NN scuba) (CC and) (NN snorkeling))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
take the following as truth
Take the following as truth: {{premise}} Then the following statement: "{{hypothesis}}" is {{"true"}}, {{"false"}}, or {{"inconclusive"}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Take the following as truth: Snorkelling and Scuba Diving Then the following statement: "Water activities are offered by the host including scuba and snorkeling." is true, false, or inconclusive?
Inconclusive